Talk:Natasha Wheat

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

[Untitled] edit

Hello,

After reviewing the deletion of the past article, it seems to have been deleted for a lack of notability under the WP:N, which makes sense. However this article, that I began contains references that post-date the deletion of the previous article from reliable secondary sources.

Hamnrye (talk) 20:24, 6 March 2011 (UTC)HamnryeReply

Similarities with regard to the last AfD edit

Note that there has been little improved since the last unanimous deletion. The four points in the deleted article were:

  • 1. She is an American artist
  • 2. She exhibited at the Museum of National Art in 2010
  • 3. She is the founder of Project Grow
  • 4. There was an article on her in the Oregonian.

These are the same points being made in this "new" article. The only difference is the addition of one or two articles on Project Grow that briefly mention Wheat's involvement in the program - these are not articles on Wheat herself. It's the same puffery that lead to the last deletion. It has been recreated and deleted three times with no substantial improvement - it looks like it needs to go a fourth round now. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:38, 6 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

NOT THE CASE. I included four references to articles and interviews with Wheat herself

The only similarity to the previous article is the first sentence which I took from the PDX.edu website, (also post dating the previous deletion) where the artist gave a lecture (http://www.pdx.edu/events/artist-lecture-natasha-wheatproject-grow) I included Project Grow and the Oregonian article as they were the usable parts of the previous article, and added to this article, that does not qualify this as puffery. Hamnrye (talk) 21:35, 6 March 2011 (UTC)HamnryeReply

Not Notable citations are not legitimate news articles, rather promotional. I don't believe this passes muster yet. Trickaphobe (talk) 16:22, 26 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

RfC edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


If this fine arts practitioner notable ? Info por favor (talk) 23:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • The proper venue for this discussion is WP:AFD if at least one editor is convinced that the subject is not notable or at least of marginal enough notability that it warrants a serious deletion consideration.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Natasha Wheat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:39, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply