This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
In dich hab ich gehoffet, Herr is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
A fact from In dich hab ich gehoffet, Herr appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 February 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Doing that now. I wonder how much should remain in the other article, since this is considered the hymn tune. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:26, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Please help me to a word: Reusner didn't "use" a melody - as I understand it but may be wrong". The hymnal had only his text, and a line saying sing to the melody of the other. Is there a word for that? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
I should have commented on that because "noted" was not clear. Maybe "prescribed", "suggested", "recommended", "requested"? I have changed to "recommended" per the wording under "History". Jmar67 (talk) 00:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
I don't know. In those old hymnals, they just had the words, and the title of the melody. Is that a recommatition? Later, a melody for several hymns became called a hymn tune (a term I only know in English), but it would not be historically correct to use it this early. Not happy, but also not knowing anything better. Thank you for thinking. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:54, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
You mean "recommendation". I was just being consistent with the previous wording, which I had not seen when I wrote the OP. I think now that "designated" might be better. Jmar67 (talk) 13:02, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
... was associated ... was connected? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:55, 5 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Do not think either one is useful, especially not "modern". If year is given, it will be understood as the current edition as of that citation. Jmar67 (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
Re "... especially not "modern" ..." – "current" is actually worse, imho, see WP:RELTIME (I don't think there's guidance against using the word "modern" when appropriate; "current" is a no-no in mainspace under virtually all circumstances—that is, when writing an encyclopedia, as opposed to writing a blog or an article in a journal—per the guidance). Other than that, giving a reference to an edition that has the EG number is likely indeed the best advice. --Francis Schonken (talk) 16:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
A ref giving the EG number is usually given, but I understood the question "when?" as if any link to Evangelisches Gesangbuch needed that is was introduced from 1993, and is current as I write this. (And yes, understand, that "current" is not wanted.) There's a link, and the information "1993" is of no consequence for the hymn article(s), this and others. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:37, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
