Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Single/2012-06-04

< Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost‎ | Single
The Signpost
Single-page Edition
WP:POST/1
4 June 2012

 


2012-06-04

WikiWomenCamp: From women, for women

Contribute  —  
Share this
By Crisco 1492
The first WikiWomenCamp was held in Buenos Aires, 23–25 May 2012.

Twenty female Wikimedia editors from around the world gathered at the National University of La Plata in Buenos Aires, Argentina, from 23–25 May 2012 for the first-ever WikiWomenCamp, where they discussed issues facing women editors and ways to increase the number of female editors (agenda here).

Discussions at the open-space event, sponsored by Wikimedia Argentina, Wikimedia Australia, Wikimedia Deutschland, and Wikimedia Österreich (Austria), were variously in Spanish or English. Topics included why few women edit,[a] Wikimedia and education, and attracting female and writers through social networks. Sue Gardner, executive director of the foundation, joined discussions on the last day of the conference. The event was followed by Wikigénero, a one-day conference discussing the gender gap.

It has long been known that women editors face different challenges than male editors. This was one of the main forces behind the creation of the Wikichix programme – a program exclusively for women editors (see previous Signpost coverage) – in 2006. The foundation listed increasing the participation of women editors as one of its strategic goals in 2010. The number of female participants has since dropped. An independent survey by Sarah Stierch, now community fellow for the encouragement of women's participation at the foundation, found that between 2010 and 2011 the proportion of women editors dropped from 13 per cent to 9 per cent; several of the survey's respondents cited inhospitality as a possible reason for quitting. This gender gap has received mainstream media attention, including a report in The New York Times.

The concept for WikiWomenCamp arose from discussions between women affiliated with several international Wikimedia chapters at GLAMcamp Amsterdam in late 2011 as a way to address women's issues; it was then developed with further input from other editors, most of them women, as well as feedback from women from wikiHow, open-space facilitator Anne Goldenberg (who served as facilitator at WikiWomenCamp), and hacktivist Christina Haralanova. The conference was attended by women from 12 countries on every continent except Antarctica, with the strongest showing from Argentina, and received coverage in the newspaper Tiempo Argentina (Google translate).

Several participants of WikiWomenCamp (photo by Jaluj)

The conference resulted in numerous plans. At the community level, these include relaunching the Wikichix programme as well as increasing work with women in technology groups, in a move that is hoped to increase women's participation, and runnning several further workshops related to the gender gap. At the foundation level, several steps for addressing women's issues are in the works. To deal with harassment, women will be able to use a private mailing list to complain about and receive input regarding harassment faced on-wiki, while outreach may be made easier with learning/training materials specific to women. Further research into gender issues is planned, as is a program to translate articles on topics related to women so that such subjects are represented more evenly across the encyclopaedia. Meanwhile, a book about the perspectives of women around the world on Wikimedia-related issues is scheduled for publication, and media related to the camp is at Commons (audio, pictures, video).

Laura Hale, a WikiWomenCamp organiser and vice-president of Wikimedia Australia, found the Camp to be worth the 24-hour transit each way, saying "I wouldn't have traded it for the world". She described a point on Friday where Sue Gardner pointed to her article work as "my personal fangirl squee moment". Sarah Stierch found the concept a "great idea" and expressed hope that all involved "left with a strong sense of empowerment to do some great things to inspire women to participate".

Another WikiWomenCamp is in the works, but a date is uncertain at the time of writing. Further discussion of women's issues in Wikimedia is planned within Wikimedia Australia. Discussion about women in open-source technology, including Wikipedia, will occur at AdaCamp, held in Washington DC by the Ada Initiative, to coincide with Wikimania 2012.

Notes:

  1. ^ Suggestions include a lack of recognition of the gender gap, a lack of mentorship, women in several cultures having less free time than men to volunteer, a difficulty in finding referencing to support their contributions, and a lack of confidence in defending their contributions from the majority demographic.


Reader comments

2012-06-04

Editors want most funding for technical areas, while widespread ignorance of WMF board elections and chapters persists; voting still live on Commons best picture

Contribute  —  
Share this
By Jan eissfeldt
"If you donated $100 to the foundation, how would you like the foundation to allocate money for the following?" Editors on average believe that technical issues (four cells on the left, blue to purple) should receive more than 60% of the foundation's financial allocation.

Editors want 60% of Foundation funding put to technical issues

The fifth release of finding from last December's editor survey (see previous Signpost coverage) sheds light on the communities' level of interest and participation in Wikimedia entities, and on how editors feel donated funds should be allocated.

The sample of nearly 7,000 editors believed that 60.5% of Wikimedia Foundation expenditures should go into technical areas, comprising operations (26.7%, blue), stakeholder-specific software improvements targeting new editors (13.6%, red), seasoned contributors (10.4%, green), and Wikipedia's readers (9.8%, violet).

Issues which are widely debated in the ongoing Wikimedia finance reform process, such as investing in community work in the Global South (5.3%) and grants to Wikimedians and other non-profit groups (5.4%), are well behind in participants' priorities.

Is there a Wikimedia chapter in the country where you live? (base: 6,660)

Comparing the findings on Wikimedia entities as such with the finding of the earlier survey from April 2011 points to a persistent lack of interest in getting involved in entity affairs. The number of survey participants who have never voted for the WMF's board of trustees remains close to 90%, and 47% (45% in April 2010) have never heard of the process in which the community picks three of the ten board members. Performance ratings for entities suffered a slight downturn (the foundation received 6.95 out of 10, down from 7.33 in 2010; and the chapters 6.04, down from 6.15), as well as the self-rating of the community (6.75, down from 7.4).

Awareness of chapters' very existence remains low: 45% of the responding users couldn't say if there was a Wikimedia chapter in their country, although the Signpost notes that the proportion of "don't knows" may have been much lower if editors in countries without a national chapter had been excluded.

Commons Picture of the Year: still time to vote in first round

Last year's winner, this photograph of the European Southern Observatory's Paranal Observatory, by ESO Photo Ambassador Yuri Beletsky

Editors are voting on the Commons:Picture of the Year 2011 to choose the best featured photos over the past year in a two-round contest. The annual contest, run by a volunteer committee, is now in its sixth year. Last year's first round covered some 800 files in 17 categories from 2010.

This year, 599 photographs are in the running. All have been selected as featured pictures and have remained on Commons during 2011. While there are still 17 categories, their structure has been slightly modified. Several category descriptions have been expanded, and panoramic nature views is now a category in its own right.

The first round of voting – to determine the 32 candidates with most votes across the categories for the final competition later this year – runs until June 7; every user who has established their account before 1 April 2012 and made more than 75 contributions on a Wikimedia wiki with SUL is eligible to take part.

In brief

  • Wiknic 2012: Preparations for the annual Great American Wiknic, scheduled mainly on and around June 23 this year, are under way. Additionally, there will be a Wiki World's Fair event on July 7 on Governors Island in New York Harbor. International volunteers will attend and then travel to Washington, D.C., for Wikimania.
  • Core Contest 2012: The winners of this year's core contest, aiming at the improvement of important articles, are announced. The first prize went to Ecosystem, improved by Guettarda, and Middle Ages, by Ealdgyth, took the second prize.
  • IPv6 day: Preparations for IPv6 day on June 6 are under way on Meta. The announcement, for the scheduled day, states that the WMF will aim to fully enable the new internet protocol version on that day, if no problems come up in preliminary tests.
  • Fundraising agreements 2012-13: Draft agreements on how to handle the funds processing of annual fundraiser donations by the Wikimedia chapters in France, Germany, Switzerland, and the UK have been published on meta.
  • New administrator: The Signpost welcomes our newest administrator, the Signpost's own Crisco 1492, who writes the "featured content" report for us each week. In real life he is a Canadian student studying Indonesian literature in its namesake country. He is planning on becoming an English teacher there after he graduates.

    Reader comments

2012-06-04

Watching Wikipedia change

Contribute  —  
Share this
By J36miles

There were many complaints from English Wikipedians regarding the implementation of the $wgShowUpdatedMarker function, which allows an editor to use "Updated (since my last visit)" to mark watched articles with new changes. A discussion about this new watchlist functionality has been initiated in a current discussion regarding the styling of the watchlist. This update will allow users to see the difference in content between the current revision and the revision from the date of their last visit. This feature has already been implemented at Commons and Wiktionary.

Proposal

Currently there are three options regarding how or if to release the customizing, and 10 current styles to choose from. These range from stars to underscores to bold or italics.

Default setting as it appears on Commons

Any logged-in editor can manually install the customization into their common.css page: 

span.updatedmarker {
    background-color: transparent;
    color: #006400;
}
.mw-special-Watchlist strong.mw-watched a {
    font-weight: bold;
}

More styling options can be found at Wikipedia:Customizing watchlists.

Discussion and voting

The request for comment attracted 72 !votes in support and 100 against. Oppose !voters expressed a desire to be able to opt-out of the change, as SoWhy put it: "If you want to use it, use it. But don't bother the rest of us with it. All Gadgets work that way – I see no reason why this one shouldn't. ... I think it should be integrated into My Preferences => Gadgets to make it easy for people to use it if they want."

Making this change into a gadget, rather than the css or javascript version, was a running theme through the oppose section. Waggers stated in support, "Not making [watchlist customizing] available by default is silly as it means many editors who would find it useful would never find that this is available."

Equazcion referenced the errors in the current code for this feature by saying "In trying to script customizations for this feature I realized its technical implementation is exceedingly poor and very limiting. It was done with a <strong> tag in an odd location, when it should've been done purely with classes. Styling a feature like this using an HTML tag is so very 1999. This is old code and shouldn't have been newly implemented on an additional wiki before it was updated. Rather than merely making it invisible, this entire thing should be completely disabled until it's coded better and a style is chosen by the community. Even then, the new feature cycle generally starts with opt-in, then after a while someone might propose turning it on by default across the board. That would be the cycle to follow here."

In brief

2012-06-04

Views of WikiProject Visual Arts

Contribute  —  
Share this
By Mabeenot
WikiProject news
News in brief
Submit your project's news and announcements for next week's WikiProject Report at the Signpost's WikiProject Desk.
South Wind, Clear Sky is part of the Thirty-six Views of Mount Fuji by Hokusai
The K'alyaan totem pole of the Tlingit erected at Sitka National Historical Park
The Royal Gold Cup made for the French royal family in the 14th century
The habitant-carved altar of Montreal's Notre-Dame Basilica
Graffiti in Olinda, Brazil
A mixed media collaboration by Jean Tinguely
The Battle of Alexander at Issus painted by Albrecht Altdorfer
Textile arts depicted in stained glass
The project identifies itself using a hamsa
Computer-generated artwork
Cinema and photography are also visual arts

This week, we spent some time with the curators of WikiProject Visual Arts. Started in February 2005, WikiProject Visual Arts has grown to encompass nearly 16,000 articles which include 43 Featured Articles, 5 Featured Lists, and 79 Good Articles. While the project's scope includes a variety of child projects covering topics like animation and public art, the members of WikiProject Visual Arts seem to have had little contact with these other projects. With activity slowing at many of these child projects, much of Wikipedia's arts community has consolidated their conversations on the talk page of WikiProject Visual Arts. The project maintains a portal, a subproject dedicated to live and performance art, a list of open tasks, and style guidelines. We interviewed TonyTheTiger, Modernist, Johnbod, Kafka Liz, Ceoil, Lithoderm (Petropoxy), and Bus stop.

What motivated you to join WikiProject Visual Arts? Do you specialize in any particular art form(s)?

TonyTheTiger: I am not an art student or scholar. When I was in Business school, I spent the summer of 1991 in Washington, DC. My business school friend and DC roommate got me to go to a Smithsonian institution every weekend while we were in DC. That is pretty much how I got introduced to art. After that, I visited a lot of museums and went to a lot of shows, although I regret missing many (since that is mostly how I learn about art). I got involved with Wikipedia for cultural topics, like National Recording Registry and Campbell's Soup Cans, although I have strayed greatly to sports and other things since. I actually don't consider myself much of a member because of my lack of knowledge of most of the subjects. I am somewhat conversant in terms of modern art, but less so with all prior time periods. I mostly come by the talk page to pick the brains of the guys who know art. Because of the high volume of content I create, even a modest fraction of it makes me seem like I am an important member of the project. I don't really know art well enough to help the group make important decisions. Thus, I have trouble even saying that I am part of the project.
Modernist: I have been involved with the visual arts all of my life. When I initially began to edit Wikipedia the Visual arts project was sorely in need of material and expansion. Along with several other editors including Tyrenius, Johnbod, JNW, Freshacconci, Ceoil, Mandarax, Ewulp, Yomangani, Kafka Liz, Riggr Mortis, Lithoderm, Bus stop, CaroleHenson, Uyvsdi, Yannismarou, PericlesofAthens, RepublicanJacobite, Trackway, RogoPD, Sparkit, Stumps, Truthkeeper88 and others we created many articles, and a few great articles began to come together; as well as starts, stubs and just plain good articles.
As an editor on Wikipedia I have worked on many hundreds of visual arts articles in several various stages of development throughout the modern era, and the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th centuries. I've also lent my efforts to art of all cultures and earlier epochs; as well as various other historical topics, although my focus in general is on painting.
Johnbod: I have always been interested in art history, and began to edit WP when I saw how weak some areas were, & have always mainly edited within the project area. Partly because of my personal preferences, and partly because the areas are weak, I do a lot on medieval art, topics in iconography, and dabble with Islamic art. Generally I do stuff that isn't just paintings.
Kafka Liz: I began editing Wikipedia as an art librarian. I used to check articles primarily to see if they corresponded to the material I was reading at the time, and then began correcting and adding to them in my spare time. My specialties are Classical, Byzantine and Mediaeval art, but I edit a wide variety of articles. I joined the Visual Arts project in hopes of expanding my scope and gaining a wider idea of the work that needed to be done.
Ceoil: The people. I see the VA project as an island of sanity on wiki. The VA community is small, tightly knit and incredibly supportive in my experience.
Lithoderm: I'm a student who vacillates between making art and writing about it. "Early 20th century German art" probably best defines my academic research focus, but what I enjoy about editing WP is how it allows me to write about anything and everything from Nasreddine Dinet to Master L. Cz. to Double spout and bridge vessels to Inuit culture to Hus. I guess my greatest fear as I prepare to go on to graduate school for art history is becoming what the Germans would call a "fachidiot" – an academic so engrossed in their particular field of specialization that they lose sight of the wider range of their subject. If nothing else, editing WP keeps me familiar with areas of art history that would otherwise be outside my specialty. As for the Visual Arts project in particular, I concur with Ceoil. It's small, but close and highly active. I've had requests for advice get buried or go ignored at larger Wikiprojects like WP Military History, but if you post on the WPVA page, you will be answered. I've never been less than impressed with my fellow members. Lithoderm 20:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bus stop: As an artist I'm passionate about visual art. I'm interested in contemporary international art. The art world can be international and easily span continents. Artists hail from countries but there seems to exist a world stage on which artworks are viewed with disregard for nationality. I think English is a language more employed across the international art world than any other language. I think this would place a responsibility on the English Wikipedia to strive for excellence in its coverage of the visual arts. We do have some fine articles; others need some work. I'm less interested in artists than in art. I'm especially heartened by the existence of entire articles devoted to individual works of art. I'm especially not interested in interpretation of art. I am of the opinion that interpretation remains in flux, that reinterpretation always remains a possibility, and that alternative interpretations can be valid. Of interest to me is the objective over the subjective: Materials used? Techniques employed? When made? Dimensions? Title? This information can be difficult to obtain but I feel it is most basic.

The project is home to 43 Featured Articles, 5 Featured Lists, and 79 Good Articles. Have you contributed to any of these? Share with us some challenges to getting articles about the visual arts promoted to FA or GA status?

Modernist: The featured articles in the visual arts that I worked on include: The Disasters of War, The Raft of the Medusa, The Garden of Earthly Delights, Caspar David Friedrich, The Third of May 1808, Rokeby Venus, The Swimming Hole, Henry Moore, and Las Meninas. Good Articles that I worked on with others include Vincent van Gogh, Langlois Bridge at Arles (Van Gogh series), Olive Trees (Van Gogh series), Haystacks, and Hans Namuth. All of these were collaborations with many contributing editors; the most difficult as well as the easiest had pitfalls, disagreements and complex source searches. The most difficulty that I have encountered in my time editing Wikipedia has been in relationship to Vincent van Gogh. Van Gogh is an enormously famous figure who generates tremendous interest worldwide and consequently controversy goes with the territory...
TonyTheTiger: By the time, I arrived on the scene, all the great masters had been created. Campbell's Soup Can was my first GA and my first FA (I have had 286 and 19 respectively). I have also promoted painting series Haystacks and Four Freedoms; artists Joanne Gair and Rashid Johnson; photographs More Demi Moore and Demi's Birthday Suit; institutions Arts Club of Chicago and Museum of Contemporary Art, Chicago; and sculptures Cloud Gate, Crown Fountain, Fountain of the Great Lakes, Fountain of Time, Burnham Pavilions, Michael Jordan statue and Man Enters the Cosmos to GA and or FA. These works vastly overstate my involvement in the project, however.
Johnbod: All my 10 credited FAs are within the area, and I have made smaller contributions to many others, and also regularly review at FAC. The 10 break down into: 5 with the Ceoil, JNW, Modernist etc "posse" (where we have really enjoyable collaborations), Funerary art which LingNut (now on his third life) got me doing, the huge British Museum GLAM collaboration for Hoxne Hoard, and three very largely by myself, but with some help from the museums involved, Royal Gold Cup, Holy Thorn Reliquary and recently St Cuthbert Gospel. For the last two of these the request came from the institution. Generally art articles are gently treated at FA, where there aren't too many, & I think the regular contributors have built up a good reputation. The ones I do "solo" are of course a huge amount of work, even though they were on single objects which, though important, had a relatively small literature compared to paintings of equivalent significance.
Lithoderm: When I contribute to FAs it's mostly in a peripheral way – for The Raft of the Medusa I mainly worked with locating, uploading, and editing images; for Caspar David Friedrich I was mostly involved in DYKing individual paintings by the artist as a way of enhancing coverage, with only occasional copyedits and prose adjustments to the main article. I've contributed one good article solo, William Blake's illustrations of On the Morning of Christ's Nativity. I guess I tend to shy away from FAs because of the massive amount of time involved and my own perfectionism. When you have OCD tendencies and are given a project with no deadline that can edited forever, it's like a black hole waiting for you to walk into it. Subjects that could be deemed obscure, or at least have less literature written on them, are easier to write and move on from. This probably explains why visual arts FAs tend to be about individual works of art or biographies of artists, rather than styles or general concepts. I can't begin to imagine the amount of time and work that would have to go into making an article like Renaissance art or Native American art FA.
Kafka Liz: The Visual Arts FAs to which I've contributed most – The Garden of Earthly Delights, Caspar David Friedrich and Book of Kells (FAR) – went well in my opinion, though I wouldn't say they were easy. I work primarily as a copyeditor, though at the time I had access to an excellent library as well, and what made the articles so much fun to work on was the knowledge that I had a solid group of editors collaborating with me. These editors, among them Johnbod, Modernist, Ceoil, Lithoderm and Outriggr (to name just a few – my apologies to anyone I have forgotten), all had their own strengths and specialties and could always be relied on both for help and constructive criticism. The main difficulty lies in tackling a very well-known artist or a broader subject such as a movement or period – the former because they attract so much controversy, the latter because comprehensive coverage can be very difficult to achieve.

What relationships do the project's members have with research institutions, galleries, and the artists themselves? Have there been any collaborations between WikiProject Visual Arts and the various GLAM projects?

TonyTheTiger: I wear several hats at Wikipedia and as the director of WP:CHICAGO and an active Wikipedian on several fronts, I find myself at the Chicago Public Library's Harold Washington Library Center quite often when the public online resources and my local Blackstone Library are insufficient for a topic. They have been quite helpful in researching in general. Recently, I have been creating numerous painting articles in an effort to provide a resource for the largest ever Roy Lichtenstein exhibition that is being held at the Art Institute of Chicago. Prior to May 9 only one of his paintings had an article. Now, Category:Paintings by Roy Lichtenstein looks pretty respectable. I am trying to get at least 25 of his works on the main page via WP:DYK. I had fallen a little short on more than a half dozen articles and the visual arts reference librarians came through with a lot of things that enabled me to find sufficient content to make many articles DYK-eligible. The library has also hosted an official Wikipedia Loves Libraries event.
Modernist: I am currently WikiProject Visual arts ambassador of the Wikipedia:GLAM/MoMA project.
Johnbod: I have been involved with GLAM projects for several museums, mostly in London or the UK, especially the British Museum and British Library, where we have excellent relations. A large proportion of all GLAM work falls in the project's area. Most of the artists I write about are dead, which probably makes things easier! Most items on the VA-related AFD list (new hands always welcome) are COI-ish biographies of living artists unfortunately.
Lithoderm: Relations haven't always been great- the brouhaha over the National Portrait Gallery images, for example. They're getting better, though, and as long as we hold hands and avoid words like "content liberation" and "copyfraud" I think they'll continue to get better. The Wikipedian in Residence program is an excellent example of collaboration, and is something I'd be interested in doing myself if the opportunity arose.

How difficult has it been to acquire images of the artwork covered by the project? Are some visual artworks difficult to capture in a single photograph? How do international copyright laws complicate matters?

TonyTheTiger: I do not recall writing an article for which an image was not permitted or that I have had trouble obtaining a photograph for. There have been cases where we have had long debates regarding what fair use images were allowed. Thus, although many images were acquired that capture the subject, WP:NFCC has limited their use. Many FAs and GAs have endured significant removal of visual content that I considered helpful to the reader at some level, including Cloud Gate, Crown Fountain and Joanne Gair.
Modernist: The visual arts requires imagery. In order to create understandable articles the project needs to depict what the works look like. It necessitates the use of many fair use images particularly when depicting artwork from the 20th and 21st centuries. Consequently the visual arts project needs cooperation from museums, private collections, as well as the foundation and other projects. I am personally grateful for all the help from other editors and projects who have aided in obtaining correct permission uses for all the images that the visual arts require.
Johnbod: Fortunately I mainly write about earlier periods where the artist's copyright has expired; we have a lot of arguments about fair use. For older paintings and other 2D works we have (thanks to the Corel-Bridgeman decision) a vast number of images (though often old book scans of poor quality) and the ability to take what we like from museum websites. But 3D images are outside Corel-Bridgeman and we are much weaker there. When I began Royal Gold Cup we had no Commons images but I asked & several people (and later myself) helped to build up the excellent 23 strong category we now have – the article uses 11 of these as the object is complex. We still occasionally get editors objecting to galleries, which we used to see a lot of, but that battle is essentially won for art articles.

As noted in a previous Report, the icon for WikiProject Visual Arts is a Hamsa amulet. Why was this symbol chosen to represent the project and how does it communicate the project's goals or purpose?

Johnbod: It replaced a more clichéd Western image a few years ago (Van Gogh sunflower?); I vaguely remember the discussion. It is visually clear and strong at small size, unexpected, and reflects some guilt at how poor our coverage of non-Western art is – above all Indian art.
Lithoderm: Universally, visual art involves the eye and the hand, perception and creation. Regardless of the Hamsa's cultural associations, it seems like a good iconic representation of these principles. I wasn't around when it was chosen, but it seems appropriate.

Have you been involved in any of the child projects of WikiProject Visual Arts? How much collaboration typically occurs between the arts projects? Have there been any efforts to collaborate on articles or revitalize dormant projects within Wikipedia's arts community?

TonyTheTiger: Which projects are you talking about? I likely have created content that is relevant to some of them.
Kafka Liz: Child projects? The mother never told me! ;)
Lithoderm: My reaction is pretty much the same as Tony's: "We have child projects?" One could also add, "We have a parent project?" WikiProject Arts itself is so inactive it feels perfunctory, a placeholder on the hierarchy of Wikiprojects. Being too specific is one problem, being too general is another. I didn't even know we had WikiProject Culture until today. "Visual arts" seems to fall right in the Goldilocks spot of being neither too specific nor too general.
Johnbod: I had to look at the list, apart from Comics and Architecture! Generally I think most projects across WP are less active than a few years ago, & consolidation is better than splitting. Some of these should be merged. The Public art project is essentially a GLAM thing which has been active in relation to (mainly US) projects & which we interact with.


What are the project's most urgent needs? How can a new member help today?

Modernist: We can use good editors' help with referenced material. We always have needs for usable high quality imagery; in particular artwork from the 20th century and the 21st century. While works in the PD (public domain) are most desirable; Fair Use is also both usable and necessary.
Johnbod: A lot of the basic high-viewing articles are still much too poor, and I increasing concentrate on improving these – recently Romanticism and Neoclassicism, with Baroque maybe next. The big Renaissance articles are patchy, where they exist (Italian Renaissance sculpture anyone? – and no, there is no suitable redirect). Very many Old Master biographies are still mainly EB 1911 or something even older, and we have hundreds of one-line stubs on major paintings (imo, one thing we don't need is more of these, but expansions of what we have). Non-Western art is mostly very poorly covered, with some exceptions. The decorative arts are very thin indeed: we have little except biographies on things like silver and furniture, though ceramics are better. Sculpture is weaker than painting. As with most of WP, we are strong on biographies (but mostly from old sources), and articles on single works, but weak on thematic articles, which is what most encyclopedias concentrate on. There is plenty for new members to do, so long as they have good and up to date references, which most libraries have, and can also increasingly be found online. We very recently got a huge release of good images to Commons from the Walters Art Museum in Baltimore which need further categorizing and using in articles – there are nearly 20,000 images at the Commons Category:Collections of the Walters Art Museum. Anyone who wants help or suggestions will be very welcome at the project talk page, where we have a very incomplete "To do" list. This is the home of the supposedly extinct "low-hanging fruit", if you ask me (and you did).
Lithoderm: Johnbod gives a good summary of our deficits. I would point out that Italian Renaissance sculpture is a Featured Article on the Portuguese Wikipedia. Translation is a great way for new people to get involved, as translating an article is certainly less of a reach than researching the entire thing yourself. Every time I go onto foreign language wikis I run into great articles without English equivalents, just waiting to be translated. Etruscan sculpture (FA in Spanish, Portuguese, and Catalan), Spanish Baroque painting (FA in Spanish), The Yellow Cow (a Franz Marc painting, FA in German), Loss of books in late antiquity (FA in German, also a substantial article in French and Danish) etc. etc. Any takers?
TonyTheTiger: I think it would be great if we could get many more individual works on WP. If we could get the effort that is seen at WP:SONGS and WP:EPISODES for works of art that would be great. I am not trained in this field and find individual works hard to properly reference. When I look at Category:Paintings by artist and see how few works of some of the great artist have articles, I feel something important is missing. It would also be great to raise the quality level of some of the renowned artists.
Ceoil: The major bios are for the most part very poor. There are a few exceptions: Hans Holbein the Younger, El Greco, van Gogh and Titian are especially strong, well sourced and insightfully written. But the Goya and Jan van Eyck bios are a disgrace, and sadly more representative. Maybe there has been too much emphasis on individual works, which are generally much easier to take on.


Next week, we'll check out a WikiProject that started out as a bot and evolved into a paramilitary vandal-fighting force. Until then, keep out of trouble in the archive.

Reader comments

2012-06-04

On the lochs

Contribute  —  
Share this
By Crisco 1492 and Mathew Townsend
A new featured picture of Loch Torridon, in Scotland
This week's edition covers content promoted between 26 May and 2 June
The constellation Andromeda, subject of a new featured article, personified in Urania's Mirror.
HMS Courageous, from the new featured article on the aircraft carrier class of the same name.
Former Pakistan cricket captain Imran Khan. A list of his five-wicket hauls has recently been featured.
A new featured picture of the George Washington Masonic National Memorial in Alexandria, Virginia, United States.
A new featured picture of a Blue-and-yellow Macaw in flight
.
A new featured picture of American golfer Morgan Pressel

Ten featured articles were promoted this week.

  • Courageous class aircraft carrier (nom) by Sturmvogel 66. The Courageous class was the first multi-ship class of aircraft carriers to serve with the Royal Navy. Originally meant to be battlecruisers for the First World War, after a period laid up they were converted to aircraft carriers. The first converted was Furious, followed by her sister ships Courageous and Glorious. Courageous and Glorious were sunk during the Second World War, whilst Furious was sold for scrap.
  • Andromeda (nom) by Keilana. Andromeda is one of the 48 constellations listed by the 2nd-century astronomer Ptolemy, and is one of the 88 modern constellations. Located north of the celestial equator, it is named for the princess in the Greek legend of Perseus who was chained to a rock to be eaten by the sea monster Cetus. In Chinese astronomy, the stars that make up Andromeda were members of four different constellations having astrological and mythological significance; a constellation related to Andromeda also exists in Hindu mythology.
  • E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (nom) by Pyrrhus16. E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial is an audiobook and soundtrack album for the 1982 blockbuster film of the same name directed by Steven Spielberg. Narrated by pop singer Michael Jackson, the album was produced by Quincy Jones and distributed by MCA Records. The audiobook was released in November 1982, but court action by the pop star's record label (Epic Records) forced the album to be withdrawn. During its limited release, E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial reached number 82 on the UK Albums Chart.
  • Ruma Maida (nom) by Crisco 1492. Ruma Maida is a 2009 Indonesian film detailing a woman's struggle to save a historic house from a developer and the life of the house's original owner, entwined with several subplots. It uses colours and shooting styles to indicate different time periods. Novelist Ayu Utami wrote the screenplay, her first such work. Asked to write a story about Indonesian nationalism, Utami said she gave the characters different ethnic, religious, and socio-economic backgrounds to show the nation's pluralism.
  • Shangani Patrol (nom) by Cliftonian. The Shangani Patrol of 34 soldiers, led by Allan Wilson, was ambushed and massacred during the First Matabele War on 4 December 1893 by more than 3,000 Matabele warriors. The patrol, isolated from reinforcements by the rising Shangani River, held out for several hours and killed more than 300 attackers before their defeat. The massacre raised much consternation in Britain, and the patrol was elevated to national hero status.
  • Western Jackdaw (nom) by Casliber and Cwmhiraeth. The Western Jackdaw (Corvus monedula) is a passerine bird in the crow family. Measuring 34–39 centimetres (13–15 in) in length, the black-plumaged bird is found across Europe, western Asia and North Africa. Its simple nests, made of sticks and built in cavities in trees, cliffs, or buildings, hold an average of five pale blue or blue-green eggs. The monogamous Jackdaw lives in small groups and has a complex social structure.
  • Colin Hannah (nom) by Ian Rose. Air Marshal Hannah (1914–1978) began his aviation career in the 1930s as a pilot. After serving as the Royal Australian Air Force's Deputy Director of Armament, he saw action in World War II and the Malayan Emergency before rising through the ranks and becoming Chief of the Air Staff, the most senior appointment in the RAAF. Knighted in 1971, the following year he began a controversial term as Governor of Queensland.
  • A Child of Our Time (nom) by Brianboulton. British composer Michael Tippett's secular oratorio A Child of Our Time was composed between 1939 and 1941 and first performed on 19 March 1944. Inspired by events related to Kristallnacht, the oratorio carries a strongly pacifist message of ultimate understanding and reconciliation and features themes of shadow and light. It was well-received at its first performance and has since found acceptance worldwide.
  • Percheron (nom) by Dana boomer. The Percheron, a popular draft horse breed originating from the former Perche province of France, was originally bred for war but is now used for draft and food. The well-muscled horses are usually gray or black and known for their intelligence and willingness to work. They have been cross-bred with several light horse breeds for different tasks.
  • Hugh de Neville (nom) by Ealdgyth. De Neville (d. 1234) was an English sheriff and Chief Forester under the kings Richard I, John, and Henry III. Loyal to Richard, he was initially very friendly with John, to the point he was declared one of the king's "evil councillors" in the Magna Carta. De Neville later deserted John after the French invasion of England in 1216, but returned to service under Henry.

Two featured articles were delisted:

  • Katie Holmes (review). Delisted on the basis of poor prose, missing information, and other problems throughout the article.
  • Transhumanism (review). Featured article review began January 5, 2012 and delisted because of multiple problems that remained unfixed on May 29, 2012.

Four featured lists were promoted:

  • List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Imran Khan (nom) by Sahara4u. Former Pakistan cricket captain Imran Khan took 24 five-wicket hauls. Khan was described by the "one of the finest fast bowlers cricket has ever seen" and is one of fewer than forty cricketers with more than 20 five-wicket hauls; his last was in 1988.
  • List of Louisiana state parks (nom) by Michael miceli. The US state of Louisiana has 22 state parks, in a system that was established in 1934 and is currently under the purview of the Office of State Parks. The parks are selected on the criteria that they must be natural areas of unique or exceptional scenic value; many also have historic or scientific importance.
  • List of municipalities in Florida (nom), by Mgreason. There are 283 cities, 108 towns and 19 villages in the US state of Florida, a total of 410 incorporated municipalities distributed across 67 counties. As of the 2010 US Census, more than 10 million Floridians, 55% of the state's total population of 18,801,310, resided in incorporated municipalities, the remainder in unincorporated areas.
  • List of 1990s UK Albums Chart number ones (nom), by A Thousand Doors. The UK Albums Chart is a weekly record chart based on album sales from Sunday to Saturday in the UK; in the 1990s, a total of 216 albums reached number one. The most successful artist of the decade was British band Simply Red, who topped the UK Albums Chart for 19 weeks with four different albums.

Eight featured pictures were promoted this week:

One featured portal lost featured status:

Topics

One featured topic was promoted this week:

The rolling hills surrounding Kimmeridge in Dorset; a new featured picture


Reader comments

2012-06-04

Two motions for procedural reform, three open cases, Rich Farmbrough risks block and ban

Contribute  —  
Share this
By James

The committee opened one new case, bringing the total to three. Two motions for procedural change are also being voted upon.

Motions for procedural change

Motions on procedural motions

Kirill Lokshin, who launched two motions for committee reform

Arbitrator Kirill Lokshin launched a motion to ensure the community "is given adequate notice of and opportunity to comment on proposed changes to the committee's processes and procedures." The motion required the committee to notify the community of all proposals for significant changes at the committee's formal motions page, and that they be advertised on the committee's noticeboard, administrators' noticeboard and the village pump on policy. It also required motions be subjected to standard voting procedure and remain open for a week before enactment. The motion was defeated 8–2.

An amended motion proposed by arbitrator Roger Davies removed the provision for notices on the administrators' noticeboard and village pump and included a stipulation that clerks make the announcement, it attracted more support but was defeated 7–6. A second compromise amendment, proposed by arbitrator Courcelles, restored the provision for notices on the administrators' noticeboard, maintained the stipulation that clerks announce the initial proposal, and shortened the period for which a motion must remain open post-announcement to 24 hours. This motion has so far garnered unanimous support, with seven votes.

Motion on standardized enforcement

Lokshin also moved a motion to standardise the enforcement of "editing restrictions imposed by the committee, and to reduce the amount of boilerplate text in decisions." The motion has attracted 13 unanimous votes for its enactment; it proposes that the following standard enforcement provision be incorporated into all cases with an enforceable remedy that lack case-specific enforcement provisions:


Motions to block or ban Rich Farmbrough

The committee has moved five alternative motions calling for the banning or blocking of Rich Farmbrough following his use of automated tools in contravention of his sanctions. This came after arbitrator AGK confirmed via CheckUser that Farmbrough had continued to make automated edits by using a hacked version of AutoWikiBrowser. The ban/block period for each individual motion varies as does the period of time before which Farmbrough may make an appeal.

Open cases

Fæ (Week 2)

The newly opened case concerns alleged misconduct by Fæ. This follows a submission for a case by MBisanz three weeks ago that was rejected on the basis that other dispute-resolution forums had not been explored. In his statement, MBisanz claims that "Fæ has rendered himself unquestionable and unaccountable regarding his conduct because he responds in an extremely rude manner that personally attacks those who question him." He alleges that Fæ mischaracterises commentary about his on-wiki conduct as harassment, further stating that while "Fæ has been treated poorly by some users off-wiki (and possibly on)", his violent responses to commentary about him on-wiki "has become the issue itself."

GoodDay (Week 1)

The case concerns disruptive editing by GoodDay pertaining to the use of diacritics; GoodDay, who is topic-banned from articles pertaining to the UK and Ireland, broadly construed, and who is is under the mentorship of Steven Zhang, the filing party of this request for arbitration, believes that diacritics should not be used in articles as they are not part of the English language. In his statement, Zhang notes that GoodDay can be uncivil when discussing his qualms with other editors, and that whenever questioned on the nature his edits, "he will often remove the comments from his talk page, citing harassment." In response, GoodDay remarks that "there's nothing for me to add here, except that folks should take a look at the English alphabet."

Falun Gong 2 (Week 1)

This case was referred to the committee by Timotheus Canens, after TheSoundAndTheFury filed a "voluminous AE request" concerning behavioural issues in relation to Ohconfucius, Colipon, and Shrigley. The accused editors have denied his claims and decried TheSoundAndTheFury for his alleged "POV-pushing". According to TheSoundAndTheFury, the problem lies not with "these editors' points of view per se "; rather, it is "fundamentally about behavior".

In brief

2012-06-04

Report from the Berlin Hackathon

Contribute  —  
Share this
By Jarry1250
Developers in the main hall of the Berlin hackathon

Developers descend on Berlin

Over 100 Wikimedians from more than 30 countries made the trip to Berlin this week to attend the 2012 Berlin Hackathon. A joint enterprise of the German chapter (Wikimedia Deutschland) and the Wikimedia Foundation, the event was held over three days from June 1 to 3 for those interested in all things MediaWiki.

Though most of the conference hours were set aside for working on specific coding projects ("hacking"), there were a number of presentations during the three days on topics such as Wikidata; scripting in the new prototype template programming language Lua; and the ResourceLoader 2.0 project, which will see per-wiki gadgets standardised and in many cases centralised. There were talks on optimising SQL queries and writing code with security in mind, a nod to recent concerns that pre-deployment security assessments have become something of a bottleneck in the deployment process. An additional general session targeted the many users who are unfamiliar with the new Git-Gerrit review system. The combined significance of these projects led WMF Deputy Director Möller to give an upbeat introductory speech.

Outside the tutorials, attendees worked on a broad range of their personal projects, including improvements to the influential pywikipedia bot framework, user scripts and gadgets, server-side performance improvements (for example, with regard to IPv6 testing), toolserver-based web tools, Wiki Loves Monuments support, and a diverse array of other initiatives. The international feel to the event meant that cross-wiki and smaller-wiki issues gained attention over the course of the three days; for example, Siebrand Mazeland, a WMF internationalisation specialist, noted that he had personally discussed such issues with more than 50 attendees during the hackathon.

Overall, attendance figures were boosted by a strong promotional effort for the event, backed by some $40,000 in WMF scholarships for those who wished to go but required financial assistance to do so. Seasoned hackers, including many of the "big names" of WMF engineering, worked alongside coders for whom the hackathon was their first Wikimedia tech event. The mood at the end of the three days was buoyant, with many developers seemingly more optimistic about future development potential than they were before the event. It is hoped that the event will encourage greater levels of volunteer development; it may also serve to ease previously aired concerns among volunteer developers that their projects were not being as well-resourced by the WMF as those of their staff developer counterparts.

In brief

Signpost poll
Developer divide
You can now give your opinion now on next week's poll: Have you been to a Wikimedia Tech event? Are you interested in going to one?

Not all fixes may have gone live to WMF sites at the time of writing; some may not be scheduled to go live for many weeks.

  • Code review: still an issue? WMF Engineering Community Manager Sumana Harihareswara confirmed this week that code review remained the top priority for staff developers' so-called "20% time" (wikitech-l mailing list). As of time of writing, more than 100 core revisions dating back two months are still marked as "open", although a large proportion have had some form of comment made on them. Semi-official targets for code review propose 200 as an upper limit on the number of such revisions (although it is not clear if this was intended to include extensions); in any case, there has still been some concern over the relatively fast rate of growth and the presence of large backlogs in specific areas such as specific extensions.
  • Wikimedia meets RENDER: Immediately before the Berlin Hackathon (above), Wikimedia Deutschland organised a separate event aimed at bringing technologically informed Wikimedians (and MediaWiki coders more generally) together to work on projects relating to RENDER, an EU-funded project aimed at "developing methods, techniques, software and data sets for scholars and readers (such as Wikipedia users) to understand, describe, process and make use of the diversity of knowledge and information" (Wikimedia blog). The invitation-only event, which was attended by a group of about 50 developers, naturally focussed on Wikidata, given its aim of massively increasing the amount of highly structured data embedded directly into Wikimedia wikis.
  • Sign-language Wikipedia: After his recent blogpost about improving Unicode and web font support, WMF localisation team member Gerard Meijssen this week published an interview with Steve Slevinski, a specialist in bringing sign languages onto the web (Wikimedia blog). It is hoped that the move to standardise web translations of sign languages will allow for better documentation of (particularly global) hearing-impaired issues and culture; a MediaWiki extension that could power a whole Wikipedia written in a sign language is currently being developed by Slevinski.
  • One bot approved: A pair of BRFAs for one bot was recently approved for use on the English Wikipedia:
    • AnomieBOT's 64th and 65th BRFA, creating monthly and daily cleanup and maintenance categories.
At the time of writing, 20 BRFAs are active. As usual, community input is encouraged.

Reader comments
If articles have been updated, you may need to refresh the single-page edition.
It's your Signpost. You can help us.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Single/2012-06-04&oldid=1183872725"