Sv1xv

TUSC token 1732e7811c2ab135ed0a40ba279f599b

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Archived discussions

• /Archive 1 : Until 2009-12-31
• /Archive 2 : 2010
• /Archive 3 : 2011-2012

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

August 2020: Just another Wiki-enemy

Hello, I'm Nigel Ish. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Grumman Gulfstream I that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nigel Ish (talk) 16:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

My comment was not meant to be civil, beacause the revent by BillCat was unreasonable. The whereabouts of the Greek "Gulfstream I" were already reasonably documented in the article by the inclusion of a photo of this plane at the museum. Unfortunately there are people who use the rules of WP against any common sense. Unfortunately Wikipedia has gradually evolved in the place to make new enemies. SV1XV (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Civility is not optional - attacking other editors in edit summaries doesn't help anyone, and merely increases the chance that someone will continue to revert you or take admin action. Sourcing is also not something that is optional - if someone removes something that is not sourced then the solution is simply to provide a source, not attacking people for making a perfectly reasonable edit. Photos do not count as Reliable Sources so just because there is a photo claiming to show an aircraft at a cerain museum doesn't mean we can say so. There is also the point as to whether it is appropriate to talk about aircraft being preserved in museums in an operators section.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:34, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

You know, civility must work both ways. I still regard his revert as malicious, even if you claim that he follows the rules, He had solid indication that it was not a bogus edit, If he wanted to be civil, hw could have tagged my edit with {{facts}} as it was not an extraordinary claim. SV1XV (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Trying to get WikiProject Amateur Radio back on the air!

Hi, I'm Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} and I'm currently doing my best to resurrect the amateur radio WikiProject. A lot of the articles need some serious work and so I'm trying to organize an article improvement drive in October. If you're interested check out the link to the drive and the project page. Right now everything is in the planning stages, trying to find people interested, articles to focus on, etc. So if you know anyone who would like to help out feel free to invite them! If you no longer interested in this project that's a-ok just remove yourself from the list on the project page and I'll never badger you again. 73! Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 00:08, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Sv1xv,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 213, January 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at three diverse works Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on the state of the Wikiproject

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 214, February 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Pickersgill-Cunliffe review four books

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 215, March 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 and Nick-D look at four recent works

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:56, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 216, April 2024

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes Op-ed: Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)