Talk:Emmanuel Mané-Katz

Latest comment: 5 months ago by NmWTfs85lXusaybq in topic Requested move 23 November 2023

Removed PROD edit

I've removed the PROD notice, added by User:Shoeofdeath with the explanation "Non-notable painter. No links here, no articles in any other language".

I think there is scope for an article here: Google finds 19,000 hits for him, and there's a museum of his work in Haifa http://ilmuseums.com/museum_eng.asp?id=9 (now spam url) with exhibitions that change every 3 months. Jheald 06:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fine, but this has existed since September 2005 and is still a very weak stub with only a sentence of content added by the (banned) creator. Google hits and and a museum do not mean someone is notable. There is no way this will become an article - if there was "scope" someone would have added some actual content by now. shoeofdeath 08:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Emmanuel Mane-Katz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 4 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 23 November 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved by BegbertBiggs per request by JackkBrown at WP:RM/TR. (closed by non-admin page mover) NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


Emmanuel Mane-KatzEmmanuel Mané-Katz – To agree with its own lead sentence. Wikipedia includes diacritics when they belong there (even if some more jingoistic English-language sources drop them.)  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  21:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.