GGOTCC

Welcome!

Hello GGOTCC! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 00:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

April 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Omega Mart has been reverted.
Your edit here to Omega Mart was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCe_EJpcFdOTfnvIA7R4sDHA) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

GGOTCC, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi GGOTCC! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: USCGC Bedloe (WSC-128) has been accepted

USCGC Bedloe (WSC-128), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hatchens (talk) 05:49, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Good work at USCGC Bedloe (WSC-128). - Hatchens (talk) 05:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: USCGC Jackson (WSC-142) has been accepted

USCGC Jackson (WSC-142), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of USS Rockville (PCE-851)

A tag has been placed on USS Rockville (PCE-851) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Draft:Tampa-class cutter, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 18:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of USRC Ingham

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on USRC Ingham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 05:45, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

MV J. A. Moffett Jr

Hello. I noticed you revert anything that I do without providing any reason. You keep adding the same things over and over. Please stop, and review what has been done before reverting my edits. Regards.Crook1 (talk) 05:16, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

@Crook1: Hello Cook1, I apologize if it seems that way. I have been putting back information which I believe was lost in several edits I discarded from us editing the same page at the same time. I added/removed the same thing as you specifically mentioned it to be unnecessary (anchors, city names followed by states, etc) which you undid along with other pieces of information which you don't give a reason for, or the reason applies to something else. Several things (such as the infobox/gallery) was not rendering correctly, so I had to reapply them. I also don't understand why you removed the images. They originated from Hatitrust as public domain images, which is reflected in the images' pages. I apologize if my edits have been blunt, I was following your lead as you are more experienced. I will have to be doing something else soon, so you are free to edit the article to your liking. Sincerely, GGOTCC 05:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, GGOTCC. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ––FormalDude talk 05:20, 2 February 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your thread has been archived

Hi GGOTCC! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Translating FA - Should I fully research topic?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:J. A. Moffett Jr..jpg

Thank you for uploading File:J. A. Moffett Jr..jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. SV1XV (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification, I will delete the file. I accidentally uploaded it to Wikipedia, not Wikimedia which did not give an option for the information. I will correctly upload it with the information. Thanks, GGOTCC (talk) 20:35, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:USCGC Bonham (WPC-129)

Hello, GGOTCC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:USCGC Bonham (WPC-129), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:USNS 1st Lt. Baldomero Lopez

Hello, GGOTCC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:USNS 1st Lt. Baldomero Lopez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:USNS 1st Lt. Baldomero Lopez has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:USNS 1st Lt. Baldomero Lopez. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 18:32, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

USNS 1st Lt. Baldomero Lopez

There is already an article for this ship. - wolf 20:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Juniper-class buoy tender

Hello, GGOTCC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Juniper-class buoy tender, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tampa-class cutter

Hello, GGOTCC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tampa-class cutter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Thetis-class patrol boat

Hello, GGOTCC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thetis-class patrol boat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tampa-class cutter

Hello, GGOTCC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tampa-class cutter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Thetis-class patrol boat

Hello, GGOTCC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thetis-class patrol boat".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of United States Revenue Cutter Service cutters

Hello, GGOTCC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of United States Revenue Cutter Service cutters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Capture of U-505

Hello, GGOTCC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Capture of U-505, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:USNS 1st Lt. Baldomero Lopez

Hello, GGOTCC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "USNS 1st Lt. Baldomero Lopez".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Capture of U-505

Hello, GGOTCC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Capture of U-505".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:08, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:USCGC Bonham (WPC-129)

Hello, GGOTCC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "USCGC Bonham".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:45, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arc-Form

Hello, GGOTCC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arc-Form, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Arc-Form

Hello, GGOTCC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arc-Form".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:List of United States Revenue Cutter Service cutters

Hello, GGOTCC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of United States Revenue Cutter Service cutters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Costanzo Ciano-class cruiser

Hello GGOTCC,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Costanzo Ciano-class cruiser for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Costanzo Ciano-class cruiser to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 21:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Oops, my bad. That should not be an article, as I moved the page into draft space due to it being just a template. What is the best way to delete the page?

Thanks! GGOTCC (talk) 21:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MV Kurdistan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ventilate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SS United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decking.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GGOTCC. Thank you for your work on USS Miami (SSN-811). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

@SunDawn:Thank you very much! I am very honored to be bestowed a Barnstar from a Wikipedian such as yourself! Have a great evening! GGOTCC (talk) 03:17, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for creating USS Miami (SSN-811)! ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi GGOTCC. Thank you for your work on Lockheed CL-1026. Another editor, Voorts, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 02:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

A well earned Barnstar !

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Thank you for the fine work put into editing HMS Royalist, which is in a much better state for your efforts! Zawed (talk) 03:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I really appreciate it! GGOTCC (talk) 03:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024 GOCE drive award

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to GGOTCC for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 08:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Monifa McKnight

Hello, GGOTCC. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Monifa McKnight, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Monifa McKnight

Hello, GGOTCC. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Monifa McKnight".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

EFFECTIVE ERASURE OF 95 PERCENT OF HMS (hmnzs) ROYALIST article by GGOTCC (US COASTGUARD) a non NEW ZEalander, Non Commonwealth, non naval ANZUS, five eyes officer, rating or commentatorr

The first question is why and on whose advice. The suspicion is that a bland inoffensive article has been inserted to serve the interests of certain non military authorities, NZ MFAT, Cabinet Ministers and servants of the interests of foreign powers and services, nb CCP, PLN. The majority of the previous article was written by me anon between 2011 -2023 to counter the year zero neutralist foreign and defence policy of the NZ Key and subsequent English and Arden governments.

 The revised article excluded the discussion of the Royalist and other proposed Dido/ Bellona class cruiser reconstructions as an effective interim AA/AD platform proving area defence in the 1956-1963 period  before the USN Terrier Tartar missiles could would function effectively as anti aircraft weapons  post 1964 in USN, RAN or prospectively RN service.  The alternative RN expenditure of Destroyer conversions of the CA and Weapon class was hardly effective or useful while in the case of RNZN the T12 Rothesay and Leander class has an effective range of only about 3300nm at 14 knots due to over reliance of filtering without compensating tanks as used fuel was balanced by inflow of compensating seawater.

Also removed from the HMS Royalist is the fact that Royalist was able to operate with the RNZN only with extensive crewing by RN officers and financial and refit assistance by the USN at Pearl Harbour in 1965. Royalist is also a major NZ Political and Historical topic, shedding critical light on the career of Cpt Peter Phipps and later MFAT Head Frank Corner, both far more left and controversial figures than now acknowledged. Phipps and Corner assertion that the Royalist was an obsolete orphan was wrong. The Royalists 5.25 DP armament was highly effective as an AA weapon while the standard RN twin 4 inch and 4.5 turrets were useless in the post war AA role. Part of the objection to the Royalist was the relatively heavy 5.25 shore bombardment capability seen as an obscenity by NZ and UK diplomats and politicians. Adequate stocks of 5.25 ammunition remained for reserve battleships, shore batteries of 5.25 guns covered the Straight of Gibraltar till, the end of the cold war. The Royalists sister ship the former HMS Diadem was never a Pakistan training ship, it reentered PLN operational service in 1961 after fitting with USN Electronic warfare ECM/ ESM and USN Carrier communication systems. Diadem was still operational and at sea at the time of the 1971 war with India. My motivation is maintaining some balance in NZ History given the overwhelming left wing nature of the historical profession and NZ History generally and the issue of economic efficiency and combat effectiveness in defence expenditure. In NZ case seems to me to overwhelmingly favor the RNZAF. my own qualifications are a BA from Victoria University Wellington awarded in 1979 and a B.Com in Accountancy awarded by Canterbury Uni in Christchurch in 2005. I also have 2 relevant post graduate degree a MA 2/2 in Political Science from Canterbury and a 3 in History from Canterbury which I accepted in 2011, five years after I completed the course as I doubted the legality of the Uni downgrading my status from 2/2 to 3 in similar disciplines with the obvious parallel, to Tony Blair being downgraded from 2/2 to 3 in Law at Oxford Uni. The point has to made that Honours degrees in NZ are half filled by students who haven't got jobs or don't know what to do: that the environment is different from undergraduate courses where the student works individually without much interaction with staff or other students. In Hons once faces an environment of many communists and classes of provocatively dressed females which is distracting and a difficult environment for anybody at all hetrosexual. In 21C NZ postgraduate degrees are marked on presentational and PC grounds and in Law, Politics and History thesis work can not clash with the operational policy of NZ MFAT. I attended Uni because my parents were highly educated teachers and because I always intended on a university career given that I in a sense became aware of politics in 1967 and 1970. My second undergraduate degree in Commerce was because it was my original intention to do Economics from the time I was first interested in university and as early as the 1970s viewed Economics qualifications on the bass of future power in NZ. My second undergraduate degree was to gain enough knowledge of market economics to defend the economic reforms which in some senses I have done. My first aim was to go to University and to qualify as a civil servant. However the uninteresting nature of Wellington and Muldoons, sinking lid graduate public service cuts of 1979 changed my course. Pursuing Journalism and jobs in the Ministry of Defence in 1980-1985 were the only real options due to my family background of teachers, academics and substantial investment in Australian banks, minerals and oil. It was not my intention to do honours degree and the second BA Hons was attempted at the request of the university. I felt the course, below my standing as a serious defence and political commentator and would have preferred to remain at university by just enrolling in odd science and arts units.. Numerous completely untrue allegations have been made against my family and me. My grandfather Frederick Fisher Miles is attacked in S J Harpers work on NZers who served in British Army regiments and many claims have been made to me that my father Alan Miles ( no middle name) was not a WW2 officer and did not serve. He travelled to the UK with one of the echelons in 1940 and transferred to the RN training with later professor Brian Philpot later a Lincoln Professor. Alan Miles served notably on the command ship HMS Khedive for Operation Dragoon. He was nominated for a Rhodes Scholarship in 1946 by Victoria Uni was a Victoria Uni lecturer in 1948 and attended Oxford Uni on a travelling scholarship in the Atlee austerity of 1949-50. In 1955 he reentered the NZ Army at a lower rank of Army Lt as a Cadet and Territorial officer while teaching at TBHS and later commanded the unit retiring as Major.

Slanders have been made about me largely by members of the rural NZ National Party. In truth I was extensively employed back in the day as a leader writer and defence and political commentator by the NBR, Timaru Herald a many other publications. I also wrote a number of academic papers on dfence and international relations published by noted NZ Naval Historian Ian McGibbon in the NZIIA. Robert F Miles. Age 67. Auckland NZ 202.36.254.250 (talk) 05:16, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello!

I want to start off by establishing that my work on the Royalist article was to copy edit, as the old version was incredibly dense, hard to follow, and often went on long tangents largely irrelevant to what would be found in an encyclopedic article. I implore you to review the Manual of Style, especially WP:EPSTYLE, Wikipedia:Summary style, and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Many other Wikipedia articles (especially those rated GA) are good examples of how paragraphs are structured and what information is included on the site.

I removed the Terrier refit as part of my copy edit because the text was nonsensical and would confuse the reader as the modifications never occurred and lack context. A more brief explanation may suffice, but the article in its current state already covers her 1953 refit and use as an AA cruiser. Are these not what you are referring to? The article also covers her refit in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, which to the average reader would indicate American assistance. Even now, I struggle to understand what you are describing, an issue multiple editors have mentioned on Royalist’s talk page.

Wikipedia can be edited to anyone, and you are free to add information you feel is necessary to maintain a good encyclopedia article and cover relevant ideas. However, your regular admittance of your political bias is a blatant conflict of interest, and this article may not be for you.

Your opening accusations against me is objectively false in every way, and I hold no grudge against New Zealand or yourself. Until I read the article as part of a copy editing drive, I was not aware New Zealand even had a navy, and as an American, I have no interest in, nor understanding, of the nation’s inter-political conflicts. I was also born well after Royalist left service and have no connections to either the ship or the entirety of Oceania.

And as a fellow heterosexual male, I struggle to understand why the way women dress would be at all relevant to one's education, and how that is relevant to the structure of an online article.

Does this help clarify your concerns?

Cheers,

GGOTCC (talk) 16:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Distraction. These courses are largely female dominated and the dress style inn 2006 Christchurch was blatant. The course and assessment structure of these courses is now female focused The questioning of the military, war and Oxford records of my father and grandfather is a travesty and criminal insult .I understand my father left Balliol in 1950 because he chose not to complete the lesser degree of B.Lit by simply completing his degree by submitting a bibliography for his work on Milton, having effectively failed the Phd std. Part of the citation problem with the article is due to frequent random criminal vandalism on it

.

Editing of the article by a US Coastguard officer without knowledge of NZ History seems extraordinarily inappropriate given that a former RNZN officer had been previously doing the work and RN or RAN officers, eg from Australian seapower officers might havebeen more relevamt. 130.216.69.80 (talk) 07:06, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

if you would like a second opinion from someone with a better understanding of the politics, feel free to ask the folks at Wikiproject Ships or Wikiproject New Zealand to review the current article and pre-copy edit version. That being said, it appears you have already burnt that bridge with several members, although I always appreciate additional help. Again, my edits to the page regarded readability and maintaining an encyclopedic tone, irrelevant of personal beliefs.

I'll also like to ask why you have made an assumption of my job, and why you had offended yourself based off said assumption?

Best,

GGOTCC (talk) 07:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi GGOTCC, coming here to explain my reversion of your recent edit and came across this...diatribe from the IP editor identifying himself as Robert Miles. I would disregard the above discourteous comments as Mr Miles looks to have no interest in constructive collaboration and does not appear to understand, or want to understand, the principles of editing Wikipedia e.g. NPOV, AGF among others. It is to your credit you have engaged with him as politely as you have done. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

I see, thank you! I would have undone my edit as well. 👍

Best,

GGOTCC (talk) 12:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)