Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender studies/Assessment

Male and female sign.svg Project
Gender Studies
Project page
Talk page
Notice Board
Translation
Assessment
Popular pages
Templates
Collaboration
Deletion sorting
WikiProject Feminism
Portal:Feminism
Category:WikiProject Gender Studies

One of the proposed tasks of Project Gender studies is to assess the quality of Wikipedia's Gender studies articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to help in recognising excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work. This plays a role in the WP:1.0 program.

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Gender studies}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Gender Studies articles by quality and Category:Gender Studies articles by importance, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

How to AssessEdit

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Gender studies}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Gender studies|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Gender Studies articles)   FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Gender Studies articles)   A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Gender Studies articles)   GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Gender Studies articles)   B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Gender Studies articles)   C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Gender Studies articles)   Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Gender Studies articles)   Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Gender Studies articles)   FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Gender Studies articles)   List 

For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:

NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Gender Studies articles)   NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Gender Studies articles)   ??? 

Discussing / Disputing ratingsEdit

Please use this subpage's talk page to question and/or discuss article ratings.

Quality scaleEdit

It is suggested that Project Gender studies use the same criteria for grading articles as set out by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team, as set out below.

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessmentEdit

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Gender studies}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Gender studies|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Gender Studies articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Gender Studies articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Gender Studies articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Gender Studies articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Gender Studies articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Gender Studies articles)  ??? 

Importance scaleEdit

Popular pagesEdit

The results of the assessment combined with information on traffic statistics for pages produces this list.

Assessment logEdit

Assessment log

April 22, 2021Edit

RenamedEdit

AssessedEdit

April 21, 2021Edit

ReassessedEdit

April 20, 2021Edit

AssessedEdit

April 19, 2021Edit

RenamedEdit

AssessedEdit

RemovedEdit

April 18, 2021Edit

AssessedEdit

April 17, 2021Edit

ReassessedEdit

April 16, 2021Edit

ReassessedEdit

AssessedEdit