Speedy deletion nomination of Kushing

edit

Hello Kleikajno,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kushing for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 18:50, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rentberry

edit

Hello Kleikajno,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rentberry for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 18:59, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

August 2020

edit
 

Hello Kleikajno. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Kleikajno. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Kleikajno|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:09, 10 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I will add the employer information on my user page, I didn´t check this notification before my last editing and therefore I apologize for doing it. It has been an honest mistake. Thank you for your guidance. ~~Kleikajno~~

  Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 11:05, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Deb. I’m aware of this, and I’m trying to make it as right as possible so that my publications are good with the terms of Wikipedia. I would like to ask if now that I added the paid information and when I edit the publication so it is not promotional, will it be more suitable to be published? Thank you. ~~Kleikajno~~ Kleikajno (talk) 11:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please review WP:COI, paid articles must be submitted for review with the WP:AFC process. Please keep your paid disclosure tags on your userpage and on the talk pages of the drafts you create. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
If I may be blunt, you should not be accepting payments for creating Wikipedia articles at all since you do not have sufficient experience in writing reliably sourced encyclopedic articles here. Draft:Ronald Joseph Woods is in practice unsourced and after reading through it I see I should have tagged it for speedy deletion as an article that makes no claim of significance rather than moving it to drafts. Please consider becoming a normal editor here improving some already existing articles with reliably sourced materials instead of writing for payment. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:47, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Deb: & @Thjarkur: it would appear that this editor has now created a second account at User:Rentberry inc, as User:Rentberry inc/sandbox is a carbon copy of User:Kleikajno/sandbox/Rentberry. Best, GPL93 (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rentberry (August 11)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Kleikajno! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:Rentberry-renting-done-right-finally.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rentberry-renting-done-right-finally.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hardeep Singh (Hardy Singh) (August 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Celestina007 16:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hardeep Singh (dancer) (August 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 15:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Hardeep Singh (dancer) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hardeep Singh (dancer). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:19, 14 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Youssef Chreiba (August 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 05:35, 24 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rentberry (November 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KartikeyaS343 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KartikeyaS (talk) 08:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Youssef Chreiba

edit
 
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CuteMeow (talk) 07:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Youssef Chreiba

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Youssef Chreiba requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youssef Chreiba. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 11:32, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Cooper J. Friedman

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cooper J. Friedman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 16:44, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hardeep Singh (dancer) (November 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 06:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Ronald Joseph Woods

edit
 

Hello, Kleikajno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ronald Joseph Woods".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rentberry

edit

  Hello, Kleikajno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rentberry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Hardeep Singh (dancer)

edit

  Hello, Kleikajno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hardeep Singh (dancer), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Rentberry

edit
 

Hello, Kleikajno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rentberry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Hardeep Singh (dancer)

edit
 

Hello, Kleikajno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hardeep Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:18, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Reply