Untitled edit

Good point - vote Yes edit

Agree to move Divizia "A" to Divizia A (which will become the existing stub)!

So the requested move is sorted, resolved, no further attention needed. (Isn't it?) I've just removed it from WP:RM. Hajor 2 July 2005 05:23 (UTC)

Name change edit

I think someone should change the name of the article from 'Divizia A' to 'Liga I', since this is the new name of the league. Of course existing links to 'Divizia A' should point to 'Liga I' from now on. Giuseppe86 13:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Liga 1 should be moved to Liga I edit

Liga 1 should be moved to Liga I because this is the real name of this league. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gabinho (talkcontribs) 15:06, 6 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Gabinho cut-paste moved this from Liga 1 on 8 June 2007. I have history-merged the revisons from before that date. – wbm1058 (talk) 15:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Notable foreign players edit

Define notable. There are a lot of names I never heard of and I live in Romania. Maybe you should create a "List of foreign players in Romania" like this one from RomanianSoccer: [1].Edgar (talk) 08:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dinamo/Ciocanul edit

Romanian football statisticians don't consider Ciocanul's two seasons as part of Dinamo's all-time history. See the 1932 - 2006 all-time table (as computed by Razvan Toma) on RSSSF -> [2]

Ciocanul Bucuresti is already mentioned on Dinamo's wiki page - no need to alter the table here.

--Edgar (talk) 08:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 16:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Liga IRomanian Liga — There is two many 1. Liga and XXX Liga, The full name of the Romanian highest division is Liga I Bürger, it may be confused with Soproni Liga, Corgoň Liga, Gambrinus liga, Swiss 1. Liga and various Prva Liga. Use Romanian Liga per Portuguese Liga case. —Matthew_hk tc 06:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Survey edit

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
  • Support per nom BanRay 11:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose because: this is the official name of the league and like in case of France Premier League, Ligue 1, this name should be used. In the worst case it should be moved to this name: Liga Întâi, which this is the Romanian spelling for the league's name.GabinhoPalavras 01:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose because: The Portuguese Liga is not a good example. Its name is not Primeira Liga, just Liga. Thus the need for 'Portuguese'. As Gabinho already said, this is the official name.--Edgar (talk) 06:33, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose - This is the only league that is named "Liga I", so it is not ambiguous to title this article "Liga I". - MTC (talk) 06:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Discussion edit

Any additional comments: Matthew_hk tc 06:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Although this RM was approved, no move had taken place for three days, so I moved it myself. – PeeJay 17:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why was the result to move? There were 2 good reasons given as to why this shouldn't have been moved versus one flawed reason why it should, it shouldn't have been moved. - MTC (talk) 17:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Using the same principle, please move La Liga to Spanish Liga. Thanks! --Edgar (talk) 06:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fully professional? edit

Is this not a "fully profession league"? Juzhong (talk) 01:29, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

It's fully professional. It's organized by the LPF: Romanian Professional Football League. --Edgar (talk) 07:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Then please add it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. Juzhong (talk) 10:44, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

1929–30 Divizia A edit

Who won this season? FC Juventus București (1924) or FC Petrolul Ploiești, on both pages the titles is on their pages. On both pages i see this "The team was founded in 1924 after the merger of Triumf Bucureşti and Romcomit Bucureşti."

On LPF official website appear the titles was won by Juventus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.234.162 (talk) 10:51, 14 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Liga I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liga I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liga I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply