Talk:Tomorrowland (disambiguation)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Paine Ellsworth in topic Requested move 1 January 2019
WikiProject Disambiguation  
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Requested move 1 January 2019Edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus. See no general agreement below to rename these articles at the present time. As is usual with a no-consensus outcome, editors can strengthen their args and try again in a few months to garner consensus for these or similar page moves. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed.  put'r there  23:02, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

– There doesn't seem to be a primary topic for 'Tomorrowland'. According to pageviews, Tomorrowland (film) seems to be the most popular page for 'Tomorrowland', but Tomorrowland (festival), especially in more recent years seems to be nearly equal in pageviews, while Tomorrowland, the current page which has that name and is a Disney themed zone, seems to be have much less views than either of them. According to Google, "Tomorrowland festival" (16.100.000), "Tomorrowland film" (14.600.000) and "Tomorrowland movie" (18.000.000) are roughly equal in hits, but "Tomorrowland disneyland" (3.030.000) has much fewer hits. As there is no clear primary topic for 'Tomorrowland', I propose the disambiguation page is moved to Tomorrowland. Civciv5 (talk) 02:01, 1 January 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. SITH (talk) 14:35, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Support – the page view statistics are quite clear that there is no primary topic. Bradv🍁 06:36, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support In ictu oculi (talk) 09:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose - The status quo reflects that many of the items on the disambiguation page take their names from the original theme park attraction area. This to me represents that the park area is primary topic based on long-term significance. Actual page views are much closer than implied by the proposer (and using Google hit numbers is fraught with unintentional bias and misinterpretation and should never be used in this way). Because no stats are conclusive, I believe the long-term significance angle must win out here. It also solves a problem with the incomplete proposed disambiguator, as I've described below. -- Netoholic @ 12:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose for now - the film is basically a film adaptation of the Disney attraction, and is therefore more of a subtopic to it (counting towards its popularity) than a topic ambiguous to it. bd2412 T 13:35, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Neutral (currently) on this, however per the discussion bellow - (Disney) is an WP:INCDAB, as the film and the theme park both belong to Disney. --Gonnym (talk) 18:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose, the theme park is the primary topic with respect to long-term significance. -- Wikipedical (talk) 05:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose per above. Theme park is primary by long-term significance. Randy Kryn (talk) 04:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support that there is no primary topic here but (Disney) does not suffice, as previously stated, this could equally refer to the film. I personally propose "Tomorrowland (theme park)" though I see that there is a discussion below Lazz_R 00:48, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Oppose The theme park is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The film is based on the theme park.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:10, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support the first move. There is clearly no primary topic. The festival gets nearly as many page views as the film over the long term and is not based on anything related to Disney. A better disambiguator is needed for the theme park article. Dekimasuよ! 20:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]


  • The proposed disambiguation is very unclear as there are several items of intellectual property, such as the film, which fall broadly under "Disney". We should be more clear. I was thinking the best would be (Disney land), but (Disney park) or (Disney attraction) may be alternatives, but based on the description, the hierarchy of Disney destinations goes: theme park > theme land > attraction/ride (for example Disneyland > Tomorrowland > Space Mountain). I oppose any move per my vote above, but if it must move, we should use a better disambiguation. -- Netoholic @ 12:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • You have a point, perhaps Tomorrowland (Disneyland) would be a better target page? Civciv5 (talk) 18:47, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • "Tomorrowland (Disneyland)" is a bad choice as Disneyland isn't the only park Tomorrowland is located at. Either "Tomorrowland (theme land)" or "Tomorrowland (Disney theme land)" should work. --Gonnym (talk) 21:50, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
        • "Tomorrowland (themed zone)" seems like a better choice than Tomorrowland (theme land).Civciv5 (talk) 17:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • My guess is that Tomorrowland Co. is also notable, though we don't seem to have an article on it now. Dekimasuよ! 20:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.