Talk:George Hoey

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleGeorge Hoey has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 6, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 5, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that George Hoey still holds Michigan Wolverines football career, and single-season records 40 years after his best season?

Auto Peer Review edit

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 17:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review edit

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I'll review the rest shortly, I at least have done this so far. Wizardman 20:19, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review 2 edit

GA review (see here for criteria)

Good work, needs a few tweaks and I'd like to see less tables and more prose

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    a few small prose tweaks and see if you can drop a table or two
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    One quotation needs a citation
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    See if there is more infomration available on why he changed NFL teams, also any information on what exactly the issues were with CU
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Details:

  • Professional career section, the quotation in the third sentence needs to have a footnote right on it. Per WP:CITE all quotations must be directly cited. Y--Cbl62 (talk) 08:10, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Same section, a LOT of your sentences in this section start with "In (year)..."... consider rewording. Y--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 20:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Family section, the first two sentences start "Hoey..." and the last two start "In (year)..." consider rewording the starts of two of them to make it less repetative. Y--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 18:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • The main concern I have is the number of tables. They overpower the text.At the least, consider dropping the last chart, as he's in fifth place on it.
  • Consider expanding the NFL section if possible. I see he was drafted by the Lions, but did they trade him to the Cardinals? Any reasons he got cut/traded/went to free agency? I think that's the section that would be easiest to pad out.
    • I added what I could. I do not have access to information from pre mid-1980s players detailing transactions. I work from statistics for the most part for players of his era. Cbl62 might have something for us because he has access to news archives.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 18:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I don't have further information to add on this.Cbl62 (talk) 08:19, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Also consider a little more information on the issues at CU. Did anyone else get blamed?
    • The eligibility issues that tainted Hoey arose at the same time that Colorado was mired in a broader scandal over rules violations under the tenure of former head coach Rick Neuheisel. I have added a sentence to put it into the broader context.Cbl62 (talk) 08:18, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Overall, a good article. Just a few prose tweaks, and some expansion and we're ready to go!

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on.Ealdgyth | Talk 16:08, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks good guys! Passing it now. Ealdgyth | Talk 20:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on George Hoey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on George Hoey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on George Hoey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Reply