Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 July 6

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< July 5
July 7 >

July 6 edit

Template:American Athletic Conference women's volleyball navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused, and out-of-date (Cincinnati, Houston, and UCF left the conference). it doesn't look like there will be enough links if the contents are revised to match the current membership of the conference. Frietjes (talk) 21:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Before trilogy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:27, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused, should be added to articles or deleted Frietjes (talk) 21:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Under18 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Arguments that this should have been at MFD are noted. However, Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#What not to propose for discussion here is not a policy or guideline, so that should make it easy to ignore all rules here. –Novem Linguae (talk) 16:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inherently problematic - we should not be making it easier for minors to self-identify as minors. Even if this does not list a specific age, it puts people at risk for targeting in a much more direct way than the standard age templates, which are fairly easily oversightable. Wikipedia is not censored, but neither should we host templates that pose potential real world issues. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:51, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did not consider that. I suppose I just thought it was best for my own use. ~ AlaskaGal~ ^_^ 19:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And you have your birthday listed on your user page as well? Come on. Poster child for why not to have this template... —DIYeditor (talk) 05:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: TonyBallioni, aren't userboxes discussed at WP:MFD per the instructions of what not to propose for discussion here? Frietjes (talk) 21:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You know, Twinkle sent it here. I don't do MfD or TfD and don't really think it matters where it is discussed. I just think this should be deleted. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:14, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
there is a pull-down menu in Twinkle that allows you to select MfD instead of TfD. Frietjes (talk) 21:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you hover over the little question mark, it says the default selection is the most appropriate based on namespace. Again - this doesn't matter as the guidance is not a policy and the community can decide to ignore it even if it was. In the future, I'll keep it in mind, but I don't see any point in moving this to MfD for the sake of process when you can have a perfectly valid community discussion here that reaches a consensus. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Relist at MFD, as is standard for user boxes (it's annoying, I know; I've made this mistake many times myself with userboxes that do not follow WP:UBXNS). If it is kept, it must be moved to "Template:User Under18" or "User/UBX:Under18" or a similar name, per that guideline. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete these type of userboxes are very problematic with the oversight policy. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 01:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    What causes you to think that? SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:11, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:07, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete WP:BEANS. Nuff said. — Prodraxis {talk • contributions} (she/her) 16:32, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 22:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I am all for bureaucracy, but I don't see any reason to procedurally move this to MFD just because it happens to be a UBX template. Primefac (talk) 08:32, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this and anything like it. No good purpose, lots of downside. —DIYeditor (talk) 05:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Example portals intro edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed in 2012. Not in use except as an example in one talk page discussion. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Edit warring report edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed in 2015 but not adopted. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot all about this. Feel free to delete — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:27, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:East Bengal F.C. league record by opponent key edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:21, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Good Article Recruitment Guideline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussion. Probably superseded by a better template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Generation timeline.svg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content that shows an image. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete are fine. cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 17:08, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I use this pic as a reference for generations compared to years of birth. It’s been pretty useful. Please don’t delete Kieghanm (talk) 21:12, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
subst and delete, single-use. Frietjes (talk) 21:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FDA classification of soft contact lens materials edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fowler image rotation edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No documentation, no categories. Used only in one editor's sandbox from 2007. This appears to be a custom implementation of {{Random slideshow}} and could likely be replaced by that template if necessary. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:49, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no memory of this. I was relatively new to WP at that time, and was very likely experimenting. Please remove. Thanks Fowler&fowler«Talk» 11:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Foreignlang edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Redundant to {{Uw-lang-foreign}}. This template probably should have been moved to Uw-lang-foreign, but it has no documentation or categories, so it would not have been easy to locate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:07, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ITN map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed in 2006, and used in one talk page as a demonstration. Never adopted. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2023 Word Men's Curling Championship standings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as 2023 World Men's Curling Championship uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 09:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_July_6&oldid=1165352341"