Talk:Bojangles (restaurant)

Latest comment: 3 months ago by 2601:19C:527F:7890:150B:9833:C577:7330 in topic name

Untitled edit

Mistitled. Should be: Bojangles' Famous Chicken 'n Biscuits (the apostrophe appears before the "n", not after). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.76.153 (talk) 00:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

WP:FOOD Tagging edit

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Restaurants or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. You can find the related request for tagging here -- TinucherianBot (talk) 07:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Biscuit edit

WTF is a biscuit? 115.129.6.87 (talk) 13:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Seriously? 64.183.154.222 (talk) 14:26, 5 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
How did you end up here if you don't know what a biscuit is? 67.77.222.68 (talk) 18:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Not very NPOV edit

The Marketing section sounds like it was written by a Bojangles' rep trying to sing its praises. Not appropriate in tune for an encyclopedia.Avman89 (talk) 16:05, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Picture edit

Someone needs to add a picture of the Conover, NC Bojangles. The Conover Bojangles is thought to be the busiest Bojangles in the whole chain and is one of the biggest in size.CFD15JR (talk) 20:25, 22 July 2012 (UTC) That is the first Boj I went to. It was one of the first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.171.133.172 (talk) 19:25, 31 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bojangles' Famous Chicken 'n Biscuits. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 20 August 2020 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved to Bojangles (restaurant). Consensus emerged for an alternate title. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Dane talk 04:00, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply



Bojangles' Famous Chicken 'n BiscuitsBojangles Inc. – Apostrophe has been officially dropped from the company name, which is also considerably shorter.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Kinda feeling that Bojangles (restaurant) might be a better option. I know using a legal name is an option per WP:NCCOMP for natural disambiguation, but in this case I don't think "Bojangles Inc." is its actual legal name. Their website uses "Bojangles’ International, LLC." and "Bojangles Restaurants, Inc." in a couple places. Using (restaurant) is WP:CONSISTENT with other franchise chains like Subway (restaurant), and is probably the most WP:RECOGNIZABLE. -- Netoholic @ 21:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'll go along with that. I learned Inc. wasn't supposed to be in an article name too late, but that's been fixed in another article.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:32, 20 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support Bojangles (restaurant) as a better option. "Restaurant" tremendously adds to recognizability, "Inc." obscures it. The current slogan byline is terrible promotion as a title. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:45, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support Bojangles (restaurant) as this is the most easily recognizable title based on the need to disambiguate. As long as I can continue to pronounce it in a faux Spanish accent like the cool kids do. --Jayron32 12:49, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Move to Bojangles Restaurants, Inc. per WP:NATURALDISAMBIGUATION. Natural disambiguation is preferable to parenthetical disambiguation. And if their own website uses this as their legal name, that's good enough for me. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:06, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
    However, WP:UCN would caution against using official names where a different name is in common use. No one says "Lets go to Bojangles Restaurant, Inc. for some chicken". --Jayron32 17:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Support Bojangles (restaurant). We don't generally add suffixes like "Inc". -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:37, 26 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

name edit

hasn't the name ever come under fire? it strikes me as borderline racist, a la Sambo's.

beyond which, wouldn't robinson's heirs have claim to trademark on the name? doesn't strike me that i could just go out and start up a business called "Sinatra's", say. 2601:19C:527F:7890:150B:9833:C577:7330 (talk)

Do you have any evidence that Robinson registered his nickname as a trademark? Do you have have any evidence that his heirs are using that trademark? A trademark which is unused for five years expires. Cullen328 (talk) 07:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
ok, well forget trademark. but in this climate, how does a resto exist named after an uninvolved black guy? i don't think one could get away with naming a place "MLK's" or "Mandela's". esp if the execs/founders are mostly white, as is the case here. 2601:19C:527F:7890:150B:9833:C577:7330 (talk) 07:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The purpose of the talk page of a Wikipedia article is to discuss corrections or improvements to the article based on what reliable sources say about the topic. Not to speculate about something hypothetical. Unless you can provide coverage in reliable sources about a controversy about this restaurant and racism, then there is nothing further to say. The CEO, by the way, is Jose Armario. Cullen328 (talk) 08:07, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Also worth noting is the man made famous by the Jerry Jeff Walker song Mr. Bojangles was white, according to the Washington Post . Cullen328 (talk) 08:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
what song?!
lol. minor hit about some white guy IN BLACKFACE doing an imitation of the famous black one.
not sure that helps your case! 2601:19C:527F:7890:150B:9833:C577:7330 (talk) 04:47, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
and?
without googling, i'm gonna guess that "jose armario" is no more black than the original founders.
i'm basically just asking why there isn't a section here talking about the name, like in the sambo's article. i've never been to the chain, but is it all decked out in black paraphernalia? minstrel type theme?
i just know that if i mention "bojangles" "amos and andy" "steppen fetchit" etc in the real world, someone is gonna call HR on me. 2601:19C:527F:7890:150B:9833:C577:7330 (talk) 04:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply