User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 14

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Asher (May 20)

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

Poorly made disambiguation page. One unintentional link to another link and a redlink.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Asher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Max Asher, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 04:32, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

User:I dream of horses you mean Draft:Max Asher (actor)? Only a redlink until someone moves the draft to mainspace. The current redirect at Max Asher is poor. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:09, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Perhaps you should resubmit this if Max Asher is accepted. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trey Yingst (May 23)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trey Yingst and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Trey Yingst, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 10:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Louisa Georgina Petrie (May 23)

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources by the subject do not establish notability. There is one source about the subject ([1]). We need one or two more like this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Louisa Georgina Petrie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mary Louisa Georgina Petrie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 15:22, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

What about this cited source User:Kvng? FloridaArmy (talk) 23:37, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

That's borderline. The fact that a library is holding on to her stuff (indirectly) argues that she's important. It would not be borderline if there were a statement from the library explaining the import of this material and why they're holding it rather than the dry description from their catalog that we have here. It is difficult to build a notability case from what you can find freely on the internet today for many pre-internet subjects. Most editors appreciate this so that reduces the possibility that someone will try to delete this if you were to move it to mainspace yourself. ~Kvng (talk) 00:42, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 24

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Nicholas Selig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Travelogue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Douglass Center has a new comment

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Douglass Center. Thanks! Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:50, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Google Amp links are blocked. I tried to fix them but sometimes it doesn't work. I went through MSN instead so the links should work now User:Barkeep49 FloridaArmy (talk) 00:41, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ray Malone (May 27)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MrClog was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Since the last time this article has been declined, only one new trivial mention has been added as a reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ray Malone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ray Malone, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MrClog (talk) 16:45, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Charles Otto Berger

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Charles Otto Berger.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:16, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blackfriars Settlement (May 30)

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MrClog was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blackfriars Settlement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blackfriars Settlement, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MrClog (talk) 15:40, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MrClog (talk) 15:40, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Auld lang syne

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Auld lang syne".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:14, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilbert Holloway (June 1)

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wilbert Holloway and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wilbert Holloway, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 15:10, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Scope_creep, isn't a State Representative notable? FloridaArmy (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi FloridaArmy, I suspect so, but the sourcing is atrocious. scope_creep^Talk 18:48, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Scope_creep what is wrong with Vote Smart and the State of Florida state archives as sources? FloridaArmy (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilbert L. Holloway has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wilbert L. Holloway, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:28, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wendell Dabney has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wendell Dabney, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:So Tough (song)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:So Tough (song).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Denver Ferguson (June 2)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not seeing anything other than passing mentions. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Denver Ferguson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Denver Ferguson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 09:40, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Another arbitrary break

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Draft:Agnes Mapes (needs expansion)
Draft:Elizabeth Lincoln Gould Done
Draft:George E. Middleton Done
Draft:Wuanita Smith, needs work
Draft:Lloyd B. Carleton
Draft:Reginald Badham Lodge Done
Draft:Daisy Jefferson
Draft:Partners of the Tide
Draft:Thomas Jefferson High School (Gretna, Louisiana) someone else's draft but meets notability criteria
Draft:George E. McDonald (architect) Done
Draft:Hubert Horton McAlexander
Draft:Benjamin B. Hampton Done
Draft:Fine Arts Film Company
Draft:Harold Holland
Draft:James Samuel Windeatt
Draft:Rita Stanwood
Draft:Edwin Harley
Draft:Santa Barbara Motion Picture Company (working on)
Draft:Joel P. Corin
Draft:Felix F. Feist
Draft:Scotty Miller
Draft:Joseph Morris (music publisher)
Draft:Alton Redd
Draft:Shane Strum will revisit in 6 mos. Or so
Draft:Dale Crider working on
Draft:Florida Folklife Festival
Draft:Price Mitchell
Draft:Florida Folk Program
Draft:Price Mitchell
Draft:James Ramsey Murray
Draft:Douglass Center
Draft:Wendell Dabney
Draft:Dale Crider
Draft:Seneca Observer
Draft:Gordon Sackville
Draft:Gilbert Sarony
Draft:Henry C. Rowland
Draft:Paul Malvern
Draft:Max Asher (actor)
Draft:Trey Yingst
Draft:Herbert L. Stoddard
Draft:Roland Harper (naturalist)
Draft:Charles Otto Berger brought electricity and lighting to Hawaii. Several photos of him on Wikipedia Commons. Coverage of him doesn't go much in depth from readily available online sources. There is almost certainly more coverage of him offline and in newspaper archives. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:09, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Wheatley Pottery Company
Draft:Garrard College
Draft:Raymond Lee (child actor and film historian)
Draft:Harry Aitken (working on)
Draft:Raymond Lee Newcomb
Draft:Walter L. Smith
Draft:Harry Aitken
Draft:Adam Kessel
Draft:James Vick
Draft:Raymond Lee (child actor and film historian)

Your Girl and Mine moved to draftspace

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An article you recently created, Your Girl and Mine, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Redalert2fan (talk) 17:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Every Woman's Problem has a new comment

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Every Woman's Problem. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 22:52, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Misch Kohn has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Misch Kohn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albuquerque Film Manufacturing Company has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Albuquerque Film Manufacturing Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Atlanta Black Star

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Atlanta Black Star.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sripur Hat High School (June 6)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Zingarese was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Zingarese talk · contribs 16:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:B-Line Trail

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "B-Line Trail".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 20:49, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wheatley Pottery Company has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wheatley Pottery Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 01:19, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tollygunge Panchanangram Canal

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tollygunge Panchanangram Canal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 03:29, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bloomington Rail Trail

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bloomington Rail Trail".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Louis Motion Picture Company has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

St. Louis Motion Picture Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:20, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Giorgio Mannini

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Giorgio Mannini".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Snowycats (talk) 14:17, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Morris and Helen Belkin Art Gallery

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello and thank you for your edits. If you are going to restore unsourced material as you did on the Belkin gallery article, please add appropriate sources. Some of the material "Admission is free" etc is also clearly promotional, and other material is just plain unsourced. Per WP:NOTPROMO and WP:VERIFY, these items need sources or do not belong, respectively. You also removed valid tags: it was tagged for notability and refimprove as there was only one indepndent source. SO, if you are goign to revert these edits again, you need to do so with reasons and sources if you want to act within established policy. Thanks! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 14:21, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David O. Whilldin has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

David O. Whilldin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:35, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dean & Jean has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dean & Jean, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 20:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tameka Hobbs (June 12)

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jodi.a.schneider was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It's necessary to articulate how the subject of this biography meets criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. The most relevant are probably these, for academics: Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)#Criteria

Also note the policy on living persons: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Reliable_sources

Good luck and hope that helps!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tameka Hobbs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tameka Hobbs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 03:55, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

The academic and author has had her work reviewed by reliable independent sources as is noted in the entry. From the notability guideline "The person's work (or works) have won significant critical attention." FloridaArmy (talk) 13:53, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herbert Dixon (golfer) has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Herbert Dixon (golfer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Eagleash (talk) 21:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Penstemon multiflorus has a new comment

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Penstemon multiflorus. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 06:38, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Minatti

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Minatti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:52, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:R. N. Stevens

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "R. N. Stevens".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 09:02, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Elias Barnabas

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Elias Barnabas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:57, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Brammall (June 15)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article needs to be divided into section headings, and is not notable enough

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jack Brammall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jack Brammall, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 12:08, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harold Salemson (June 16)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article subject is notable, but more references to support. Usually two obits are needed for an bio article. There is more sources available. Check JStor, Google Books, newspapers.com, fold3. Please forward me a a note when completed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harold Salemson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Harold Salemson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 11:58, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Night in Dixie (June 16)

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

Article is notable, but insufficient context. What is it about. Is it anything to do with this: [2]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A Night in Dixie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A Night in Dixie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 13:10, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

From the 'aricle's first sentence: "A Night in Dixie is a Phonofilm musical short film from 1925." I'm not aware of a connection to that story but there may be one. I've resubmitted. Not sure what you are confused about. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:12, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slavery at American colleges and universities (June 17)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slavery at American colleges and universities and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Slavery at American colleges and universities, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 09:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tameka Hobbs (June 17)

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zanhe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tameka Hobbs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tameka Hobbs, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zanhe (talk) 09:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Zanhe, the references include in depth bylined reviews of her work from the Journal of American History and Journal of Southern History as well as other coverage. How is that not substantial coverage? FloridaArmy (talk) 10:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bessie Buskirk has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bessie Buskirk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 22:39, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Penstemon multiflorus (June 20)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Plants/Template for more information on the style

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Penstemon multiflorus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Penstemon multiflorus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 06:05, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katharine Kaelred has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Katharine Kaelred, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lapablo (talk) 19:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vallesia antillana has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Vallesia antillana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lapablo (talk) 19:50, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph J. Franz (June 21)

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Joseph Franz (director) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph J. Franz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Joseph J. Franz, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 02:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

User:Mjs1991, my entry didn't "already exist". My entry was worked up in April and the article in mainspace was created in June while the draft languished waiting for a review. What a waste of time. And not the first time this.has happened. A history merge would be the appropriate outcome. And your redirecting a far more conprehensive entry to the more limited entry created subsequent to it seems misguided. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:11, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Kessel has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Adam Kessel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 08:12, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moses Friedman (June 21)

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Moses Friedman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Moses Friedman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 11:53, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

I have resubmitted. The cited sources have extensive coverage of Friedman, controversies at the school, anti-semitism, his marriage, his policy initiatives at the school, his relation to Pop Warner and Jim Thorpe in the school's athletic programs also Dietz, and include hotographs. the second source is a book about the school from 1998 with an entire section on Friedman. So decades later he was still being discussed. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:24, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raymond Lee Newcomb has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Raymond Lee Newcomb, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Redalert2fan (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linda Waggoner (June 21)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by StudiesWorld were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article needs independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linda Waggoner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Linda Waggoner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StudiesWorld (talk) 22:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ray McDonald (actor) (June 22)

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MJL was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ray McDonald (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ray McDonald (actor), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 14:49, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

The subject clearly meets the notability criteria for actors having had substantial and significant roles in notable works. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jack Livingston has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Jack Livingston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lapablo (talk) 18:23, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Penstemon multiflorus (June 22)

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Boothsift was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

One of the references, https://www.fnps.org/ is literally the home page of the organization. This is not very helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Penstemon multiflorus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Penstemon multiflorus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BoothSiftTalks 18:54, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Seems to be a flaw in Wikipedia's citation software. Looking in the history the correct link was provided. I attempted to fix it and I believe it works now. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:03, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Last Rebel (1918 film) has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Last Rebel (1918 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 19:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucretia Harris has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Lucretia Harris, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 19:52, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ray Hallor has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ray Hallor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 19:53, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sex Lure has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Sex Lure, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 03:50, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Penstemon multiflorus has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Penstemon multiflorus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 04:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Booth Tarkington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monsieur Beaucaire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:02, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Roster of Company B, 6th Florida Infantry Regiment

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roster of Company B".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:05, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:William H. Kendrick

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "William H. Kendrick".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alton Redd (June 26)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Alton Redd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Alton Redd, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 21:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William C. Paley (June 28)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William C. Paley and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:William C. Paley, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 12:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William C. Paley has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

William C. Paley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:10, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Linda Waggoner (June 29)

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I am not seeing how she meets WP:NAUTHOR or WP:PROF. I think there is next to no chance that she is notable but I won't rule out that I could be proven wrong.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Linda Waggoner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Linda Waggoner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

She certainly doesn't meet the PROF criteria and nowhere in the article is it asserted that she is a professor. She does meet the AUTHOR criteria because her works have been substantially covered and discussed in reliable independent sources. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:04, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinellas High School (June 30)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pinellas High School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pinellas High School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:23, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lloyd B. Carleton has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Lloyd B. Carleton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mjs1991 (talk) 05:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Jimmie Cooper

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Jimmie Cooper.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:09, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

redir National Trust

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello,

I have proposed National Trust Collections for deletion. It is a redirect that is no longer in use.

Greetings, --Dick Bos (talk) 09:45, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Samuel Windeatt has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

James Samuel Windeatt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 10:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elinor Hancock has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Elinor Hancock, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 17:46, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Coe Glade (July 3)

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This is a very close paraphrase of the New York Times article. It must be rewritten in your own words

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Coe Glade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Coe Glade, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 17:50, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 17:50, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Addison Gayle has been accepted

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Addison Gayle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

scope_creep^Talk 22:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Carey Bond (July 3)

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jean Carey Bond and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jean Carey Bond, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 22:50, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Archie Lindo

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Archie Lindo.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)