The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article should adhere to the gender identity guideline because it contains material about one or more trans men. Precedence should be given to self-designation as reported in the most up-to-date reliable sources, anywhere in article space, even when it doesn't match what's most common in reliable sources. Any person whose gender might be questioned should be referred to by the pronouns, possessive adjectives, and gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman") that reflect that person's latest expressed gender self-identification. Some people go by singular they pronouns, which are acceptable for use in articles. This applies in references to any phase of that person's life, unless the subject has indicated a preference otherwise. Former, pre-transition names may only be included if the person was notable while using the name; outside of the main biographical article, such names should only appear once, in a footnote or parentheses.If material violating this guideline is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other related issues, please report the issue to the LGBT WikiProject, or, in the case of living people, to the BLP noticeboard.
A fact from Little Joe Monahan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 September 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that cowboy Little Joe Monahan's gender became a national news story in 1904?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In the Early life section, doubts seems to be raised about the actual birth name - but lead and figure captions state one name only, with apparent certainty. If doubts are real, at least there's no need to reiterate one of the possible bith name in both figure captions - even if it is the most likely one.--Nø (talk) 13:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago5 comments3 people in discussion
The article reads as if the subject is clearly a woman though she pretended to be a man - so from this point of view, "he" is inappropriate. If we, on hte other hand, assume the suject is transgender, identifying as a man not just for convenience in a male dominated society but as a personal gender identity, "he" is appropriate from a modern perspective. I feel that in order to use "he", some (properly sourced) statements about gender identity would be needed. I imagine no such sources exist, leaving us with a bit of a problem here. I really don't know.--Nø (talk) 13:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
It looks like male pronouns are used by the greater WP:WEIGHT of the sources, including those in the article:
Doyle 2003 uses female pronouns to refer to the historical Monahan before going West, and male pronouns afterwards
Fisher 1968 and Venable 2013 use female pronouns, but only discuss Monahan briefly (a paragraph and a sentence, respectively)
That's all the sources I can find, so it looks like the "he"s have it. FourViolas (talk) 15:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
It's a good question and was raised in the DYK process too. I chose the pronoun that reflected the academic literature and the subject's personal preference. Seemed like those two were in alignment so it was good to go. Owlsmcgee (talk) 20:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the replies; they certainly make sense. I don't see the question as completely settled, but I understand "he" is the least objectionable choise at this point.--Nø (talk) 08:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
I still think this is problematic. To make sense of the lead it stands (without/before reading the rest of the article), one has to deduce from "assumed masculine identity" that his sex was actually and truly female - otherwise, what was "revealed"? I may not fully understand current distinctions between "gender" and "sex", but to make sense of the lead, I think it should state explicitly that he was assigned female sex at birth, and the same at death, but that he most of his life identified (and lived and worked) as male.
(Also, I suppose the concept of trans person was unknown to him and his contemporaries, making it difficult to discuss his gender identity in modern terms. Without a concept of trans person, there may have been no other way to describe the situation - for him and his contemporaries - than to consider him a fraud. But without sources showing his own perception of his situation, it is very difficult to go anywhere with this in the article.) Nø (talk) 10:44, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@Owlsmcgee: Hi, there are several books cited that do not indicate the pages. Do you have them? If so, let me know if you need help adding them. MX (✉ • ✎) 17:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
I will work on this now, thanks. Owlsmcgee (talk) 21:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
