Rawal Bishal, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Rawal Bishal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of KMC School edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on KMC School, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  GILO   A&E  16:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Prakasheshowar Mahadev Temple edit

 

The article Prakasheshowar Mahadev Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Daiyusha (talk) 07:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kumar Panta edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kumar Panta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019 edit

 

Hello Rawal Bishal. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Bhaban Bhatta, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rawal Bishal. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rawal Bishal|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Daiyusha (talk) 16:11, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kumar Panta edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kumar Panta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Nahal(T) 08:25, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019 edit

 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Rawal Bishal, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rawal Bishal|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Daiyusha (talk) 14:24, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

October 2019 edit

 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Daiyusha (talk) 19:50, 1 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you very much for declaring that on my talk page, although it may have been enough to just reply here on your own talk page. Daiyusha (talk) 04:00, 2 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Malikarjun Temple edit

 

The article Malikarjun Temple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources at all. Please add a news article, website or something, that says this is a famous temple.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Daiyusha (talk) 15:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your userpage edit

Please do not post personally identifying information, such as your real name, date of birth, school, contact details or Facebook profile on your Wikipeida userpage. The content you added has been suppressed from the page's history. If you post such information again, your account will be blocked for your own safety. You should read Wikipeida's guidance for younger editors before continuing to edit. Yunshui  14:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

October 2019 edit

  One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. GirthSummit (blether) 15:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Further to the above automated notice, I wanted to explain my concerns more fully. A page you recently created, Durgesh thapa, was unambiguously copied and pasted from this site - I have deleted it as a copyright violation. You must not copy and paste material from websites into Wikipedia articles, or even into draft space or user space - we cannot host material that is protected by copyright anywhere on the site. Furthermore, the material was obviously promotional, so even if it had not been a violation it would most likely have deleted it under as promotional. If you have any questions about this you can contact me on my talk page, but if you create any further promotional articles, or articles that do not comply with our copyright policies, you risk having your account blocked. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 15:23, 26 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sumika Boyrachasya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kumari (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 27 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2019 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kalapani territory, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Please discuss on the talk page and achieve WP:CONSENSUS Kautilya3 (talk) 17:06, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

The thing written in Kalapani territory is biased.  This has ignored historical evidences which is against wikipedia's policy. The thing which I have incorporated is based on historical evidences provided by former Surveyor General of Nepal and he is the expert of landscape and territory. Rawal Bishal (talk) 17:16, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

If it is biased, you are welcome to raise it on the talk page and we can discuss it. But by doing guerrilla edits like the above, you are setting a bad example to the others. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kalapani territory, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Gotitbro (talk) 04:22, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Kalapani territory. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Trying to get your point of view inserted by colluding with other selected editors through WP:Canvassing is a no go especially WP:STEALTH canvassing through email. Discuss on the article's talk page transparently rather than engaging as such or you might be reported and blocked.

Foreign Employment moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Foreign Employment, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 17:06, 18 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

New message from DBigXray edit

 
Hello, Rawal Bishal. You have new messages at Kautilya3's talk page.
Message added 18:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

DBigXray 18:33, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
@DBigXray, Thanks for informing about it to me.

ARBIPA sanctions alert edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 00:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring again edit

Hi Rawal, you have received ample warnings about edit warring already, and the article was protected due to it. You can't do that again. Any admin looking at this won't wait for 3RR to be crossed. Please be warned. You need to engage on the talk page properly and achieve CONSENSUS. Or, take it to WP:DRN. Your choice. But no more edit-warring please. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 00:19, 20 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2019 edit

  Your addition to School Sector Development Plan (2016-2023)~Nepal has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing.Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

School Sector Development Plan (2016-2023)~Nepal edit

Hello, and thank you for submitting the article for Wikipedia Asian Month. Unfortunately, as much of the article content was copied from other sources and has since been removed, the article is now below 300 words and this is ineligible for acceptance. Please expand the article further, using original wording and without copying from elsewhere, so that the article can be accepted. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:41, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

SAG Update edit

I have just noticed that you are frequently changing statistics. I don't see any hurry in updating statistics. Let the website be updated properly. You can update the same at the article once the website is fully updated, let's say update at 10pm. Dey subrata (talk) 15:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


@Dey subrata Yeah its ok for it but we should be punctual and keep the right information because there are many people who watch wikipedia for correct information. For more discussion we can go on talk page. Rawal Bishal (talk) 15:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nepal men's national volleyball team moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Nepal men's national volleyball team, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:10, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2019 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at School Sector Development Plan (2016-2023)~Nepal. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rawal Bishal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

According to the my knowledge I don't think that motto, rules and other such things can be changed because if we do any change there the whole sense will be changed. Lastly, I apologize for doing such activity and I promise not to repeat it in future. Please unblock me. 👌Rawal Bishal👍 (talk) 00:03, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

What you copy-pasted can hardly be described as "motto or rules". Huon (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rawal Bishal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I apologize for my mistake and I promise not to repeat it again. I will edit and create articles without having copyright violations. Please unblock me. 👌Rawal Bishal👍 (talk) 14:36, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

  • What is copyright?
  • How is Wikipedia licenced?
  • Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
  • Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
  • How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yunshui  15:41, 10 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rawal Bishal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry for delay. According to me copyright is something which is the right of owner of their property and cant be used by others without permission of the owner. Allowing copyright in wikipedia can be a serious problem because of many claims that will be done by the owner. Now, If I get unblocked then I will write everything avoding copyright on my own words. Please unblock me.👌Rawal Bishal👍 (talk) 02:53, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You were asked specific questions. You will not be unblocked unless you answer them all. I'll note that your first answer is wrong, and you didn't bother to answer other questions. Yamla (talk) 11:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of School Sector Development Plan (2016-2023)~Nepal edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on School Sector Development Plan (2016-2023)~Nepal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://moe.gov.np/assets/uploads/files/SSDP_Book_English_Final_July_5,_2017.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ❯❯❯ S A H A 09:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Foreign Employment (March 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 06:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Nepal men's national volleyball team concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nepal men's national volleyball team, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Nepal men's national volleyball team edit

 

Hello, Rawal Bishal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nepal men's national volleyball team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Foreign Employment edit

 

Hello, Rawal Bishal. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Foreign Employment".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Portal:Paragliding at the 2019 South Asian Games" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Portal:Paragliding at the 2019 South Asian Games and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 17#Portal:Paragliding at the 2019 South Asian Games until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk) 15:16, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Chamoru Wikipedia edit

Hi! How are you? I've seen that you speak Chamoru and I would like to ask you whether you could help out at the Chamoru Wikipedia. Thank you for your time. --Caro de Segeda (talk) 10:20, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply