Talk:Hank Crisp

Latest comment: 7 years ago by MisterCake in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hank Crisp/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  19:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    The infobox image could do with a caption
    "Crisp remained active at the University and served as director of intramural athletics through 1967" - no need for capitalisation here
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

The article's strongest point is that it is well sourced, and comprehensive for the subject matter. I see no reason to put this on hold, so I'll pass it now as it meets the criteria. JAGUAR  17:07, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you jaguar; not sure of a proper caption for the infobox. Cake (talk) 18:09, 25 November 2016 (UTC)Reply