Talk:John Swift (cricketer)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Cuchullain in topic Requested move
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was Move article and disambiguation. Cúchullain t/c 13:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
– Too many alternatives on the disambiguation page to safely assume this person is the primary topic. Powers T 00:57, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support. The cricketer is arguably the most notable, but I agree that readers are not "much more likely" to be searching for the cricketer than the others listed on the dab page when typing in "John Swift". Jenks24 (talk) 07:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Cricketers are not that searchable, despite "significance". While I love cricket, American readers would prefer someone else with the same name. --George Ho (talk) 00:31, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- If you are suggesting that cricketers can never be the primary topic, that's ridiculous. Jenks24 (talk) 07:48, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.