Talk:2009 swine flu pandemic

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Otr500 in topic External links
Good article2009 swine flu pandemic has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 4, 2009Good article nomineeListed
September 22, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
In the newsNews items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on April 25, 2009, June 11, 2009, and August 13, 2010.
Current status: Good article

"Baconlung" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Baconlung. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 21#Baconlung until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Talk 01:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

pictures of people in masks edit

Why have pictures of people wearing masks been added. Mask were barely worn by the general public. This seems like an attempt by to say masks were always worn when infact they where not. This article is trying to rewrite history. 96.32.195.62 (talk) 16:07, 22 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

External links edit

Trimmed excessive links and moved below for discussion if some can be used as references. This is a result of the article being placed in the External links WikiProject for maintenance.
  • This will not normally be subjected to BRD per ELBURDEN: Disputed links should be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them.
There were twenty-one entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • ELMIN: Minimize the number of links. --
  • ELCITE: Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.

Note: Moved from article page for discussion.