Talk:Zoe Arancini

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleZoe Arancini was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 26, 2012Good article nomineeListed
June 13, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 2, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Australian Stingers Ashleigh Southern, Glencora Ralph, Zoe Arancini, Rowena Webster and Nicola Zagame are five of seventeen water polo players trying to make the 2012 Summer Olympics squad?
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Victoria Brown (water polo)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Resolute (talk · contribs) 22:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
General
  • Images are good
  • References are reliable
    • Reference use is good.
  • NPOV good
  • Article is stable
Infobox
  • No required change, but a suggestion: The medal table might look cleaner without the repetitive use of "team competition" on each line, especially since there are no articles to link to. It seems busy to me with so much there.
Lead
  • I swear it is in the MOS somewhere, but generally we don't put the subject's birth location in the lead unless it is especially relevant. I did notice on your first two GA water polo articles that one includes the birth location, while the other does not. I personally would remove it, but if other reviewers on other articles tend to not have an issue, consistent usage is better.
  • Link to water polo on first use?
  • "She has represented Australia as a member of the Australia women's national water polo team on the junior and senior level, with over eighty appearances for Australia between the two levels." - Three uses of 'Australia' in one sentence is a tad redundant. I think you could remove the third use... "with over eighty appearances between the two levels".
Personal
Water Polo
Junior national team
Senior national team
Overall
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zoe Arancini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Zoe Arancini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted - no improvement. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Article was listed for GA 11 years ago. Missing info on career post 2012 with the exception of 2020 Olympics. LibStar (talk) 00:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not a reason for GAR. WP:SOFIXIT applies. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:51, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Do not close until June, to prevent topic overload for willing editors.~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:56, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.