Justshepu

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justshepu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Brother, seeing that I had two user accounts, did I commit a great sin? I didn't know that having two accounts was a problem. The reason I have two user accounts is because one is logged on my laptop and the other I work on mobile. I have not done anything illegal. I have said many times that I did not know that. If I had known, I would not have made such a mistake. My request is to please unblock my user. Say it again Because I have two users, I have said before that I had one user on my mobile and another on my computer. I did not hire two users to do anything illegal. I hope you please unblock my user.justshepu (talk) Justshepu (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

So you've gone from denying you did anything wrong to "OK, I did it but I didn't know it was wrong". I can only imagine where we're going next if we keep doing this (hint hint): "Brother, I knew it was wrong but I didn't think I would get caught." And the SPI shows more than two accounts. And you had been blocked once before, over a year ago ... that's too much time here for any claim that you didn't know (And really, is there a website anywhere that approves of the practice of users creating sockpuppets? I think the default assumption on the Internet circa 2021 is that this is just wrong). — Daniel Case (talk) 23:34, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I suggest to any admin that if there is a fourth request along these same lines that talk page access be revoked after it's declined. Daniel Case (talk) 23:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

May 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Login, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. Please feel free to use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. At the top of the page which you were editing, it says: "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Login article." David Biddulph (talk) 15:42, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Login. Did you not read the previous warning? The page which you were editing says: "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Login article." David Biddulph (talk) 15:58, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Welcome Justshepu!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,285,919 registered editors!

Hello Justshepu. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:   Introduction to Wikipedia   The five pillars of Wikipedia   Editing tutorial   How to edit a page   Simplified Manual of Style   The basics of Wikicode   How to develop an article   How to create an article   Help pages   What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:   Do be bold   Do assume good faith   Do be civil   Do keep cool!   Do maintain a neutral point of view   Don't spam   Don't infringe copyright   Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest   Don't commit vandalism   Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:   Ask a question

or you can:   Get help at the Teahouse

or even:   Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:   Fight vandalism   Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome   Help contribute to articles   Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you   Help design new templates   Subscribe and contribute to The Signpost

To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to:

• Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
• Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
  

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!

Sincerely, Ad Orientem (talk) 17:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

• Español
• Deutsch
• Français
• Italiano
• עברית
• Русский
• 日本語
• Polski
• فارسی

Ad Orientem (talk) 17:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 17:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Mrittunjoy Chowdhury moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mrittunjoy Chowdhury, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 08:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mrittunjoy Chowdhury

Hello Justshepu,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mrittunjoy Chowdhury for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Govvy (talk) 18:54, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Need help?

Hello! Hope you are doing good. Feel free to leave me a message if you need any help. You can also talk in Bangla if you want. Happy editing! --Zayeem ^(talk) 16:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Musafire Syed Bachchu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Musafire Syed Bachchu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 18:55, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Touhid Talukder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Touhid Talukder, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touhid Talukder until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mrittunjoy Chowdhury

Hello, Justshepu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mrittunjoy Chowdhury, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Musafire Syed Bachchu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Musafire Syed Bachchu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musafire Syed Bachchu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— A.A Prinon  ^Conversation 22:32, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Musafire Syed Bachchu. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Musafire Syed Bachchu. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:28, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Removing AfD templates

Though, the incident was 10 days ago, I would like to alert you not to remove Articles for deletion templates before the discussion is closed. You did it to the article, Musafire Syed Bachchu, which I nominated for deletion.

যদিও ঘটনাটি দশ দিন আগের, তারপরও আমি আপনাকে সতর্ক করতে চাই যে Articles for deletion এর Template গুলো আলোচনা শেষ হওয়ার আগে সরিয়ে ফেলবেন না। আপনি এমনটি Musafire Syed Bachchu article টি-তে করেছিলেন। আশা করছি এমনটি আপনি আর করবেন না। — A.A Prinon  ^Conversation 08:04, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Ishrat Zaheen Ahmed moved to draftspace

See WP:DRAFTIFY. Take your time and create the article properly and submit via WP:AFC when completed. Celestina007 (talk) 21:12, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ishrat Zaheen Ahmed

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ishrat Zaheen Ahmed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:45, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Musafire Syed Bachchu

Hello, Justshepu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Musafire Syed Bachchu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zidan Miah

Hello, Justshepu

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Zidan Miah, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 ^Talk 13:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Zidan Miah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zidan Miah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zidan Miah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

JW 1961 ^Talk 13:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Azmari Nirjhar moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Azmari Nirjhar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 20:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

If a page has been draftified, please do not copy the content from the draft back into the main page, as you did here. Thanks, Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 20:57, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Azmari Nirjhar (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Azmari Nirjhar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Azmari Nirjhar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Justshepu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:25, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Shahin Alam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahin Alam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahin Alam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

StickyWicket (talk) 20:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Konal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Playback. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Fahad Munir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fahad Munir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fahad Munir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nayb Md. Tahmid Islam

The article Nayb Md. Tahmid Islam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 12:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Nayb Md. Tahmid Islam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nayb Md. Tahmid Islam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nayb Md. Tahmid Islam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BlameRuiner (talk) 22:30, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chirkutt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RTV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

The Bangladeshi Tv Channel RTV (Bangladeshi TV channel) Justshepu (talk) 06:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Justshepu. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 03:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

I haven't opened another account for any illegal work. The reason I have been blocked is my friend's user, we use the same WiFi broadband. Please open my block, I'm starting to contribute to regular Wikipedia. Thanks to Wikipedia Justshepu (talk) 06:37, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

I didn't know it before Wikipedia: Sockpuppetry. Thanks a lot for letting me know. I haven't done anything illegal on Wikipedia so I can say I won't do it again. I could work on Wikipedia if my user was unblocked, so please unblock my user. And if you want BdH1H2 you can block this user but justshepu requested to unblock this user. Thank you. Justshepu (talk) 08:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justshepu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't know it before Wikipedia: Sockpuppetry. Thanks a lot for letting me know. I haven't done anything illegal on Wikipedia so I can say I won't do it again. I could work on Wikipedia if my user was unblocked, so please unblock my user. And if you want BdH1H2 you can block this user but justshepu requested to unblock this user. Thank you.08:39, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Justshepu

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you understand WP:SOCK now. Yamla (talk) 12:43, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I did not do anything illegal, even if I forgot, I am sorry for it, there will be no such mistake. Please unblock my user. I can't contribute to Wikipedia because of user block. How do people work on Wikipedia if you block it? So please unblock my user, thanks Justshepu (talk) 13:03, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justshepu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not do anything illegal, even if I forgot, I am sorry for it, there will be no such mistake. Please unblock my user. I can't contribute to Wikipedia because of user block. How do people work on Wikipedia if you block it? So please unblock my user. justshepu (talk)Justshepu (talk) 15:38, 21 November 2021 (UTC)justshepu

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Brother, seeing that I had two user accounts, did I commit a great sin? I didn't know that having two accounts was a problem. The reason I have two user accounts is because one is logged on my laptop and the other I work on mobile. I have not done anything illegal. I have said many times that I did not know that. If I had known, I would not have made such a mistake. My request is to please unblock my user. Justshepu (talk) 20:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Brother, seeing that I had two user accounts, did I commit a great sin? I didn't know that having two accounts was a problem. The reason I have two user accounts is because one is logged on my laptop and the other I work on mobile. I have not done anything illegal. I have said many times that I did not know that. If I had known, I would not have made such a mistake. My request is to please unblock my user. Say it again Because I have two users, I have said before that I had one user on my mobile and another on my computer. I did not hire two users to do anything illegal. I hope you please unblock my user Justshepu (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Azmari Nirjhar

Hello, Justshepu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Azmari Nirjhar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)