User talk:PrairieKid/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

A brownie for you!

Thank you for your thorough review of Mario Ramírez Treviño! Don't worry about the delay, however. Your review comments will surely help me in my future projects. It was a pleasure to work with you. Happy editing! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 05:41, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Howard Dean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert Sarvis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Sarvis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Sarvis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 20:56, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Dan Wolf

Hi, could you please take a look at my peer review? I'm trying to get it to GA status and I would like some other opinions. Thanks, and I'm sorry for the scary notification alert! Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 05:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New York City comptroller election, 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservative Party (United States) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Your Edits to Annise Parker

Hello PrairieKid! Recently you edited Annise Parker to change the word, controller to comptroller. That edit has been reverted as it was not correct. According to the City of Houston's own website , Annise Parker was City Controller from 2004 - 2010. Cheers, Dillard421♂♂ ^{(talk to me)} 21:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Oops. Thank you for letting me know. The two words are similar, and many think "comptroller" is "controller" and I hadn't heard of an actual "controller" before. I should have done my research before making the edit to make sure. Have a good one. PrairieKid (talk) 21:53, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

No Worries, I added additional references around the object of discussion, just in case anyone else is curious. :) I actually had to look it up myself, I have heard of a city controller, but never really knew what it was. Dillard421♂♂ ^{(talk to me)} 22:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK for New York City comptroller election, 2013

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
5		R. J. Harris (politician) (talk)						Add sources
232		Political party strength in U.S. states (talk)						Add sources
13		Richmond Outreach Center (talk)						Add sources
84		United States presidential nominating convention (talk)						Add sources
446		International Phonetic Alphabet chart for English dialects (talk)						Add sources
139		Hassan Rouhani presidential campaign, 2013 (talk)						Add sources
11		Ben McKee (talk)						Cleanup
65		Mohsen Rezaee (talk)						Cleanup
1,528		Old English (talk)						Cleanup
11,044		PRISM (surveillance program) (talk)						Expand
896		Kristin M. Davis (talk)						Expand
55		United States gubernatorial elections, 2010 (talk)						Expand
66		PolitiFact.com (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
102		Argument from poor design (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,973		Conspiracy theory (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
214		Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (talk)						Merge
5		Special elections to the 111th United States Congress (talk)						Merge
903		State of Palestine (talk)						Merge
36		Rick Larsen (talk)						Wikify
71		United States House of Representatives elections, 2006 (talk)						Wikify
3,398		Republican Party (United States) (talk)						Wikify
1		United States Senate elections in Delaware (talk)						Orphan
1		Delaware gubernatorial elections (talk)						Orphan
1		Missouri's 27th Senate district (talk)						Orphan
5		United States Senate Health Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging (talk)						Stub
50		Virginia's 10th congressional district (talk)						Stub
42		Politics of the Southern United States (talk)						Stub
46		Maher El-Beheiry (talk)						Stub
9		South Dakota gubernatorial election, 2010 (talk)						Stub
28		Dominican Republic passport (talk)						Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Title of Comptroller election

Just so we don't get into another edit war, I posted the recent issue of the title of the article on the talk page. I can 100% understand that the names of the infoboxes must match the titles of the article but, the title of the article is wrong. Comptroller should be capitalized as it is an official government position. In the 2009 election, Comptroller was capitalized, as it should be. Would love to get your feedback. - DONALDderosa (talk) 15:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

First off, we didn't get into an edit war in the first place. If you ever get into one (which you never should), you'll know. Second, the 2009 election is also wrong. According to the policies I cited and their application, it should be a lowercase. If you look to any article (besides the 2009 article, which I have fixed) the infoboxes match the title, unless they are in a series. Here, it isn't a matter of opinion. It is simply following a policy. PrairieKid (talk) 16:24, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK RfC

• As a listed GA participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should be eligible to appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat|Contributions03:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Maia Mitchell

Just so you know, the IP edit you accepted at Maia Mitchell was a copyvio and had to be reverted. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

When accepting edits, I only look at the immediate edit. I should have nominated the image for Speedy Deletion, but as long as it remained on the wiki, I felt I should let the edit stand. Next time, I will nominate and will wait to accept the edit until the discussion on deletion is completed. And thanks for letting me know! PrairieKid (talk) 21:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

There's no reason to wait on the edit. Just revert it right away (and then tag) if the image linked to is a copyvio (and there's no good content). Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

OK! I'm still pretty new to reviewing edits, and that was one of the rules I wasn't completely certain about. Thanks for the clarification! PrairieKid (talk) 22:05, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Mario Ramírez Treviño

He just got captured! Now I'm more glad the article got reviewed. [1] Thanks again! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 18:38, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm glad he was found and captured!!! I'm really glad the article is at a GA level, as it is going to get a LARGE amount of traffic. Thank you for your continued coverage of him, along with other cartels. As the US considers immigration reformation and drug legalization, while Mexico amps up its own force, those people become that much more important! PrairieKid (talk) 23:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
48		United States Senate elections, 1998 (talk)						Add sources
206		Braselton, Georgia (talk)						Add sources
281		Stefon (talk)						Add sources
150		Solid South (talk)						Add sources
150		Modding (talk)						Add sources
817		President (talk)						Add sources
2,450		Democratic Party (United States) (talk)						Cleanup
40		Domestic policy of the George W. Bush administration (talk)						Cleanup
701		James Dasaolu (talk)						Cleanup
20		United States Senate election in Illinois, 2010 (talk)						Expand
5		Draft Ron Paul movement (talk)						Expand
69		Federal Reserve Transparency Act (talk)						Expand
52		Laurence Kotlikoff (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,408		Eric Holder (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,226		Google Drive (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
13		Topi (cap) (talk)						Merge
2,053		Tea Party movement (talk)						Merge
37		Matching gift (talk)						Merge
196		Kelly Ayotte (talk)						Wikify
9,531		Mohamed Morsi (talk)						Wikify
40		United States Senate election in Indiana, 2012 (talk)						Wikify
1		Missouri's 33rd Senate district (talk)						Orphan
23		GASB 45 (talk)						Orphan
1		Missouri's 25th Senate district (talk)						Orphan
24		Idaho's 2nd congressional district (talk)						Stub
8		Liberty Defined (talk)						Stub
30		Soraia Chaves (talk)						Stub
7		Brazosport Independent School District (talk)						Stub
9		United States Senate election in New Jersey, 2000 (talk)						Stub
90		United States Senate election in South Carolina, 2014 (talk)						Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day

Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.

Quality

Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content

Is more content needed?

Headings

Does this article have an appropriate section structure?

Images

Is the number of illustrative images about right?

Links

Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?

Sources

For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

ASL GAR

Hi PrairieKid, I wanted to check in about the GAR for American Sign Language. Let me know whether you plan on continuing with it, or if you'd like another reviewer to take it up. Best, Mo-Al (talk) 22:24, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Woh. I'm very sorry. Real life got in the way of Wikipedia for a while. Last Tues.-Mon. I worked about 75 hours at the Vancouver Wine and Jazz Festival in Vancouver, Washington. I spent all of the next 2 days asleep and am still recovering. I don't know what happened during the 5 days before that and how I managed to forget. Please forgive me. I will begin my review ASAP!!!!! PrairieKid (talk) 00:51, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

No problem -- just wanted to check in. Take your time. Best, Mo-Al (talk) 01:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Carol Paul AfD

FYI I have posted Carol Paul for AfD. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 14:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

In all honesty, I don't think that it will survive the AfD. However, I wanted the opportunity to make my case and wanted us to follow procedure. Just deleting a page isn't the proper way to go about it. Thanks. PrairieKid (talk) 17:06, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

It might survive -- take a look at the various reviews her cookbook received, now part of the article. Regarding procedure, the WP:BLAR is an acceptable one. Carol's contributions are now in the Ron Paul article, and the BLAR gave a redirect right to that section. Reverting the BLAR left little choice; e.g., leave as is or AfD it. Posting the AfD had a beneficial impact because another editor came in and spiffed it up. That often happens. – S. Rich (talk) 22:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liz Pike (September 3)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Liz Pike.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 18:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello! PrairieKid, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

This was denied in January...? Why am I getting this message now? PrairieKid (talk) 18:41, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Substing templates

Hi! I just wanted to leave you a quick reminder. When using certain templates (such as welcome templates and user warnings) on talk pages, don't forget to substitute them by adding subst: to the front template tag. For example, use {{subst:uw-test1}} instead of {{uw-test1}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. Cheers, — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 01:19, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Cory Booker

These statements are not cited. They should have citation or be removed. I'm a novice and do not know how to easily communicate with people here, but I will not stop editing the opening of the Cory Booker article until action is taken. These statements are dubious and do not have citations. They must go, or have citation. It's easy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.162.18.52 (talk) 23:20, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Please start a discussion on the administrators' board. I will continue editing until that discussion has been resolved. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.162.18.52 (talk) 23:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Source for Cory Booker living on food stamps is a youtube video of Cory Booker saying he lived on food stamps. All other "citations" are equally dubious. As I said before, I'm fine continuing to add the citation needed tag. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.162.18.52 (talk) 23:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Please start a section on the Talk Page so we can work through this issue. Thanks. 209.162.18.52 (talk) 23:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)