Talk:Cuca Roseta

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Whiteguru in topic GA Review

Photo requested edit

Could not find free photographs, other than the cover of one of her albums. Adding the the photo requested template. --Alan Islas (talk) 14:49, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Created by Alan Islas (talk). Self-nominated at 15:14, 9 September 2020 (UTC).Reply

  •   Article is new and definitely long enough. I like ALT3 best which is both interesting and cited inline. QPQ has been done. No evidence of copyvio, although I'm assuming good faith for the Spanish sources. Kingoflettuce (talk) 14:41, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA criteria edit

To pass the GA you will need to ensure that all info in the article is cited to a reliable source. Right now some sentences have no source. (t · c) buidhe 06:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks buidhe, I will work on that right away. --Alan Islas (talk) 15:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cuca Roseta/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Whiteguru (talk · contribs) 09:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply


Starts GA Review; the review will follow the same sections of the Article. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 


Final edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
  • Reference 2 is a dead link; it loops to a blank page on archive.org (which loops blank)
  • My sense is that English readers are going to be unfamiliar with the concept of fado. It may be useful to include a short explanation in the lede.
  • An overall read is that the lede might include a summary from Television, modelling and commercial appearances, Personal life and her volunteering. As one gets into the article in depth, a much stronger sense of her notability becomes apparent. So the lede might be expanded a bit.
  • Reference 30 is a dead link and goes to a blank page on archive.org
  • Reference 54 goves 'not found'.
  • Lots of research, lots of checking on archive.org. Good work for a first GA submission!


Hi Whiteguru, thanks again for the review and your encouraging words! See my responses below:

  • Reference 2 is a dead link; it loops to a blank page on archive.org (which loops blank)
I did see the blank page but the page came up after refreshing my browser. I changed the archived version to archive.vn, which hopefully works better.  Y
  • My sense is that English readers are going to be unfamiliar with the concept of fado. It may be useful to include a short explanation in the lede.
Added.  Y


  • An overall read is that the lede might include a summary from Television, modelling and commercial appearances, Personal life and her volunteering. As one gets into the article in depth, a much stronger sense of her notability becomes apparent. So the lede might be expanded a bit.
Expanded lede.
This reads much better, now.  Y
  • Reference 30 is a dead link and goes to a blank page on archive.org
I see that reference 30 goes to her IMDb page, and the link worked fine. I did change the archive to archive.vn since that seems to work better. However, I also checked reference 29 (about the Grand Prix) and that was broken so changed to a different link. Maybe you were referring to that one? (Yes)
Works now with the redirect.  Y
  • Reference 54 gives 'not found'.
Also did not see an issue with that link, not sure why. Of course I can change it if it's unreliable. Is that the last reference in the paragraph, about the Porto hospital concert?
Works now with the redirect.  Y
  • Additional notes: After another copyediting pass I changed a few small things for example removed italization from Clube de Fado since it is the proper name of a venue.  Y

Alan Islas (talk) 16:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

That's all the work needed on this article. A good effort for your first GA. --Whiteguru (talk) 19:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Passed