Talk:Guerilla Cricket
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Ritchie333 in topic Spectator source
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Spectator source
edit[1] is clearly listed as a blog, and therefore I do not believe that it qualifies as a reliable source. Thoughts? Ritchie333 ? Joseph2302 18:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- I can't think of any reason why The Spectator is unreliable, but I changed the text to just say it's controversial. Even an opinion piece has to have had some editorial control and judgement in order to be published against a near 200-year old work. Perhaps the text was getting confused with Test Match Sofa, with whom I believe the ECB came down on like a ton of bricks. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:55, 3 August 2016 (UTC)