Open main menu

Efforts to impeach Donald Trump have been proposed by various people and groups, who have asserted that Donald Trump has engaged in impeachable activity during his presidency.[1][2] Talk of impeachment had begun before Trump took office.[3][4] Formal efforts were initiated by Representatives Al Green and Brad Sherman, both Democrats, in 2017, the first year of his presidency.[5][6] Grounds asserted for potential impeachment have included violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution by accepting payments from foreign dignitaries, allegedly in return for special treatment; alleged collusion with Russia during the 2016 presidential election campaign; alleged obstruction of justice with respect to investigation of the collusion claim; and "Associating the Presidency with White Nationalism, Neo-Nazism and Hatred", which formed the basis of a resolution for impeachment brought on December 6, 2017.

Since the Republicans controlled the House and the Senate, the likelihood of impeachment during 2017 and 2018 was remote.[7][8] A December 2017 resolution of impeachment failed in the House by a 58–364 margin.[9] The Democrats gained control of the House in 2019, but it remains uncertain if they will launch an effort toward impeachment. However, the Democrats have launched internal investigations and hearings on Michael Cohen, Robert Mueller and Donald Trump Jr., including the Trump Administration.


Initial impeachment effortsEdit

In December 2016, Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren, Dick Durbin, Chris Coons, Ben Cardin, and Jeff Merkley introduced a bill that would require the president of the United States to divest any assets that could raise a conflict of interest, including a statement that the failure to divest such assets would constitute high crimes and misdemeanors "under the impeachment clause of the U.S. Constitution."[3] Vanity Fair characterized this as a preemptive effort to lay the groundwork for a future impeachment argument.[3] Concerns had previously been expressed that Trump's extensive business and real estate dealings, especially with respect to government agencies in other countries, may violate the Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution,[4] sparking debate as to whether that is the case.[10][11]

Immediately after his inauguration, The Independent and The Washington Post each reported on efforts already underway to impeach Trump, based on what the organizers regard as conflicts of interest arising from Trump's ability to use his political position to promote the interests of "Trump"-branded businesses, and ongoing payments by foreign entities to businesses within the Trump business empire as a violation of the Foreign Emoluments Clause.[1][2] In March 2017, China provisionally granted 38 "Trump" trademark applications that were set to take permanent effect in 90 days, which were noted to come in close proximity to Trump making policy decisions favorable to China.[12]

The Washington Post further noted the creation of by Free Speech For People and RootsAction, two liberal advocacy groups.[2] On February 9, Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D, NY) had filed a resolution of inquiry titled "H.Con.Res. 5" to force the Trump administration to turn over documents relating to potential conflicts of interest and to ties with Russia.[13] Some sources identified this as the first step in the process of impeaching Trump.[14][15] Fox News outlined two potential bases for impeachment, one being the Emoluments Clause and the other being complicity with Russian interference in the 2016 United States presidential election.[16] On March 21, it was widely reported that Congresswoman Maxine Waters tweeted "Get ready for impeachment," which Waters explained was in reference to the allegations of collusion with Russian interference in the election.[17]

The Impeach Trump Leadership political action committee, was started in February 2017 by California Democratic Party congressional candidate Boyd Roberts.[18]

On January 17, 2019, new accusations involving Trump surfaced, claiming he instructed his long-time lawyer, Michael Cohen, to lie under oath surrounding Trump's involvement with the Russian government to erect a Trump Tower in Moscow.[19] This also invoked calls for an investigation and for the President to "resign or be impeached" should such claims be proven genuine.[20]


May 2017Edit

Actions and revelationsEdit

James Comey on why he believes he was fired

Following Trump's dismissal of FBI Director James Comey, multiple Democratic members of Congress discussed an "impeachment clock" for Trump, saying that he was "moving" toward impeachment and raising the future possibility of bringing forth articles of impeachment for obstruction of justice and criminal malfeasance, if proof of illegal activity were found.[21][22] Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut stated in an interview: "It may well produce another United States v. Nixon on a subpoena that went to United States Supreme Court. It may well produce impeachment proceedings, although we're very far from that possibility."[23]

Later in May, news of Trump's disclosure of classified information to Russia led to further discussions about the possibility of impeachment, with Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) in particular alluding to the possibility.[24]

At around the same time in May, the revelation that the president had asked Comey to drop the investigation into Michael Flynn led still more observers, including Senator Angus King (I-ME), to say that impeachment might be in the offing.[25]

The developments led Senator John McCain (R-AZ) to venture that matters had reached "Watergate scope and size".[26]

Preparations for possible proceedingsEdit

Congressman Al Green's Floor Speech on the Impeachment of President Trump
Congressman Luis Gutierrez: "It is the Judiciary Committee in the House where impeachment begins."

Impeachment proceedings begin with a resolution being introduced in the House of Representatives. The first two Representatives to publicly suggest such an action were Pramila Jayapal (D-WA)[27] and Al Green (D-TX).[28]

Two Republican Representatives, Justin Amash (R-MI) and Carlos Curbelo (R-FL), called for impeachment on the grounds that obstruction of justice charges against Trump were proven true.[29] Curbello was defeated in his bid for reelection in 2018,[30] but Amash was reelected, and following his reading of the redacted Mueller Report, reaffirmed his position, stating that the evidence supported the conclusion that Trump had committed impeachable offenses.[31]

On May 17, Representative Green made a call for impeachment on the house floor[32][33] and House Oversight Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) announced that he was issuing subpoenas on the memo that FBI director James Comey wrote detailing possible obstruction of justice by the President.[34] On May 24, Green told CSPAN in an interview that he was drafting articles of impeachment and would shortly submit them as a privileged resolution, to begin the formal impeachment process.[35]

However, some major Democratic figures have stressed the need for caution, patience and bipartisanship in any potential impeachment process.[36]

Administration officials have said that White House lawyers are indeed researching impeachment proceedings and how to deal with them.[37][38]

Independent counsel appointmentEdit

On May 17, former FBI Director Robert Mueller was appointed special counsel by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, acting after the recusal of Attorney General Jeff Sessions, to lead a Special Counsel investigation to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election,[39] and any cover-up related to it by Trump or any White House officials.[40][41] According to sources close to the White House, the Trump administration is considering using various obscure legal means to slow down the investigation and undermine the special counsel.[42][43]

June 2017Edit

Former FBI Director James Comey agreed to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 8.[44] Some legal experts and politicians, such as Representative Eric Swalwell of California, argued that Trump's numerous comments in news interviews and on Twitter regarding the subjects Comey would testify on (such as whether or not Trump tried to improperly influence or coerce Comey and the reasons why Trump fired him) may well have voided the validity of an Executive Privilege claim in this instance.[45]

On June 7, an advance copy of Comey's prepared congressional testimony was submitted to the Senate Intelligence Committee[46] in which he said that the President attempted to persuade him to "let go" of any investigation into Michael Flynn on February 14.[47] He added that Trump requested his personal loyalty, to which Comey replied he would give his "honest loyalty" to the President.[48] Comey said Trump on several occasions inquired whether there were an investigation into the President himself and Comey replied each time there was not.[49] Comey states that Trump requested that he publicly declare this so that Trump's image could be improved, but Comey says he told the President he would need to have approval from the Attorney General's office for reasons of legality.[50]

Comey recounted his final conversation with President Trump on April 11:

On the morning of April 11, the President called me and asked what I had done about his request that I "get out" that he is not personally under investigation. I replied that I had passed his request to the Acting Deputy Attorney General, but I had not heard back. He replied that "the cloud" was getting in the way of his ability to do his job. He said that perhaps he would have his people reach out to the Acting Deputy Attorney General. I said that was the way his request should be handled. I said the White House Counsel should contact the leadership of DOJ to make the request, which was the traditional channel.

He said he would do that and added, "Because I have been very loyal to you, very loyal; we had that thing you know." I did not reply or ask him what he meant by "that thing". I said only that the way to handle it was to have the White House Counsel call the Acting Deputy Attorney General. He said that was what he would do and the call ended.

That was the last time I spoke with President Trump.[48]

"Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors" by Congressman Brad Sherman

On June 7, Congressman Al Green announced that Congressman Brad Sherman would join with him in drafting articles of impeachment against President Trump.[5] On June 12, Sherman began circulating an article of impeachment among his colleagues.[6] Sherman said: "I'm not going to be deterred."[5] Green stated: "In the spirit of keeping the republic, I have concluded that the president has obstructed justice and in so doing, the remedy for obstruction of justice is impeachment. The president will not be indicted while he is in office, and while there is some merit in talking about the judicial process, the impeachment process is the one that will bring him before the bar of justice."[5]

Former United States Attorney Preet Bharara said in a June 11 interview with ABC News that "there's absolutely evidence to begin a case" regarding obstruction of justice by Trump.[51] Bharara went on to note: "No one knows right now whether there is a provable case of obstruction. [But] there's no basis to say there's no obstruction."[51]

On June 14, The Washington Post reported that Trump was being investigated by Special Counsel Robert Mueller for possible obstruction of justice relating to his actions in regard to the investigation into Russia.[52]

July 2017Edit

On July 12, Congressman Sherman formally introduced in the House of Representatives an Article of Impeachment (H.Res. 438),[53] accusing the President of obstructing and impeding the investigation of justice, regarding the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.[54]

The Democrats in the House Judiciary committee demanded that hearings begin as soon as possible,[55] but the Republicans demurred, rewriting the request in favor of investigations into Hillary Clinton's emails.[citation needed]

August–November 2017Edit

Representative Steve Cohen introduced articles of impeachment in November 2017.

In August 2017, following controversial comments by Trump about the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, Representative Steve Cohen announced that he would introduce articles of impeachment because Trump had "failed the presidential test of moral leadership."[56][57]

There was a brief debate about impeaching the president before a privileged resolution introduced by Representative Al Green was withdrawn.[58][59] In late October, progressive activist hedge-fund manager Tom Steyer funded an impeachment campaign that quickly garnered 1.3 million signatures.[60] By mid-November, the campaign had garnered over 1.9 million signatures.[61] As of December 2018, the campaign's signature count is over 6.5 million.[62]

On November 15, six Democrats including Cohen introduced H.Res. 621 with five articles of impeachment.[63] Cohen said that Trump's "train of injuries to our Constitution must be brought to an end."[64] The five accusations were "obstruction of justice," "violation of the foreign emoluments clause," "violation of the domestic emoluments clause," "undermining the independence of the federal judiciary" and "undermining the freedom of the press."[63] Many Democrats opposed this action.[64]

A survey showed nearly 40% of American citizens were in favour of impeachment (up from 30% in February), with almost 75% of Democrats and 7% of Republicans supporting possible impeachment, although Trump's approval rating among Republicans fell from 91% in June to 79% in November.[63] For impeachment to occur, a simple majority is needed in the House and for conviction/removal from office to occur a two-thirds majority is needed in the Senate. At the time both the House and Senate were controlled by Republicans. At this date, 12 Republican Senators had individually indicated a willingness to take action against Trump's presidency: if supported by all 48 Democratic Senators, 8 more Republican Senators would be needed to successfully remove the President.[63]

December 2017 and January 2018 House votesEdit

On December 6, a second privileged resolution on articles of impeachment, H.Res. 646, was brought on the floor by Representative Al Green, Democrat of Texas. The resolution listed two articles, i.e. proposed reasons for impeachment: "Associating the Presidency with White Nationalism, Neo-Nazism and Hatred" and "Inciting Hatred and Hostility."[65] House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California, moved for the resolution to be defeated ("tabled"), which was agreed to by a 364–58 vote with four members voting present.[9]

Among Republicans, 238 voted to table the articles of impeachment and one did not vote. Among Democrats, 126 voted to table the articles of impeachment, 58 voted against tabling the articles of impeachment, four voted "present" and five did not vote.[66]

Green's effort did not receive the support of Democratic leadership. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer issued a statement saying that "[l]egitimate questions have been raised about [Trump's] fitness to lead this nation," but that "[n]ow is not the time to consider articles of impeachment" given ongoing investigations by congressional committees as well as the investigation by the special counsel.[9]

On January 19, 2018, Green brought up the resolution a second time. On this attempt his motion was defeated by a vote of 355–66. 234 Republicans and 121 Democrats voted against the motion. All the votes for the motion were from Democrats: three Democrats voted present and three Republicans and three Democrats did not cast a vote.[67][68]

2018 mid-term electionsEdit

The matter became an issue, primarily for Republicans, in the midterm elections,[69][70] with both conservatives and the president himself warning of dire consequences if he is impeached.[71][72] The Democrats won control of the House, and they have promised to launch investigations into various actions by Trump and his administration, but Democratic leaders were reported as reluctant to address impeachment, at least until after the report of the Special Counsel is released.[73]

Post-2018 mid-term electionsEdit

On March 11, 2019, Nancy Pelosi said, "I'm not for impeachment, Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there's something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don't think we should go down that path, because it divides the country. And he's just not worth it. No. I don't think he is. I mean, ethically unfit. Intellectually unfit. Curiosity wise unfit. No, I don't think he's fit to be president of the United States." She then scolded herself for "coming across too negatively".[74][75][76]

With the Democrats in control of the House, and with a direct impeachment inquiry deemed somewhat toxic,[77] the work of investigations into Trump's possible crimes were divided into several committees while waiting for some outside force, such as the Mueller probe or the Southern District to force the Democratic leadership's hands.

Hearings and investigations: December 2018–February 2019Edit

  • December 2018: The ranking members of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees place job listings in search of experienced lawyers to aid in investigations of Trump and his administration.[78]
  • January 2, 2019: Speaker-Designate Nancy Pelosi, in an interview with Today's Savannah Guthrie, refuses to rule out an impeachment inquiry.[79]
  • January 3:
    • The new Democratic Congress convenes. Jerrold Nadler takes over the House Judiciary Committee as chairman. He has stated that he will file another resolution and its subsidiary subpoenas for inquiries relating to possible criminal charges associated with the Stormy Daniels affair and the conspiracy convictions of Michael Cohen[80] related to it.
    • H.Res.13, the first of several impeachment resolutions, is introduced into the House by Representative Brad Sherman.[81]
  • January 13: In response to Trump's public statements about Michael Cohen, representatives Elijah E. Cummings, Adam Schiff, and Nadler issued a joint statement warning Trump against interfering in the upcoming Cohen hearings, saying "Our nation's laws prohibit efforts to discourage, intimidate, or otherwise pressure a witness not to provide testimony to Congress."[82]
  • January 16: The Inspector General of the GSA issues report declaring that the President may have violated the emoluments clause of the Constitution and chastised the lawyers in the case for refusing to consider the possibility.[83]
  • February 4: H.Res.13 is referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Justice.
  • February 8: Acting Attorney General Matthew G. Whitaker testifies before the House Judiciary committee, primarily on the subject of the Mueller investigation, and possible attempts to stop it.[84][85]
  • February 26:
    • Former Trump attorney Michael Cohen testifies in private before the Senate Intelligence Committee to correct the record on possible kompromat which the Russians might have on the President.[86][87]
    • Whitaker is invited to return to testify before the House Judiciary Committee to possibly correct the record on obstruction of Justice by the president.[88]

February 27: Michael Cohen hearingsEdit

On February 27, 2019, Cohen publicly testified before the House Oversight committee on possible high crimes and misdemeanors committed by President Trump both prior and after taking office.[89][90] His testimony occurred under oath, which also means additional criminal charges of perjury could be filed if it were proven that he lied.[91] In his opening remarks, obtained in advance by the New York Times, he expresses his regret and shame at lying to Congress and working for a "racist" and a "con man", and accuses Trump of numerous lies and illegal actions. White House officials dismissed the credibility of his testimony in advance, calling him a "disgraced felon" and "convicted liar".[92]

During his testimony, Cohen described how he protected Trump from potential scandals during the 2016 campaign through payoffs.[93] He stated that he and National Enquirer owner David Pecker conspired to "catch and kill" potentially damaging stories about Trump and that Trump also was concerned that the allegations by Stormy Daniels and other women would result in the general public being reminded of a tape which aired on Access Hollywood at the beginning of October 2016 where Trump was caught a decade prior discussing how he groped, grabbed and kissed women without their permission.[93] He also stated that Trump would inflate his personal wealth for financial benefits, such as a failed bid to buy the Buffalo Bills,[94] and that he and Trump conspired with Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg and the President's son Donald Trump Jr. to organize more payoffs in 2017.[93] Cohen also showed lawmakers a check for $35,000 which the President wrote to him on August 1, 2017, and stated that it was used as a part of a hush money payoff to Stormy Daniels as well.[93]

The testimony implicated the President as committing a minimum of 11 impeachable offenses.[95][96]

Hearings and investigations: February–April 2019Edit

  • February 28: Cohen testifies in private before the House Intelligence Committee.
  • March 3: House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler announces requests for over sixty documents from the White House and other sources in his overisight investigtions.[97]
  • March 4: The House Judiciary issues requests to 81 people for documents and testimony in a "pre-impeachment" investigation into obstruction of justice and other alleged threats to the rule of law.[98][99][98]
  • March 6: Cohen finishes testimony at the HIC.[100]
  • March 22: Mueller Report is delivered to Attorney General William Barr.[101]
  • March 24: According to Barr, the investigation "did not find evidence to charge other Americans (including Trump associates) in conspiring with Russia in 2016," and did not come to a conclusion about obstruction of justice.[101]
  • March 27: While the Congress was waiting for the Mueller report to drop, Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) introduced another resolution, H.Res. 257, calling for a formal impeachment investigation of the President,[102] which was referred to the Committee on Rules.
  • April 18: The Mueller Report is made public. In it, Mueller states that that since the president cannot be indicted while in office, it would be left to Congress to decide whether to use its power of impeachment.[103]

Mueller Report and impeachment debateEdit

A Department of Justice spokesperson called Nadler's subpoena "premature and unnecessary," detailing that the publicly released version of the report had "minimal redactions" and that Barr had made arrangements for Nadler and other lawmakers to review a version of the final report with fewer redactions.[104][105]

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer stated that "Based on what we have seen to date, going forward on impeachment is not worthwhile at this point," "[106] while Speaker Nancy Pelosi was more noncommittal, telling the majority caucus: "We will update you on the next steps that must be taken. The Caucus held a conference call on April 22 to discuss the matter.[107]

It was decided to go full bore on the investigations and deal with actual impeachment later.[108]

Impeachment resolutions in the 116th CongressEdit

  • H.Res.13 Introduced 01/03/2019 by Brad Sherman(D-CA)
  • H.Res.257 Introduced 03/27/2019 by Rep.Rashida Tlaib(D-MI)

Hearings and investigations: April–July 2019Edit

  • April 18: Nadler says redacted Meuller report might necessitate impeachment.[109]
  • April 19: House Judiciary Committee issues subpoena demanding the unredacted report and its underlying evidence.[110]
  • April 22: HJC issues subpoena for former White House Counsel Don McGahn to testify on his statements as exhibited by the Special Counsel in his report. [111]
  • April 23: President Trump issues orders retroactively asserting executive privilege over all testimony given to the special counsel by McGahn and others given subpoenas by the HJC.[112]
  • April 28: Attorney General Barr threatens to boycott scheduled hearings and Nadler threatens a subpoena if he does.[113]
  • May 2: Barr boycotts hearings[114]
  • May 8: Barr held in contempt by House Judiciary committee 24-16.[115]

Fight over subpoenasEdit

As noted above, several committees in the House of Representatives have issued subpoenas for materials and testimonies from various people and institutions within the Trump administration and others. The President's personal lawyers have issued letters saying that all such requests shall be ignored whether such action is legal or not, [112] also, lawsuits have been initiated. (see below)

Trump's tax returnsEdit

Unredacted version of Mueller reportEdit

As stated above, the HJC has subpoenaed the unredacted report and Attorney General Barr has rebuffed this,[116] leading to a contempt citation a possible lawsuit.[117]

Lawsuit strategiesEdit

Pro TrumpEdit

The HJC's subpeonas have been resisted by the President's lawyers via lawsuit. Specifically:

Trump et al v. Mazars et alEdit

The President and his lawyers wish to delay or prevent possibly damning information from getting to the House Oversight committee by getting a court injunction. They are doing this by suing the leadership of the House Oversight committee and the Mazars accounting firm.[118][119]

On April 23, 2019 U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta set a May 14th date for the preliminary hearing,[120] although several weeks later, he decided that the entire suit would be heard on that date.[121]

Trump et al v. Deutsche Bank et alEdit

The President and his lawyers wish to delay or prevent possibly damning information from getting to the House Financial Services and Intelligence committees by getting a court injunction. While the defendants are Deutsche Bank and Capital One bank U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos has permitted representatives of the House committees to take part.[122]

Judge Ramos had canceled a May 9th preliminary hearing when the committees agreed to hand over "substantial portions" of the subpoenas to the plaintiffs.[123]

Anti TrumpEdit

Many of the lawsuits filed against Trump ask for declaratory relief. This remedy differs from injunctive relief (an order to do something or stop) and damages. A court's declaratory judgment compels no action as it simply resolves a legal question. For example, a court may simply declare that a device does not infringe another's patent. A declaration that the president has accepted emoluments would make the work of House Managers easier in an impeachment.[124] Blumenthal v. Trump asks for declaratory relief as to emoluments. In CREW and National Security Archive v. Trump and EOP, a declaratory finding that the administration willfully failed to retain records would support a charge of obstruction of justice.[125] Some observers think the emoluments cases are unlikely to go anywhere, for lack of standing.[126] The CREW v. Trump case was dismissed in December 2017 for lack of standing.[127] Blumenthal v. Trump, on the other hand, was not.[128]

Symbolic municipal resolutionsEdit

City councils that have made formal resolutions calling for the impeachment of President Trump include those in the San Francisco Bay Area cities of Alameda, Berkeley, Oakland and Richmond[129][130][131] as well as the city of Los Angeles.[132] On the East Coast, the Cambridge, Massachusetts city council passed a policy order to support a House resolution to investigate Emoluments Clause conflicts.[133]

Trump statementsEdit

During an August 2018 Fox & Friends interview, Trump was asked about the possible ramifications of him being potentially impeached after his ex-lawyer Michael Cohen pleaded guilty to charges and implied he had done so by Trump's direction. Trump stated, "I don't know how you can impeach someone who's done a great job. I tell you what, if I ever got impeached, I think the market would crash, I think everybody would be very poor. Because without this [points at his head, referring to his brain and his thinking], you would see numbers that you wouldn't believe in reverse."[134]

In a January 2019 tweet, Trump expressed bewilderment at the possibility, saying among other things, "How do you impeach a president who [...] had the most successful first two years of any president?"[135]

In late April 2019, Trump vowed to take a possible impeachment to the Supreme Court,[136] even though the Supreme Court has twice ruled that the judiciary has no power over the process. [137]

Public opinion polling on impeachmentEdit

Public opinion is a key factor in impeachment proceedings as politicians including those in the House of Representatives look to opinion polls to assess the tenor of those they represent.[138][139][140] First and foremost action would have to be based on the requisite legal grounds for impeachment, with such action being more likely in the face of support from public opinion.[138][139][140]

As of January 26, 2017, Public Policy Polling reported that 35% of voters supported the impeachment of President Trump, while 50% opposed.[141] By the following week, after the controversial rollout of Executive Order 13769, which barred people from seven majority-Muslim countries from entering the United States, support for impeachment had grown to 40%.[142] The following week, support for impeachment reached 46%, matching opposition to impeachment.[143]

In May 2017, after the firing of James Comey, for the first time more Americans supported impeaching Trump (48%) than opposed impeaching Trump (41%), with 11% not sure.[144] At the beginning of August 2017, one poll showed that number falling substantially with 53% of people being opposed to impeachment and 40% in favor, according to PRRI studies,[145] but by the end of August 2017 and following political fallout from the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, 48% of people were again in favor of impeachment and 41% were opposed.[146] In December 2017, Public Policy Polling conducted the first public poll showing majority support for impeachment (51% support, 42% oppose, 7% not sure).[147]

In March 2019, a CNN Poll found that 36% of respondents support the impeachment.[148]

In May 2019, a NBC/WSJ poll with Republican pollster Bill McInturff found that 17% thought enough evidence existed for the House to begin impeachment hearings, 32% want Congress to continue investigating and decide on impeachment later, and 48% said that the House should not pursue impeachment.[149][150]

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ a b Revesz, Rachael (January 20, 2017). "Website aiming to impeach Donald Trump so popular it crashed". The Independent. Archived from the original on January 20, 2017. Retrieved January 20, 2017.
  2. ^ a b c Gold, Matea (January 20, 2017). "The campaign to impeach President Trump has begun". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 22, 2017. Retrieved January 20, 2017.
  3. ^ a b c Fox, Emily Jane (December 15, 2016). "Democrats Are Paving the Way to Impeach Donald Trump". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on February 2, 2015. Retrieved December 15, 2016.
  4. ^ a b Teachout, Zephyr (November 17, 2016). "Trump's Foreign Business Ties May Violate the Constitution". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 27, 2017. Retrieved November 17, 2016.
  5. ^ a b c d See:
  6. ^ a b "Democratic Rep. Sherman Drafts Article of Impeachment Against Trump". Roll Call. June 12, 2017. Archived from the original on July 1, 2017. Retrieved June 12, 2017.
  7. ^ Bump, Philip (July 14, 2017). "No matter how bad it gets for him, here's why Trump isn't getting impeached this year [analysis]". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 14, 2017. Retrieved July 14, 2017.
  8. ^ Alexander Burns (October 11, 2017). "Pledge to Impeach Trump, a Key Donor Demands of Democrats". The New York Times. Retrieved October 11, 2017.
  9. ^ a b c Mike DeBonis (December 6, 2017). "House votes to kill Texas lawmaker's Trump impeachment effort". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 6, 2017.
  10. ^ Tillman, Seth Barrett (November 17, 2016). "Constitutional Restrictions on Foreign Gifts Don't Apply to Presidents". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 23, 2017. Retrieved November 17, 2016.
  11. ^ Adler, Jonathan H. (November 21, 2016). "The Emoluments Clause – is Donald Trump violating its letter or spirit?". The Volokh Conspiracy (The Washington Post). Archived from the original on January 29, 2017. Retrieved November 21, 2016.
  12. ^ "China provisionally grants Trump 38 trademarks – including for escort service". The Guardian. Associated Press. March 8, 2017. Archived from the original on March 26, 2017. Retrieved March 25, 2017.
  13. ^ DeBonis, Mike (February 9, 2017). "Democrat moves to force House debate on Trump's alleged business conflicts and Russia ties". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 11, 2017. Retrieved February 9, 2017.
  14. ^ Solomon, Norman (February 10, 2017). "The Long Road To Impeach Trump Just Got Shorter". HuffPost. Archived from the original on February 14, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
  15. ^ "Congressman Jerrold Nalder takes First Steps Toward Impeachment of Donald Trump". The Source. February 10, 2017. Archived from the original on February 12, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
  16. ^ McKelway, Doug (February 27, 2017). "Dems already cranking up Trump impeachment talk". Fox News. Archived from the original on March 1, 2017. Retrieved February 27, 2017.
  17. ^ Harriet Agerholm (March 22, 2017). "Prominent politician tells Donald Trump: 'Get ready for impeachment'". The Independent. Archived from the original on March 25, 2017. Retrieved March 22, 2017.
  18. ^ Hagen, Lisa (February 14, 2017). "Congressional candidate forms Impeach Trump PAC". The Hill. Archived from the original on July 22, 2017. Retrieved February 14, 2017.
  19. ^ "President Trump Directed His Attorney Michael Cohen To Lie To Congress About The Moscow Tower Project". Buzzfeed News. January 17, 2019. Retrieved January 18, 2019.
  20. ^ "Trump told to 'resign or be impeached' if reports he instructed attorney Cohen to lie to congress are proven. However on January 18th, The special counsel's office issues a rare statement in response to the report by BuzzFeed News regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony by clarifying that it is inaccurate in its assessment". The Independent. January 18, 2019. Retrieved January 18, 2019.
  21. ^ Roarty, Alex (May 10, 2017). "Democrats talk of an 'impeachment clock' for Trump". The McClatchy Company. Archived from the original on May 11, 2017. Retrieved May 10, 2017.
  22. ^ Easley, Jonathan (May 10, 2017). "Dem reps: Trump is 'moving' toward impeachment". The Hill. Archived from the original on May 10, 2017. Retrieved May 10, 2017.
  23. ^ Hamedy, Saba (May 11, 2017). "Blumenthal: Comey firing 'may well produce impeachment proceedings'". CNN. Archived from the original on May 11, 2017. Retrieved May 11, 2017.
  24. ^ "Waters: Trump's Disclosure of Classified Info to Russia Moves Us Closer to 'Impeachment'". The Washington Free Beacon. May 16, 2017. Archived from the original on July 11, 2017. Retrieved May 16, 2017.
  25. ^ "CNN's Wolf Blitzer: "Are We Getting Closer" To Impeachment Of Donald Trump?". RealClearPolitics. May 16, 2017. Archived from the original on May 16, 2017. Retrieved May 16, 2017.
  26. ^ Seipel, Brooke (May 16, 2017). "McCain: Trump scandals reaching 'Watergate size and scale'". The Hill. Archived from the original on May 17, 2017. Retrieved May 16, 2017.
  27. ^ Connelly, Joel (May 16, 2017). "Connelly: Rep. Jayapal raises specter of impeachment". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Archived from the original on May 17, 2017. Retrieved May 17, 2017.
  28. ^ Elliott, Rebecca (May 15, 2017). "U.S. Rep. Green calls for Trump's impeachment". Houston Chronicle. Archived from the original on May 16, 2017. Retrieved May 17, 2017.
  29. ^ Smilowitz, Elliot (May 17, 2017). "First Republicans talk possibility of impeachment for Trump". The Hill. Archived from the original on May 17, 2017. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
  30. ^ "Shalala, Mucarsel-Powell flip Miami-Dade House seats to Democrats". Sun Sentinel. Associated Press. November 6, 2018. Retrieved November 9, 2018.
  31. ^ Watkins, Eli; Bohn, Kevin. "GOP Rep. Amash becomes first Republican to call for Trump's impeachment". CNN.
  32. ^ Firozi, Paulina (May 17, 2017). "Dem calls for Trump impeachment on House floor". The Hill. Archived from the original on May 17, 2017. Retrieved May 17, 2017.
  33. ^ Elliot, Rebecca (May 15, 2017). "U.S. Rep. Green calls for Trump's impeachment". Houston Chronicle. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
  34. ^ "House Oversight Chairman Chaffetz demands all FBI documents on Trump, Comey". NBC News. May 17, 2017. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
  35. ^ "Rep. Al Green says he's drafting Trump impeachment articles". New York Daily News. May 23, 2017. Archived from the original on May 24, 2017. Retrieved May 24, 2017.
  36. ^ "Democratic Leaders Try to Slow Calls to Impeach Trump". The New York Times. May 18, 2017. Archived from the original on May 19, 2017. Retrieved May 19, 2017.
  37. ^ Perez, Evan (May 19, 2017). "Sources: White House lawyers research impeachment". CNN. Retrieved May 19, 2017.
  38. ^ Giaritelli, Anna (May 19, 2017). "Trump's lawyers researching impeachment procedures: report". The Washington Examiner. Archived from the original on May 20, 2017. Retrieved May 19, 2017.
  39. ^ "Appointment of Special Prosecutor". Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs. May 17, 2017. Archived from the original on May 17, 2017. Retrieved May 17, 2017.
  40. ^ "Comey agrees to testify in public as Trump-Russia probe heats up". The McClatchy Company. May 19, 2017. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
  41. ^ Chaitin, Daniel. "Investigation into Russia now has ability to look for possible Trump cover-up". The Washington Examiner. Archived from the original on May 19, 2017.
  42. ^ "White House looking at ethics rule to weaken special investigation: sources". Reuters. May 19, 2017. Archived from the original on May 19, 2017. Retrieved May 20, 2017.
  43. ^ Note that starting with the appointment of Archibald Cox in relation to the Watergate scandal in May 1973, supporters of presidential impeachment proceedings have relied on independent counsels to gather evidence in support of their efforts. See Posner, Richard A. (1999), An Affair of State: The Investigation, Impeachment, and Trial of President Clinton, Harvard University Press, pp. 116, 151, 208, 220, ISBN 978-0674000803
  44. ^ "Comey agrees to publicly testify before Senate Intelligence Committee". NBC News. May 20, 2017. Retrieved May 20, 2017.
  45. ^ "White House Weighing Attempt To Block James Comey Testimony". MSNBC. June 2, 2017. Archived from the original on June 3, 2017. Retrieved June 2, 2017.
  46. ^ Bertrand, Natasha (June 7, 2017). "Here's what James Comey will tell Congress in his first testimony since being fired". Business Insider. Retrieved June 7, 2017.
  47. ^ Smith, David; Borger, Julian (June 7, 2017). "James Comey reveals concerns about Trump in devastating account to Congress". The Guardian. Archived from the original on June 7, 2017. Retrieved June 7, 2017.
  48. ^ a b Comey, James (June 8, 2017). "Statement for the Record Senate Select Committee on Intelligence" (pdf). United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. p. 7. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 7, 2017. Retrieved June 8, 2017.
  49. ^ Schmidt, Michael S.; Goldman, Adam (June 7, 2017). "Comey to Testify Trump Pressured Him to Say He Wasn't Under Investigation". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 7, 2017. Retrieved June 7, 2017.
  50. ^ Comey, James B. (June 7, 2017). "Read: James Comey's prepared testimony". CNN. Retrieved June 7, 2017.
  51. ^ a b Davis, Maia (June 11, 2017), There's 'absolutely evidence' to begin obstruction of justice case on Trump: Bharara, ABC News, archived from the original on June 11, 2017, retrieved June 11, 2017
  52. ^ WaPo: Donald Trump Under Investigation For Obstruction of Justice. MSNBC. June 14, 2017. Retrieved June 14, 2017 – via
  53. ^ "H Res 438 Article of Impeachment" (PDF). June 12, 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 12, 2017. Retrieved July 13, 2017.
  54. ^ Marcos, Cristina (July 12, 2017). "House Democrat files article of impeachment against Trump". The Hill. Archived from the original on July 12, 2017. Retrieved July 12, 2017.
  55. ^ Cohen, Kelly (June 21, 2017). "House Judiciary Democrats demand GOP leadership start new Russia-Trump probe". The Washington Examiner. Retrieved August 11, 2017.
  56. ^ Le Miere, Jason (August 17, 2017). "Trump Impeachment Process Begins as Democrat States President 'Failed Test of Moral Leadership'". Newsweek. Retrieved August 17, 2017.
  57. ^ Estepa, Jessica (August 17, 2017). "Democratic lawmaker to file articles of impeachment over Trump's Charlottesville response". USA Today. Retrieved August 17, 2017.
  58. ^ "Impeach Trump? House Dem Offers Resolution, Sets It Aside". The New York Times. October 11, 2017. Retrieved October 11, 2017.
  59. ^ DeBonis, Mike (October 11, 2017). "Democrat stops just short of forcing House vote on Trump's impeachment". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
  60. ^ "Trump-tweet target Tom Steyer's impeachment campaign tops 1.3 million signatures". San Jose Mercury News. November 1, 2017. Retrieved November 2, 2017.
  61. ^ Reilly, Katie (November 9, 2017). "Billionaire Tom Steyer Is Doubling His Budget on These Ads to Impeach Trump". Fortune. November 9, 2017. Retrieved November 9, 2017.
  62. ^ "Home". Need to Impeach. Retrieved December 15, 2018.
  63. ^ a b c d Le Miere, Jason (November 15, 2017). "Trump impeachment articles introduces by six Democrats calling for hearings to begin immediately". Newsweek. Retrieved November 17, 2017.
  64. ^ a b Freking, Kevin (November 15, 2017). "5 House Dems introduce impeachment articles against Trump". Winston-Salem Journal. Associated Press. Retrieved November 15, 2017.
  65. ^ Detrow, Scott (December 6, 2017). "Trump Impeachment? Texas Democrat Forces Vote Against Party's Wishes : NPR". National Public Radio. Retrieved December 7, 2017.
  66. ^ "Final Vote Results for Roll Call 658: H. Res. 646". Office of the Clerk. United States Hoyuse of Representatives. December 6, 2017. Retrieved December 6, 2017-
  67. ^ DeBonis, Mike (January 19, 2018). "Democratic Rep. Al Green offers second Trump impeachment measure". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 19, 2018.
  68. ^ "Final Vote Results For Roll Call 35". Clerk of the United States House of Representatives. January 19, 2018. Retrieved January 19, 2018.
  69. ^ "Trump is on a collision course with impeachment". The New York Times. October 13, 2018. Retrieved December 2, 2018.
  70. ^ "The midterms could set Trump on a path toward impeachment". FiveThirtyEight. March 1, 2018. Retrieved December 2, 2018.
  71. ^ "Trump tells supporters it'll be 'your fault' if he gets impeached". CNN. September 7, 2018. Retrieved December 2, 2018.
  72. ^ "Donald Trump warns of market meltdown if he's impeached". The Times of India. August 23, 2018. Retrieved December 2, 2018.
  73. ^ Kwong, Jessica (November 3, 2018). "Will Donald Trump Be Impeached after the 2018 Midterm Elections? Here's What's Likely to Happen if Democrats Win the House". Newsweek. Retrieved December 2, 2018.
  74. ^ "Don't bother: Pelosi says Trump 'just not worth' impeaching". NBC News. Retrieved April 22, 2019.
  75. ^ Schwab, Nikki; Campanile, Carl; Feis, Aaron (March 11, 2019). "Nancy Pelosi: Congress should not impeach Trump". Retrieved April 22, 2019.
  76. ^ Fandos, Nicholas (March 11, 2019). "Impeaching Trump Is 'Not Worth It,' Nancy Pelosi Says". Retrieved April 22, 2019 – via
  77. ^ "Democrats face a dilemma on impeachment". NBC News.
  78. ^ Alexandra Hutzler On 12/28/18 at 2:51 PM (December 28, 2018). "House Democrats are reportedly on the hunt for lawyers with a variety of expertise to help investigate Trump in 2019". Newsweek. Retrieved January 4, 2019.
  79. ^ Kim, Eun Kyung (January 3, 2019). "Nancy Pelosi says she won't rule out indictment, impeachment for Trump". Retrieved January 4, 2019.
  80. ^ "Nadler: New Evidence from Michael Cohen Suggests Impeachable Offense Could Indict President Trump". December 9, 2018. Retrieved December 15, 2018.
  81. ^ Connolly, Griffin; Connolly, Griffin (January 3, 2019). "Brad Sherman to introduce impeachment articles against Trump on first day of Democratic Congress". Retrieved January 4, 2019.
  82. ^ "Three top Democrats warn Trump not to interfere with Michael Cohen testimony". CBS News. January 14, 2019. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  83. ^ "IG report rips gov't for punting on possible Trump emoluments violation tied to his DC hotel". NBC News.
  84. ^ "The hearings begin: Acting AG Whitaker clashes with House Judiciary Democrats".
  85. ^ CNN, Jeremy Herb and Alex Rogers. "At fiery hearing, Whitaker testifies that he has not talked about Mueller to Trump". CNN.
  86. ^ CNN, Jeremy Herb, Gloria Borger and Manu Raju. "Michael Cohen apologizes to Senate panel for lying to Congress". CNN.
  87. ^ Megerian, Chris; Kim, Kyle; Simani, Ellis. "The definitive Michael Cohen explainer".
  88. ^ CNN, Eli Watkins. "NYT: Trump asked Whitaker if he could put prosecutor in charge of Cohen probe". CNN.
  89. ^ "5 Revelations From Cohen: 2017 Checks, 'Catch-And-Kill,' Possible Book Deal".
  90. ^ Herb, Jeremy (January 10, 2019). "Michael Cohen, Trump's former lawyer, to testify publicly before Congress". CNN. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  91. ^ Marshall Cohen (February 28, 2019). "Michael Cohen denies under oath visiting Prague in 2016 to collude with Russians". CNN. Retrieved February 28, 2019.
  92. ^ Fandos, Nicholas; Haberman, Maggie (February 26, 2019). "Michael Cohen Plans to Call Trump a 'Con Man' and a 'Cheat' in Congressional Testimony". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved February 27, 2019.
  93. ^ a b c d Jessica Taylor (February 28, 2019). "5 Revelations From Cohen: 2017 Checks, 'Catch-And-Kill,' Possible Book Deal". NPR. Retrieved February 28, 2019.
  94. ^ Emily Caron (February 28, 2019). "Michael Cohen Claims Donald Trump Inflated His Net Worth by $4 Billion in Attempt to Buy Buffalo Bills". Sports Illustrated. Retrieved February 28, 2019.
  95. ^ Walters, Greg. "Michael Cohen implicated Trump in at least 11 different felonies".
  96. ^ Chait, Jonathan (February 27, 2019). "Michael Cohen's Testimony Is the First Hearing in President Trump's Impeachment". Intelligencer.
  97. ^ News, A. B. C. (March 3, 2019). "'This Week' Transcript 3-3-19: Rep. Nadler, Rep. McCarthy and Gov. Inslee". ABC News.
  98. ^ a b CNN, Manu Raju and Jeremy Herb. "House Dems announce broad probe into allegations of obstruction of justice". CNN.
  99. ^ "House Judiciary Committee Unveils Investigation into Threats Against the Rule of Law". Committee on the Judiciary - Democrats. March 4, 2019.
  100. ^ "Michael Cohen will return to Congress March 6, Felix Sater to testify March 14". WPLG. March 1, 2019.
  101. ^ a b Lind, Dara (March 24, 2019). "Mueller report: The full text of William Barr's summary letter". Vox. Retrieved March 26, 2019.
  102. ^ Tlaib, Rashida (March 27, 2019). "H.Res.257 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Inquiring whether the House of Representatives should impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America". Retrieved April 22, 2019.
  103. ^ Appelbaum, Yoni (April 18, 2019). "The Mueller Report Is an Impeachment Referral". The Atlantic. Retrieved April 21, 2019.
  104. ^ Chalfant, Morgan (April 19, 2019). "DOJ: Dem subpoena for Mueller report is 'premature and unnecessary'". TheHill. Retrieved April 20, 2019.
  105. ^ Herridge, Catherine (April 19, 2019). "DOJ calls Nadler subpoena for full Mueller report 'premature and unnecessary'". Fox News. Retrieved April 20, 2019.
  106. ^ "Senior Democrat Steny Hoyer: Impeachment of Donald Trump 'not worthwhile' at this point". USA TODAY. Retrieved April 22, 2019.
  107. ^ Staff, A. O. L. "Nancy Pelosi plans Monday meeting on Mueller report: 'Congress will not be silent'". Retrieved April 22, 2019.
  108. ^ "Pelosi slow walks impeachment, says Dems first need to 'save our democracy'". NBC News.
  109. ^ "Chairman Nadler Statement on Redacted Mueller Report". Committee on the Judiciary - Democrats. April 18, 2019.
  110. ^ "Chairman Nadler Issues Subpoena for Full Mueller Report and Underlying Materials". Committee on the Judiciary - Democrats. April 19, 2019.
  111. ^ "Chairman Nadler Issues Subpoena for Former White House Counsel Don McGahn". Committee on the Judiciary - Democrats. April 22, 2019.
  112. ^ a b Re, Gregg (April 23, 2019). "Trump: 'No reason' to honor Dems' 'very partisan' subpoenas, as McGahn testimony fight looms". Fox News.
  113. ^ Stolberg, Sheryl Gay (April 28, 2019). "Attorney General Barr objects to House's terms of testimony on Mueller report". SFGate.
  114. ^ El-Bawab, Nadine (May 1, 2019). "AG William Barr won't attend House Judiciary hearing scheduled for Thursday". CNBC.
  115. ^ "House Judiciary Committee votes to hold Barr in contempt after Trump asserts executive privilege". NBC News.
  116. ^ Berman, Russell (April 9, 2019). "What Barr Told Congress About the Mueller Report". The Atlantic.
  117. ^ Breuninger, Kevin (May 6, 2019). "House panel sets vote to hold Attorney General Barr in contempt over Mueller report". Retrieved May 10, 2019.
  118. ^ "Trump v. Cummings May Not Be a Slam Dunk for Congress - Point of Order".
  119. ^ "'All-Out Political War': Trump Sues Dems and His Own Accounting Firm to Block Subpoena".
  120. ^ "Judge sets May 14 hearing in Trump bid to block Congress demand on..." April 23, 2019 – via
  121. ^ "Indian-American Judge To Fast-Track Ruling On Trump Finances Summon".
  122. ^ "Bloomberg - Are you a robot?".
  123. ^ "Trump, family to see 'substantial portions' of House subpoenas to..." May 9, 2019 – via
  124. ^ Lucas, Fred (July 10, 2017). "Democrats Hatch Plans A, B, and C to Impeach Trump". The Daily Signal. Retrieved July 27, 2017. 'You look at the bill Sen. Warren sponsored,' he added. 'The lawsuits ask for declaratory judgment to fill in very wide gaps and reasoning.'
  125. ^ Laura, Jarrett; de Vogue, Ariane (June 15, 2017). "What is obstruction of justice?". CNN. Archived from the original on July 7, 2017. Retrieved July 26, 2017.
  126. ^ Arias, Cristian (January 23, 2017). "'Emoluments' Lawsuit Against Trump May Get Kicked Out Of Court". HuffPost. Archived from the original on July 7, 2017. Retrieved July 26, 2017.
  127. ^ "Judge dismisses lawsuit alleging Trump violated Constitution". December 21, 2017.
  128. ^ "Judge says Blumenthal, other Dems, have standing in lawsuit against Trump". September 29, 2018.
  129. ^ Raguso, Emilie (March 29, 2017). "Berkeley calls for Trump impeachment". Berkeleyside. Archived from the original on March 30, 2017. Retrieved March 30, 2017.
  130. ^ "Berkeley Joins Other Bay Area Cities Calling For Trump's Impeachment". CBS San Francisco. March 30, 2017. Archived from the original on March 30, 2017. Retrieved March 30, 2017.
  131. ^ Fernandez, Lisa (June 28, 2017). "Oakland City Hall lights up with 'Impeach Trump' sign, council votes for Congress investigation". KTVU. Archived from the original on June 29, 2017. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
  132. ^ Smith, Dakota (May 5, 2017). "L.A. City Council backs effort to investigate Trump for impeachable offenses". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on June 29, 2017. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
  133. ^ McGovern, Marc C.; Devereux, Jan; Cheung, Leland (April 3, 2017). "Policy Order POR 2017 #96". City of Cambridge, Massachusetts. Archived from the original on April 25, 2017. Retrieved April 3, 2017. That the City Council call upon the United States House of Representatives to support a resolution authorizing and directing the House Committee on the Judiciary to investigate whether sufficient grounds exist for the impeachment of Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, including but not limited to the violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause and the Domestic Emoluments Clause of the United States Constitution.
  134. ^ "Impeach me and the market crashes - Trump". BBC News. August 23, 2018. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
  135. ^ "Trump rips impeachment talk after Dems take House". The Hill. January 4, 2019. Retrieved January 14, 2019.
  136. ^ Samuels, Brett (April 24, 2019). "Trump says he would challenge impeachment in Supreme Court". TheHill.
  137. ^ "U.S. Senate: Senate Impeachment Trial Powers Upheld".
  138. ^ a b McCarthy, Tom (May 16, 2017), "What would happen if Donald Trump were impeached?", The Guardian, archived from the original on June 3, 2017, retrieved May 16, 2017, Public opinion matters because for impeachment to happen, Congress must act, and elected officials sometimes hang their principles on opinion polls.
  139. ^ a b England, Charlotte (November 10, 2016), "What would happen if Donald Trump was impeached?", The Independent, archived from the original on May 15, 2017, retrieved November 10, 2016, So the House of Representatives could turn against Mr Trump, and there could be sufficient legal grounds to impeach him. But to actually kickstart start the mechanism for removing him from office there would probably have to be a shift in public opinion.
  140. ^ a b Clench, Sam (May 17, 2017), "Could Donald Trump be impeached as president?",, retrieved May 17, 2017, But ultimately, the probability of a push for impeachment succeeding is dependent on public opinion.
  141. ^ Jensen, Tom (January 26, 2017). "Americans Think Trump Will Be Worst President Since Nixon". Public Policy Polling. Archived from the original on January 27, 2017. Retrieved January 26, 2017.
  142. ^ Jensen, Tom (February 2, 2017). "After 2 Weeks, Voters Yearn For Obama". Public Policy Polling. Retrieved February 2, 2017.
  143. ^ Jensen, Tom (February 10, 2017). "Americans Now Evenly Divided on Impeaching Trump". Public Policy Polling. Archived from the original on February 11, 2017. Retrieved February 10, 2017.
  144. ^ Jensen, Tom (May 16, 2017). "Health Care Puts House in Play". Public Policy Polling. Retrieved May 16, 2017.
  145. ^ "PRRI August 2017 Survery". Public Religion Research Institute. August 15, 2017. Retrieved August 15, 2017.
  146. ^ "PPP Realese National". Public Policy Polling. August 23, 2017. Retrieved August 23, 2017.
  147. ^ "Voters Think Trump Should Resign Over Harassment Allegations". Public Policy Polling. December 14, 2017. Retrieved December 14, 2017.
  148. ^ Director, Jennifer Agiesta, CNN Polling. "CNN Poll: Support for impeachment falls among Democrats". CNN. Retrieved April 22, 2019.
  149. ^ "'Hung jury': Public remains divided over Mueller probe in new NBC/WSJ poll". NBC News. Retrieved May 10, 2019.
  150. ^ Harwood, John (May 5, 2019). "Mueller report has not changed American minds about Trump: NBC/WSJ poll". Retrieved May 10, 2019.

Further readingEdit