User talk:Rdp060707/Archives/2021/January

Rdp060707, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rdp060707! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

About the edit I've made in last June according to city status of Cainta when attained cityhood.

In the Resolution on October 13, 2003.

The municipality of Cainta has built as an Independent component city (ICC) not only a component city.

So, the provincial government tactically, reasoned the boundary disputes of Cainta.

But in these days, the town has been equated the minimum requirement of HUC. So that's why did I estimated Cainta as an HUC in cityhood Adhesivecobra17 (talk) 16:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

@Adhesivecobra17: I can't even find on Google that Cainta will be a highly urbanized city or independent component city, it shows something else, however. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 08:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Awit ng Meycauayan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Awit ng Meycauayan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 10:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Ok, i will comply with this, but i will add some sources. Rdp060707 (talk) 11:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Awit ng Meycauayan (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Awit ng Meycauayan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Awit ng Meycauayan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:37, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

I will comply. Rdp060707 (talk) 05:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Rdp060707, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:37, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Thanks. Rdp060707 (talk) 05:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Awit ng Meycauayan (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Awit ng Meycauayan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Awit ng Meycauayan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Hello. Your recent edit to List of YouTubers appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 11:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

I will be comply with the guidelines, and i will create this soon. Rdp060707 (talk) 11:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tarlac City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kapampangan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for sending this messae to me. I am very good at history, you know? Rdp060707 (talk) 09:06, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malolos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kapampangan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Limasawa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cebuano and Tagalog

Don Marcelino, Davao Occidental (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cebuano

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angelika Dela Cruz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Esperanza.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Rdp060707! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, I am did a mistake on redirection!, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Francis Leo Marcos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francis Leo Marcos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Leo Marcos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Nanay Baby

Hello, Rdp060707

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Nanay Baby, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 22#Nanay Baby.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello Rdp060707, please stop - thank you. Regards --Serols (talk) 07:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok, sorry! Rdp060707 (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Limca Book of Records

Hi - I do not understand your revert, and so it's been reverted. Please do not repeat without proper explanation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.124.32 (talk) 13:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Hey, This user, Materialscientist reverted your edits because you did wrong on this article. Rdp060707 (talk) 13:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi - your reply makes little sense. However, you are in error to claim I 'did wrong on this article' as my edit improved the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.124.32 (talk) 13:14, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

pay attention

Try reading before undoing. It was not vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:AA11:71F0:7A5D:C8FF:FE22:42FD (talk) 02:11, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry. i will not do that again. I will pay attention. But you replaced others, with othees. You need to think your childhood. Rdp060707 (talk) 03:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

stop

	stop
	stop Fuscoferuginous (talk) 04:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Stop reverting everybody's contributions. Why stop? I did not did bad Rdp060707 (talk) 12:19, 7 September 2020 (UTC)stop @Fuscoferuginous: I am still waiting for your comment. Rdp060707 (talk) 12:26, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

I will not stop helping Wikipedia. I said: I denied your claim! I'm only reverted edits that are unconstructive, vandalism, unsourced, false, etc. If i stop, how we can build an encyclopedia? Rdp060707 (talk) 07:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

I added my word to you: If i reverted vandalism or something bad, some contributors thanked me for my fight against vandalism. For you, please stop spreading something false to others! Rdp060707 (talk) 07:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Police misconduct

Hi there,

Thanks for reverting edits to this page: Police misconduct. Just to let you know I have reported this user to administrators for homophobic vandalism.

Cheers, AussieWikiDan (talk) 06:18, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

@AussieWikiDan: You reported this user for doing a bad thing here. That's a very good news! Rdp060707 (talk) 06:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Cheers :) AussieWikiDan (talk) 06:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

-

Your thread has been archived

Hi Rdp060707! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is that the rollback feature possible on devices?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Guy stop Reverting and doing Vandalism

Guy, are you stupid ? Please stop doing Vandalism, please do not change things you are ignorant of. Go Study and read. The plan of presenting the 737 in Museum is over https://www.schwaebische.de/landkreis/bodenseekreis/friedrichshafen_artikel,-neuer-direktor-des-dornier-museums-das-kapitel-landshut-ist-fuer-uns-beendet-_arid,11271127.html

Hello, I did not introduce vandalism to this article, it was a mistake, and I apologized. I think you placed a dot at the end, after my mistake. Rdp060707 (talk) 13:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

I will not do that again. Rdp060707 (talk) 13:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Restore my updation.

I want to talk to you. I have put the correct information. http://www.keralaculture.org/malayalam-language/547 This is the source. Realknowledgesharer90 (talk) 08:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

You put the correct information on some of the articles, but you have being caught for adding copyrighted material and also, removal of content without explaination, as you did at Malayalam. Rdp060707 (Talk and my fight.) 02:25, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Rdp060707. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — Wug·a·po·des​ 22:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

This guy defends slavery

This guy thinks that slaves were "permitted" to live in Georgia rather than being forced, without their consent, without compensation or possibility of freedom, until they died. How's that for editing your talk page in good faith? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FashBasher92 (talk • contribs) 13:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

I think its edits to George Whitefield are in original research. It needs sources or references, so I reverted it and placed a warning on its talk page. Rdp060707 (Talk/My fight against the devil/contributions) 02:19, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you! Firestar464 (talk) 03:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	You've got a thick face! Firestar464 (talk) 03:56, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Méliès film "Joan of Arc"

Georges Méliès' film "Joan of Arc" was shot in the spring of 1900, and not in 1899. Furthermore, the protagonist is Jeanne Calvière and not Jeanne d'Alcy (who plays Giovanna's mother). The source (also cited in the Wikipedia article on the film) is: Malthête, Jacques; Mannoni, Laurent (2008), L'oeuvre de Georges Méliès, Paris: Éditions de La Martinière, p. 106, ISBN 9782732437323

Edit to wiki/Spencer_Davis

Hi,

I am trying to remove false information on this page. Could you please let me know what a constructive reason is for it's removal?

My reason is that I work for the Wyman's - and this information has been deemed false.

I would like to find a solution to removing this information as soon as possible.

Many thanks,

Joseph — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.17.153.15 (talk) 10:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

• 92.17.153.15: My apologies. Please explain on the edit summary before you remove some information that are false. If I did a mistake, or any questions about things, please let me know on my talk page. Thank you very much. ---Rdp060707 (Talk/My fight against the devil/contributions) 12:42, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

News Aggregators

Re: Edit of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_aggregator Upstract was created by the inventor of the single page aggregator popurls, which predates other Social Media Aggregators sites like Digg.com. The site itself is the most recent re-branding. Backstory: https://thomas.medium.com/upstract-21aaa3550fbe — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.146.217.234 (talk) 13:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

@90.146.217.234:: Wikipedia has a policy that any users/editors should avoid adding external links instead of linking it to a article. All users will likely to be blacklisted and there will be a potential chance of being penalized by search engines (I think Google would handle that). If you want to read about this policy, please go to Wikipedia:Spam (Head to the External link spamming section). ---Rdp060707 (Talk/My fight against the devil/contributions) 13:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for warning IP User:62.73.136.123! Firestar464 (talk) 02:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

@Firestar464:: I will display this barnstar that you given to me on my userpage, as other users did. ---Rdp060707 (Talk/My fight against the devil/contributions) 07:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Is there a UAA barnstar? Thank you for appearing at WP:UAA just as frequently as the bot!! Firestar464 (talk) 07:46, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Not English Speedy Deletion

Please do not tag pages for speedy deletion just because they are not written in English. There is no requirement anywhere that pages that are not articles be written in English. Even articles that are written in other languages are not speedy deleted. They are tagged with the {{Not English}} template. If no one translates them, they are moved to Draft, Prod'd or AFD'd but in no case are pages eligible for speedy deletion, solely because they are not written in English. ~ GB fan 10:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@GB fan:: My apologies. I should understand your statement about this, but not to do that again in the future/soon. I am still in good faith. If I did a mistake, or any comments/suggestions about changes, please let me know on my talk page, and sign your comment. Regards and sincerely, ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 12:25, 7 November 2020 (UTC)" at the end. Regards and sincerely,

The military term "BMOW"

The military abbreviation for "Boatswains Mate of the Watch" is indeed "BMOW". Your reversion is incorrect. The U.S. Coast Guard does use this term for the principal enlisted assistant to the Officer of the Deck (OOD). Source: Krietemeyer, George E. (2000). The Coast Guardsman's Manual (Ninth ed.). Naval Institute Press, Annapolis, Maryland. ISBN 1-55750-468-7. Cuprum17 (talk) 16:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

@Cuprum17: Please take a look on this revision: diff. I didn't do incorrect on this revision. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 11:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Melusine Global/sandbox

Hello Rdp060707. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Melusine Global/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost. Thank you. kelapstick^(bainuu) 14:07, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:49, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	That is a truly huge number of edits. Thank you for keeping Wikipedia free of vandalism! NonsensicalSystem(err0r?)(.log) 11:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

@NonsensicalSystem: Thank you very much for giving a barnstar to me. I will place it on my userpage shortly. Stay safe at the time of COVID-19 pandemic! ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 08:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

User talk page message removals

Hi Rdp060707, and thank you for your reports on the vandalism noticeboard. Please note that, according to WP:OWNTALK, editors are allowed to remove most types of content from their own user talk pages, including warnings posted by other editors. Edits such as Special:Diff/989989350 are allowed under the guideline, and should not be reverted or responded to with a warning. However, if an editor removes another editor's message from a third editor's user talk page, this may be disallowed under WP:TPO. I hope this helps. — Newslinger talk 07:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

"vandalism after final warning"

Hi Rdp060707, hope you're doing well. Please be careful that when you write this at AIV, there actually has been vandalism since the final warning. I blocked the IP you reported (generic LTA) but if it were ordinary vandalism I was planning on declining the report because there had been no edits since the final warning. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 08:51, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

@L235: Well, I will understand this and I'll try. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 07:58, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

You are now a Pending Changes Reviewer!

Hi Rdp060707! I've been running into you while patrolling logs and recent changes, and I happened to notice that you don't have the pending changes reviewer rights. I hope you don't mind, but I went through your contributions and I noticed that you're quite active in recent changes patrolling and that you consistently view and undo vandalism and bad faith disruption. I believe that the pending changes reviewer rights would be useful for you to have and that you'd make good use of the tools. Instead of having you formally request the rights at WP:PERM, I went ahead and just gave it to you. This user right allows you to review edits that are pending approval on pages currently under pending changes protection and either accept the edits to make them viewable by the general public, or decline and revert them.

Please keep these things in mind regarding the tool or when you're reviewing any pending changes:

• A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed at Special:PendingChanges.
• A list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed at Special:StablePages.
• Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
• You'll generally want to accept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
• Never accept any pending changes that contain obvious and clear vandalism, blatant neutral point of view issues, copyright violations, or BLP violations.

Useful guidelines and pages for you to read:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline and tutorial on using the rights and reviewing pending changes.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, a summary of pending changes protection, the pending changes user right, and how it applies.
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy section on pending changes protection and its appropriate application and use by administrators.

I'm sure you'll do fine with the reviewer rights - it's a pretty straight-forward tool and it doesn't drastically change the interface that you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my user talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, or if you're not sure if you should accept or revert pending changes to a page - I'll be more than be happy to help you. If you no longer want the pending changes reviewer rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove it for you. Thank you for helping to patrol recent changes and keep Wikipedia free of disruption and vandalism - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:25, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Thank you very much for this message. It is a pleasure to help build Wikipedia as a encyclopedia. I will end vandalism and disruption, to make it understandable. Regards, ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 06:08, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Rdp060707 - I know you will. ;-) Keep up the excellent work! I'm happy that you're here with us. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Thank you very much once again. Be safe and strong. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 06:13, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome. Same to you - be safe and be well. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

SPI

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Please read WP:ILLEGIT before reporting more socks. Cabayi (talk) 09:39, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

@Cabayi: I have read about that right now. I am apologized for this. I will try my best as a user of Wikipedia, and I should be careful. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 13:34, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi, did you check what my edit did?

Actually take a peek before assuming an IP is a vandal. Thanks! --50.72.215.179 (talk) 06:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, 50.72.215.179. Sorry for my mistake. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 06:46, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

No worries. I fix errors as I find them. As you can tell, it seems to be a common thing for me. Can't be bothered to log into my account these days. Have a good evening. --50.72.215.179 (talk) 06:48, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec20}} to your friends' talk pages.

@Donner60: Tomorrow is December 25, Christmas Day. A holiday of joy. That's what I said. Merry Christmas and may god bless you! ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 07:04, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

My Edits You Reverted in Nepal Tourism

Hi Rdp060707,

The edit that I made was to give a brief idea/information to the users who is planning to take Nepal Trip. If a person is searching Nepal Tourism on Wikipedia means he intend to take the trip & for that, he needs a plan i.e an itinerary. My external link was to that itinerary section only, so why do you think that it was not relevant for the users. Can you please fix it & explain me he reason why removed it.? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashirwad.gkp (talk • contribs) 09:07, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

@Ashirwad.gkp: This is because it appears to be promotional. And also, that is the addition of unnecessary/inappropriate external links. Please read WP:ELPOINTS/WP:ELNO (Wikipedia:External links) for more information. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 13:22, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

@Rdp060707: It was not a promotional link. I was neither marketing anything nor having the intent to sell. It was just for the information of the user, that which tour itineraries they can plan. So, I advise you to let the link be as it is, because it will help users who are planning their trip t Nepal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashirwad.gkp (talk • contribs) 07:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

I indef'ed and Yamla declined the unblock-request. DMacks (talk) 16:04, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Ramanujan Math Society

Hello User,

 Recently I ,made few changes to Ramanujan Math society page. But you reverting back the changes, can you please let me make changes. You can cross with data in site I have taken new updates from live site. Thank you  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshianil89 (talk • contribs) 06:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC) 

@Joshianil89: Please provide a reliable source. See WP:CITE and a tutorial on how to provide it. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 15:06, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

World Wide Web

Sorry, I reverted your reversion on the WWW page. I had meant to go back to go back three or four versions. All sorted, now. Langcliffe (talk) 08:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

@Langcliffe: No worries. Please take a look on any revisions before reverting it. Thank you! ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 11:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Occasionally, three or four times, I have made a mistake during my 4000+ edits made over the past 12 years, and each time I have apologised to the editor in question. Fortunately, for my peace of mind, the others did not find it to necessary to be quite so patronising in their response. Langcliffe (talk) 12:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Regarding accusation of sockpuppetry

Hello! Please see my comments in the sockpuppet investigation of Mark Maglasang. I believe you have misconstrued my editing at the article Xander Ford. As you can see, I added Xander’s photo along with editing some things in the page since it was vague and lacking clarity at some extent. Thank you. TheHonchoMindset (talk) 11:21, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

@TheHonchoMindset: Please read on the investigation that I said. Take a look on one of your diffs on the article. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 08:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I have. Please do not subject me to false accusations. Sockpuppetry is a serious issue here on WP and you shouldn't just accuse anyone whom you think is guilty of such. Revisit the edit history. My edits prove your claim otherwise. Thanks, friend. TheHonchoMindset (talk) 10:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

@TheHonchoMindset: I denied these claims. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 02:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

You’re denying your claims? Which means your claims are wrong? Is that so? Then you might as well close the SPI investigation. Do not wrongfully accuse others of this blunder. You are in bad faith. >:( TheHonchoMindset (talk) 09:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Hugh Dillon

Hi,

I'm updating Hugh Dillon's page can you please stop changing it back until I have sorted it out please. All information I post will be correct and accurate.

If you can work with me on this I would appreciate it.

Many thanks

--Quebear40 (talk) 11:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

@Quebear40: I have only reverted the edits that are not in compliance with WP:BLP. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 08:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

UAA report

Just as a note, I think you selected the wrong option with this link. I assume you wanted that the "name represents a well-known living person" option per Michael Fassbender. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

La Poem

Hello,

I saw your message about removing external links, but I can't find my recent draft that I've been working on in the past hours. Where can I find it? The draft I see is the one I left on the 13th.

Thank you! LavicP73 (talk) 09:23, 21 January 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LavicP73 (talk • contribs) 08:57, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Just a heads up...

You have advertised your YouTube channel on a page called 'Fort King' on the 30th of September, 2020. Please follow Wikipedia rules, as not following will lead to warnings, bans, etc. (Also, please correct me if I am mistaken) WikiLove Goat (talk) 15:00, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

@WikiLove Goat: I did not promote/advertise a YouTube channel on the article. I have only reverted the edits for advertising/promotion, and on October 8, the another user reverted advertisement further. ----Rdp060707 (Your questions?/My fight against the devil) 03:43, 23 January 2021 (UTC)