User talk:Miyagawa/Archive 18

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

→

Archive 25

WikiCup announcements. NOT.

I don't think it appropriate for you to spam WikiCup announcements to WikiProjectss. Most of the other messages spammed to WikiProjects either related to WikiProject management in general or to tools available to WikiProjects. In other words, I don't see how the WikiCup assists WikiProjects, or how WikiProjects should assist the WikiCup. If you cannot explain reasoning why they should be there, please do not do it again, and, if possible, try to remove the sections you've spammed. The only reason I haven't removed it from two of the WikiProjects I'm active in is that my bandwidth or connection time is limited, and WP:UNDO doesn't work on large pages, such as WikiProject talk pages. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:08, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your opinion. Those notices were deliberately posted to the WikiProjects whose subjects have featured heavily in the WikiCup over the years as well as several highly active projects who have been under represented in an attempt to work against systematic bias in the production of featured content. I see the WikiCup assisting WikiProjects by providing an means of encouragement to editors to enter into content creation/improvement as well as a sense of achievement to those editors, which in turn encourages retention. There was no intention to cause offence, and while it may seem like spamming because of these targetted posts in some areas (particulary the sciences), I never sought to add these notices to all Projects or even what can been seen as a majority of them. Miyagawa (talk) 11:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Invitation

	You've been invited to be part of WikiProject Cosmology
	Hello. Your contributions to Wikipedia have been analyzed carefully and you're among the few chosen to have a first access to a new project. I hope you can contribute to it by expanding the main page and later start editing the articles in its scope. Make sure to check out the Talk page for more information! Cheers Tetra quark (talk) 19:48, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year Miyagawa!

Happy New Year!

Miyagawa,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Your GA nomination of Star Trek (2013 video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Star Trek (2013 video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 16:21, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Hey, just pinging you that I've completed an initial review on the GA page. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 16:06, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! I've been away with work so haven't had a chance to edit, but I did read the review. I intend to give it a thorough copyedit over the weekend. Miyagawa (talk) 19:08, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Osama bin Laden (elephant)

Would you take a look at the red link for the location in the infobox. This is the kind of compulsive question that someone at DYK will get hung up about. Thanks. Happy New Year! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:19, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikicup: What the fuck?!

What the fuick are you even thinking? You ignored all discussion, you ignored the vote going against what you implemented, you pulled a one FP per article rule out of your ass, with no discussion whatsoever on it...

This is a travesty. I'm seriously considering nominating the Wikicup for WP:MFD over this, because it seems to be more divisive than helpful now. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 18:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Adam, let me be clear. J and Ed put up with a lot of stuff from you last year. I am far less inclined. While I have no issue whatsoever with you posting your views on the Cup talk page, a personal attack such as this on my talk page will not be tolerated and will result in you being kicked out of the Cup if it is repeated. Miyagawa (talk) 20:31, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Look, let me put this bluntly, but more politely. I am very, very upset that you ignored pretty much every consensus actually reached about FPs. And I cannot see any merit or consensus in any of your changes: the bonus scheme is ruined by changing the hard-won agreement on the base to start the bonus scheme from from 30 to 20. People voted 4:1 to keep sets from being devalued; you added rules to state one image per article can get points, apparently not knowing, or just ignoring, what a set was - a set of images, usually from a single article.

Nergaal, I, and others spent most of a month trying to create a compromise on FPs that all of us were happy with. And this was ignored. The only thing implemented in it was the bonus scheme, which was meant to soften the blow of a reduction of base and set FP points by keeping the most valuable images at or even above the old value. Instead, only a tiny, tiny, TINY proportion of images will even come close to the old value.

Hell, the one FP per article rule isn't even enforceable in any but the most trivial cases: If image A is in articles 1, 2, and 3, and image B in articles 2 and 3, does B get points? Propagate that question over all possible and extremely common possibilities, and see if you can still get a sensible rule out of it.

I hope this makes my objections and upset clear, and explains my annoyance. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 21:11, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

How about let's keep this on the WikiCup page, where everyone can see the discussions, eh? --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 21:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Copied over. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 21:39, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter

Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs)
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Captive Pursuit

The article Captive Pursuit you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Captive Pursuit for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 11:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Instead of a cheque...

		The Running Man Barnstar
		Thank you for all you have done to help me with the Boat Race articles. Tonight we hit a landmark, over 50% of the race articles are now Good or Featured Articles, which is a monumental achievement considering that none of the articles even existed eight months ago. Thanks again. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Rescue barnstar

	Lifesaver 1st class
	Rescued Fred Phillips and a DYK to boot. "When life gives you lemons, make lemonade!" 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

AN notice

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Requesting consensus review/input on dispute at WP:WikiCup". Thank you. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:47, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited René Echevarria, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ABC and Intelligence (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Half a Life (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

The article Half a Life (Star Trek: The Next Generation) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Half a Life (Star Trek: The Next Generation) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 11:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Lolani

Hello! Your submission of Lolani at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 19:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Katherine Pulaski

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Katherine Pulaski you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 06:00, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Q-Less

The article Q-Less you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Q-Less for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 09:40, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 9

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 9, November-December 2014
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs)

• New donations, including real-paper-and-everything books, e-books, science journal databases, and more
• New TWL coordinators, conference news, a new open-access journal database, summary of library-related WMF grants, and more
• Spotlight: "Global Impact: The Wikipedia Library and Persian Wikipedia" - a Persian Wikipedia editor talks about their experiences with database access in Iran, writing on the Persian project and the JSTOR partnership

Read the full newsletter

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Daedalus (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 02:40, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

GA Cup Barnstar

	The Good Article Barnstar for the GA Cup
	You made it to Round 3! Thank-you for being part of the success for the first GA Cup! We hope to see you next year! --Dom497 (talk) 03:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Survivor (Star Trek: The Animated Series)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Survivor (Star Trek: The Animated Series) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 20:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
3		HaPijamot (season 7) (talk)						Add sources
4		Steve Carlip (talk)						Add sources
1,524		Star Trek (film franchise) (talk)						Add sources
6		The Bob Newhart Show (season 3) (talk)						Add sources
45		Storm Front (Star Trek: Enterprise) (talk)						Add sources
295		Uhura (talk)						Add sources
56		Star Trek DAC (talk)						Cleanup
16		John Winston (actor) (talk)						Cleanup
21		Hawaii Five-O (season 2) (talk)						Cleanup
41		Broken Bow (Star Trek: Enterprise) (talk)						Expand
70		Parallels (Star Trek: The Next Generation) (talk)						Expand
115		Time's Arrow (Star Trek: The Next Generation) (talk)						Expand
233		United Federation of Planets (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
643		Sequel (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
30		Findmypast (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,666		Grumpy Cat (talk)						Merge
100		Ben Lashes (talk)						Merge
34		Autism spectrum disorders in the media (talk)						Merge
26		Hero Worship (Star Trek: The Next Generation) (talk)						Wikify
1,602		George Takei (talk)						Wikify
697		Walter Koenig (talk)						Wikify
3		Andrey Muravyov (talk)						Orphan
1		Arcot Desai (talk)						Orphan
0		Aleksei Latushkin (talk)						Orphan
5		The Larry Sanders Show (season 2) (talk)						Stub
64		Teresa Gallagher (talk)						Stub
10		Stratagem (Star Trek: Enterprise) (talk)						Stub
6		Jon Povill (talk)						Stub
148		Peter Rodger (talk)						Stub
429		Plan B Entertainment (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Re: Morality play

As above, it's unusual for a TNG episode to be a blatent morality play (although I think that the show works best when they are).

Heh. I'm not going to give up so easily. :-) I just ran across this Brannon Braga quote you might like: "Every episode and movie of Star Trek is a morality tale in which human beings find solutions to conflict through enlightenment and reason. Through science. Through wit and intellect. Through a belief in our potential as animals that can supercede our baser instincts." Viriditas (talk) 06:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

I'd argue that certainly Voyager and Enterprise wandered off from the morality play trail quite a few times - although I think that DS9 was chock full of them. Miyagawa (talk) 09:16, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't know if that's true about Voyager, but yes, something changed with Enterprise. Although I certainly enjoyed Enterprise, the pacing, editing, and direction was "off" compared to earlier Trek shows, and somewhere along the line, the important aspects of the morality play got lost or subsumed into less important aspects of the narrative. To me, at least, I felt like their wonderful cast was held back and prevented from being truly great. I noticed there were serious problems with the dialogue, for example, in Daedalus. So perhaps the writing is to blame. Viriditas (talk) 19:47, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

There was a lot of crappy studio involvement in Enterprise. For starters the entire premise of the first season was changed (although I don't know if it was for the better or worse), then they started trying to shoehorn awful ideas in - there was a running thing about they wanted bands to be able to appear via a holodeck of some sorts in order to attract younger viewers (I wish I was kidding). There was an improvement in seasons three and four, but season two killed the show. If you want to watch some awful Trek, pick some random episodes from there. But some episodes are tremedous on Enterprise - Manny Coto's first writing job is a stand out for me - make sure you watch "Similitude" at some point. Miyagawa (talk) 12:54, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Q-Less

The article Q-Less you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Q-Less for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 10:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Survivor (Star Trek: The Animated Series)

The article The Survivor (Star Trek: The Animated Series) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Survivor (Star Trek: The Animated Series) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 07:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Lolani

The DYK project (nominate) 08:44, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Submissions

@Miyagawa: When do you check submissiions for WikiCup. Because I have a submission and my points total isn't updated. Yoshi24517^Chat _Absent 18:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

It would be automatically added to the table based by the bot. However, I'm afraid that since the review hasn't yet been closed then the review isn't valid for points. Additionally, it falls foul of the very short rule based on the section you added - so it wouldn't count even if it had been closed already. Miyagawa (talk) 21:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

@Miyagawa: Just a quick question. Isn't it supposed to be 1000 bytes though? Yoshi24517^Chat _Absent 21:57, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

The scoring guidelines state "As a rough guide, no review shorter than 1000 bytes will be considered, though the judges reserve the right to remove other short reviews. This is not to say that such short reviews are not worthwhile, it is merely to say that they will not be recognised in this competition." The paragraph you added to the review was just over a thousand, but your second edit appeared to be padding to take it over the 1000 limit. That's just my personal opinion. Miyagawa (talk) 22:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Katherine Pulaski

The article Katherine Pulaski you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Katherine Pulaski for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 23:20, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Fred Phillips (makeup artist)

The DYK project (nominate) 09:14, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Survivor (Star Trek: The Animated Series)

The article The Survivor (Star Trek: The Animated Series) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Survivor (Star Trek: The Animated Series) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seattle -- Seattle (talk) 20:21, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

WP:PALon Collaboration of the Month

Hi Miyagawa, is there anything you can add to Victoria Memorial, London with your access to news archives? Best, Ham II (talk) 10:51, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem, will do - and I'll stick collaboration page on my watchlist too. Miyagawa (talk) 12:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Wow, that was quick! Thank you so much! Ham II (talk) 13:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup

Hi, can I submit this one at here? Regards, --Khadar Khani (talk) 15:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

@Sahara4u: If it'd been nominated in 2015 then there wouldn't be a problem as you did enough work on it to say it's significant (anyone who says that formatting tables isn't significant needs to try it!!). However the scoring rules state "Content must have been worked on and nominated during the competition" - which means the nomination needed to happen during 2015 in order to qualify I'm afraid. Miyagawa (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

This was nominated on 9 December 2014, but promoted on 18 January 2015! --Khadar Khani (talk) 16:34, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Exactly, according to the rules, the nomination needs to take place during one of the cup rounds for that year. The promotion can then happen in any round (i.e. you could nominate in round 3 and not be promoted to round 5 and then claim in the points in round 5). As it was nominated on 9 December 2014, the FL wasn't nominated during the 2015 cup as that didn't start until 1 January 2015. Miyagawa (talk) 16:56, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2012 Summer Olympics

I noticed that you removed São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2012 Summer Olympics from my good article submissions in the WikiCup. Fair enough, as I forgot that I did the work in late December. Got a bit of a question however. You see, I submitted this article as a Did You Know candidate and it passed. Will this count considering I submitted this as a candidate in 2015? good888 (talk) 14:17, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

DYKs based on Good Article promotion (which was the category on Template:Did you know nominations/São Tomé and Príncipe at the 2012 Summer Olympics) aren't eligible for points in the cup. Miyagawa (talk) 15:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Oh, OK. Thanks for the reply. good888 (talk) 15:57, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for René Echevarria

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:30, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Guidance on content for Wikicup 2015

Hello,

I am bit new to the Wikicup, but very much interested and excited about this. I am still trying to figure out if any of my contributions (which you deleted from my submission list Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2015/Submissions/Vishal0soni actually hold some place across the various listed categories (if not in GAR & PR). Or if you could provide some guidance on approaching towards some good content valid for this contest, that would be helpful. Thanks, Vishal0soni (talk) 07:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok. Well the WikiCup is generally geared towards promoting recognised content. So while for example, you wouldn't get any points for creating a new article - if you then took that article through the Did You Know process, then you could gain points for that. Likewise, if that article meets the requirements for a Good Article and is then reviewed by another user as meeting those requirements, then again points can be gained. The Peer Reviews are based on reviewing articles where a user has requested a review at Wikipedia:Peer review. I hope this helps, a full summary is covered at the Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring page. Miyagawa (talk) 12:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Help requested for GA review of Sunil Kumar Verma

Dear Miyagawa thanks for your help for my recent DYK nomination! Hope it would go ahead! May I also seek your help to review my another article (this) that is currently nominated for GA (See here). Regards. Educationtemple (talk) 16:32, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Katherine Pulaski

The article Katherine Pulaski you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Katherine Pulaski for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Viriditas -- Viriditas (talk) 06:41, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carpenter Street (Star Trek: Enterprise)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carpenter Street (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 23W -- 23W (talk) 06:20, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Star Trek: The God Thing

Harrias ^talk 12:02, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Trek (2013 video game)

The article Star Trek (2013 video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Star Trek (2013 video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 03:41, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

GA Cup - The Finals

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup - Round 5/Final GA Cup competitors and observers: Get ready, we're about to move into the finals of the inaugural GA Cup! Not nearly as important as another competition taking place this weekend, but significant none the less. No deflated footballs here, though! Thursday saw the end of Round 4. Out of the 8 contestants in the semi-finals, 5 have moved to the finals. The semi-finals continued to be very competitive. The highest scorer overall was Ritchie333 from Pool B, with an impressive 488 points and a total of 36 articles reviewed, the most of any competitor; close behind was Jaguar (last round's wildcard), with 477 points and 29 reviews. At times, the competition between them was a real horse-race, and exciting for the judges to witness. Both Ritchie333 and Jaguar have moved onto the finals. In Pool A, Good888 with 294 points, and Wizardman with 179 also won slots in the final. 3family6 with 285 points, won the wildcard slot. We also had one withdrawal, due to outside-of-Wikipedia priorities. Congrats to all! Although there were just 8 competitors, more reviews were conducted this round than in any other round—148, which demonstrates the commitment and enthusiasm of our participants. The most successful competitors, like in all previous rounds, reviewed articles that languished in the queue at GAC for at least five months (worth 18 points). The Boat Race articles were popular review choices again, with almost 20% of the articles reviewed this month. In other news, we received another report from GA statistics page maintainer User:AmericanLemming. See here [1] for his take on the effect the GA Cup has had on Good Article reviews. He believes that we've made a real difference. AmericanLemming says: "As you can see, ...the GA Cup has done wonders when it comes to getting the oldest nominations reviewed much sooner thanks to the system whereby you get the most points for reviewing the oldest articles." Everyone involved with this competition, especially the competitors, should be very proud of what we've been able to accomplish! The Final will start on February 1 at 0:00:01 UTC and end on February 26 at 23:59:59 UTC with a winner being crowned. Information about the Final can be found here. Good luck to all our finalists! Cheers from Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:00, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup Results

Thank you for your written note. However, I did not receive any points for my reviews... I ask about the reasons for that. Yours Sincerely, --Csisc (talk) 11:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

It's not just you - there hasn't been a bot based update since the 28th. I've emailed the owner to give it a poke. Miyagawa (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carpenter Street (Star Trek: Enterprise)

The article Carpenter Street (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carpenter Street (Star Trek: Enterprise) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 23W -- 23W (talk) 09:41, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carpenter Street (Star Trek: Enterprise)

The article Carpenter Street (Star Trek: Enterprise) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carpenter Street (Star Trek: Enterprise) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 23W -- 23W (talk) 19:41, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Web of the Romulans

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 February 2015 (UTC)