Welcome!

edit

Hello, Amsterdad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 13:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jan Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Usher and Rob Thomas
Lucian Hudson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries and TLG
Toni Castells (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Coram

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

T. Brian Callister (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to University of Nevada and Tonopah
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Prudential and Big Brother
Michael D. Yapko (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to National University

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DJ Amadeus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 3 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Walker (printmaker), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Twin Towers and Laurence Hyde (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Monica Lindstrom

edit

Hi, just to let you know I made some MoS edits to the page Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monica Lindstrom, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages James Ray and KTAR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 13 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael J. Lindstrom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Ray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 20 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Agora Financial, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SEC and Bill Bonner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Haberkern, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Parametric, Ultrasonic and Secret Service (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Good update!

edit

Great (much needed) update to the Liberal Judaism article -- good stuff! Jheald (talk) 15:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grigory Gurevich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St. John’s University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Healthspan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Devil's claw, Advertising Standards Authority and Valerian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Freeloading?

edit

Keeping articles in ones user space always smacks to me of using Wikipedia as a free host. I have moved User:Amsterdad/ChrisArnold to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ChrisArnold. You have various options for the others: move to mainspace, move to AfC, tag for U1 deletion or wait for me to move them to AfC space. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • I'm not sure what a free host is, but if there is an issue with getting distracted from one page while thinking about another and not being sure whether or not I want to post my work on Wikipedia, then I'll move these to sandboxes that do not include the page names in them and hopefully that solves your issue. Also, would you mind sending me the link to the Wikipedia policy instructing Wikipedia administrators to move new pages to AFC without the consent of the creator who is still working on them (possibly resulting in a rejection caused by said administrator who didn't want to wait to vet the article), as well as the policy whereby a user cannot keep work in their sandboxes beyond a set period of time? Understanding the limitations as to how editors are allowed to create their articles within their user space sandboxes would help me in determining whether or not to continue contributing to the website. Amsterdad (talk) 14:29, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Moving to different names would serve absolutely no purpose whatsoever. If you do not like my actions, you are quite at liberty to reverse them and I will consider whether to take alternative actions. I have not seen a stated time limit for user space drafts but the six month time limit for G13 deletions might be considered to create a precedent. Please indicate how long we may be expected to wait before you get around to publishing your drafts. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:33, 13 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Justin Levinson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Virgin Airlines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Steven Cox

edit

Hello Amsterdad,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Steven Cox for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 21:16, 10 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Contesting deletion of Steven Cox

edit

Hello TheLongTone,

I posted the following response on the talk page for Steven Cox, contesting it due to the following:

This page should not be speedy deleted because...

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Amsterdad (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

This is a page on an entrepreneur who is notable due to his established history as well as the amount of sourced material. Sources such as : http://money.cnn.com/2010/02/03/smallbusiness/small_business_jobs/ http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2009/may/17/lz1b17startup215029-survival-mode/?dsq=9471776#comment-9471776 http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/columnist/wolff/2013/02/24/michael-wolff-specialty-lists-push-into-craigs-territory/1943975/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/chicceo/2013/02/18/10-unique-businesses-to-help-you-keep-your-resolution/ http://www.inc.com/magazine/20090501/a-recession-high-note.html http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/04/02/us-usa-workplace-music-idUSTRE53102C20090402 http://www.crunchbase.com/company/takelessons-com#ixzz2gPDTUa1k http://ocbj.media.clients.ellingtoncms.com/static/sdbj/supplements/Fastest-Growing-Private-Cos_1307.pdf http://techcrunch.com/2013/01/31/music-lessons-marketplace-takelessons-grabs-4m-from-pinterest-exec-softtech-others-to-expand-into-new-verticals/ http://www.businessinsider.com/hottest-startups-in-san-diego-2013-9?op=1

Are all reliable sources that establish the notability of the subject, and the reasons that he is notable enough to warrant an entry. Amsterdad (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to DJ Amadeus may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:56, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Victor Perez (Director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Will (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ChrisArnold concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ChrisArnold, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Lucian Hudson

edit
 

The article Lucian Hudson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No-notable figure. Has engaged in some endeavors, but lacks multiple reliable sources about the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thargor Orlando (talk) 19:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lucian Hudson for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucian Hudson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucian Hudson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thargor Orlando (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Your editing history looks like you are creating articles for paid clients. Am I mistaken? Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi there User:Candleabracadabra. I tend to get into Wikiwormholes or similar drags through pages on the Internet and throw up a page when someone I'm looking for isn't there. I have a lot of spare time at home as I'm taking care of a young child. Can you let me know what I should be doing differently in terms of writing? Amsterdad (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

You didn't answer my question. Are you creating articles for paying clients? Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:42, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
As this attack is your first offense, I chose to ignore it as the No Personal Attacks doctrine states, and simply provide you with the reason why I'm here. Of course I don't get paid; I volunteer here just like everyone else. Can I ask you why you've chosen to harass me beyond the AFD for one of my pages?Amsterdad (talk) 21:24, 26 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it's unreasonable to ask someone who is engaged in a pattern of creating highly promotional and poorly sourced articles on subjects of marginal notability whether they are engaged in paid editing. I don't see any personal attack in my comments. But as you appear to be knowingly violating the rules for profit and your behavior is against the community's rules, I think you are the one who owes your fellow editors volunteering here in good faith an apology. I hope you will consider doing right. I have raised my concerns on the WP:ANI page. You're welcome to participate and I look forward to reading further explanation from you. Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Candleabracadabra, you were wrong to press the question. We have two contradictory rules, 1/ that nobody is allowed to do undisclosed paid editing, and 2/ that nobody need say who they are. At the moment, arb com has held that the 2nd is more important than the first; I think that decision of theirs at least partially wrong, but that's besides the point. Unless they can be convinced otherwise or replaced by those who think otherwise 10 months from now, we must follow it. But we can protect ourselves: Anyone who edits in a manner as if they are a paid editor can be treated as one, whatever the motives for their editing. What this amounts to, is saying that borderline importance promotional articles must be deleted, and if necessary we will block or ban anyone who persists in submitting them after a warning. Amsterdad has been sufficiently warned at this point. DGG ( talk ) 07:13, 2 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Rest well; you are missed. ~TPW 14:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Greenberg Glusker for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greenberg Glusker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenberg Glusker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ron McKerlie for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron McKerlie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron McKerlie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:22, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bill A. Jones for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bill A. Jones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill A. Jones until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Greenberg Glusker Logo.gif

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Greenberg Glusker Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ChrisArnold

edit
 

Hello Amsterdad. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "ChrisArnold".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ChrisArnold}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Schott Stevens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Defense (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 10 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 15 May

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 16 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natel Engineering Co. Inc. (May 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 
Hello! Amsterdad, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Orphaned non-free image File:Burlington Stores, Inc. Logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Burlington Stores, Inc. Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All Hands Volunteers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hurricane Isaac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Natel Engineering Co. Inc. concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Natel Engineering Co. Inc., a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Natel Engineering Co. Inc.

edit
 

Hello Amsterdad. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Natel Engineering Co. Inc.".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Natel Engineering Co. Inc.}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 22 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chicago Mosaic School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Louis Cathedral. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

May I ask ...

edit

if you are a paid editor? Smallbones(smalltalk) 15:41, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, Smallbones, you can ask, and I may even answer. Scroll on up my talk page and see that I've been accused of it before for the subjects I chose. And like I said, the answer is no, I volunteer to write about the stuff I want to write about just like everyone else. I'm a SAHD with two small ones, and lots of free time to devote to occasionally on stuff I find as I'm traveling through wiki wormholes. That being said, I got pretty disgusted with the witch hunt when one user (who was later banned for being a sockpuppet anyway) decided to flag everything I'd ever done as a COI, most of which was found to be unwarranted, and many of the rest which I rewrote in order to better accommodate wiki style. My sourcing was always accurate, my writing style wasn't necessarily the best - I unintentionally leaned toward more promotional copy, which I worked on and still work on, and I am by no means the worst offender I've seen. But THAT being said, I really haven't done anything here in almost a year because I got sick of defending it warrantlessly. Amsterdad (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

You were mentioned on Smallbones talk page

edit

I mentioned you in an entry at User talk:Smallbones. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 01:41, 3 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Amsterdad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Amsterdad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Simplilearn

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Simplilearn, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ Winged BladesGodric 08:16, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:All Hands Volunteers Logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:All Hands Volunteers Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Amsterdad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Amsterdad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hospitality Financial and Technology Professionals for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hospitality Financial and Technology Professionals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hospitality Financial and Technology Professionals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 11:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of TakeLessons

edit
 

The article TakeLessons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article. Tagged since 2014 for notability. Makes grandiose claims of noteworthiness, but the actual sourcing is a WP:REFBOMB - RSes are passing mentions or doesn't mention the company, sources about the company are churnalism or local boosterism.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 17:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:LabWare Corporate Logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:LabWare Corporate Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply