User talk:Sean Stephens/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Disambiguation

Before you request moves like this in future, just know that there are some editors on this website, namely ones like In ictu oculi, who will argue with editors endlessly that a preceding "The" in a title of a work does not sufficiently disambiguate it from others. I've had those very discussions before. I deliberately created the article at Optimist (Finneas album) while also having created the redirect for Optimist (album) myself. My point is others find it less clear so explore all the options before requesting them as they're not always uncontroversial technical requests. Ss112 01:36, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

I thought that it might've deliberate; I didn't think it was like you to "miss" something so pertinent as correct disambiguation. I'm aware of the editor you mentioned, and it sounds like they need to be made aware that small details are almost always enough to differentiate two (or more) articles. Time will tell whether or not any further discussions result from the move I guess. Thank you for making me aware of that though. Sean Stephens (talk) 02:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Please avoid following me to articles you've never edited before. I'm sure you have enough articles you can edit without needing to peruse my contributions just like AshMusique does when you're bored or for ideas. You followed me to A Shape of Light and not only that, but you then added ridiculous British English and use dmy dates templates when we should be using neither considering it's a Japanese topic and Japanese topics predominantly use mdy. I'm sure you're aware this behaviour can be construed as hounding even if you have no negative intent or malice. Thank you. Ss112 03:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

I don't know why you feel I've done you wrong here. I only came across the page in question (I think you're referring to A Shape of Light??) because of Himu's edits, who I have been keeping track of as he's interfered with various pages I've edited in the past, so I've kept an eye out in order as his edits are beginning to be more disruptive than productive. I went to Sergecross73's talk page in order to raise an (unrelated) issue, when I came across a discussion between him and Serge regarding changes he'd been making, so I headed to the article he'd edited in order to make sure everything was "up to scratch", so to speak (I ended up getting distracted and forgetting to ask him what I'd intended, but that's irrelevant). I don't know how you got the impression I followed you there, but I'm sorry you did. I'm sure you've probably had your fair share of people doing that in the past, but I can assure you, I have better things to do than to worry about what you're doing. As for the templates added, I figured it was either {{Use British English}} or {{Use American English}}, as {{Use Japanese English}} doesn't currently exist. I figured someone would remove them if they were wrong, and they were; you live and you learn, I guess. Anyway, please avoid bringing unnecessary drama to my talk page: this is clearly a misunderstanding on your part, as I have no intention to "hound" others on here. Sean Stephens (talk) 13:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Sean Stephens, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 20:29, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

@Schwede66: Very much appreciated, thank you! I will ensure I continue to add talk page tags and create new categories where necessary. Thanks for getting in touch. Sean Stephens (talk) 13:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

King Brown

I reverted your changes for several reasons, some of those are given in the edit summary. Can the notability of the song title be established? I have considered a disambiguation for the term before, athough all that I can think of refers untimately to the sanke. eg. slang for a large bottle of beer ~ cygnis insignis 11:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

That's fair enough, thanks for being pragmatic and following it up with an explanation. A disambiguation page seems apt. As for the notability of the song, see various sources here, here, here, [https://sydneynewstoday.com/valquas-king-brown-is-a-scorching-display-of-womens-strength/261215/ here], and here. It's far more notable than her article makes it appear. I'm happy to create a disambiguation page, as that appears to be the best solution at this point in time. Sean Stephens (talk) 22:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

No worries. That does seem to support notability, and having listened to them I am now a fan (especially liking the reworking of that cool tune from an annoying song). When the article is expanded then what you had as hat notes may be the means to direct readers to Barkaa's song, a source that connects the term to the sanke could support a mention in that article. ~ cygnis insignis 10:20, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Apologies for the delayed reply. I'm thinking at some stage, I'll draft an article and from there we can see where a potential disambiguation page would go. I'll be sure to expand the relevant article(s) in order to justify the hatnote. Sean Stephens (talk) 04:10, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

WP:RFPP#Holy Moley

Hi! I saw this edit and was just wondering what process you followed to make that edit? The requests aren't normally supposed to go there, but that's not your fault - that's just something that needs to be fixed in the process or code somewhere. Enterprisey (talk!) 05:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey! I'm pretty sure I went from Wikipedia:Protection policy#Creation protection (salting) to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for reduction in protection level and then clicked "Request unprotection" and added it in there. If I mucked that up, I apologise, that's on me. Thank you for moving it to the right place. Sean Stephens (talk) 05:55, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Please preview before saving

Please do not add nonexistent templates to talk pages, as you did here and on other pages. Use preview before saving to ensure that there are no errors in the pages that you are creating or modifying. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Apologies, it wasn't my intention. As I edit on my mobile phone, you see, the preview function is limited and doesn't show up non-existent templates. It didn't appear to be causing any problems when I initially checked, so I figured I'd proceed. I'm sorry if it caused you any inconvenience. Sean Stephens (talk) 23:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Nimbus Rooftop Bar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nimbus Rooftop Bar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nimbus Rooftop Bar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Femke (talk) 16:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

No, it's not common practice and don't edit war over hatnotes

It's not "common practice" to list non-notable songs as hatnotes on far more notable songs' articles unless those songs have articles and are not determined not to be the primary search term. If anything, editors like you have tried to make this common practice. Don't edit war when you're reverted for things like this in future because WP:BRD trumps whatever importance you see in adding silly little features like this. You can tell me "you don't have any proof for that claim" but I guarantee you nobody is trying to find an album track from a one-hit wonder when searching "To the Moon" on Wikipedia. Common sense applies here and everywhere, and you don't get the right to edit war regardless of whether something is allowed on Wikipedia or not. Ss112 15:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Primary topic how? Don't move redirects pre-emptively

In regards to Won't Forget You, please do not move redirects pre-emptively and try to avoid moving redirects at all unless you're moving them out of the way for an actual article. I hope you realise editors like Jax 0677 have gotten blocked because of their habitual moving of redirects. You claimed in an edit summary when moving a redirect I created that the "Shouse song would appear to be the primary topic" without a hint of evidence. Based on what? Both are singles. Pixie Lott is historically a more notable artist than Shouse, who have yet to prove they're anything beyond a one-hit wonder. And then leaving all that aside, you said you would be creating an article there later and three weeks later...nothing. As I said, be careful moving redirects before actually making anything because this just looks like you wanted article credit for doing zilch. If I find you've moved more redirects of mine out of the way for nothing in future, I will be reverting you and informing an admin. This isn't acceptable and your practices on Wikipedia are becoming quite questionable. Ss112 08:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Running Touch

I'm currently busy elsewhere. I saw your edit at the above article. If you're not too busy yourself, you might want to provide Australian charting for:

1. A Body Slow, No. 1 on ARIA Hitseekers Albums, No. 31 ARIA Digital Albums. Both via "ARIA Report" Issue 1415
2. "My Hands" (Superlover / Adult Art Club / The Journey mix), No. 12 on ARIA Club Tracks. Via "ARIA Report" Issue 1497

Its okay if you are too busy, no pressure.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 09:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

@Shaidar cuebiyar: Apologies, I forgot to respond to this the other day. I'm happy to add the peaks, thanks for letting me know about them! Sean Stephens (talk) 05:04, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for mopping this up, I'm still busy elsewhere.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:17, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

No problem! Always happy to help. Sean Stephens (talk) 05:30, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Mia Wray

ARIA used to let PANDORA archive their ARIA Reports which provided chartifacts and charts (including component ones), from issue 566 (1 Jan 2001) to issue 1544 (30 September 2019). The archive was taken over by Trove and is housed here. In October 2019 I contacted both ARIA and Trove by emails but neither could explain why they were no longer archiving the reports. Each blamed the other, I suspect the reason was money-related.

As for Mia Wray it was issued in early June 2014? If it charted it should have been covered by issues 1266 and/or following.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

@Shaidar cuebiyar: Thanks for all of that, I think that answers all of the questions I had. Each of them blaming the other doesn't surprise me either, I've found ARIA employees to be quite slack at their jobs in the past! I'll take a look at those issues and see if I find anything I guess. Much appreciated! Sean Stephens (talk) 07:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ultra (Mickey Kojak album)

Hello, Sean Stephens. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ultra (Mickey Kojak album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Rancid Eddie

If you would like to add streaming service links do that in the Charts section next to the song. The citations I removed where from either dead links or a non-valid primary source as it is easily editable. A valid source should not be easily editable. Please Do not revert the Rancid Eddie article article as very useful information and citations were added. I have no Agenda, in fact I have added the band's statement regarding the controversy from a valid source, which in any case helps them — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matias4000 (talk • contribs) 23:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

They weren't and aren't used as "streaming service" links per se, they're used to verify the digital release of the single. They should be used to source the single's official release date where possible. Dead links are still valid sources, and they're all archived so all that needs to be done is change "url-status=live" to "url-status=dead". Your changes weren't helpful, hence why I reverted them–you removed valid citations and replaced them with nothing, leaving the material unsourced, you replaced chart peaks with sentences that mislead the reader into thinking it peaked at #2 on the ARIA Singles Chart, when that's not the case, and you added sources to the lead, where it is not required. And your last sentence is entirely my point, it seems that you are acting on behalf of the band, which would be a conflict of interest. Changing peaks to reflect a higher peak on a lower chart is generally am indication of this, as it can show intent to "promote" the subject of the article. Sean Stephens (talk) 23:38, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

as you can see here "Dry" did peak in number 2 https://www.aria.com.au/charts/australian-artist-singles-chart/2021-10-11 I am not acting on behalf of the band, a controversy citation should have all the information required from every part. Matias4000 (talk) 23:53, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes, but that's a supplementary chart, meaning that if it's already peaked on a higher overall chart, we shouldn't mention that peak in the article. I was intending to elaborate on the "controversy" section–which it was why it was still in draftspace, it still required work. I hope we can resolve this, but several of your edits were quite destructive, which I took issue with. Sean Stephens (talk) 23:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Stop Bullying me

Stop bullying me or I will report you on Wikipedia. You constantly delete my valid additions backed by valid citations in every page. You nominated for deletion a valid page I created. Stop now or you will be reported; it's not ok to bully other users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TubbyDubby (talk • contribs) 10:27, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

I'm not bullying you–and nominating your page for deletion is not a personal attack. I have explained, with detail, the problems with the content you've added (such as placing undue weight on a source, etc) and I have tried to seek a resolution with you, but to no avail. It's great that you're passionate about the stuff you're editing, I think that passion would be better channelled if you sought to understand Wikipedia's guidelines a little better. The producer in question fails key notability guidelines, which I explained in my deletion nomination and my reply to you on that page. I agree that it's not okay to bully other users; that's not what I'm doing and I'm sorry if I've given that impression at all. I don't think it's unreasonable to expect good, sourced content to remain i.e. the Australian, New Zealand and Irish chart peaks, which you've frequently tried to remove in an attempt to make mention of the other chart peaks; peaks which should not be included due to having ranked on a higher chart. Sean Stephens (talk) 13:40, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

(I did write "complement chart usage" earlier; that was an error, it should've read "component chart usage".) Sean Stephens (talk) 13:45, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Things that make you think twice before you react.

I keep seeing your name slot, but don't really know you. What's your deal with you buddy? You a stoker bro? 201.175.211.37 (talk) 23:31, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

I'm not sure what I'm supposed to make of this indecipherable message, have I wronged you in some way? I'd appreciate an explanation, if you are able to string a sentence together that isn't nonsense. If you are a sockpuppet, particularly of the user I think you might be, just know I won't hesitate to report you. Sean Stephens (talk) 08:12, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:Liam Payne EPs has been nominated for deletion

Category:Liam Payne EPs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 10:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Astrology (disambiguation)

Sean Stephens: The reason I placed the first two items in a group on the Astrology (disambiguation) page is because the third item was placed in the "Other" group. If we are not going to group the first two, the third should not be placed in an "other" group by itself. It begs the question, "other than what?", since there is not other grouping. I agree that such a small list does not require grouping, but the Astrology software also should not be set off in a group by itself. Just my thoughts on the matter. Thanks for the feedback on the curley apostrophes. OvertAnalyzer (talk) 02:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

@OvertAnalyzer: Well see, disambiguation pages aren't typically meant to include partial title matches in the main list, and as such, I moved it to a different section. Perhaps it'd be better covered in an {{In title}} bullet point in the "see also" section, as is commonplace? Sean Stephens (talk) 02:39, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

@Sean Stephens: I think when I originally added Astrology software to the list, I had it in my mind that the name of the software was "Astrology". Given that the article is describing a type of software, I think you are right that it should be dropped from the list, especially since it will show up in the {{In title}} list anyway. OvertAnalyzer (talk) 16:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for your reply. That's fair enough, I've made similar errors on disambiguation pages before. I was going to update the page with the new changes, but I see you already have, so thank you for that. Best wishes. Sean Stephens (talk) 01:48, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Teal independents for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Teal independents is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teal independents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

LivelyRatification (talk) 04:31, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mia Wray

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mia Wray you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sebbirrrr -- Sebbirrrr (talk) 10:21, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mia Wray

The article Mia Wray you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mia Wray for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sebbirrrr -- Sebbirrrr (talk) 16:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Artificial Intelligence (EP)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Artificial Intelligence (EP) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 10:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Artificial Intelligence (EP)

The article Artificial Intelligence (EP) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Artificial Intelligence (EP) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lots of Nothing

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lots of Nothing you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:01, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lots of Nothing

The article Lots of Nothing you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lots of Nothing for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:21, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

One year!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:13, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lots of Nothing

The article Lots of Nothing you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lots of Nothing for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 12:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Meanjin (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Meanjin (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 14:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bridget Hustwaite

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bridget Hustwaite you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of JK-47

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article JK-47 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 18:01, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of JK-47

The article JK-47 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:JK-47 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 09:41, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bridget Hustwaite

The article Bridget Hustwaite you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bridget Hustwaite for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 10:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ultra (Mickey Kojak album)

Hello, Sean Stephens. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ultra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:18, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ballarat High School alumni

A tag has been placed on Category:Ballarat High School alumni indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kanye West (disambiguation)

The article Kanye West (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

None of the secondary terms have their own articles. Could easily be a hatnote along the lines of "This article is about the rapper. For the songs named after him, see Southsiders (album) and Jeffery (mixtape)". See also: WP:TWOOTHER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Midnite Wolf (talk) 14:02, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of JBP (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on JBP (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Aravindhan Ravikumar (talk) 08:18, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2022 Cook by-election

Hello, Sean Stephens. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Cook by-election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of JBP (disambiguation)

The article JBP (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2022 Cook by-election

Hello, Sean Stephens. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2022 Cook by-election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mia Khalifa (disambiguation)

The article Mia Khalifa (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

G14: unnecessary disambiguation. The actress is far more notable; the song is both directly in reference to her career, and links to her entry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kawa (talk) 05:58, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Todd Sampson

A tag has been placed on Category:Todd Sampson indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:Music videos shot in Newtown, New South Wales has been nominated for merging

Category:Music videos shot in Newtown, New South Wales has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 07:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)