Talk:Lucid Motors
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lucid Motors article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
This page should not be speedy deleted because... edit
This page should not be speedily deleted because the tag is frivolous. There is nothing "promotional" about simple facts from reliable sources. The tagger further suggests that the simple sentences in the article is "incomprehensible", which is also a skewed opinion : the sentences are very straightforward. For editors who consider this article to be one-sided anyway, the sources provide material for more depth, particularly the strange relationship with LeEco, but also the built-in controversy of its employees. In short; wp:soFixIt.
I consider making a similar article for NextEV, which already has a car running. I have made substantial contributions to Tesla articles, and I interpret wp:Balance in a wider perspective to the point that other EVs should also have at least some coverage her on Wikipedia. TGCP (talk) 15:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Contested deletion edit
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because there have been a lot of press coverage on this company, including some well known media, such as Motor Trend, Car and Driver, CNET.com, etc. This page might has been just created so the information is not sufficient. Please, please give some time for the page to be filled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.207.127.54 (talk) 16:24, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Links edit
Then there was an article in Russian , link to somebody. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.21.42.85 (talk) 16:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC) https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucid
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Template idea edit
I replaced the lengthy list of "other manufacturers" under "See also" with a template Template:Automotive_industry_in_the_United_States - however it includes a lot of non-EV ones and obviously not the non-US EV ones. Does anyone think there's scope for a similar template "Electric-only vehicle manufacturers"? I suggest electric-only because almost every traditional manufacturer produces (or has produced) an EV of some sort, so keeping it to EV only prevents the template from being unwieldy. See also Talk:Rivian -- Chuq (talk) 06:09, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- I think that there is already a category for Electric Vehicles Manufacturers of the United States. From what I have seen, Rivian and Lucid Motors have since been added to those categories as well as the category for Car Manufacturers of the United States. Leiwang7 (talk) 05:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)