Talk:Alex J. Groesbeck

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Charles G. Groesbeck as nephew? edit

The political graveyard identifies Charles as a nephew of Alexander, but contemporaneous sources identify Charles father as Louis Groesbeck--it is impossible to say without further research if it is the same Louis Groesbeck as the father of Alex. I removed a line the line below pending some more conclusive evidence. olderwiser 13:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

He was the nephew of Charles G. Groesbeck, a member of the Michigan State House of Representatives from Macomb County 2nd District, 1863-1864.

OK, I completely misread what I wrote last night -- PG claims Alex is the nephew of Charles (not that Charles is nephew of Alex). Nonetheless, there are contemporaneous sources saying Charles father was named Louis, which could certainly be possible that were Alex's grandfather. olderwiser 13:50, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Alex Groesbeck.jpg edit

 

Image:Alex Groesbeck.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 13:48, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Seal-of-Michigan.png edit

 

Image:Seal-of-Michigan.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 09:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removal of a portion of a sentence in the article edit

Just to let everyone know, I removed a portion of a sentence that stated that the Ku Klux Klan shared the same viewpoint regarding public schooling as Groesbeck. I read the article it cited to support that statement, and the article stated the exact opposite. So I deleted the end of that particular sentence because it simply was untrue. I tried to explain why I did this in the "reason field", but there's a character cap on that field, so I'm explaining my reason here. :o) Adrienne (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I rewrote it to correct the inadvertent misstatement. Good catch. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC) StanReply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move to Alex J. Groesbeck. Orlady (talk) 03:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply



Alex GroesbeckAlexander J. Groesbeck — To use the correct, more formal name than the colloquial "Alex". Supported by Michigan governmental document FORMER OFFICIALS OF MICHIGAN as PDF. And yes, while the photo of his tombstone File:Groesbeck grave.jpg appears to say "Alex" is actually reads "Alex-period" which is an abbreviation. — MrDolomite • Talk 11:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose suggested title but support move to the redirect at Alex J. Groesbeck. We don't care what his official or formal name was. See WP:UCN, WP:OFFICIALNAMES and WP:OFFICIAL. We do care what the common name is though, and searching the current name and "attorney general" to remove false positives, as well as various combinations suggests that Alex J. Groesbeck is the common name used in reliable English language sources by a wide margin. Google book results:
A search of The New York Times archive resturns a similar disparity favoring Alex J. Groesbeck.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
It was probably like Bill Clinton for William Jefferson Clinton. You could google the results for Governor, too. Moving this to the latest proposal does not offend me, and I support the change. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 16:30, 11 August 2010 (UTC) StanReply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Alex J. Groesbeck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Alex J. Groesbeck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Alex J. Groesbeck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Reply