Talk:First Student Canada

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merging can be a good idea

Proposed merge edit

This article is one of three articles about the operations of First Student, a subsidiary of First Group in one of three geographies. Each article lacks context and should be merged into a single article with three sections.

Merging can be a good idea edit

This proposal has been up for nearly 2 years (it's been unsigned), but I think it's a good idea if done correctly. If anything, it will simplify the disambiguation page. I would suggest merging this page and its US counterpart into a combined article; the more-complete UK article should remain freestanding. The US and Canada articles have a format that compliments each other better. --SteveCof00 (talk) 08:04, 19 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

To clarify, there is no such thing as First Student (United States), it should just be First Student (the first First Student), and the others are properly named independent parts of First Group, with First Student Canada being the dominant part of First Canada. The official divisions of First America are First Student, First Canada, First Transit, First Services and Greyhound. Each of those divisions has its own internal subsidiaries. If you wish to reorganize those article make sure they fit with the corporate plan not how you imagine the might fit together. Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:53, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Hard to find sources on this, but it seems that First Student Canada is part of First Student (United States) and should be discussed inside that article. Nothing in my research shows that this is an independent company. 162 etc. (talk) 15:48, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Support merge; it does seem as though First Student is one company active throughout North America (US and Canada); see, for example, discussion from First Group here. Klbrain (talk) 20:51, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on First Student Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)Reply