Talk:White Cube

Latest comment: 13 years ago by 141.54.138.32 in topic Disambiguation

Hoxton Square edit

It is a good idea to leave the red link to Hoxton Square if you think the article should exist, or in due course will exist. Red links can prompt article creation. I suggest reverting, as the Square is well known enough to generate its own article. Tyrenius 02:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sure. I removed it because I noticed that there was already a link to 'Hoxton' earlier in the article. Cheers, Jacklee 06:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
OK, have restored the link to 'Hoxton Square'. Cheers, Jacklee 21:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Now you've reinstated it, maybe you might be tempted to start the article! Tyrenius 01:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not within my area of expertise, I'm afraid. :-) Cheers, Jacklee 01:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation edit

I wonder is the concept of the 'white cube' a precursor to the gallery, or did the gallery popularise the former? I stumbled across this article searching for the concept. I think we need a disambiguation page. Enaikei (talk) 19:35, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think it's a precursor to the gallery. It will get disambiguated when there is another article on white cube. Ty 02:23, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

the white cube is a theoretical concept, the gallery appropriates the term as the name. there should be a disambiguation page once the separate article exists, even if as a stub. the white cube (term) page can be something similar to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_wall or similar to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altermodern where the term is attributed to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_O%27Doherty.

I am not a registered use, so i cannot create the page, but i will gladly contribute if someone takes that first step. 141.54.138.32 (talk) 20:27, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Metro use of Wikipedia edit

A review of Fred Tomaselli on 1 April 2009 in Metro included:

Ironically, Wikipedia currently states that: 'White Cube is one of the most prominent contemporary commercial art galleries in the world (citation needed).' After this latest in a series of charmless exhibitions, it is little wonder that no one can remember why the gallery earned its international reputation in the first place. Steve Pill —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.36.38.240 (talk) 08:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nazi ties edit

Come on. 81.178.215.33 (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)Reply


Agreed. I'm not going to be the one to do it, but someone should definitely mention the fascistic origins of this whole thing. 212.85.14.98 (talk) 09:53, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply