Portugal articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
![]() |
2 | 6 | 6 | 14 | |||
![]() |
1 | 3 | 4 | ||||
![]() |
3 | 9 | 33 | 45 | |||
B | 15 | 76 | 104 | 224 | 24 | 443 | |
C | 25 | 83 | 135 | 711 | 1 | 192 | 1,147 |
Start | 10 | 114 | 421 | 2,455 | 10 | 1,200 | 4,210 |
Stub | 26 | 164 | 4,051 | 201 | 3,615 | 8,057 | |
List | 1 | 16 | 55 | 465 | 3 | 191 | 731 |
Category | 3 | 7,690 | 7,693 | ||||
Disambig | 3 | 86 | 89 | ||||
File | 114 | 114 | |||||
Portal | 7 | 7 | |||||
Project | 11 | 11 | |||||
Template | 474 | 474 | |||||
NA | 14 | 290 | 304 | ||||
Other | 28 | 28 | |||||
Assessed | 51 | 321 | 894 | 7,968 | 8,915 | 5,222 | 23,371 |
Unassessed | 3 | 19 | 22 | ||||
Total | 51 | 321 | 894 | 7,971 | 8,915 | 5,241 | 23,393 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 75,404 | Ω = 5.42 |
Welcome to the assessment department of the Portugal WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Portugal or the people of Portugal. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Portugal}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:WikiProject Portugal articles, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Frequently asked questionsEdit
- How can I get my article rated?
- Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
- Who can assess articles?
- Any member of the Portugal WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
- What if I don't agree with a rating?
- You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
- Aren't the ratings subjective?
- Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.
InstructionsEdit
QualityEdit
An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Portugal}} project banner on its talk page:
Quality scaleEdit
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Flag of Portugal |
FL | The article has attained featured list status. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of Presidents of Portugal |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Cividade de Terroso |
GA | The article has attained good article status, having been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
The article meets the good article criteria:
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (but not equaling) the quality of a professional encyclopedia. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Nelly Furtado |
B | The article is mostly complete and without major problems but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
The article meets the six B-Class criteria:
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Portuguese Empire |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. Articles on fictional topics are likely to be marked as C-Class if they are written from an in-universe perspective. It is most likely that C-Class articles have a reasonable encyclopedic style.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | John II of Portugal |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style compliance non-existent. The article should satisfy fundamental content policies, such as Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Frequently, the referencing is inadequate, although enough sources are usually provided to establish verifiability. No Start-Class article should be in any danger of being speedily deleted.
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Visigoths |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Can be well-written, but may also have significant content issues. More detailed criteria
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to become a meaningful article. It is usually very short; however, if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible, an article of any length falls into this category. Although Stub-class articles are the lowest class of the normal classes, they are adequate enough to be an accepted article, though they do have risks of being dropped from being an article altogether.
|
Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Ballon d'Or 1965 |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of cities in Portugal |
ImportanceEdit
An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Portugal}} project banner on its talk page:
- {{WikiProject Portugal|importance=???}}
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Portugal articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Portugal articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Portugal articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Portugal articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Portugal articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Portugal articles) | ??? |
Importance scaleEdit
The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Portugal.
Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.
Importance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information. | Culture of Portugal |
High | Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. | Portugal at the Olympics |
Mid | Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. | List of countries where Portuguese is an official language |
Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. | Treaty of Lisbon (1668) |
NA | Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. | History of Portugal |
??? | Subject importance has not yet been assessed. |
Requesting an assessmentEdit
If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.
- I have recently made improvements to the Belém Tower article trying to follow all the style rules and meet the quality criteria. I think it follows pretty well, but I am not certain how comprehensive it is. It has not previously been assessed for quality in WikiProject Portugal. I also rated it with mid level importance, maybe someone else should check that too. Thought you might want to know that one of the articles in your project has been improved, Strafpeloton2 (talk) 01:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- I just translated to EnWiki an article I created in PtWiki: Jorge Ferreira Chaves, and I would like an outside opinion about it. Thank you.Quiiiz (talk) 03:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Although I didn't edit the article, I'd like to ask Henry_the_Navigator to be reassessed as being of top importance, as I feel that someone with such global historical impact is woefully misrepresented by "only" a medium rating. Maegil (talk) 00:13, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
- Manoel de Oliveira - expanded and rewritten. I would also like to request an assessment on the pages importance scale. --Deoliveirafan (talk) 04:42, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Tarrafal concentration camp - translated from ptwiki. --BunnyyHop (talk) 18:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Assessment logEdit
Index · Statistics · Log
- The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.
This is a log of operations by a bot. The contents of this page are unlikely to need human editing. In particular, links should not be disambiguated as this is a historical record. |
May 25, 2022Edit
RenamedEdit
- Campo do Almirante Reis renamed to Campo Almirante Reis.
- Gabriel Soares de Souza renamed to Gabriel Soares de Sousa.
ReassessedEdit
- 2014 Portuguese Social Democratic Party leadership election (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
AssessedEdit
- Campo Almirante Reis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Gabriel Soares de Sousa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
May 24, 2022Edit
AssessedEdit
- 2021 Taça de Portugal Final (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Diogo de Carvalho (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Graça Morais (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
May 23, 2022Edit
ReassessedEdit
- Clara Menéres (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Ricardo Mangas (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
AssessedEdit
- Category:Sportspeople by district in Portugal (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Aveiro District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Beja District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Braga District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Bragança District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Castelo Branco District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Coimbra District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Faro District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Guarda District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Leiria District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Lisbon District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Portalegre District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Porto District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Santarém District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Setúbal District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Viana do Castelo District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Vila Real District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Viseu District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Sportspeople from Évora District (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
May 22, 2022Edit
RenamedEdit
- Artur Alberto de Campos Henriques renamed to Artur de Campos Henriques.
- Campo (São Martinho), São Salvador do Campo e Negrelos (São Mamede) renamed to Vila Nova do Campo.
- Francisco Joaquim Ferreira do Amaral renamed to Francisco Ferreira do Amaral.
- Sebastião Custódio de Sousa Teles renamed to Sebastião Teles.
- Venceslau de Sousa Pereira de Lima renamed to Venceslau de Lima.
ReassessedEdit
- Gonçalo Oliveira (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- José Gonçalves (cyclist) (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Ministry of Justice (Portugal) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Porto Football Association (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Silene acutifolia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
AssessedEdit
- Artur de Campos Henriques (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Clara Menéres (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Francisco Ferreira do Amaral (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Template:Parishes of Coimbra (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Template-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Sebastião Teles (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Venceslau de Lima (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Vila Nova do Campo (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
May 21, 2022Edit
ReassessedEdit
- HMS Convertine (1650) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Henrique Araújo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Soldadeira (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
AssessedEdit
- 2022 monkeypox outbreak (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Antônio Antunes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Silene acutifolia (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
May 20, 2022Edit
AssessedEdit
- Draft:Hans Jörg Böhm (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Soldadeira (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Umaro Darame (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
May 19, 2022Edit
RenamedEdit
- São Jorge Castle renamed to Saint George's Castle.
ReassessedEdit
- Gonçalo Paciência (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Portugal in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
AssessedEdit
- Maria Antónia Siza (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Massamá (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Saint George's Castle (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)