Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 15

< Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Archive 10 ← Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 → Archive 20

Cosmic Evolution

There was no error or violation Wikpedia rules in my page -119.152.142.172 (talk) 14:09, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

? There is no record of any such article (deleted or otherwise), by you or anybody else. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
There is a current article Religious interpretations of the Big Bang theory, is that what you are talking about? ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 17:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

American King James Version

I'm here by clicking on a red link which said the article was removed by the PROD process, and could be undone if I requested it.

The deletion was made on a suggestion with no objections, not on content or criteria as far as I can tell. Since it is a religous article, (making it potentially controversial) I would hope wikipedia's deletion policy to be one of motion + momentum (maybe 10 seconds from verifiable different domains), not simply a motion + no objections.

I'd like to actually see the deleted contents before I request it's undeletion, but there doesn't appear to be a way to see the article's contents before undeletion. -Mikey (talk) 17:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

The prod nom was "No claim to notability for this Bible translation." and then it sat for a week with a huge tag warning of what was coming and being listed on the page of PROD-tagged articles. Nobody stepped up to explain why this article was worthwhile, or even say "wait, I think it might be worthwhile"--if nobody cared to fix it or disagree, it just goes away. Not a perfect system obviously, but there's consensus that WP:PROD is one of the standard mechanisms on Wikipedia. It actually isn't a religious article, just an article about a specific translation/publication of the bible. I can restore it to your userspace for a few days if you like. DMacks (talk) 17:16, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
  Done Expired PRODs can be restored without comment, since the only element needed to stop a prod is an objection. I have done so. The exact nature of the article and the subject's suitability for wikipedia might still be questioned at an AfD. Protonk (talk) 17:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Bishop Heber College

This page was recently deleted by my request for copyright violation problems. I find, though that I need access to the earliest version (of this incarnation of the file), which I wrote and which has no copyvio issue, so that I can easily get the file in usable form again. Sorry. My fault for requesting the deletion when I should have just fixed it. -Tim Ross (talk) 20:39, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

  • I left the clean revision on your talk page... Spartaz Humbug! 21:28, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Birthplace of Marco Polo

please see this discussion -Danares (talk) 20:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Rana Mazumdar

I have added a source for this article. I will continue to add more once more of his films are released. -OrangeINDIA (talk) 23:16, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this page has not yet been deleted.. You can see from the deletion tag that the article must have at least one reliable source covering the subject--not just a disc list on a database style website. the source does not need to be in english but non-english sources are harder for the bulk of our editors to review. If the article does not have a source when the tag expires on August 8, it will be deleted. Protonk (talk) 01:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Son of God Discussion in Caesarion article

In the discussion section, several posters discussed the correlation between Caesarion and Jesus -- all of that has been removed and has been replaced with comments that are intentionally misleading -- like 'Caesar left Cleopatra pregnant' -- which is a known innaccuracy; It is a discussion page and the topic of discussion was fair, may I at least have access to the archived page? -67.237.113.168 (talk) 10:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Spartaz Humbug! 14:35, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Correct the discussion page was not deleted, the text of the subsection which was been there for several years has been deleted, I think on 6/22/10 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.237.113.168 (talk • contribs)

Content issue; you can easily see the deleted text by looking at earlier revisions, even if no one other than the IP and topic-banned is interested in it being there. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Kyron Horman

KEEP HIS NAME PAGED, ON SITE AND UPDATED. YOU WILL BE PREPARED. BEWARE OF THOSE PUSHING TO MAKE HIS NAME DISAPPEAR SAME AS THE CHILD, WHO MAY BE WORKING TO ADVANCE THEIR CAREER AND INCOME . -24.44.164.67 (talk) 17:09, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Kyron Horman was deleted after a deletion discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyron Horman the proper forum if you believe it was improperly deleted is deletion review ~~ GB fan ~~ talk 17:21, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Fixed formatting of the request. I am the deleting admin. May I suggest you read up on some of the policy links from the AFD as they might help you understand our inclusion criteria. In particular, WP:BLP1E Spartaz Humbug! 18:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyron Horman, and cannot be undeleted through this process, which is only for pages deleted uncontroversially. Please read what this page is for at the top. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Spartaz (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — ξxplicit 06:02, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Deviant Sound Records

There are other records labels on wikipedia which are no more noteworthy than Deviant Sound Records, which has been in existence for nearly a decade and has e.g. released several albums with a well known opera singer from Germany. But maybe that is not noteworthy enough... -Coolfunkyboy (talk) 09:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

John Broadhurst Boothman

John Broadhurst Boothman was submitted as a football player for the Hawthorn and Camberwell Football Clubs from 1927. He IS NOT A LIVING PERSON. HE PASSED AWAY IN 1989. -Brie2000 (talk) 13:38, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

No need to SHOUT. Your article did not say he was deceased: we have to be extremely careful about biographies of living persons, and an article that gives a date of birth but not a date of death is likely to be a BLP. I have removed the BLP-PROD tag, but you still need to provide references to verify what the article says and confirm notability. See WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 15:17, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Derek Ridgers - Michelle Olley.jpg

The image 'Derek Ridgers - Michelle Olley.jpg' was deleted under the mistaken belief that it was an orphaned image even though it weas being used on the page 'Michelle Olley'. Can this image be restored to use. Affable Familiar (talk) 13:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

  Not done It's not deleted but tagged for deletion. It's currently not used in any article though since it was removed from Michelle Olley for violating WP:NFCC#1 by Moonriddengirl (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). If you think it does not violate this policy, please contact Moonriddengirl about it. Regards SoWhy 15:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Fligban

My friends and I are artists and have developed a new form of poetry. The submission I made was not offensive in any way, was not lude, described our art form precisely (Fligban) and was concise and respectful of other users. A user called DMack deleted my entry without reason. I have contacted DMack without reply. I've visited his user page and see that he has a recent history of removing content simply because he wishes to...with reasons rarely given. Others have asked him why he removed their content and also seemingly have received to reply. I love and appreciate the nature of Wikipedia, but I implore you to restore my content. IF we as a people cannot create, then what are we. And we have created a legitimate form of poetry, with a number of people practicing, and we wish simply to have it represented on Wikipedia. Please undo DMack's deletion. Thank you. -Sean H Healy 14:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

It is utter, non-notable nonsense and should stay deleted.--Biker Biker (talk) 14:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Claptrap indeed. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own new inventions - see Wikipedia:No original research. We only report on things that are already established, the test being notability, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 15:03, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Michele Gould

founding member of Lava Hay (wiki page exists), referenced in Have Not Been the Same/Canadian Rock Book went on to release one more record with Taste of Joy (also deleted yesterday) on Nettwerk Records/Vancouver and Edel Records/Germany) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.94.182 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 23 July 2010

I have restored the page to its former state as a redirect to Lava Hay. It does not seem that she meets the requirements of WP:MUSICBIO for a standalone article. Also, the new article was written by Michelegould (talk · contribs), and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged. JohnCD (talk) 11:32, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Judy Mikovits

she is clearly notable enough to warrant her own page, just put her name in google, she has a life of her own so she doesnt need to be merged with her CURRENT employers wiki page which is what was the fate of her page! -86.159.2.153 (talk) 23:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was converted to a redirect after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Mikovits, though the target for the redirect was later changed by agreement on the talk page. The page cannot be restored through this process, which is only for pages deleted uncontroversially. Please read what this page is for at the top. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Arbitrarily0 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 11:18, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Observium

This was an article related to an opensource software project. It was deleted after its name was changed from ObserverNMS (software). I believe it was deleted because the deleter didn't check if it was previously a valid article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamathefrog (talk • contribs) 23:29, 23 July 2010

  Not done This article was deleted as an advertisement by RHaworth (talk · contribs); you should contact him in the first instance. JohnCD (talk) 20:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
    • i did that before i came here.

Black Veil Brides

Band has become notable since time of deletion -Wordshark (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

The page on this band was deleted in August 2009 for failing to assert the importance or significance of its subject. Since then, they have become more notable (664,000 Google hits, 13 million views on a Youtube video, interview in Billboard) and deserve a Wikipedia article. Wordshark (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this one has quite a history, which means that any new version will be met with some suspicion. It was re-created so many times that the title has been salted - protected against re-creation; the article was userfied for the author to work on improvements, but that did not happen and that too was deleted after two discussions - see (1, 2); and the original author has been indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry. What I suggest you do is:
  1. carefully read WP:BAND to be sure you can show that the band meets its criteria - otherwise you will just be wasting everyone's time; if so,
  2. read WP:My first article,
  3. prepare a draft article in your userspace at User:Wordshark/Black Veil Brides, making sure you have references from reliable independent sources,
  4. post a request at WP:Requests for feedback to get comments on it,
  5. approach user Drilnoth (talk · contribs), the admin who protected it, or user Tedder (talk · contribs), the last admin who deleted it, and ask them to unprotect the title so that it can be moved back. Failing that, you can try WP:Deletion review
If you like, I can move the last version into your user space for you to work on, though from a quick look at it you might do better starting from scratch. JohnCD (talk) 10:09, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Awesome, thanks. I'll just start it from scratch. Wordshark (talk) 17:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

msh flight training

reasoning this is a notable company in this part of the country (or in this part of the world) If you have been to Cornwall you would understand!. It is the only flying school in the area and is as important as Land's End Airport which is retained as a valid page! -Glenandrebekah (talk) 22:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

  •   Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Tagishsimon (talk · contribs), who proposed it for deletion, in case he wishes to nominate it at Articles for deletion. You need to add some independent references - notability is not a matter of opinion, but needs to be established by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The article has only the AOPA list, which is not significant coverage, and a Flightglobal article which does not mention MSH. JohnCD (talk) 11:21, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Yaki Kadafi

Important individual -Illuminati hater (talk) 20:52, 25 July 2010 (UTC)


According the talk page it was originally deleted for not being notable enough. However, there is plenty evidence to the contrary.

1. News reports about his death: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Yh8zvlQoRc

2. He was the sole witness to the murder of tupac.

3. Solo post-humorous content is still being released and sold on amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Son-Rize-1-Kadafi/dp/B000KD0BE2

4. Even though he died at the young age of 19 he has appeared in the following songs: http://en.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/7068994

5. Online biographies of him litter the net from reputable sources. A quick google search found the following: http://www.last.fm/music/Yaki+Kadafi, http://www.thugz-network.com/Outlawz~Kadafi.php,

6. The french version of wikipedia contains an article on Yaki Kadafi:

http://translate.google.ca/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaki_Kadafi&ei=OpJMTI2ZJ4L6sAOuj-xI&sa=X&oi=translate&ct=result&resnum=17&ved=0CGAQ7gEwEA&prev=/search%3Fq%3DYaki%2BKadafi%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3DM0m%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official%26prmd%3Div (translated to english)

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaki_Kadafi (original)

7. The deletion discussion doesn't indicate a high-level knowledge of Kadafi or hip-hop in general. An impartial review by individuals who are more knowledgeable of hip-hop is required.

As a final note, I would be open to creating a new article should the old one not meet certain standards. However, I do not wish to create a new one only to have it deleted (as the last couple attempts from various members) using the flawed original judgment as a basis.

Also the original deleter indicated he would unavailable to answer questions via his talk page which is another reason I requested review.

EDIT: Forgot username and timestamp --Illuminati hater (talk) 21:34, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Lost Of Love

reasoning -110.32.62.160 (talk) 08:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - you have given no reason for restoration. This article has been repeatedly deleted because (a) it gave no indication that the band met Wikipedia's notability requirement, (b) it had no reliable sources, only Myspace and Facebook, and (c) it was extremely negative in tone and amounted to an attack page. JohnCD (talk) 17:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Cyber kids

want to work on it and dispute its deletion -Futuristas (talk) 09:14, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

  Done - I have restored it to your user space at User:Futuristas/Cyber kids where you can work on it. Check out WP:Notability and WP:Notability (companies and organizations), and check with user Vianello (talk · contribs), the admin who deleted it, before moving it back to the main space. JohnCD (talk) 17:34, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Shocker tv

the entity exists and is notable in Las Vegas Hardcore Noise Electronic Scene -192.83.111.65 (talk) 20:21, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

It's a Matter of Taste

I just saw that my page was deleted. I had to make a wikipedia page for my journalism course at Michigan State University and my professor said to make a page about a local business. This is not my business by any means. I could write more to make it less advertisey, but I would really appreciate if, at least, this page could stay up for a week just so I could get credit for my course. Or could I at least get a copy of the page without it being put back up? I just need to show my professor I did the assignment. Thanks. -JacquelineatMSU (talk) 21:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

It was a copyright violation, and about a non-notable business besides. Neither of those is likely to win you much credit. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
I'd also recommend that both the professor and you read Wikipedia:School and university projects immediately to minimize embarrassment for you and MSU. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Beauty (album)

I would like to have this page userfied so I can add references to it before recreating in the main namespace. This afd was closed a few months ago and the result was redirect to Neutral Milk Hotel. This is actually a notable release. Even if it were considered a demo recording, it was distributed (self-released) among the artists of the Elephant 6 collective. This can be noted on page 9 of Kim Cooper's In The Aeroplane Over The Sea (33 1/3), 2005. The threshold for notability with regard to albums is explained by WP:NALBUMS, "Unreleased material (including demos, mixtapes, bootlegs, promo-only recordings) is in general not notable; however, it may be notable if it has significant independent coverage in reliable sources." I feel that for this particular case, this coverage exists. I will also add other sources to this article with can demonstrate notability -riffic (talk) 09:38, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

  Done at User:Riffic/Beauty (album). Before restoring it to the main space, you should get agreement from user Black Kite (talk · contribs), the admin who closed the AfD, or failing that go through WP:Deletion review. I have re-created the redirect as an interim measure, but the article history is now attached to the userfied version, so return to the main space must be done by a move, not by cut and paste. JohnCD (talk) 11:18, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! I've already left a message on Black Kite (talk · contribs)'s talk page, but he's on vacation so I'd like to get a head start on my edits. I'm familiar with the userfication process and I've done this before with a few other deleted articles so I appreciate the help. riffic (talk) 11:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Brandon Patrick Watson

Brandon is a political operative that has been working extremely closely with Meg Whitman on her campaign. He has traveled to more then 550 events with Meg and has experience working with high level politicians including, John McCain, Mitt Romney and Jeb Bush. He is the youngest political operative in the state of California and is know throughout the California GOP political scene, at 18 years old he was hired by Jillian Hasner, MEg Whitman's campaign manager. Brandon will be returning back to UChicago in the autumn to finally start College. He has also been marked as being a possible leading CA GOP figure out of College. -Yoitspaul23 (talk) 13:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

None of that makes him notable in and of himself. Remember: notability is not contagious. I'd also advise reading WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Also please note that listing the page here then recreating it anyway doesn't help your case much. -- roleplayer 17:25, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

The CODE for Global Ethics

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_was_my_page_deleted%3F

I am tired of it all.

This is dumb sensorship.

That censor Jforget is a censor-in-chief.

That person boasts on his site that he deletes more articles than anybody else.

That persons, Jforget, should be kicked out of Wikipedia.

C.J.-Carole Jean (talk) 00:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The CODE for Global Ethics, and cannot be undeleted through this process, which is only for pages deleted uncontroversially. Please read what this page is for at the top. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user JForget (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review —Preceding unsigned comment added by DMacks (talk • contribs) .

Dariusz Krzysztof Zawislak

reasoning -89.76.120.12 (talk) 11:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dariusz_Krzysztof_Zawiślak Wiki in Poland and others webs like Català, Español, Italiano, Português, Русский, Slovenčina

http://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dariusz_Zawiślak

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dariusz_Zawiślak

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dariusz_Zawiślak

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dariusz_Zawislak

http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Зависьляк,_Дариуш

http://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dariusz_Zawiślak

  Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dariusz Zawiślak, and cannot be undeleted through this process, which is only for pages deleted uncontroversially. Please read what this page is for at the top. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

We Are Cloud

the company is young and therefore does not have a wealth of outside sources. However all the outside sources that it does have do mention the product/company without fail. They are not all 'social media sites' as claimed by those proposing deletion. -90.48.108.96 (talk) 13:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Are Cloud, and cannot be undeleted through this process, which is only for pages deleted uncontroversially. Please read what this page is for at the top. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. I'd also advise you to read WP:UPANDCOMING. --Orange Mike | Talk 13:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Baby & Hide

we are a notable rock band in the city of chicago, and growing. not cool for wikipedia to make our little bad not noteable, we're working on it, dont delete us, we have a history, and a future. jsut because some wikipediea user wnker in the UK hasent heard of us we exist. Thank you. Baby & Hide. And team AV went under we are looking for a new label. check out the article of Biran Deck and tell me we're not at least somewhat noteable. -98.222.41.217 (talk) 22:06, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

  •   Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Baby & Hide, and cannot be undeleted through this process, which is only for pages deleted uncontroversially. Please read what this page is for at the top. See WP:BAND for what a band needs to have achieved to be notable in Wikipedia terms, and also see WP:UPANDCOMING. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Goddess of Universal Love

I am outraged and greatly offended that this article and several other articles refering to god as a woman being edited out, such as the holy spirit being a woman and associated with the creator goddess of universal love, or just plain censored and subsequently deleted! it as if wikipedia has been infiltrated by religous fanatics and that wikipedia is biased rather than objective and open minded. i cannot even go on right now i am so furious. and i don't give a damn if i followed every little protocol in writing this!

love and peace, jamie jo jesus—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiejojesus (talk • contribs)

There's no article by that title that's been deleted. I checked some capitalization variants - no article. Are you sure you've got the right article? Acroterion (talk) 01:30, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Austin Powell

Please reconsider deleting Austin Powell's page. He is a great upcoming actor and talented singer as well. He has music about to be released on the upcoming soundtrack of "Standing Ovation" and according to numerous entertainment sources his picture can be recently seen in Popstar magazine and is creating a real buzz for tweens and teens. An article just came out today on the internet talking about it! <spamlink redacted> He has been touring and performing all over the country according to their websites, newspaper, you tube and press releases. I see him on IMDB as well. I would like to continue following him and reading about him like I do with other upcoming young stars. Thanks! -76.116.139.154 (talk) 06:23, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Austin Powell, and cannot be undeleted through this process, which is only for pages deleted uncontroversially. Please read what this page is for at the top. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs); but first please read WP:ENTERTAINER, the notability standard for actors, and also WP:UPANDCOMING. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 09:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Coey Turipa

The page now has at least one reference -Manbeast21 (talk) 23:08, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

This page isn't deleted, so there's nothing to be done here. As the banner in the big pastel green box at the top of this page states, "This page is NOT... to address the pending deletion of any page"; it's for restoration of pages that have already been deleted. If I may ask, what pointed you at this page? —Korath (Talk) 23:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Daph Nobody

-109.128.116.80 (talk) 12:30, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

  Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. However, it may still be nominated at Articles for deletion; if it is to survive it needs much better referencing to establish notability. For any article, but particularly for the biography of a living person, the verifiability policy requires that reliable sources are cited to confirm what they say - see References are not optional. At present the only reference in this article is a single review of one book. JohnCD (talk) 14:37, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Wes Prodigy

The page meets certain criterion in the inclusion guidelines for musicians -Retro 2010 (talk) 21:42, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. I fail to see how the subject meets a single point listed at WP:MUSICBIO. — ξxplicit 21:52, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Undisputed 3

May be resotred to replace an article's content with a redirection to Undisputed III: Redemption -94.27.92.81 (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

matched betting

Betting exchange is not matched betting, actually they aren't even similar, this is a enormous mistake that can mislead readers -ChuckNorris9999 (talk) 13:45, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this page was converted to a redirect as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matched_betting, and cannot be undeleted through this process, which is only for pages deleted uncontroversially. Please read what this page is for at the top. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
I suggest that the existing article be expanded and sourced, which might explain the difference, and then ask on its talk page for a split. DGG ( talk ) 00:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Rameses Casten

The article was deleted through A7, although the facts and supporting information are not yet done and finalized. Rameses Casten is a figure known among the youth of his country, the Philippines, especially in Davao and Zamboanga. The written article about him is true, and is not a ground to be deleted as such just because of lack of information. It is requested thereof to restore the article and let the author finalize the article. The article, when done, would really aid the people to know more about a simple person who did his best to support the youth. A request to undelete is hereby passed by the author. -Ramianus (talk) 13:33, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Rameses Casten is 16, has no google scholar, books or news entries and the only three google hits are the deleted page and mirrors. If I were grumpy i'd ask you to stop wasting our time with frivolous requests, but since I'm a good mood I'll stick with   Not done. Spartaz Humbug! 13:44, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Musti .gif

This was not my image, but relevant for article, I will fix all licensing and tags, thank you -Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 09:15, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

  • Done but you need to come up with a decent FUR that shows the image isn't just decoration...14:17, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Fixed, I hope, how's that?--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 09:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
I read the new FUR (but not the article that the image falls in) and it looks fine. Thank you. Unforgettableid (talk) 20:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

German International School Boston

It is totally unclear as to why this page was deletd. Probably an act of vandalism. -24.34.75.2 (talk) 01:10, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Maashatra11 (talk · contribs) who proposed it for deletion, and user Schuhpuppe (talk · contribs) who supported the proposal, in case they wish to nominate it at Articles for deletion. The reason given for the PROD was "A private school lacking third party sources to show notability"; what the article needs is references from independent sources. JohnCD (talk) 09:36, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Stacey Clark

-Aidanledgard (talk) 08:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. It has been nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, and your comments are welcome at WP:Articles for deletion/Stacey Clark. JohnCD (talk) 09:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Club for Five

Deleted as failing all 12 points of WP:MUSIC, but in reality: Group has one gold record [1], has had multiple albums and singles on national chart [2], has released four albums on international labels (Universal, Warner) and has won international award [3]. Probably there are more proof available with little Google-usage but I think this is enough. -Harriv (talk) 11:24, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

  Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It will help if you add references to the article to document these achievements. JohnCD (talk) 13:25, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Killa-mo_187

it's a real life person. i can back it up because i can give you guys his personal facebook page where you can even ask for his permission. i assure you. -KMTDCfan89 (talk) 20:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

  Not done Nobody, as far as I know, has denied that it is a real person. There is, however, no evidence that it is a notable real person. Try reading the reason given for deletion before asking for undeletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:38, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killa-mo_187, and cannot be undeleted through this process, which is only for pages deleted uncontroversially. Please read what this page is for at the top. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Scientizzle (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. DMacks (talk) 20:43, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

End_Of_Time_Entertainment

It's a real legit independent record label from Michigan. i assure you. as with the last page. i can give you guys the persons real facebook page and you can ask him yourself. I assure and promise you. -KMTDCfan89 (talk) 20:09, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

  Not done Nobody, so far as I am aware, has denied that it is a real label. What has been denied is that there is an indication of significance. The facebook page of someone involved in the company is neither a reliable source. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:24, 2 August 2010 (UTC)


I will note that this same editor has been removing deletion templates; as well as uploading scans of album covers with the assertion that it is okay because the album cover is "entirely my own work" (apparently unable to distinguish between an actual artist and somebody running a copying machine). --Orange Mike | Talk 20:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtney_Collins

Oh, she has become quite notable, I think this one slipped through the cracks. Our site has been getting over a thousand extra hits per day from one article!-71.30.158.3 (talk) 21:16, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

File:AswadStoning.jpg

The article link to this image from Stoning of Du'a Khalil Aswad was apparently removed by a vandal here. It was subsequently automatically deleted because it was an orphaned fair-use image. I would have caught this before it was deleted, but I’ve been on an extended break from Wikipedia. Note that this image has met with repeated attempts at censorship in the past due to its graphic nature. Consensus has been to keep it. -S.dedalus (talk) 08:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Restored. Please put it back in the article before a bot comes around to delete it again. Protonk (talk) 08:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Breeze Zuckerman

Breeze Zuckerman recently won the "Last Woman Standing" trophy at the 2010 World Series of Poker (WSOP) Main Event. This is a coveted trophy and the WSOP is gaining larger audiences with each year that passes. She is already quite a celebrity. Breeze Zuckerman's popularity and notoriety will be tremendous. The 2010 WSOP Main Event is just starting to air on television and once Breeeze is mentioned on television, thousands of people will want to have information on her. She placed 121st in the WSOP Main Event and cashed at over $57,000. Breeze will be playing in many professional tournaments in the weeks, months and years to come. Breeze Zuckerman is a personal friend who has given her full permission to me to write this about her. Please reconsider reinstating this article on Breeze Zuckerman. Thank you, Ally L. - Simi Valley, CA Phone* P/N redacted* if you should have any questions. -Allyplayspoker (talk) 08:09, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

  • I've removed the phone number. Google scrapes these pages (not sure if this page is noindexed) along with less scrupulous web crawlers, so it isn't a great idea to have that information in plaintext. As for the article, it hasn't been deleted, just turned into a redirect to WSOP. You can view the article here and the history here including all past revisions to the article. Protonk (talk) 08:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Silver Creek Plunge

I wish to restore this page so I can edit it and make it up to your standards, making it not an advertising page, but an informing page, for people who want to go to Silver Creek, but need more information. -~ Emily J (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

  Not done. I'm afraid you really do not understand what Wikipedia is - an encyclopedia, not a notice-board or a listing directory. What you wrote is so far from an encyclopedia article that I think you would do better to start from scratch. Promotional tone is not so much the problem as the content: lists of facilities, map directions, prices, snack-bar menu, babies' need for plastic pants, "One cup of chlorine is added to the pool each morning" etc. are matters for the resort's own website, not for an encyclopedia. It is not Wikipedia's job to feed customers that information - they can Google the site and click on its website.
If there is to be an article, the resort needs to satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirement, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." In fact a good test of whether you can write an acceptable article is to follow the advice of an experienced user in User:Uncle G/On notability#Writing about subjects close to you:

When writing about subjects that are close to you, don't use your own personal knowledge of the subject, and don't cite yourself, your web site, or the subject's web site. Instead, use what is written about the subject by other people, independently, as your sources. Cite those sources in your very first edit. If you don't have such sources, don't write.

See also WP:Amnesia test. If you are now thinking "but all I want to do is use Wikipedia to tell the world about Silver Creek", then sorry, but you have still not understood what an encyclopedia is. More advice in WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 18:57, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

MACKmai

The artist MACKmai is not yet a big artists. However, he has already released a mixtape and will release another by next year. The purpose of the page is to provide users an ability to read about his music and possibly become a fan. Wikipedia is used to provide information about people, organizations, events, etc. This MACKmai page is to provide information on the artist's underground rap and to give him a base to work off of. -Raymond Mai 19:45, 3 August 2010 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Da619Homie (talk • contribs)

Note that Raymond Mai is the name of the performer now calling himself "MACKmai". Raymond, I suggest you read WP:UPANDCOMING. We are not here to make you notable; an article is only appropriate if and when you have become notable. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:14, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Titanic 2

I'd like to setup a redirect to Titanic 2 (film) -Henri Watson (talk) 06:01, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

  • I've removed the protection and you are free to add a redirect. Hope this helps. Let me know if you need a hand w/ anything. Protonk (talk) 06:07, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Panjab University

Because i want to create this page -Hsingh.uppal (talk) 05:22, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

I was trying to create this page, as i found that it can be created or modified by the administrators only. I am an Employee of this institute and want to create this page, so kindly allow permission to do so

thanks

Please read WP:COI and WP:SPAM. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:48, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Zaboj Harvalik

Zaboj Harvalik was an important Czech/American physicist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.33.135.62 (talk • contribs) 14:10, 4 August 2010

Morph music

Hope there are enough references. Please dont delete the article.If you think you can edit it to make it more open that would be great Thanks Goirick -Goirick (talk) 21:08, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. You are welcome to comment at the ondoing WP:AFD discussion as noted on the page--that is where the decision on this article will be handled. DMacks (talk) 21:16, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Morph music-Please don't delete it

97 WESt has created a sound and has named it morph.It would be an Cultural impoverishment to delete the article that talks about the sound.THere are 1000's of articles that about 97 West's New sound :the Morph Sound.Kindly consider the article -Goirick (talk) 21:32, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Tarek Najm

He is one of very senior micrcoft technical leaders who has big impact on direction of online advertising and there was nothing in appropriate in the article -Rajeevpra (talk) 18:58, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

  Question: The article's only reference was his Microsoft profile. Can you show the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" required to establish notability? JohnCD (talk) 20:17, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Answer: Some more links talking about him in context of AdCenter and AdLabs, if you need more i can get some more. I will add some more links if article gets undeleted

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aoxKbnwb5qQA
http://www.freshpatents.com/Tarek-Najm-Kirkland-invdirn.php
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/microsoft-adlab-msn-adcenters-incubation-lab/2761/

OK, that's probably good enough. Article restored, please add the refs to it. Any that you can find about him, rather than just quoting him, would be particularly useful. JohnCD (talk) 13:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Alexander (Alec) Hill

This article is fact-based and unbiased. I do not understand why it was deleted and when I tried to get more info, it was never provided. This is my first time posting and it has been an unpleasant experience in that I am unable to get clear assistance. -DaisyMae2005 (talk) 12:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander (Alec) Hill--follow the links that are in that discussion (WP:GNG, WP:RESUME, WP:BIO). If after reading those links you still have questions you can ask at the help desk or post {{helpme}} on your talk page, with your questions written below the notice that template places. Note that articles deleted after discussion are never undeleted through this page (see the top of this page).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Cairo International Model United Nations

Article was Speedy deleted for notability reasons eventhough I removed the speedy tag since I'm contesting it. User:Vianello ignored my prior removal of the tag and proceeded with deleting it anyway without any prior notice or compromise proposal like a merger.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 13:03, 5 August 2010 (UTC) -Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 13:03, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

  Done - Deleting admin restored article per user's request on his talk page. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 20:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

File:GunCrazy2DVDCover.jpg

This is not my image, however it is useful for the article and I will fix the licensing so it is not copyvio -Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 06:53, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, and thank you for the cleanup before I could get back to it.--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 09:19, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Clay Tarver

Member of very popular band, very notable as guitarist. Also professional screenwriter with IMDB page. Absurd to delete. -76.8.72.250 (talk) 16:11, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

  Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Rednevog (talk · contribs), who proposed it, in case s/he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. It will help if you can add references to reliable sources to help establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 18:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Best tourist destinations of pakistan

Dear wikipedia, I am really new to wikipedia so i don't know the rules of website. I made a page named, User:San andrew/Best tourist destinations of pakistan which is about pakistan's beautiful places but i didn't like the title and i was unable to change it so i made a new page named, Best tourist destinations of pakistan, i copied all the information from my previous page. I made this page because of the title, I kindly request you to not delete this page. -San andrew (talk) 22:32, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

 N Not doneWe don't allow articles like this in Wikipedia. The deleted article was clearly promotional in nature; indeed, such articles are routinely deleted here because they tend by nature to be promotional, full of opinion(s) and generally impossible of verification. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Gao_Xiaosong

added reference -Wilson Hu 09:15, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

If you have added a reference to a reliable source, all you need to do is remove the BLP-PROD template. You do not need to post here - this page is only for requests about articles which have already been deleted - see instructions at head of page. JohnCD (talk) 10:27, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Cheng_Lei

referenced -Wilson Hu 09:17, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

See comment above. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Alfred Briffa

Hi, This page was deleted because there was no source for the biography. I found a good source regarding the Biography of Alfred Briffa which is on this web site http://www.saatchi-gallery.co.uk/yourgallery/artist_profile/Alfred+Briffa/43072.html. Do you mind if this page will be undeleted please? -Indrinu (talk) 14:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

  Not done That reference was already in the article. It was not deleted for lack of references, but under speedy deletion criterion A7 because it did not indicate why he was important or significant. I think it could maybe be improved to pass A7, but if it is to be kept it needs to pass the higher bar of notability, which requires showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:CREATIVE. If you think you can find more which might meet that standard, I will put the article into the WP:Article Incubator where you can work on it. JohnCD (talk) 21:51, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

enhancing Police Accountability through Forensic Science

It is really horrible to find that article that I have posted Titled Enhancing Police Accountability through Forensic Science has been deleted and categorised under copy right infringement . That as a lawyer , as a man of criminal justice administration , I say that this act is ultra virus and bad in nlaw , as I am the original writer of this article , which I posted in drgautamghosh.com. That it is fact that the creator of my blog , a company is having my user ID and password , and could have played mischief , which is being probed , but such an act , is really diagracing . At present I am going to the Munk Centre , University of Toronto , so I cannot , sway more , but I would request you to see , verify , analyze the facts in issue and re-instate my name . Even if it takes time , I will wait , but at the same length , I want that you please e-mail me the article , which is purportedly posted in my blog , which necessitated such drastic action , on 5th August 2010. Nevertheless , I stand by my act and I am happy with my contribution in the field of Police Administration . Thank You Dr Ghosh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.196.55 (talk) 14:56, 8 August 2010

  • Please give either your username or the exact title of the article; I cannot find any deleted article with that title, though I have tried several variations of capitalisation.
  • If material has already been published elsewhere, we cannot accept it just on the basis of an assertion of authorship: for one thing, we have no way to know that you are who you say. If you want to release material you have written to Wikipedia, it is essential to follow the steps explained in Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • Before doing that and submitting it again, please read Wikipedia:No original research. Wikipedia is not a place to publish your original work. Wikipedia:Your first article has useful advice, too.
JohnCD (talk) 15:25, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Clipeado

No reasoning given. -Jose Levy (talk) 19:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this page is a copyright violation. — ξxplicit 19:13, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Vanilla (software)

There are now enough 3rd-party sources to support the article, the recent 2.0 release puts it on-par with other forum software listed on Wikipedia both in popularity and developer involvement. -76.195.68.49 (talk) 19:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Iris_Software

Claimed was non-notable. It is the largest privately owned software business in the UK with 60,000 customers. -110.33.104.47 (talk) 05:05, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

  Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iris Software, and cannot be undeleted through this process, which is only for pages deleted uncontroversially. Please read what this page is for at the top. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. DMacks (talk) 05:10, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_15&oldid=1138663757"