User talk:Lee Vilenski/Archives/2022/March
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I noticed you removed a tournament listing notability?
Hi you removed an article citing notability but that means nothing because not every single event ever played had its own article, as long as it has a source so what is the problem?.By the way their are millions of events without any source at all. So why was this labeled?. 92.251.200.171 (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi Lee you say we only include notable wins. Is a notable win determined by opinion ?. Going back to the 70's, 80's and 90's Steve Davis and many others won 4 man events with little prize money. Players actually won titles under a challenge system of one match. Are these all notable wins to you ?. maybe not to you but even these small invitations are included on Wikipedia some with and without sources. you cannot pigeon hole events like that imo. 178.167.199.22 (talk) 10:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Please follow WP:BRD on the talk page of the article. We don't include every tournament ever held, only professional and major amateur events. I also did not need 8 notifications regarding this. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
8 notifications well answer the first one then ok ?.We hold any title that has a source and some without. You do not decide how Wikipedia is ran. Oh dear it is not your site. It is for the people. It was here long before you and it will be here after you pal. 178.167.199.22 (talk) 12:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
You delete snooker events and add exhibition events in golf, it really is unbelievable. That event was sanctioned by the PGA and Sky Sports as joint partners. Sky clearly announced it as an exhibition and I have evidence to prove it and I want to post it. this is just ridiculous. People add all sorts of rubbish in golf par 3 events and nonsense but you delete everything in snooker. 178.167.199.22 (talk) 14:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia follows consensus. It's very clear that you do not have consensus for your changes. You will need to gain some before making these changes. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2022
- From the team: Selection of a new Signpost Editor-in-Chief
- News and notes: Impacts of Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Special report: A presidential candidate's team takes on Wikipedia
- In the media: Wiki-drama in the UK House of Commons
- Technology report: Community Wishlist Survey results
- WikiProject report: 10 years of tea
- Featured content: Featured Content returns
- Deletion report: The 10 most SHOCKING deletion discussions of February
- Recent research: How editors and readers may be emotionally affected by disasters and terrorist attacks
- Arbitration report: Parties remonstrate, arbs contemplate, skeptics coordinate
- Gallery: The vintage exhibit
- Traffic report: Euphoria, Pamela Anderson, lies and Netflix
- News from Diff: The Wikimania 2022 Core Organizing Team
- Crossword: A Crossword, featuring Featured Articles
- Humour: Notability of mailboxes
Disambiguation link notification for February 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pankaj Advani (billiards player), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IBSF.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Can you explain
If that content was added by anyone else would it have been removed ?. No chance. Are you just going to keep trying to block me ?. At least you could reply like a man 77.75.244.10 (talk) 18:59, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- As a blocked user, you cannot simply edit logged out, nor under a different username. You must request an unblock on your original account. I will block this IP, and you should request the unblock there. I will WP:DENY and block any further IP block evasions. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:09, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Lee I'm sorry I don't understand where do I try to unblock on my account is it ?. I haven't a clue about this jargon. What reason do I give in asking for an appeal to lift the block ?. Can you give me some idea because I haven't a clue how this works. Will the appeal be successful ?. I won't message again on here but I want to understand how it works before I attempt it ok. Thanks 77.75.244.3 (talk) 19:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Where do I go to unblock ?
Hi Lee. You said last night if you blocked an IP I could do it there, but it also says you have to go to your original account. Can you just explain to me where I go to lodge the appeal ?. I want to do it now this morning to make a start. Regards 77.75.244.16 (talk) 11:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
I just want to get it over. Will I go to my original account and use the talk page ? Thanks 77.75.244.16 (talk) 11:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- You will need to desist in IP hopping, and login to your original account User:DooksFoley147 and request an unblock. You as a person are blocked and will need to gain an unblock before your editing privileges are returned. You cannot simply keep changing IP addresses. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 11:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
I know that the only reason I am doing it is because you keep blocking me and I do not know the process. I am not trying to annoy or dodge I just wanted an answer ok. Lee I went to login to DooksFoley147 account but I cannot remember the password it says incorrect when I enter it. How will I procede can I change it to continue ?. Regards 77.75.244.16 (talk) 11:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Lee I said I forgot my password they emailed me a temporary 10 pin code to enter and they said it would last up to 7 days, but when I try to log in using the temporary code it says please enter the correct password. Why is that happening to me ?. I just want to log in 77.75.244.16 (talk) 11:56, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
I got in and I put in my block request
Lee how long does the appeal process usually last when will I know the outcome ? Regards 31.200.131.38 (talk) 12:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) IP, you are not blocked as of now. Severestorm28 12:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- SevereStorm - this is regarding DooksFoley147 above. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
I am sure you know my block was rejected. They said 6 months without any edits from any IP which I don't mind. But there is no guarantee that I will be allowed to edit then is there Lee ?. What would I have to do ? 31.200.128.222 (talk) 14:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- The standing offer is that if you can not sock (which is what you are doing now) for six months, then editing rights may be returned. If you are unable to do this then I cannot help you. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
I promise Lee I won't sock anymore. I just want to ask one question. You said editing rights may be returned so that means there is a chance they will not. What would I do then ?. Do people usually get them editing rights back ?. If you can help me out on this I won't bother you again. ok Thanks 31.200.128.222 (talk) 14:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm far too WP:INVOLVED to be able to review your unblock request. I think if you can show that you are capable of not controvening the rules in six months, it would be highly unlikely you wouldn't get an unblock. Even if it did; you'd then be told what you'd need to do. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Lee thanks very much I respect that you took the time out to explain that to me even though I am banned. I also want to say there was never any personal feeling of Ill will I am just very passionate about what I try to do on Wikipedia as you are yourself. I will not take up anymore of your time. Thanks for explaining. I hope to be back in six months. take care stay safe. Regards 31.200.128.222 (talk) 14:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2022).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A RfC is open to change the wording of revision deletion criterion 1 to remove the sentence relating to non-infringing contributions.
- A RfC is open to discuss prohibiting draftification of articles over 90 days old.
Technical news
- The deployment of the reply tool as an opt-out feature, as announced in last month's newsletter, has been delayed to 7 March. Feedback and comments are being welcomed at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project. (T296645)
- Special:Nuke will now allow the selection of standard deletion reasons to be used when mass-deleting pages. This was a Community Wishlist Survey request from 2022. (T25020)
- The ability to undelete the talk page when undeleting a page using Special:Undelete or the API will be added soon. This change was requested in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey. (T295389)
Arbitration
- Several unused discretionary sanctions and article probation remedies have been rescinded. This follows the community feedback from the 2021 Discretionary Sanctions review.
Miscellaneous
- The 2022 appointees for the Ombuds commission are Érico, Faendalimas, Galahad, Infinite0694, Mykola7, Olugold, Udehb and Zabe as regular members and Ameisenigel and JJMC89 as advisory members.
- Following the 2022 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AntiCompositeNumber, BRPever, Hasley, TheresNoTime, and Vermont.
- The 2022 Community Wishlist Survey results have been published alongside the ranking of prioritized proposals.
WikiCup 2022 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the WikiCup. Last year anyone who scored more than zero points moved on to Round 2, but this was not the case this year, and a score of 13 or more was required to proceed. The top scorers in Round 1 were:
Epicgenius, a finalist last year, who led the field with 1906 points, gained from 32 GAs and 19 DYKs, all on the topic of New York buildings.
AryKun, new to the contest, was second with 1588 points, having achieved 2 FAs, 11 GAs and various other submissions, mostly on the subject of birds.
Bloom6132, a WikiCup veteran, was in third place with 682 points, garnered from 51 In the news items and several DYKs.
GhostRiver was close behind with 679 points, gained from achieving 12 GAs, mostly on ice hockey players, and 35 GARs.
Kavyansh.Singh was in fifth place with 551 points, with an FA, a FL, and many reviews.
SounderBruce was next with 454 points, gained from an FA and various other submissions, mostly on United States highways.- Ktin, another WikiCup veteran, was in seventh place with 412 points, mostly gained from In the news items.
These contestants, like all the others who qualified for Round 2, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews of a large number of good articles as the contest ran concurrently with a GAN backlog drive. Well done all! To qualify for Round 3, contestants will need to finish Round 2 among the top thirty-two participants.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Anything that should have been claimed for in Round 1 is no longer eligible for points. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Survivor: The Australian Outback
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Survivor: The Australian Outback you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Survivor: The Australian Outback
The article Survivor: The Australian Outback you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Survivor: The Australian Outback for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 06:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sayyid dynasty on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2021 UK Championship
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 UK Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2021 UK Championship
The article 2021 UK Championship you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2021 UK Championship for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Your GA nomination of Survivor: The Australian Outback
The article Survivor: The Australian Outback you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Survivor: The Australian Outback for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 18:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Jussie Smollett on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox musical artist on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2021 UK Championship
The article 2021 UK Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2021 UK Championship for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Portkey Games Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Portkey Games Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neville Chamberlain (police officer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IBSF.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cowboy pool
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cowboy pool you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nehme1499 -- Nehme1499 (talk) 16:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cowboy pool
The article Cowboy pool you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cowboy pool for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nehme1499 -- Nehme1499 (talk) 17:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cowboy pool
The article Cowboy pool you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cowboy pool for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nehme1499 -- Nehme1499 (talk) 01:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello, if you mind checking this dog article. I'm a little concerned about why it passed GA criteria; others like GamerPro64 have also commented on it [1], and it contains a lot of unreliable sources see here on edit summary [2] per Wikipedia:VG/Sources. Hoping if you open GAR Reassessment on this article. 2001:4455:364:A800:5DC:1FFF:D6C9:A8C7 (talk) 01:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Request
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/ACBS-English-Billiards-Asienmeisterschaft
Hello, can you create this article from German to English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CuCau.a (talk • contribs) 14:23, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- CuCau.a. Yes. ACBS English Billiards Asian Championships/ Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:35, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Harsh Vardhan Shringla on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Oops
I forgot about walden when doing those calculations lmao. Thanks for reverting. His make-or-break match is tomorrow with Trump so we’ll have better clarity on fixed rankings and the like after that match has been concluded. —CitroenLover (talk) 23:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Question from Bradja11 (20:55, 26 March 2022)
Hello, I wish to edit a page and act as a primary source. Will I need to supply documentation along with any statements I make, or can I make a change to a page that is labelled "citation needed" with current information without supplying documents. I wish to avoid uploading documents as I believe they may be restricted under a company NDA. --Bradja11 (talk) 20:55, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- While you may know the information you upload is correct, other editors won't, and it would be completely reasonable for them to delete inflammatory comments which have a 'citation needed' tag attached.
- I also wouldn't recommend breaking your NDA for a Wikipedia article, of all things... If you're that desperate, I'd look into whistleblowing with a newspaper.
- (Even if it isn't under NDA... is it worth getting fired over?!) Mooshua1857 (talk) 23:29, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- More to the point, we don't allow original research here. You knowing something is true, or even having personal documents to show this, is irrelevant. We summarise what reliable, secondary sources say about a subject. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:12, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
DYK for 2022 Turkish Masters
On 27 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2022 Turkish Masters, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a snooker table used at the 2022 Turkish Masters was fixed with a car jack? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2022 Turkish Masters. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2022 Turkish Masters), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
The Signpost: 27 March 2022
- From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
- News and notes: Of safety and anonymity
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps
- Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks
- In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
- Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
- Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now
- Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon
- Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors
- Traffic report: War, what is it good for?
- Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
- From the archives: Burn, baby burn
- Essay: Yes, the sky is blue
- Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja
- On the bright side: The bright side of news
Requesting pre-emptive no fault self-block
I am requesting a admin to voluntary self-block for one week on the English WikiPedia. Since I believe I have accused of subversion by admin Joe Roe and due to RL pressures at this time I am likely to blow and do something stupid which is not good, per previous block by Girth Summit. I have some image/licensing stuff I need to proceed with on commons and I promise not to do a picture injection on April 1st or anything, (which still hasn't cleared from Ja:Luas). I must apologise to Daniel, which I thought the AfC route for return of Monisha Shah was likely to be less dramatic but a procedural XfD at a poor RL point for myself with an ex UK WikiMedia Chair making the first !vote meant a specifically time chosen DRV might have been less dramatic. Requesting block as I've going to blow it seriously otherwise .... I'll simply start calling people names until I get blocked. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- I wouldnt fulfill a selfblock Djm-leighpark. Perhaps if you messaged someone from Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to consider placing self-requested blocks. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 17:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- I have given the block as requested. I'll take responsibility. I don't understand but do know the editor and will try to help them as I can. BusterD (talk) 18:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- BusterD - sorry, I don't want to tread on your toes here, but since I was pinged above, can you point me at the context here? Girth Summit (blether) 20:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- I find it awkward to have this conversation on Lee's talk where User:Djm-leighpark can not reply if they see something. However, since they chose to ask here, I'll answer this reasonable query here. I can't speak for Djm-leighpark's motivations, but blanking this page told me they were serious about needing a time-out. The context for this escapes me outside what they wrote to commence this thread. BusterD (talk) 21:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- BusterD - sorry, I don't want to tread on your toes here, but since I was pinged above, can you point me at the context here? Girth Summit (blether) 20:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- I have given the block as requested. I'll take responsibility. I don't understand but do know the editor and will try to help them as I can. BusterD (talk) 18:17, 29 March 2022 (UTC)