Open main menu

Contents

Cholula forksEdit

Just in case you're interested, I've forked several articles from the Cholula, Puebla article: San Francisco Acatepec, Santa María Tonantzintla, San Gabriel Convent, and Plaza de la Concordia. I've noted the forks at Talk:Cholula, Puebla and suggested additional trimming to the "Pyramid of Cholula and Nuestra Señora de los Remedios Church" section since there are separate articles about both. None of these articles are ideal, but hopefully they will get the ball rolling on some better standalone articles about seemingly notable topics. Just wanted to share in case you enjoy following along, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:00, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

UnomásunoEdit

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Unomásuno has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN review.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of UnomásunoEdit

The article Unomásuno you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Unomásuno for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catrìona -- Catrìona (talk) 22:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK for 2015 Ocotlán ambushEdit

 On 15 December 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2015 Ocotlán ambush, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the police force of a town in Jalisco, Mexico, was disarmed in 2015 after their own officers ambushed the national police? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2015 Ocotlán ambush. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2015 Ocotlán ambush), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 12:02, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Joselyn Alejandra NiñoEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Joselyn Alejandra Niño at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversaryEdit

Precious
 
Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

  • @Gerda Arendt: Thank you! Much appreciated. Happy New Year.   MX () 18:30, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

A belated thanksEdit

Hey MX! Thanks for the successfully nominating México en la Piel for DYK. I didn't think there was anything in the article that would warrant a DYK and yet you did it. So I just let you know that I saw and am grateful for it! Erick (talk) 23:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

  • @Magiciandude: You're very welcome! Thank you for getting the article to GA status. I'll be happy to review more Mexico-related articles you nominate. Cheers, MX () 18:29, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Hmm, does this count as a Mexican-related article to you? I'm just curious since I've nominated it for DYK and GA. Erick (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
@Magiciandude: Yes, it does! I saw it at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Mexico/Article alerts page. I started a draft but once I'm done with it I'll get to another GAR. Cheers, MX () 19:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

1999 Matamoros standoffEdit

  • @Baffle gab1978: Thank you for the copyediting! Magnificent work. I hope you enjoyed the read. MX () 18:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Help identifying subjectsEdit

Hello again! These statues are installed outside the Mexico City Metropolitan Cathedral:

Do you happen to know who the statues depicts?

I also posted a note here asking about a few other statues in Mexico City, if you happen to know. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

  • @Another Believer: Dang it, no idea. I tried looking online by Googling statues at Mexico City Metropolitan Cathedral and couldn't find any. MX () 20:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Just another FYI, you might enjoy seeing some of the recent updates at Monument to Christopher Columbus (Buenavista, Mexico City) and Monument to Christopher Columbus (Paseo de la Reforma, Mexico City). Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:59, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

ScharwenzelEdit

Hi MX, thank you for your good faith "citation needed" and "unsourced section" edits of the above article. Just letting you know that I've reverted them because the opening sentence of the overall section states the source on which the rules were based. HTH. Cheers. Bermicourt (talk) 19:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

  • @Bermicourt: Ah, got it. Missed that entirely. I apologize for the inconvenience. Thanks for reaching out. MX () 19:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2015 Ocotlán ambushEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2015 Ocotlán ambush you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 07:41, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Indefatigable ContributorEdit

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Awarded in admiration of your excellent and detailed articles on the topics of Mexico and organized crime, such as 2015 Ocotlán ambush. buidhe (formerly Catrìona) 01:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
  • @Buidhe: Wow! First one of 2019 – love it. Thank you very much.   MX () 03:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2015 Ocotlán ambushEdit

The article 2015 Ocotlán ambush you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:2015 Ocotlán ambush for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

For hard work and perseveranceEdit

  The Good Article Barnstar
It is my great pleasure to award you this barnstar in recognition of the many articles which you have been instrumental in promoting to GA status. Long may this continue. Gog the Mild (talk) 03:42, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
  • @Gog the Mild: Thank you. I really appreciate the work you do at GOCE as well. None of this would be possible without your assistance. Cheers, MX () 14:33, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Joselyn Alejandra NiñoEdit

 On 8 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joselyn Alejandra Niño, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that suspected hitwoman Joselyn Alejandra Niño had a nickname which referred to Our Lady of Holy Death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joselyn Alejandra Niño. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Joselyn Alejandra Niño), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

TalkbackEdit

Hello, MX. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosalinda González Valencia.
Message added 23:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

  • @Narutolovehinata5: Hello. Not sure what you need from me. Yoninah proposed a new hook and it is pending review. MX () 01:14, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
I meant I was pinging you to see if you could respond to her proposal. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:24, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: What is there to respond? I cannot approve/disapprove the hook. The "new review" tick is there so I'm sure another editor will get to it eventually. The other hooks have been striked out. Regards, MX () 01:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Citation adviceEdit

Hi, thanks for tagging John Leamy (merchant) today. I'm not sure how to resolve the citation-needed tag for "Tusculum Street still runs nearby". Isn't the mere uncontroversial existence of a public street, identified by location, a case of WP:BLUESKY? I could find a Philadelphia street map to cite, of course, but it seems a bit silly. It would be like citing the existence of a book to some outside source, rather than just giving the publication details. What are your thoughts? As for the introductory sentence to the Business section, this is a summary of the section, introducing (per my best effort) no claims not cited below. Kim Post (talk) 02:59, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

  • @Kim Post: Hi, thanks for coming to my talkpage. I'm more on the other side of the perspective, and think we should cite absolute statements of fact whenever made (notwithstanding if they are controversial or not). In the end, an additional source won't hurt. Besides, information on Wikipedia can quickly become outdated, so a source can help readers understand when the information was once relevant or factual (by adding an access date, for example). You are allowed to cite Google Maps or similar websites for specific roads, so feel free to do that.
I've removed the citation request for the Business section. Thanks for clarifying! MX () 03:17, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1999 Matamoros standoffEdit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1999 Matamoros standoff you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 11:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1999 Matamoros standoffEdit

The article 1999 Matamoros standoff you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:1999 Matamoros standoff for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 19:02, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

HuachicoleroEdit

Thanks. It's not great, but it's something that can be expanded. Moscow Mule (talk) 22:59, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

There's also a Draft:Huachicol there in draft space. It's not quite ready to go public, though. Moscow Mule (talk) 23:28, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 1999 Matamoros standoffEdit

 On 24 January 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1999 Matamoros standoff, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that two U.S. agents were nearly killed by a drug cartel in Mexico in 1999? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1999 Matamoros standoff. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 1999 Matamoros standoff), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:03, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Alberto Jorge's articleEdit

Thanks for your comment on my submission. I have done as you suggested.

While researching for the footballer's stats (that I copied from both the German and Spanish Wikipedia articles), I realized they were inaccurate or missing for some seasons; thus I had to go on research season by season, since his database profile has been deleted and does not seem to be any archive of it. Also I have added a few other interesting facts to the article such as how much León payed to bring him to Mexican football.

Feel free to check it out. Cheers.--Cocu15 (talk) 02:59, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

  • @Cocu15: Thank you. Nice job with the article. I'm a Toluca fan myself, but I haven't been to the renovated stadium yet since I live far away from the State of Mexico. Do you plan to work on other managers for the team? I noticed a lot of red links at the manager's template.
BTW, I did a few changes at the article, particularly with citation merging and archiving. Please let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing, MX () 14:49, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
  • @Cocu15: I'm also happy to review any of your articles if you ever need me. Just drop me a line here or at the article's talkpage. MX () 14:51, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
  • @MX: Actually I am currently working on a list of managers (feel free to check it out if you wish), so, yes, I am planning to work on other coaches' articles as well, I am doing it chronologically backwards - that is why I started with Alberto Jorge. --Cocu15 (talk) 19:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Chhota ShakeelEdit

I've been approached by 180.183.219.199 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) about Chhota Shakeel. Same thing you dealt with on the OC project page? Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 12:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

  • @Vaselineeeeeeee: Yes. This user keeps wanting to push the fact that Shakeel is dead when in reality there has not been an official statement from India, the U.S., or the Interpol. I initially thought he was right, but as I did more research it seems like the circumstances surrounding his supposed death are mysterious. The sources that claim he's dead do not even address this investigation conducted by India Today. They just claim he's dead, and that's it. I rather not give undue weight to any version. I'm not sure what to do at this point because the user doesn't seem to listen or want to engage in a discussion at the talkpage. MX () 14:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
I agree with you. Official sources should be used that are confirmed by the relevant officials before someone should be considered dead. Good work expanding the article by the way. I've added it to my watchlist; I won't actively search if the news is later confirmed, but if another IP adds it later, it'll prompt me to do a quick search to confirm. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 15:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Oh no.You guys got it wrong.It is an extremely intricate and complex subject but the fact is that he is no longer alive.The whole of India knows that and Pakistan would never admit that he even existed.Also the rumours began in early 2017 and go to a confirmation point via Intelligence analyst ocnus ( whose paper on Organized crime and politics has been published in many places) only in 2018 and in my opinion that changes the entire story and kills the rumours.But the State will not declare him dead.Since you know and are interested in organized crime-you might know why.There are a lot spelling errors on the article too.You need to analyze the time frames between the Rumours and the Confirmation after which there has been utter silenceClearwater555 (talk) 12:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Adán Medrano RodríguezEdit

 On 9 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Adán Medrano Rodríguez, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the arrest of Adán Medrano Rodríguez marked a shift in how the Mexican government tackled drug cartels? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Adán Medrano Rodríguez. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Adán Medrano Rodríguez), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:01, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Adán Medrano Rodríguez copyeditEdit


DYK nomination for Rosalinda González ValenciaEdit

I have completed a review at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosalinda González Valencia, and noted a couple minor questions. Please respond there when you are able. Thanks! Flibirigit (talk) 02:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for United States of America v. Joaquín Guzmán LoeraEdit

 On 13 February 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article United States of America v. Joaquín Guzmán Loera, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:05, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
  • @Stephen: Thank you for the recognition. And thanks for your admins efforts at ITN. All the best, MX () 03:28, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Rollback grantedEdit

Hi MX. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

José Manuel Garza Rendón copyeditEdit


Sorry mateEdit

Im sorry I meant to revert the vandalism act, I didnt realized it was reverted by you. Im really sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.0.232.47 (talk) 14:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Rosalinda González ValenciaEdit

 On 23 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rosalinda González Valencia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a 12-hour hearing for Mexican businesswoman Rosalinda González Valencia was held behind closed doors because the government was presenting sensitive evidence about a drug cartel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosalinda González Valencia. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rosalinda González Valencia), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Monica-Spear.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Monica-Spear.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for José Manuel Garza RendónEdit

 On 24 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article José Manuel Garza Rendón, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after snitching on a drug cartel, José Manuel Garza Rendón may live the rest of his life like a "hunted rabbit"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/José Manuel Garza Rendón. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, José Manuel Garza Rendón), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Juan Carlos de la Cruz ReynaEdit

 On 1 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Juan Carlos de la Cruz Reyna, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Juan Carlos de la Cruz Reyna tried to bribe an undercover agent to ensure he was released from prison to members of a drug cartel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Juan Carlos de la Cruz Reyna. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Juan Carlos de la Cruz Reyna), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Juan Carlos de la Cruz ReynaEdit

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Juan Carlos de la Cruz Reyna has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:11, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Chhota ShakeelEdit

 On 3 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chhota Shakeel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that U.S. citizens are prohibited from engaging in business activities with Chhota Shakeel? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chhota Shakeel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Chhota Shakeel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Amakuru (talk · contribs) 12:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Mexico 68 and Tlatelolco massacreEdit

I added to the Tlatelolco massacre talk page, suggesting that the narrative of the Mexico 68 movement there be moved to the supposed main article. That article needs a lot of help, and I was willing to put in time. But I think the more sensible solution is to move text from Tlatelolco massacre to Mexico 68. What do you think? It would be great if you weighed in on the question. BTW Congrats on your new usename. Best. Amuseclio (talk) 19:39, 8 March 2019 (UTC)Amuseclio

Víctor Manuel Vázquez MirelesEdit

  • @Baffle gab1978: Thank you for taking this. I appreciate the work done so far. Let me know if you have any questions. MX () 15:33, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
No worries; I've split off most of the text in 'Early Life', which usually means birth, childhood and early adulthood., and placed it into a new section because it didn't really fit in 'Early life'. The c/e looks fairly simple anyway; you do a fine job with these articles. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 19:31, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

() While copy-editing the Trial and proceedings section, I found some ambiguous phrases. There are:

a) 1st paragraph: "His sentence was later dropped but Vázquez Mireles remained imprisoned and was issued with other charges." Does this mean the sentence was quashed/canceled/annulled or that it was reduced in length?
  • @Baffle gab1978: His 7.5 year conviction was cancelled (sources don't say when). MX () 14:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
b) 2nd paragraph: "This new charge was uncovered as part of an investigation headed by the Subprocuraduría de Investigación Especializada en Delincuencia Organizada (SIEDO), Mexico's organized crime investigation agency." Did the charge already exist but was forgotten until uncovered? In English, charges are usually "brought" or "laid", not "uncovered".
  • You're right. It would be "brought" since they were new charges against him. MX () 14:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
c) 3rd paragraph: " He claimed this was a violation of his human rights and asked the court to allow him to serve his trial under conditional release". Does this mean he would have been released to be tried on the new charges or did you mean serve his sentence?
  • Since he was in prison without a conviction for so long, the defense petitioned for Vázquez Mireles to be granted special privileges to allow him to be on trial as a free man (similar to being out on bail, but in this case Vázquez Mireles wouldn't pay anything to be out).
d) 4th paragraph; "The tribunal determined the evidence presented by the PGR was deficient and asked the prosecution to re-examine and modify the evidence." This seems odd; why would they be asked modify (change or adjust) the evidence?
  • Direct quote: el tribunal consideró que eran deficientes las conclusiones acusatorias que presentó la PGR en el juicio contra Vázquez Mireles, apodado "El Meme Loco" y por ello resolvió que [la PGR] tenía la posibilidad de revisarlas y, de ser el caso, modificarlas. I think what the source is saying is that the prosecution was told the evidence they presented was not good enough to convict Vázquez Mireles, and was given the opportunity to go back and fix they way it was presented (or find more/better against him). I hope my responses help. MX () 14:28, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Anyway, I'm happy to make changes based on your reply here. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:36, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

MX, thank you for your replies; they clarified the points well and I've amended the text in that section accordingly. Thanks for your help and good luck with the article. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 21:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Víctor Manuel Vázquez MirelesEdit

 On 19 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Víctor Manuel Vázquez Mireles, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that U.S. citizens are prohibited from engaging in business activities with Víctor Manuel Vázquez Mireles? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Víctor Manuel Vázquez Mireles. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Víctor Manuel Vázquez Mireles), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!Edit

  Thank you for the Editor of the Week nomination. I'm honored to have received the award. ♠Vami_IV†♠ 06:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

PRI NPOV and UNDUEEdit

Dear MX, I am working my way through the article on the PRI, Wikifying it, adding text and citations. Since you tagged the article, could you take a look now? I plan on adding a section dealing with PRI presidential succession. I will likely trim significantly sections that don't directly deal with the PRI but more generally with the history of Mexico. BTW, thanks for the Mexico barnstar! I really appreciate it. Best, Amuseclio Amuseclio (talk) 17:45, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Amuseclio

  • @Amuseclio: Thanks for stopping by. I no longer follow the article on my Watchlist since I wanted to move away from politics as much as I could. But feel free to make the appropriate changes. Most of my concerns revolved around the past two presidencies (particularly about the undue weight on the electoral fraud claims). The article should probably narrow its focus to the PRI's role in those elections and not rely entirely on allegations/scandals. The dedazo practices and frauds (along with other authoritarian methods) of the past, when the PRI was the dominant party in Mexico for 71 years, are generally accepted by most accounts because that's how the PRI maintained a strong corporatist state. Cheers, MX () 18:49, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
  • @MX: Thanks for letting me know. I am deep into modern political history right now. I haven't gotten to the sections on the most recent elections yet, but will keep your comments in mind as I approach them. Saludos, Amuseclio (talk) 19:04, 5 April 2019 (UTC)Amuseclio

DYK nomination of Gilberto García MenaEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Gilberto García Mena at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Kingsif (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

es:Fox Networks Group Latin AmericaEdit

I'd like to ask if you can translate Spanish Wikipedia's es:Fox Networks Group Latin America article into English. Thing is, while the company was known as Fox Networks Group Latin America in recent years, it looks like (judging from Terms of Use and Privacy Policy) their legal name was Fox Latin American Channel, LLC all along (so it's like "Fox Latin American Channel, LLC, d/b/a Fox Networks Group Latin America"). Do you think which one should be the new article's title? Fox Networks Group Latin America, or Fox Latin American Channel? JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 16:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "MX".