User talk:Kacamata/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome!
|
The article Sean Cunningham (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sarahj2107 (talk) 23:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
I've been improved the article and I've added a reliable source, please reconsider your decision to delete.
The article Joseph Gyau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:21, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Sean Cunningham (soccer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean Cunningham (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Cunningham (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of John Anthony Brooks
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on John Anthony Brooks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
The article Royal-Dominique Fennell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:23, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Sean Cunningham (soccer)
I noticed some of your recent articles had been recommended for deletion. This one is a better example of what we would want to see. --RichardMills65 (talk) 03:19, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. My articles have been deleted because I didn't knew some rules of edition, but now I've learned it.
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited Kelley O'Hara, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wingback and Winger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:11, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Devann Yao for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devann Yao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devann Yao (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Devann Yao
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Devann Yao, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Steffen Vroom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:52, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Patrick Hopkins has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:55, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Lester Dewee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:56, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
The article Danijal Brković has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:57, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Steffen Vroom for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steffen Vroom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steffen Vroom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:13, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Danijal Brković for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danijal Brković is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danijal Brković until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:05, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks my friend, this is really useful. I will start to do this now--SirEdimon (talk) 23:05, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Patrick Hopkins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrick Hopkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Hopkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Villyan Bijev and Marc Pelosi
Re: your comments on my talk page on 5/5/12 - in what sense? --Zanoni (talk) 22:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- Pelosi has looked OK so far in a couple of U18 matches but got injured, so too soon to tell. Bijev's been on loan and all I have seen of his is highlights so too soon to tell 22:42, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Notice of discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Talk:2012 Major League Soccer season regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:35, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
The article Thiago Carvalho de Araújo has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
- All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 01:54, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Brian Span
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Brian Span, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:04, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
The article Bianca Henninger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:06, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Re: Bianca Henninger
Looks good to me. Just don't use the youtube video, since it's not a reliable source. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:23, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Slovak First League
Slovak Superliga = old name this competition, the new name is Slovak First League (Corgoň Liga) since the 2011/2012 season. Players, which plays for clubs in the slovak first league have a professional contracts. IQual (talk) 07:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Slovak Super Liga
It's not mentioned at WP:FPL. GiantSnowman 08:09, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- I have no idea, what do reliable sources say? GiantSnowman 07:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
The article Bianca D'Agostino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Footballers on the U-23 teams are not notable. They have to be a member of the senior team per WP:NFOOTBALL
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Please don't remove the Articles for Deletion tag
Do not remove the tag. An admin will remove it when the deletion review is over.
Also, next time, please add information that would make a footballer notable. Professional footballer is notable, a U-23 is not. Please review WP:NFOOTY. Bgwhite (talk) 00:39, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
The article Jose Villarreal (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --IShadowed 22:46, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
The article Julie Ménard has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KTC (talk) 23:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
The article Julie Ménard has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Noom talk stalk 23:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
August 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from an article unless it contains at least one reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010, as you did with Julie Ménard. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. KTC (talk) 11:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing the new article 2012 FIFA U-17 Women's World Cup squads. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. GiantSnowman 15:20, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Joshua Gatt
Hi there. In your recent addition to Joshua Gatt, you state that he was called up for the national team, but had to withdrew due to an injury. Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mentoz86 (talk) 08:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
The article Adrianna Franch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:59, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Adrianna Franch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrianna Franch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrianna Franch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- This player was recently drafted to the Western New York Flash in the *professional* National Women's Soccer League. [1] Her article should be re-instated for expansion. I posted a request on the deleting administrator's Talk page: User:Mark_Arsten. Hmlarson (talk) 20:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kealia Ohai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Deprodded articles
You've deprodded a few articles about women's U-20 players and haven't given an explanation! Familiarize yourself first notability criteria for athletes before creating articles and in this case, before removing proposed deletion tags! None of those players are notable as per the criteria! Banana Fingers (talk) 10:05, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
The article Toni Pressley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:53, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
The article Sinead Farrelly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:54, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Toni Pressley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toni Pressley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toni Pressley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:31, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 2012 FIFA Ballon d'Or
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 2012 FIFA Ballon d'Or requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
November 2012
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. Your recent edit to the page 2012 MLS Cup Playoffs appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 Torneio Internacional Cidade de São Paulo de Futebol Feminino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pernille Harder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
January 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Brek Shea, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Brek Shea
That link says it has been reported that a fee has been agreed. No transfer has yet taken place. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uelliton da Silva Vieira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monte Santo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Response to your messages
Hi, I've posted a response to your recent message on my Talk page. Hmlarson (talk) 20:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Adrianna Franch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adrianna Franch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrianna Franch (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 2013 CONCACAF U-20 Championship squads (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Mark Brown, Clarendon College and Andrew Allen
- Jamaica national under-20 football team (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Mark Brown, Clarendon College and Andrew Allen
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 2009 CONCACAF U-20 Championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Tony Taylor
- Ventura Alvarado (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Defender
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Kacamata, and thank you for your contributions!
Some text in an article that you worked on 2013 Algarve Cup squads, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, 2012 Algarve Cup squads. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.
It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on 2013 Algarve Cup squads at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 23:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Women's football players articles up for deletion
You are invited to join the discussion at:
Disambiguation link notification for February 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup qualification (CONCACAF), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nassau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:46, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
|
The Women's Football Barnstar | |
| Thank you for your work on Wikipedia articles related to women's football. :) Hmlarson (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2013 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 CONCACAF U-17 Championship squads, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eleanor Roosevelt High School, Next Generation and Police FC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Wambach article
Hello, as you have previously contributed to Abby Wambach articles, please consider sharing your input in this discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Abby Wambach Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 22:06, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cacilda Becker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
NWSL players AFD discussion
Hello, as you have contributed to articles related to the NWSL, you are invited to join this discussion at:
The article Patrick Weihrauch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Player has not played in fully professional so far and fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Weihrauch
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Patrick Weihrauch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:27, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ventura Alvarado, SirEdimon!
Wikipedia editor Jezhotwells just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Needs better referencing
To reply, leave a comment on Jezhotwells's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
National association football teams naming convention discussion
As you have contributed to numerous articles on football/soccer, you are invited to join the discussion at:
Disambiguation link notification for June 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mayke Rocha Oliveira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
The article Morgan Brian has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:
- All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me) 22:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sunderland A.F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:42, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jozy Altidore. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:14, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Jozy Altidore
Because he hasn't signed for Sunderland yet, quite simply. The reference you provided is entitled "AZ confirm that Jozy Altidore will join Premier League side Sunderland", emphasis being on will. It's just a case of waiting for the transfer to be confirmed by a reliable source. As yet that hasn't happened. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:12, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 National Women's Soccer League season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brittany Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
|
| Happy New Year from the Women's Football Task Force! |
 Women's Football Task Force and hope to see more of your great work in the new year. Cheers! |
| Task force quick links |
| Open Tasks | Recognized content | Members | Resources New! Portal:Women's association football |
The article 2013 Cyprus Cup squads has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:NOTSTATS
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 19:46, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of 2013 Cyprus Cup squads for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013 Cyprus Cup squads is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013 Cyprus Cup squads until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 23:10, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
The article Lucca Borges de Brito has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bensci54 (talk) 16:56, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States women's national soccer team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Friendly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 2015 FIFA U-20 World Cup squads, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 2013 FIFA U-20 World Cup squads. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (2015 FIFA U-20 World Cup squads) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 2015 FIFA U-20 World Cup squads, SirEdimon!
Wikipedia editor Sammanhumagain just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Please complete the whole sqaud list.
To reply, leave a comment on Sammanhumagain's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
June 2015
Hello, I'm Weegeerunner. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2015 FIFA U-20 World Cup, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Weegeerunner (talk) 20:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 20:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Weegeerunner (talk) 20:50, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Steven Vitória
Has Steven Vitória played for Canada yet? SLBedit (talk) 18:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bruno Viana Willemen da Silva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Transfermarkt
Since most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable. Please do not cite the website in articles, as you did with Luis Felipe Fernandes. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, SirEdimon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Demon in the Bottle (film)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Demon in the Bottle (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:00, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted article (Demon in the Bottle)
I've deleted the page in question and below is my response to your comment on the talk page.
Ultimately none of the things you listed show notability for the film in this situation. The movie received no critic reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, which is what it'd need to establish notability. IMDb is not considered to be a RS that can give notability (and isn't seen as a WP:RS in almost all situations) and YouTube videos would not show notability unless they were videos where news outlets discussed the film in depth. Even then, only if the video was uploaded by the copyright holder, who would also have to be considered a RS on Wikipedia. Not all YT vids show notability and things like trailers and the like are just considered to be WP:PRIMARY sources.
As far as the notable people goes, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by that association. A film can have dozens of notable people attached to it, yet still fail notability guidelines because no one wrote about the film. (A film can also be notable without having anyone notable in the movie.) I tried looking for sources, but this just seems to have solidly flown under the radar. A movie isn't notable because it exits (WP:ITEXISTS) and while it'd be nice if we could have an article for this movie, it just does't have the coverage necessary to meet WP:NFILM. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
Gargantua (film) copyright problem
Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Eighteenth Angel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Eighteenth Angel Theatrical Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Eighteenth Angel Theatrical Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Robin of Locksley (film)
- added links pointing to Michael Kennedy and Bill Goddard
- Hollywood Safari
- added a link pointing to John Savage
- Silent Predators
- added a link pointing to John Stokes
- The Sight (2000 film)
- added a link pointing to David Johnson
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Leapin’ Leprechauns!
- added a link pointing to Andrew Smith
- Outside the Law (2002 film)
- added a link pointing to Columbia TriStar
- The Operator
- added a link pointing to Michael Coleman
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Ablaze (film)
- added links pointing to Tom Arnold and John Bradley
- The Ticket (1997 film)
- added a link pointing to David Alexander
- Trapped: Buried Alive
- added a link pointing to Jack Wagner
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Color of Love, Jacey's Story (2000) Film Poster.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:The Color of Love, Jacey's Story (2000) Film Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cloned (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NBC Studios. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
An invitation for you
|
Please join us during the month of May 2017 for the... | |
 |
Contributions to new or existing articles on women athletes (including WOSO players) are encouraged and appreciated. For more information and resources, please see WP: Women in Red, the Women's football task force and WP:Women's Sport.
 #wikiwomeninred
|
(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) (Delivered: 16:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC))
May 2017
Your addition to Taboo (1980 film) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:49, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
|
Moves like Kim Little Barnstar | |
| As a recipient of the Kim Little barnstar, we'd like to thank you for make amazing Kim Little-like contributions to articles related to women's football (soccer) and WP:WOSO. Thank you for your diligent work! |
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for File:Two Against Time (2002) Film Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Two Against Time (2002) Film Poster.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 00:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Do you not read the revert comments?
Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:26, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
References
Because of the notability consequences, the sourcing standards for WP:FPL are quite stringent. To add a league to the list, you need a source that very explicitly confirms full professionalism. Simply adding a link to the league's homepage is not sufficient. The text of the list even explicitly says that when citing particularly long source, the citation should quote the text in the source that confirms FPL-status. Please do not re-add the Primeira Liga without proper sourcing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:37, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues
You have been reverted numerous times by numerous editors. You have been told that citing the league's own website is not enough. Please do not re-add. GiantSnowman 17:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Subject of mass mailing: Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017
|
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017 |
|
Should the women's football task force become WikiProject: WOSO? |
 According to an op-ed in the recent Signpost, some editors think task forces and subgroups are dying in 2017. What do you think about forming our own WikiProject separate from WP:FOOTY? There's an on-going discussion of the potential pros and cons on the task force talk page. Input is welcome. |
New initiatives have been created for:
While WP:FPL lists only two women's top-division leagues as notable due to its "fully professional" criteria, did you know you can create an article on any player in any league as long as the references meet WP:GNG guidelines? Make sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}. Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks page if you'd like and other editors may be able to help. Need tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page. |
|
Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)! |
|
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force |
(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) – Hmlarson (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
Move Janaúba's Tragedy to Janaúba Tragedy
I commend you on your contribution to this important subject. In cases like this, the possessive 's is not used. The page should be moved accordingly.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, SirEdimon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Woojer Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Woojer Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Eternal Road (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ville Virtanen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Titan (2018) Film Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Titan (2018) Film Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks
.jpg)
|
The Marta Award | |
| As a recipient of the Marta Award, we'd like to thank you for scoring Marta-like goals related to WP:WOSO. Thank you for your talents and dedication! |
DYK nomination of Matilde Fidalgo
Hello! Your submission of Matilde Fidalgo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:50, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
WOSO Task Force News: April 2018
|
Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: April 2018 |
 Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014
Hello WOSO editors! A few initiatives have been started with an emphasis on making more WOSO links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles. If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, take a look at the initiatives listed in the box below. Sign up at the bottom of an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles ... or create your own initiative.
WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in 1 active women's league)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}
Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? |
|
Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)! |
 Women's Football / Soccer Task Force |
_Film_Poster.jpeg){kind=link}
_Film_Poster.jpg){kind=link}
_Film_Poster.jpg){kind=link}
_Film_Poster.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Film_Poster.jpg){kind=link}
_Film_Poster.jpg){kind=link}
_Film_Poster.jpg){kind=link}
_Film_Poster.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
April 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 02:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Kacamata (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why am I being blocked from editing. I'm a legitimate editor
Decline reason:
The reason is stated in the block message, and there is more detail at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ubuntuforum. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kacamata (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
How can I do to unblock it. I want to explain my situation and I really want to edit Wikipedia again. I don't want be banned from Wikipedia forever. I made many importnat contribuitions and still do SirEdimon (talk) 05:59, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were blocked by a Checkuser and per Wikipedia's policy, ordinary administrators cannot overrule the CheckUser decision without Checkuser approval. We obviously do not have such approval. Your only hope is to appeal to the WP:ARBCOM. I have to notice that you didn't comment on the accusation that you were engaged in the undisclosed paid editing. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- If you want to explain your situation, just do so here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 06:45, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Boing! said Zebedee: First all, not all those accounts attributed to me are mine. Second of all I didn't know that only creating more than one account was illegal. I thought that using multiples accounts for disruptive actions was illegal. I never did use my accounts to disruptive actions. Never use than to deceive or to harm anyone. I just used their "sandbox" and nothing else. In fact, I just created those accounts for their sandboxes. Never used any of the accounts to harm Wikipedia or Wikipedia comunity, because I really like Wikipedia. I have been made many good contribuitons to the Wikipedia and I really like wikipedia. The away they did it, they just banned me forever from Wikipedia. I can't use my account, I can't edit using my IP and I can't even create another account. It means that I'll never be able to contribute to Wikipedia again. That's unfair. It's like I'm a criminal or something. A danger to Wikipedia and that's it not true. Since I made several and even important contribuitions to Wikipedia. And even worst, nobody in my home can edit Wikipedia since they blocked my IP. It means that they will pay for my mistakes. So, I ask you to find an way to resolve that situation. For me, honestly, it would desvating no being able to edit Wikipedia ever again. I've using Wikipedia for over ten years at daily basis, being forced to take it off my life would be really sad for me.--SirEdimon (talk) 07:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- OK, the first thing is don't panic. Indefinite doesn't mean for ever, it means for a period of time that has not been defined.
I will take a look at your accounts and what you did with them, but I'm busy in real life right now and you might have to wait a couple of hours (though that shouldn't stop anyone else investigating in the meantime).Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:49, 21 April 2018 (UTC) - One thing you could do that would help is list all of the accounts you actually have used. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:59, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- OK, the first thing is don't panic. Indefinite doesn't mean for ever, it means for a period of time that has not been defined.
- @Boing! said Zebedee: First all, not all those accounts attributed to me are mine. Second of all I didn't know that only creating more than one account was illegal. I thought that using multiples accounts for disruptive actions was illegal. I never did use my accounts to disruptive actions. Never use than to deceive or to harm anyone. I just used their "sandbox" and nothing else. In fact, I just created those accounts for their sandboxes. Never used any of the accounts to harm Wikipedia or Wikipedia comunity, because I really like Wikipedia. I have been made many good contribuitons to the Wikipedia and I really like wikipedia. The away they did it, they just banned me forever from Wikipedia. I can't use my account, I can't edit using my IP and I can't even create another account. It means that I'll never be able to contribute to Wikipedia again. That's unfair. It's like I'm a criminal or something. A danger to Wikipedia and that's it not true. Since I made several and even important contribuitions to Wikipedia. And even worst, nobody in my home can edit Wikipedia since they blocked my IP. It means that they will pay for my mistakes. So, I ask you to find an way to resolve that situation. For me, honestly, it would desvating no being able to edit Wikipedia ever again. I've using Wikipedia for over ten years at daily basis, being forced to take it off my life would be really sad for me.--SirEdimon (talk) 07:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
I did actually have some time, so I've checked all the accounts blocked as socks of User:SirEdimon, and this is what I see...
- User:Cesaraff: No edits, no deleted edits.
- User:EEmerique: Edits related to John D. Bernard, including at the AFD on April 19 saying "Yes, I know I'm a new account...". That was deceptive. User page at December 30 said "Hi, I'm new here." That was also deceptive. None of the other accounts took part in that AFD. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:23, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- User:EEmerique II to User:EEmerique VI: Sandboxes only.
- User:RandyKal: No edits, no deleted edits.
- User:SirEdimon: Main account, no overlap with User:EEmerique.
So what I'm seeing is minor deception with User:EEmerique, but no overlaps, vote stacking, or any of the other usual sockpuppet activities. Do you have any comments on these findings, SirEdimon? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:18, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Boing! said Zebedee: There is more than you listed, but first I'd like to explain what I suspect is really going on here: UPE. Take a look at all the pages (articles and files) SE has created in their time here. Although there is a focus on football-related articles, apparently something the user really likes, many other articles are very diverse and not typical of most editors. The sandbox-only EEmerique accounts are where they create at least some of the articles before putting them in main space. For example, look at this sandbox and GVATE LLC, created by SE two days later. Another puppet sandbox and the subsequent article creation by the master at Jack Simony. Apparently, SE copies and pastes from the sandboxes, hiding the true history and making it look like the article was created solely by the master account. None of this is of course declared, and I don't see the need for or the legitimacy of such puppet accounts. In EEmerique's case, the only puppet who edited both their sandbox and made edits in main space directly, take a look at Taylor Henry (journalist), which was created by SE and edited by EEmerique. EEmerique, promoting Henry, also made this edit. Take a look at Kelly Hyman, which came from EEmerique's sandbox. Take a look at the deleted history of that article. Another editor involved in that article was blocked by Smartse for UPE a bit over a year ago. Many articles have a New York connection, although there is no reason why SE should have an interest in New York. Yet, some are related to areas of the globe far from New York, like Lebanon. Finally, I received an e-mail from SE, disingenuously asking why they were blocked. One disturbing line from the e-mail: "I even can't create another account." I hope this helps explain why I chose to indefinitely block SE.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- Nice detective work - I was going to see how SE responded and then dig a bit deeper, but there's no need now. I concur with your conclusions. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm, and I see the IPs are coming out in force at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John D. Bernard. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:43, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Boing! said Zebedee: and @Bbb23:. First all. Bbb23, I sent you an email, because when I was blocked I didn't know what to do and I couldn't edit any talk page, so I just sent an email for two admin, you and another one, in order to understand what did happen. But I never did mean to disturbe you or something like this. Now the facts: My main account is SirEdimon. This account I've been using since 2011. I mainly create and edit articles that nobody would create or edit, female footballers, biographies, championships and leagues that nobody watch, low budget films. That's is my policy on Wikipedia. And I did good contribuitions. My other occounts are the EEmerique and other relates EEmerique II and etc. These are the accounts I had control until the block. The only account I ever used to edit was EEmerique and my only wrong action was to use this account to vote in the John D Bernard deletion. But I only used this account. I didn't use any other account to manipulate the "vote count" and also I used logical argument in my vote. My only mistake was to use this account to vote, a action that I admit can be considered "disruptive". My others EEmerique's account I only used the sandboxes to draft the article before create them with my main account. These articles are created solely by me. About the accusation of "promoting" Taylor Henry (journalist)'s article that is not true. When I created it the article was tagged as an "ORPHAN" and what I did was just link this article to another article. It happens sometimes when I create an article about a movie. It simple to resolve. I just link the film to actors and filmakers filmography. I never did promotion. Check the languages in my articles. Neutral language and all the facts are supported by sources. I never used articles to praise or to promote anyone. I only use the sand boxes because sometimes I had no time to finish the article at once and I didn't want to create and let the article unfinished. The articles I create without draft are normally those one that are less changelling and I can create at once without spending much time. I did a mistake, but I can delete my other accounts (actually I no even know if this possible) and keep only this one. This is no problem for me. I just don't think that banning me forever from Wikipedia is a "fair" punishement in this case. I'm not a danger to Wikipedia (and actually I did go contribuitions), I just made a mistake and I didn't mean no harm.--SirEdimon (talk) 18:14, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Boing! said Zebedee: and @Bbb23: My request was denied by another admin. Can you advise me? I think people are not assuming my good faith in this case. I already told I'm willing to comply with Wikipedia's rules and only have one account. I really don't believe that after so many years editing here I'll be banned like this. --SirEdimon (talk) 18:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- If you wish to make a new unblock request, another admin will review it. Please stop pinging me now. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Kacamata (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for using multiples accounts which I already admitted. I also took one disruptive action with one of my alternative accounts. I'm willing to comply with Wikipedia rules and not use any account besides SirEdimon. I ask the admin analyzing this request, that please, assume my good faith. If I didn't care about editing with Wikipedia I would only leave this account aside. But I really care about editing here
Decline reason:
Blocks are not a punishment, nor a warning. They are typically set in order to protect the encyclopedia - as I think this one was/is. I believe, based on the circumstances that the best way forward would to be to appeal directly to arbcom. SQLQuery me! 03:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- SirEdimon, just so you're aware, the "UPE" that Bbb23 referred to in their post above, explaining why you were blocked, refers to "undisclosed paid editing"—in other words, they believe that you have been paid for some of the editing you have done; this was referenced by Vanjagenije when they turned down your unblock request. However, since Bbb23's block was made in their role as a Checkuser, I believe that Vanjagenije is correct in that no admin has the power to unblock you, so the above request cannot succeed. Instead, it appears you will need to appeal to the Arbitration Committee; they have a way to contact them from the User:Arbitration Committee page via email, though if that doesn't work for you due to your block, you can email them directly at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- That's not necessarily true, as any admin can ask a CheckUser to approve an unblock. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- I explained my situation above. I admitted that I used the accounts and I'm willing to not use them anymore. I'm willing to fit in any rules. I just don't want to be banned forever. I did good contrubuitions and just for one flaw I've been banned forever. I admitted my mistake and I stated to everyone that I don't intend in persisting in the mistake.--SirEdimon (talk) 22:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- If I find a Checkuser, can I ping him here or it would be harassment?--SirEdimon (talk) 22:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- SirEdimon, let me cut to the chase. I don't want to talk about technical possibilities when an editor is CU-blocked because most of them are remote. Based on what you've done pre-block and said post-block has not convinced me that you should be unblocked. That means I will not approve an unblock. Therefore, only another CU or the Arbitration Committee can unblock you. Your repeated unblock requests have no doubt already attracted other CheckUsers to this page. Pinging other CUs at random would be a waste of time. I agree with Vanjagenije. Your best bet is to appeal to the Committee. I will say that if you continue requesting unblocks here that are clearly repetitive, you will probably have your access to this page revoked. Finally, I don't want to argue with you about this. It's your choice.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- I just don't understand why the admins are so unwilling to help me or even irritated about me. The "Blocking Policy" states that the block " should not be punitive". I'm admitting my mistake and I'm stating that I'll not incur in the same mistake again. To keep my block means that nobody believes me and that everybody thinks that I will incur in the same mistake again. Also, you are saying that all my contribuitions before block are all unworth. Which is not true. Also, you don't give me any solutions. I mean, I can't not edit with my account, I can't editing with my IP, so I'm banned forever. And now I'm been threated to have my access to my own talk page blocked, so I not even can defend myself. Blocks should serve as a means to warning editor and not to punish them. I know I did wrong. If you unblock me and I reincide in bad behaviour you can just block me forever. My edits didn't cause any harm to the comunity and my contribuitions on women's soccer was worth note. But if there's no other way I'll appeal for the AC.--SirEdimon (talk) 23:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- This isn't a case where you'd been blocked for socking months/years ago, come clean/participated positively at other projects, learned from your mistakes, and returned. It was 4 days ago. I, and likely others probably feel you're telling us what you think we want to hear. You might want to look at the standard offer in addition to contacting arbcom. SQLQuery me! 03:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- @SQL:So I need to wait 6 months without editing Wikipedia because of one mistake? I did good contributions to the community you just need to check my edits. In women's soccer, I was the main editor of several articles. Including the 2013 NWSL season, which is the only pro women's football league in the world. I did create the articles for two teams in the league. I created the article for several women's players. Some of them with almost 100 international caps and no articles. I was creating articles for every player that played in the 2017 UEFA women's championship when I was blocked. So, I can say that I did good contributions. And it took me only one bad act for being banned forever. What I did good, means nothing. Honestly, I saw worse cases in which editors behavior was much more disruptive to the community and they were not punished so severely like I'm being right now. And I'm not "telling what you want to hear". I just loved to edit Wikipedia. To create an article that anyone can read in any place in the world. To build the biggest knowledge base in the world. There is no reason for me to lie in this case. Also, if I was only another editor disrupting Wikipedia's order I would just leave this account aside and create another one to keep my disruption. It would be way easier. I would be not here, trying to prove that I'm a good editor who did a mistake. But, it's alright, I understand. If Wikipedia's community wants me out forever I'll be out. I'll appeal to the AC if they deny my plea I'll respect their decision and leave Wikipedia forever. Regards--SirEdimon (talk) 03:49, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- This isn't a case where you'd been blocked for socking months/years ago, come clean/participated positively at other projects, learned from your mistakes, and returned. It was 4 days ago. I, and likely others probably feel you're telling us what you think we want to hear. You might want to look at the standard offer in addition to contacting arbcom. SQLQuery me! 03:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- I just don't understand why the admins are so unwilling to help me or even irritated about me. The "Blocking Policy" states that the block " should not be punitive". I'm admitting my mistake and I'm stating that I'll not incur in the same mistake again. To keep my block means that nobody believes me and that everybody thinks that I will incur in the same mistake again. Also, you are saying that all my contribuitions before block are all unworth. Which is not true. Also, you don't give me any solutions. I mean, I can't not edit with my account, I can't editing with my IP, so I'm banned forever. And now I'm been threated to have my access to my own talk page blocked, so I not even can defend myself. Blocks should serve as a means to warning editor and not to punish them. I know I did wrong. If you unblock me and I reincide in bad behaviour you can just block me forever. My edits didn't cause any harm to the comunity and my contribuitions on women's soccer was worth note. But if there's no other way I'll appeal for the AC.--SirEdimon (talk) 23:04, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- SirEdimon, let me cut to the chase. I don't want to talk about technical possibilities when an editor is CU-blocked because most of them are remote. Based on what you've done pre-block and said post-block has not convinced me that you should be unblocked. That means I will not approve an unblock. Therefore, only another CU or the Arbitration Committee can unblock you. Your repeated unblock requests have no doubt already attracted other CheckUsers to this page. Pinging other CUs at random would be a waste of time. I agree with Vanjagenije. Your best bet is to appeal to the Committee. I will say that if you continue requesting unblocks here that are clearly repetitive, you will probably have your access to this page revoked. Finally, I don't want to argue with you about this. It's your choice.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- If I find a Checkuser, can I ping him here or it would be harassment?--SirEdimon (talk) 22:34, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- I explained my situation above. I admitted that I used the accounts and I'm willing to not use them anymore. I'm willing to fit in any rules. I just don't want to be banned forever. I did good contrubuitions and just for one flaw I've been banned forever. I admitted my mistake and I stated to everyone that I don't intend in persisting in the mistake.--SirEdimon (talk) 22:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- That's not necessarily true, as any admin can ask a CheckUser to approve an unblock. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:23, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- (←) You need to understand that in a consensus-based environment, offenses like sockpuppetry are some of the absolute worst offenses you can commit. Sockpuppetry is directly damaging to the project, and undermines the concept of consensus in many situations. It is extremely hard to trust someone with the privilege to edit the encyclopedia after they have socked - wether or not they have admitted it after the fact. With that being said - I do think you have handled this case admirably, and I would hope arbcom will look at everything surrounding this request. SQLQuery me! 04:52, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- @SQL:I understand it now. But my "alternatives accounts" I only used to draft articles. I only used one account to commit one disruptive act which I honestly regret deeply. But I will try the AC and see if they willing to give me a second chance.--SirEdimon (talk) 05:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- @SQL: Sorry for pinging you, but I have a question. I realized that I still can edit in the Wikipedia in Portuguese (a language that I also speak). If I edit in there I'll be breaking any rules or disrespecting the block or is it ok?--SirEdimon (talk) 19:40, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
- @SQL:I understand it now. But my "alternatives accounts" I only used to draft articles. I only used one account to commit one disruptive act which I honestly regret deeply. But I will try the AC and see if they willing to give me a second chance.--SirEdimon (talk) 05:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Fátima Pinto
Hello! Your submission of Fátima Pinto at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ISD (talk) 06:25, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- @ISD:. The problem is: My account have been recently blocked and I can't edit nothing but my own talk page. But if you are willing we can work to make the hook suitable for a DYK. It could be "...that Portuguese footballer Fátima Pinto is the first woman from Madeira to ever win the Portuguese football league and to ever represent Portugal in a UEFA Women's Championship?". What do you think? Thanks and sorry for the incovenience I'm causing.--SirEdimon (talk) 07:03, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Fátima Pinto at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 17:14, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Gatoclass: Hi, there. Sorry for pinging you, but as I'm blocked the only thing I can edit is my talk page. I saw that you pulled this nomination from the queue because you could not confirm it from source. The source I left confirms the DYK. Pinto says here in her interview: "Fui a primeira madeirense a apurar-se para um Campeonato da Europa feminino. Sempre que me encontram no Funchal, os meus antigos colegas de escola, professores, vizinhos, todos dizem maravilhas de mim e da Seleção" ("I was the first Madeiran to play a women's European Championship. Whenever they meet me in Funchal, my old classmates, teachers, neighbors, all say wonders about me and the National Team ") In another point in the same interview she says: "Eles vibram muito com os meus feitos. Também fui a primeira madeirense campeã nacional [pelo Ouriense, em 2013]. É natural que tenham orgulho. Muitos vêm ver os meus jogos pelo Sporting. Espero dar-lhes mais alegrias este ano" ("They vibrate a lot with my deeds. I was also the first Madeiran national champion [for the Ouriense, in 2013]. It is natural that they feel proud. Many come to see my matches for Sporting. I hope to give them more joys this year"). Sorry for bothering you with this. I know I'm blocked and everything, but my nomination is legitimate and the information on the article and on the DYK are all corrected. Regards.--SirEdimon (talk) 19:49, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Andreia Norton at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 17:23, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Amberrock: Hi, there. I'm currently blocked from editing, so I cannot participate actively in my own DYK nominations, however I still want to help the nominations to being approved. I would like to know why exactly this nomination was not completed. And also if you could help with another DYK (Fátima Pinto, in the message above this one) I would much apreciate. All help is welcome and sorry for ping you, but I just can edit my own talk page. Regards.--SirEdimon (talk) 06:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
DYK for Matilde Fidalgo
On 10 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Matilde Fidalgo, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Portuguese international football players Matilde Fidalgo and Bernardo Silva are cousins? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Matilde Fidalgo. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Matilde Fidalgo), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Nomination of GVATE LLC for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GVATE LLC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GVATE LLC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Stor-Age Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Stor-Age Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 12 June 2018 (UTC)