User talk:Redtigerxyz/Archive 20

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Joshua Jonathan in topic Inchegeri Sampradaya

Your GA nomination of Ayudhapurusha edit

The article Ayudhapurusha you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Ayudhapurusha for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your recommendation to delete a page edit

The article Kautilya Society you recommended for deletion has been deleted. Is it possible to improve the page and attempt to come back? What are the steps required to bring back an article that was deleted?Vrindadar (talk) 17:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive edit

It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:

  • This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively.
  • Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
  • The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
  • An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.

Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.

More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the the drive page. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.

I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!

--Dom497

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kalyanasundara edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kalyanasundara you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ammodramus -- Ammodramus (talk) 21:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Synonyms of Purusha edit

Hi, I'm hoping you can clarify something for me. Is the Vedic Purusha (as in RV 10.90, Purusha sukta) synonymous with Vishwakarma? The sukta article seems to suggest three possible names but members of the Vishwakarma (caste) have been adamant across various articles that Purusha = Vishwakarma and that nothing else might apply. I've tried reading some sources but it is just confusing me further ... and I'm very wary of anything related to claims made by members of any caste about their own community (especially when, like here, they're claiming a "higher" position than almost everyone else seems to think that they hold). - Sitush (talk) 11:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:Sitush, it is not as simple as Purusha = Vishwakarma. As far as I know, Vishwakarma is sometimes taken not the deity Vishwakarma, but as the epithet meaning "Creator of the World". Every sect has a different interpretation e.g. Vaishnavas say that Purusha Sukta is dedicated to Narayana [1]; Prajapati is also identified with Purusha [2]; another candidate is Brahman [3]. --Redtigerxyz Talk 06:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks very much. I can now return to Talk:Brahmin, Talk:Vishwakarma (caste) etc without thinking that maybe I've completely lost the plot! - Sitush (talk) 10:31, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Pratyangira edit

Hello Wikipedian, I am Ganapati Pujans. It seems you have renamed an article called Prathyangira, yet why did you delete photos off of this article? And why you said Narasimhi is not Pratyangira? When I wanted to read Wikipedia's article about Pratyangira. Thanks for renaming the article, but you must add those images again. And thanks for your edits on Pratyangira. I appreciate it. And please reply. Have a nice day! Ganapati Pujans (talk) 19:09, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi User:Ganapati Pujans, see Talk:Pratyangira.--Redtigerxyz Talk 05:38, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kalyanasundara edit

The article Kalyanasundara you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kalyanasundara for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ammodramus -- Ammodramus (talk) 03:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've passed this as a good article. Congratulations, and thanks for writing an article on this interesting subject. I'm glad that you're working in the area of Hinduism; in the course of doing the GA review for this article, I visited a number of other articles in the area, and many of them were in need of considerable improvement. Your efforts in the field are helping to bring that about. Ammodramus (talk) 23:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

GAN March 2014 Backlog Drive edit

The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kalyanasundara edit

The article Kalyanasundara you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Kalyanasundara for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ammodramus -- Ammodramus (talk) 23:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your note at my talk page. It was a pleasure for me to review this article, which covered an interesting topic about which I know all too little. I appreciate the work that you put into it, both before you nominated it for GA and in response to my suggestions. I look forward to seeing more articles on Hinduism that you've written or improved. Ammodramus (talk) 18:00, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Shiva edit

Hello, Why did you delete the photo from King of Wikis on Shiva? Pumanis (talk) 06:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

It was not an accurate depiction of the iconography. --Redtigerxyz Talk 06:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Could I put it into another section? It was his drawing you know. Pumanis (talk) 19:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Why include a pencil drawing by a wiki user when we can use iconographically correct historical paintings?--Redtigerxyz Talk 14:38, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Buddha edit

Did Buddhist people Agree With Buddha As a 9th Avtar of Vishnu...? please Buddha is son of man he was not God. then why hindu people think that Buddha is a 9th Avtar Dr. Ambedkar says "बुद्ध हा विष्णूचा अवतार आहे हा खोडसाळ प्रचार आहे.असे मी मानतो." pladge Given In Nagpur by B.R.Ambedkar on 14th Nov 1956. PRASAD 17:34, 12 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salveramprasad (talkcontribs)

Hindus agreed Buddha is an avatar of Vishnu, at least a 1000 years before Ambedkar. There are several depictions of Buddha as Vishnu from Maharashtra to North India.--Redtigerxyz Talk 18:33, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bhubaneswar temples edit

Hi, thanks a lot suggesting the changes - i have modified the same. When you have some time, can you please have a look at Rajarani Temple and Lingaraja Temple. I am planning a GAN for these if they can be bolstered up a bit more from its current state.Ssriram mt (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 29 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rudras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gajasura (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

JSTOR Survey (and an update) edit

Hi! Just a quick update that while JSTOR and The Wikipedia Library discuss expanding the partnership, they've gone ahead and extended the pilot access again, until May 31st. Thanks, JSTOR!

It would be really helpful for growing the program if you would fill out this short survey about your usage and experience with JSTOR:

SURVEY

Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Indian rulers before 1500 on WP:VA/E edit

Hi Redtigerxyz! Thank you for your efforts to improve the coverage of Indian philosophy and religion on the Vital Articles/Expanded list. Do you have any interest in the general history of India before 1500? We have a severe problem of balance on the list, in that we have over 100 European political leaders from that time period, but just two from India: Chandragupta Maurya and Ashoka. I have made a list of eight possible additions on Gizza's talk page, but my knowledge of Indian history is extremely poor and I would greatly appreciate any comments you might have on my selections. Thanks for your time! Cobblet (talk) 08:32, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I'll nominate Rajaraja and Ajatashatru instead of Rajendra and Amoghavarsha. I like your History suggestions as well but for me the priority there is to get Middle Kingdoms of India on the list. Cobblet (talk) 17:59, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
[[User:Cobblet|Cobblet], I forgot the Rajput Prithviraj Chauhan. --Redtigerxyz Talk 10:22, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Just curious: was there a reason you suggested Ajatasatru over his father Bimbisara? Cobblet (talk) 11:49, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Cobblet, Ajatasastru expanded the kingdom more and as I understand, this was the apogee of Magadha. He also remembered as founder of Patna (Pataliputra). He is remembered in Hindu, Buddhist as well as Jain scriptures. --Redtigerxyz Talk 12:27, 20 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
I finally got around to writing up the proposals – take a look if you're interested. Thanks again for your help. Cobblet (talk) 10:11, 12 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Guhyaka edit

  Hello! Your submission of Guhyaka at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Guhyaka edit

Thanks from the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear redtigerxyz, I would like to use one of the images uploaded by you (the image of God Vishnu - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/7/72/20131110112029!God_Vishnu.jpg) for a non-commercial purpose. I would very grateful if you would get in touch with me at agscil9@yahoo.com. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.97.77.81 (talk) 19:32, 19 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Anantashayani Vishnu edit

We have articles at Ananta Shayana and Anantashayana Vishnu. Are these two talking about one and the same idol; both situated in Odisha? And actually, should the article title "Anantashayani Vishnu" or "Anantashayana Vishnu" be actually discussing the form of Vishnu resting on the Shesha rather than one particular sculpture? User:Skysmith/Missing topics about Hinduism has a missing entry for Anantasayin Vishnu. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 13:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dharmadhyaksha, they are talking about different sculptures. I want to write an article on Anantashayani Vishnu or Sheshashayi Vishnu the iconographical form combined with Padmanabha iconographical form some day. After an article is created on the iconographical form, Anantashayana Vishnu and Ananta Shayana should be redirected there, while sculptures be named "Ananta Shayana", Place format.--Redtigerxyz Talk 05:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Okay! Good you have it in your to-dos. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nisargadatta Maharaj edit

Dear Redtigerxyz, does Nisargadatta Maharaj not count as a Hindu guru, saint or philosopher? Nisargadatta Maharaj MerlynDanielMali (talk) 19:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

MerlynDanielMali, The template is for the most prominent gurus, not a list of all gurus.--Redtigerxyz Talk 19:06, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear Redtigerxyz, Okay. Well, I guess prominent is a rather subjective concept. I am sure Nisargadatta would agree! ;) Never mind. Regards, MerlynDanielMali (talk) 19:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Vajreshwari naming confusion edit

Hi, I have recently edited Vajreshwari article and found that a place and temple with similar name exists in Kangra, HP. While the Maharashtra one is known as Vajreshwari or Vajreshvari (also ancient names Vadvali, Vajrabai which can be ignored for titles) and the Himachal one whose article is Vajreshvari is also known as Bajreshwari, Brajeshwari and Brijeshwari. This is the temple name and I dont know if a place by that name exists as the temple is located in Kangra town itself. So I request you give suggestions so that the articles can be moved/renamed, new redirects or a WP:DAB needs to be created. Thanks WorLD8115 (TalK) 04:21, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Badrinath Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garhwal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply


Koenraad Elst (serious BLP violations in a BLP article) edit

There are serious, ongoing and long-term BLP violations in the BLP article Koenraad Elst (see also at the BLP noticeboard).

The BLP article seems to be unstable: Each time someone removes any BLP violations in the article, they are being restored - and an user is again threatening to restore all BLP violations "soon". BLP policy is crucial to be enforced. Because of the very serious NPOV violations in a BLP article, this requires the attention of neutral editors.

The NPOV violations were explained in great detail by the subject of the lemma here:

These links say among other things:

Well, there you have it. The lemma on me has ended up taking this form because some militant among your contributors purposely wanted to “warn readers” against me. Please cite me an instruction for encyclopedists that names “warning” among the legitimate goals of an encyclopedia.
Either you remove the lemma altogether, or you straighten it out and apply the rules of encyclopedia-writing to it. At any rate, in a encyclopedia, I count on being judged for what I myself have said or done, and not for the gossip my declared enemies have come up with.
If Wikipedia wants to live up to its promise of being a reliable encyclopedic source, it will strike this and all sentences resembling it from its article on me. At most, it can use me as an example of how it was fooled by some of its all-too-partisan collaborators. Speaking of whom: the history page accompanying my page proves forever that some Wikipedia collaborators wanted to inflict on me the maximum harm possible, an attitude incompatible with work for an encyclopedia. --Calypsomusic (talk) 12:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Need Clarity edit

Hello Redtiger, i am skandasol, I visited the shiva talk page. In that shiva talk page you agree that Devdutt Pattnaik is a repsctable mythologist. Well said, the way he decodes needs to be appreciated. But, at the same time some members like Muon(yoga master,never respects others), Charles Riheens are of the view that a content needs no change. i am talking about the "Ascetic and Householder"(tale about shasta) page. I strongly feel the story description about Shasta clearly needs some change. They are taking explanation from Wendy Doniger. An Indian Court did ban her book. It's not important to look upon the credibility of the author before taking her explanation as a reliable on?? I strongly feel that references to Wendy Doniger needs to be removed from references tag and description needs to changed. Again Devdutt is far far better in decoding the stories. You are one among those powerful editors who always gets his say won. What's your take on this. Please provide some light on this issue. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skandasol (talkcontribs) 07:54, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Precious again edit

beauty of Hindu mythology
Thank you for revealing the beauty, powerful life and sensuality of Hindu mythology, present in figures such as Ahalya, - a blue jewel should go well with her and a red tiger, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Two years ago, you were the 131st recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:31, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bharat Ratna: Article or List? edit

Hey...If you get a chance, can you please opine here? - Vivvt (Talk) 14:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Rahul Shewale edit

  Hello! Your submission of Rahul Shewale at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Skr15081997 (talk) 04:15, 25 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Shava sadhana edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:43, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

hello Sir edit

Namaskaram, In India how we differentiate regional deities and main deities?!Let me know?!

thank youEshwar.omTalk tome 18:03, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:Eshwar.om, pan-Indian/pan-Hindu deities (also they are mentioned in various scriptures) are mainstream deities. Regional deities enjoy patronage in specific regions (say Kerala, Nepal, South India) eg. Aiyappa, Manasa, Ashokasundari, Aiyappa, Andhaka etc. (all considered children of Shiva, See also Talk:Shiva#Shiva.27s_children); they are restricted to regional scriptures. --Redtigerxyz Talk 18:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Namaskaram Redtigerxyz, first of all thank you for your info. May i know the pan-Indian/pan-Hindu deities details where you got it.you said that they are mentioned in various scriptures?may i know the scriptures names. if you say then which is helpful for me to discuss furher .will you?thank youEshwar.omTalk tome 18:57, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:Eshwar.om, I just gave you a summary of the definition. RS do the classification. Please see Shiva article relevant section where all children are mentioned. It already has references which call them regional. Some other references that call him regional: [4], [5]. Aiyappa also has no reference in the Puranas or any other mainstream scripture. [6] --Redtigerxyz Talk 19:27, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

For further discussion please come to the Talk page of the article,Namaskaram https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Shiva#shiva.27s_son_ayyappaEshwar.omTalk tome 19:43, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Vaikuntha Chaturmurti edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vaikuntha Chaturmurti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ugog Nizdast -- Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rahul Shewale edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:50, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Vaikuntha Chaturmurti edit

The article Vaikuntha Chaturmurti you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Vaikuntha Chaturmurti for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ugog Nizdast -- Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:41, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Dada Masiti edit

  Hello! Your submission of Dada Masiti at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Redtigerxyz Talk 13:38, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Redtigeryz. Thanks for the heads up. If you can point out which exact phrases you are referring to, I would be glad to adjust them accordingly. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Virtually paras 1 and 2 of Biography are copy paste.--Redtigerxyz Talk 05:27, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ok, I've adjusted them. Please have a look; let me know if you see any other phrases that need rewording. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Middayexpress, Please see DYK page.--Redtigerxyz Talk 16:38, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks; I've adjusted the phrases accordingly. Let me know if it's ok now. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 16:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks again. How does "among the most adept female poets in the Bravanese dialect" sound? She is described therein as the "most outstanding poetess" in that particular dialect. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 17:07, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Middayexpress, If we have a ref, can you add the sentence in the lead with a ref. It should be ok. --Redtigerxyz Talk 17:35, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi Redtigerxyz. The assertion is in the same Vianello work as the others. Perhaps it would be better to indicate here that her "poetry was widely memorized and figures strongly in Barawa's poetic heritage" since that's less subjective? Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 16:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Middayexpress, I can approve "among the most adept female poets in the Bravanese dialect", once you put it on the DYK page. Also, "Her poetry was widely memorized and figures strongly in Barawa's poetic heritage" is a copyright violation, too close to the original. Either remove, rephrase or put in quotes. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:21, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Ok thanks. I've reworded that phrase in the body, and changed the DYK to "among the most adept female poets in the Bravanese dialect". Let me know if it's alright now. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 16:47, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Fair use of images depicting gods/goddesses edit

Hello Redtigerxyz, you have removed the fair use image I have added to the article of goddess Pattini citing a violation of WP:NFC. Since the normal copyright laws are also applied to the statues or paintings of goddesses, those work can not be uploaded straight in to Wikipedia under the free accepted licenses. Can you please indicate the section/paragraph of WP:NFC or any other Wikipedia guideline that was violated by this image? In my view, that image does not violate WP:NFCCP and therefore can be used in the article of the goddess. Thank you. -- Shehanw (talk) 15:27, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Shehanw, Criterion 1 "No free equivalent" is violated. Since Pattini is an ancient goddess, at least 1 {{PD-art}} image of the goddess should exist in the world. Else, you or anyone else can paint her picture or sculpt her statue and click it and upload under a wikipedia allowed license.--Redtigerxyz Talk 16:25, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Your theory can be applied to the fair use images of dead persons and album covers too, isn't it? any one can paint or sculpt a statue of a dead person and click it and upload it under an acceptable license. Album covers also can be painted and uploaded with an acceptable license. Hopefully an artist will paint or sculpt the goddess and upload it to Wikipedia one day. If not we have to wait until a wikipedian find that {{PD-art}} image of the goddess that should exist some day. I got it, thanks for the information. --Shehanw (talk) 16:43, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahaganapati, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lotus, Blue lotus and Gada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ashokasundari edit

You had reverted my edit on the article saying that she is worshiped in Gujarat. However she is not worshiped in Gujarat and especially you have no proof that she is worshiped there. Also that news article by Devdutt Patnaik (http://www.speakingtree.in/spiritual-articles/mysticism/shivas-girl-child) is inaccurate and contains many false claims. Devdutt's articles are often filled with inaccuracy and contradictions and that's why this news article about Ashokasundari has not been used a reference in the Ashokasundari article. The article says that she is called Okha and salt is not purchased in her memory in the month of Chaitra. However this is false. No book by any author (except Devdutt himself)on mythology mentions that she is called Okha or that salt is not purchased in her memory. Also the article mentions that she hid behind a sack of salt during Ganesha's beheading however in no book not even in any translation of the Padma Purana itself where she is mentioned says that she was present during Ganesha's beheading. SO tell me do you still want to use this unreliable source by Devdutt Patnaik. This the reason why this unreliable source hasn't been used in the article. You are a much more experienced editor than me should know that we do not mention something on Wikipedia just because it seems that way especially when the source mentioning it is itself unreliable. We only mention it when it is proved beyond doubt that the source mentioning it is reliable and is displaying correct info. MythoEditor (talk) 09:39, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

This Gujarati article [7] also narrates the story of the salt is told. Please note the story is not part of Padma Puranna, but a Gujarati folk tale. --Redtigerxyz Talk 10:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
You should know that we do not use some random website off the internet as a source even if this article is in Gujrati. Also it is written recently in 2014. It could be likely that this article copied the information from Devdutt Patnaik's article. There are many websites that have copied the same thing about Ashokasundari should we use them as source too. That's why we didn't use Devdutt Patnaik's article and we can't use this website as a source too. Do you have any real proof that she is mentioned in Gujrati folk tales like a direct translation of the folk tale where she might have been mentioned? Do you have any proof that she is really worshipped in Gujarat? Like a temple of hers or a ritual? Actually salt is not eaten in Chaitra because of Navaratras not because of Ashokasundari. When sourcing mythological articles we cannot source just some random website of the internet as they might be biased. And I wonder why do you insist so much on adding that Ashokasundari is mentioned in folktales of Gujarat. If she is mentioned in folktales of Gujarat then why doesn't any book about mythology mention it? Also Oneindia.in is actually web portal which bring its information from diverse sources. It is most likely they have copied this information from Devdutt's article since none of the content on their site is original. It is disappointing to see that you will try to insert information about which you have no reliable source. MythoEditor (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Oneindia.in is also a news portal and they have a news section. Anything is which is 2014 does not mean that it is copied from Devddutt's article. --Redtigerxyz Talk 04:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
That is supposedly. However this article's content and Devdutt's article's are very similar. And that is not just because they both are about Ashokasundari. The way these two articles is written is very similar. Also remember that a web portal sources its information from various sources even the news. Also you should know that 's article also appeared in Times of India. Should we use that as a source just because it appeared in a news website? Obviously not. All information must be verified. If you think that a folk tale about a god or a goddess can't appear in a book then think again.Vishnu maya is not mentioned in any scripture. His origins too are folk legends however the source I have used on his article clearly mentions he is a non Sanskritic deity. Also there is a folk tale about Shiva dancing nude to make Kali run away from a forest. However it is mentioned in a book that I read on Google. I am not at all against adding information about Ashokasundari to her article I actually in support of it. However the information should be first proved reliable and true without a doubt. Besides I think it is not such a big deal that the thing about the folk tale can't be added ,even if might be true (which is unlikely). Actually believe me it's not even that much important since the main reason behind creating Ashokasundari article was to prove that there did exist a daughter of Shiva and being able to prove just that is a big achievement in itself. MythoEditor (talk) 11:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Redtigerxyz. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kangana Ranaut/archive1.
Message added 16:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

KRIMUK90  16:31, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I have responded to two of your remaining concerns on the FAC. Do reply when you get a chance. Thanks. -- KRIMUK90  09:12, 25 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Justin Melton DYK nomination edit

Hello, i just want you to know, that the question you asked for me to qualify my DYK nomination for my articles, has been answered, I have expanded it more then 4945 bytes this time, qualifying it as you said. Thank You! -PapaJeckloy (talk) 14:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Mahaganapati edit

  Hello! Your submission of Mahaganapati at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Constantine 11:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference problem on DYK nomination of Justin Melton edit

Hello, i just want to let you know that the problem you are stating on my nomination is fine now, i added references on every section now, i think it is now qualified, please review it if there is other problems ,Thanks! -PapaJeckloy (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2014 (UTC).Reply

Witnesses edit

Thanks for reconsidering. "Students" would be OK too as we don't need to mention the denomination involved I guess. Victuallers (talk) 17:09, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Victuallers, first I thought that it was non-neutral to the controversial Jehovah's Witnesses, then read their article and ref. It seems it was not uncommon for the sect to oppose the national symbols. --Redtigerxyz Talk 17:13, 22 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bhajan in infobox in Bhaktivinoda Thakur edit

Dear Redtigerxyz, I've started a discussion on this topic that you may want to take part in. Many thanks. Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 08:06, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dashavatara edit

its wrong to say buddha is a avatar of vishnu. it is not accepted by hindus. the sources are not right.. maybe budhists (not majority) have a belief like that. plz don't endorse wrong inforation in wikipedia.Rameshnta909 (talk) 12:06, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Which holy puranas says that tell me? Some of the editors aggressively endorsed this view in an article doesn't make it right.. there are numerous versions of dashavatara but the most accepted is krishna as the 9th avatar and balrama as the 8th. It is the most popular list. budha was born in kaliyug. there is only one avatar in kaliyug that is kalki. plz change this nonsense.Rameshnta909 (talk) 12:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Problem on Justin Melton nomination edit

Hello, i just want to let you know that the problem about the copy paste is now fixed on my nomination, no problems were left and it's so smooth now, its qualified now. ], Please review it again if it has some problems, but i am sure, there are none -PapaJeckloy (talk) 14:21, 23 June 2014 (UTC).Reply

Template:Did you know nominations/Justin Melton edit

Hi, please see note on your last DYK review, i assure you this is the last time, but if there is any problems left, i will find an independent reviewer, Thanks in advance -PapaJeckloy (talk) 13:20, 24 June 2014 (UTC).Reply

DYK for Haridra Ganapati edit

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mahaganapati edit

Gatoclass (talk) 08:02, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
For your brilliant article Mahaganapati........Keep it up! Cheers, ƬheStrikeΣagle 14:40, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks User:Strike Eagle, helps to keep up the enthusiasm to contribute here. :) --Redtigerxyz Talk 17:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for June 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Devasena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Tamil, Atman and Tamas
Jayanta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Chitrakuta
Justin Melton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Yorktown
Sarama (Ramayana) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bengali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Problem with Jayanti (Hinduism) edit

  Hello! Your submission of Jayanti (Hinduism) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Sandstein  20:07, 27 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Bala Ganapati edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:35, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Kangana's FAC edit

Hey, I was just wondering what you thought of Krimuk90's responses here AB01 I'M A POTATO 09:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I working on other articles and don't have time to review the entire article. I will take a look later in the evening. --Redtigerxyz Talk 09:30, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Oh ok, thanks! Just a reminder, that's all :-) AB01 I'M A POTATO 09:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
So, we've addressed your 2nd comment. Could you please strike it out to show this? Also, we just have your 1st comment remaining. What do you think of our response? Btw, sorry if it feels like I'm pestering you. It's just that that's the last comment that needs solving.. AB01 I'M A POTATO 02:15, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Naigamesha edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:44, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

FP nomination for Yogapith temple edit

Hello Redtigerxyz. Would you be interested to review the FP nomination for Yogapith temple? Regards, Cinosaur (talk) 07:23, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Jayanta edit

Gatoclass (talk) 18:42, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Samra edit

Hi.. I have reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Sarama. Regards -Nizil (talk) 18:51, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I suggested a tweak on ALT4 and wonder if you could review it. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:17, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yoninah, you are free to review new ALTs or call a new reviewer. I am NOT participating in that "Lunatic" mudslinging match.--Redtigerxyz Talk 04:52, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I wouldn't blame you for pretending you didn't get the ping... edit

...but you are needed at the lunatic asylum. EEng (talk) 06:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sorry -- didn't see the prior section. As already stated I don't blame you. EEng (talk) 06:58, 4 July 2014 (UTC) P.S. If I promise not to dunk you in the Bath of Surprise will you please come back long enough to settle (again) on a solidly sourced ALT? Please?Reply
EEng, (edit conflict) it is not about your humour. That does not upset me. The problem is people provide not so good hooks backed by not so good references and then cry why the reviewer is harassing them. I can't waste my time and mind on a DYK nom, where there is possibility of more mudslinging. The story has ended for me with an unconditional apology. My last edit was just to clarify Skr15081997's doubt about the hook. Sayonara. THE END. PS: I promise to dunk you in the Bath of Surprise if you call or ping there again. :P Disclaimer: The preceding statement is HUMOUR, NOT A THREAT. I suggest EEng, you too start using such disclaimer.--Redtigerxyz Talk 07:12, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mukhalinga
added links pointing to Nandi, Aghora, Asian Art Museum and Agamas
Nala (Ramayana)
added links pointing to Bengali, Javanese and Telugu
Jaratkaru
added a link pointing to Naga
Khandoba
added a link pointing to Aurangabad district
Nila (Ramayana)
added a link pointing to Balinese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Sarama (Ramayana) edit

Gatoclass (talk) 16:03, 4 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Jaratkaru edit

  Hello! Your submission of Jaratkaru at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Nala (Ramayana) edit

Gatoclass (talk) 18:34, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Jaratkaru edit

Gatoclass (talk) 02:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Uchchhishta Ganapati edit

It'a approved! Come back! EEng (talk) 18:41, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I second that. --Storye book (talk) 14:15, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
EEng and Storye book, I respect your sentiments; but I am sorry that the DYK environment is not much coming back. The vague criterion "Within policy – meets core policies and guidelines" is exploited to include all policies in the wiki world e.g. an image review for copyright violations (I don't want to name the DYK). After what happened on Template:Did you know nominations/Glore Psychiatric Museum, where possibly I - the reviewer - was haunted by the demon of the new DYK process and unintentionally hurt people. Also Uchchhishta Ganapati was not a one off case (I don't want to name the others), suddenly a breed of so-called Hinduism "experts" (read DYK reviewers/participants) rose and started interpreting Hinduism and were offended or found gross misrepresentations in the articles. These "experts" were more right (pun intended) than the Hindu right-wing, were offended by heretic Tantra practices; which is not mainstream, but heterodox Hinduism. They were not aware of the fact that a Hindu deity is a complex being venerated by various sects, by various practices for various purposes, alike the Abrahamic God. These individual editors are not to blame, the DYK system and Wikipedia:Systemic bias is to blame. I am sorry again that I can not honour your requests. I hope our paths cross again on wikipedia. --Redtigerxyz Talk 17:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Wow. If only you knew how perfectly what you say reflects my own concerns about DYK, especially the built-in contradiction of 7-day-old articles having to "meet policy", which turns out to mean "meet whatever miscellaneous guidelines the reviewer feels like pointing to", instead of just letting new articles be what they are which is, well, new articles. Well, maybe with time your strength will return. In the meantime, good luck and good editing! EEng (talk) 18:06, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar edit

  The Superstar Award
For your attempt in getting this article listed at WP:VA. I tried once but you did it! Vensatry (ping) 16:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Jayanti (Hinduism) edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:49, 13 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Uchchhishta Ganapati edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:53, 14 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Shiva edit

Dear Redtigerxyz,

I seen your edits on article Shiva.your reverting previous of my edits.No need to present all languages?!.yes! your correct.But i said already Tamil script and Sanskrit script should be present.why this languages should be present.In india they used grandha script for sanskrit.From 15 th century on words northern india they used devanagari script for sanskrit.so these two script mainly should be present.both are classical Literature date backs to more than 300bc.Shiva mentioned in both.so here no language Race.i am talking about vedic Sanskrit and sangam Literature.sangam Literature dates back to Lord krishna's period.i said all the reasons behind.then your wish to thing.My kind request is please read more.Also thing one ,here there is no language or else culture race. thank you.God bless you!Eshwar.omTalk tome 13:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Dharmadhyaksha, I suggest that this message be directed at the article talk or Eshwar's page. I don't think he stalks my talk :P. --Redtigerxyz Talk 12:01, 17 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK Nila edit

Hey, reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Nila (Ramayana) and suggested ALT hook. Please respond. Regards, -Nizil (talk) 17:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing the DYK and the message, Nizil; but I am sorry that your effort of posting here will be in vain. I have quit DYK, because I no more believe in the process in its current state. Sorry again for all the trouble.--Redtigerxyz Talk 18:22, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hey, you should not quit DYK as you are a prolific contributor and we need much more people like you. Anyways Just express your opinion on ALT hook. Regards -Nizil (talk) 18:40, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Nizil, I am sorry for bothering you and I am honoured that you regard me "a prolific contributor". I leave it to you. I will refrain from any page starting from Template:Did you know nominations. I can't break my "Bhishma pratidnya" so soon. :) I hopefully will return when DYK improves. --Redtigerxyz Talk 18:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Bhishma Pratigya. :D Ok, as you wish. Keep contributing, -Nizil (talk) 19:05, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • Woooo!!! When and why did this pratidnya happen? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:30, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
User:Dharmadhyaksha, See User_talk:Redtigerxyz#DYK_nomination_of_Uchchhishta_Ganapati. This was the final blow. I am frustrated by the process. --Redtigerxyz Talk 04:23, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Barnstar of Diligence
For your persistent efforts on WP, I award you this accolade. Radrianne (talk) 12:11, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Trijata edit

  Hello! Your submission of Trijata at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Dahn (talk) 13:34, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing the DYK and the message, Dahn; but I am sorry that your effort of posting here will be in vain. I have quit DYK (Template:Did you know nominations/Uchchhishta Ganapati was the final blow), because I no more believe in the process in its current state. Sorry again for all the trouble. Do what you deem right. --Redtigerxyz Talk 04:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry you took that decision, and I hope you will reconsider -- not for the sake of this nom, but because I dig your editing style, and because you're one of the few who add good content in a very low-key section of wikipedia. ("Low-key" only in the sense that it has been degraded by very poor edits in the past.) Dahn (talk) 05:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Dahn for the appreciation. But DYK has become a psudeo-FAC and we have forgotten that DYK's job was to encourage new articles, and new articles can not be perfect; but DYK now requires them to be perfect. Each word is endlessly scrutinized. All it does inflict agony. I want to live in peace, away from accusations of all sorts from people who hardly understand Hinduism. Sorry again for wasting your time. --Redtigerxyz Talk 09:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Devasena edit

  Hello! Your submission of Devasena at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 22:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing the DYK and the message, Yoninah; but I am sorry that your effort of posting here will be in vain. I have quit DYK (Template:Did you know nominations/Uchchhishta Ganapati was the final blow), because I no more believe in the process in its current state. Sorry again for all the trouble. Do what you deem right. --Redtigerxyz Talk 12:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

email edit

 
Hello, Redtigerxyz. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

John Carter (talk) 19:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please fill out your JSTOR email edit

As one of the original 100 JSTOR account recipients, please fill out the very short email form you received just recently in order to renew your access. Even though you signed up before with WMF, we need you to sign up again with The Wikipedia Library for privacy reasons and because your prior access expired on July 15th. We do not have your email addresses now; we just used the Special:EmailUser feature, so if you didn't receive an email just contact me directly at jorlowitz gmail.com. Thanks, and we're working as quickly as possible to get you your new access! Jake (Ocaasi) 19:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

For your comments and support for Dadasaheb Phalke Award FLC, specially for images. The list is a FL now. Thanks again. - Vivvt (Talk) 14:35, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Help edit

You have provided a settlement ref on Jangaon page. Kindly please do that for this page Karumuri Vari Palem too.Not to be confused with Karumuru (Repalle mandal), Karumuri Vari Palem (Tsundur mandal) (but no proper ref). --Vin09 (talk) 06:56, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Vin09, you can see this place on google maps with pin code 522313, but all sources I found say it is a pin code of Chinagadelavarru, which neither exists on wiikipedia nor on Google maps. So I am confused. Someone from Guntur/Andhra may know. --Redtigerxyz Talk 07:04, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Fine, I know about AP, Telangana related pages, it is much like a hamlet as far as I know, even you cannot see that in sub district related pages of Census India for villages list. Still let's wait and surf more for some info.--Vin09 (talk) 09:07, 27 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Mukhalinga edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:38, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan edit edit

Is it now okay to put the names of non-notable (no blue link) relatives in the infobox as you did here? It was not in the past, so where was that changed? See the doc at Template:Infobox_person. BollyJeff | talk 18:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:Bollyjeff, [8] Aardhya Bachchan seems notable in her own right considering the media frenzy in India similar to the frenzy around the royal child of England. That article did not even name in the article section. Though if you insist, I am okay with removal from infobox, but relevant section should have the name. --Redtigerxyz Talk 18:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Info in sections is good if sourced, but I think the box is for links to other notable people. Why don't you try making an article for her and see what happens? BollyJeff | talk 19:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Bollyjeff, notability required for stand-alone article is different from notability required for mention in other article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:53, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Devasena edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:08, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Devayanai edit

Hi, It says on the Devasena page that "Devayanai" translates to "Divine Elephant" that is, Deva+Aanai. Not correct. Adding "ai" to female names is just something we do in Tamil, like "Seethai" and "Sakuntalai." Nothing to do with elephants. 59.182.155.131 (talk) 15:36, 1 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Panchakanya edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Panchakanya you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:21, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kalmashapada edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kalmashapada you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Devasena edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Devasena you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Nila (Ramayana) edit

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:52, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dashavatara edit

I'm pretty sure I meant a week. Try that anyway and see what happens. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 05:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

You seem to be very passionate about the contents of the page on Mansa Devi. Not sure if you have read any scriptures about her, or are you just relying on the stated references which are obviously there to malign Hinduism by creating fake literature and introducing deliberate misinterpretation. It is sad to see that you are trying to bully other users and believe in your opinion and not in facts. Angirausa (talk) 18:17, 7 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Panchakanya edit

The article Panchakanya you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Panchakanya for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kalmashapada edit

The article Kalmashapada you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kalmashapada for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:41, 11 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nominations/Trijata edit

Hi. Could you take a quick look at either Trijata or Template:Did you know nominations/Trijata? The current hook is good to go, but the article needs a copyedit. At least two (possibly more) editors have tried to copyedit the current version but it still needs work. Viriditas (talk) 01:34, 14 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Viriditas, you and User:Drmies have already done the copyedit. The text looks ok to me. I have made minor changes. --Redtigerxyz Talk 10:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
I have made a new comment. The only thing preventing me from passing this DYK is the "Trijata and Sita" section, which I find impenetrable. Viriditas (talk) 21:52, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Good articles Future GAN Backlog Drive edit

Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

why my article VIN RANA has been deleted edit

Sir My article VIN RANA was about an Indian Telivision star and the article was accepted by Wikipedia and was on it for almost 3 months.now suddenly it has been deleted.may i know why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rashmi11 08 (talkcontribs) 06:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Heramba edit

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

User:EEng, I was pleasantly shocked to see this on main page. This DYK that initiated the decision for the exit from DYK was finally passed and reached main page. Thanks EEng for trusting the article and trying to understand Hinduism. --Redtigerxyz Talk 06:59, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
You may wire my fee to the usual numbered account. EEng (talk) 07:17, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
LOL :P--Redtigerxyz Talk 10:33, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Please consider resuming your contributions to DYK. The atmosphere has improved considerably in the last few months. Maybe just come by for a visit first. EEng (talk) 15:03, 24 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

List of Chola Temples in Bangalore edit

Hi, you have any sources to expand the article? Vensatry (ping) 16:00, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Vensatry, None. Not my area of expertise. --Redtigerxyz Talk 05:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Panchakanya edit

The article Panchakanya you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Panchakanya for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:02, 27 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA Cup edit

Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Review edit

Hello Redtigerxyz! Thanks for your review here. Can you give your comments here too. I would be thankful to you --85.167.232.112 (talk) 14:54, 31 August 2014 (UTC) (FrB.TG)Reply

Which locations? edit

On Ganesha you wrote "...from 1st century CE found in Ter, Pal," what is 'ter', 'pal', can you wikilink it? Bladesmulti (talk) 15:43, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bladesmulti, I just moved the sentences, did not add the sentence. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:58, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
I still don't know what is "Ter, Pal," you have any idea? Bladesmulti (talk) 06:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Kalmashapada edit

The article Kalmashapada you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Kalmashapada for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:02, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Trijata edit

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Good Articles - GA Cup edit

 

WikiProject Good articles is holding a new competition, the GA Cup, from October 1, 2014 - March 28, 2015. The Cup will be based on reviewing Good article nominations; for each review, points will be awarded with bonuses for older nominations, longer articles and comprehensive reviews. All participants will start off in one group and the highest scoring participants will go through to the second round. At the moment six rounds are planned, but this may change based on participant numbers.

Some of you may ask: what is the purpose for a competition of this type? Currently, there is a backlog of about 500 unreviewed Good article nominations, almost an all time high. It is our hope that we can decrease the backlog in a fun way, through friendly competition.

Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors! Sign-ups will be open until October 15, 2014 so sign-up now!

If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the four judges.

Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

To receive future GA Cup newsletter, please add your name to our mailing list.


Can you review the GAN for Maharashtra? edit

Hello again, I was wondering whether you got time for this. I took part in Wikipedia:Peer review/Maharashtra/archive1 and the nominator 25 Cents FC improved and rectified the sourcing in this page, so I feel the GA review should be relatively easy. I've seen a almost six month backlog and I feel your background will help in it getting a better review than a regular GA project member reviewing it eventually. Can you? -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Inchegeri Sampradaya edit

 
Someone's watching! ;)

Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)Reply