Talk:Michael Jerrell
Latest comment: 2 months ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Michael Jerrell appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 August 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 00:54, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Michael Jerrell was the only player from the NCAA Division II level selected in the 2024 NFL draft?
- Source: WTOL
5x expanded by BeanieFan11 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 174 past nominations.
BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC).
- I don't know why DYK-helper failed to add this to T:TDYK, but there's no way you should be penalised for that, so I'm IAR reviewing this. Long enough, new enough. QPQ is done and Earwig picks up only names and WP:LIMITED phrases. I see no need for any maintenance templates. I've taken the liberty of replacing the hook's source with an archive URL as it was down, and the hook is short enough and interesting. This is good to go, and should not be timed out before 23 August.--Launchballer 00:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review (hah, it took so long for someone to review that the source link went dead! ). BeanieFan11 (talk) 00:35, 16 August 2024 (UTC)