Talk:Evgeny Sviridov (violinist)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 19:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 10:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC).Reply

  •   Article is new, long enough and neutral. It cites sources inline, except the last sentence. "Earwig's Copyvio Detector" reports a moderate rate of text similarity in one source, however, c"opyvio is unlikely". The hook is well-formatted and interesting. Its length is within limit, and its fact is accurate with inline citations. QPQ was done. Will approve after the a.m. issue is addressed. CeeGee 12:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
    I searched but couldn't find a good source for the modern violin. Commented out, CeeGee, and thank you for the review. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:09, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  •   Everything is fine now. Good to go by AGF for German language source. CeeGee 10:17, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • @CeeGee: what does "the a.m. issue" mean? -- RoySmith (talk) 15:41, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
    I understood "above mentioned", and from the context, seem to have been right. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:02, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
    @RoySmith: Sorry that I used the otherwise widely-used abbreviation of "above mentioned". The issue was that a sentence lacked citation. The issue was later addressed by replacing the sentence with another one, which was referenced. CeeGee 08:35, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply