Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 13

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 12
June 14 >

June 13 edit

Template:City locator edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We have a few other templates in the Template:Location map direction that can perform the function of this template. Suggest replacement and deletion. Izno (talk) 23:56, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Clone High edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 June 20. Izno (talk) 19:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFRSurvivorVotingHistoryTable/1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure what on earth purpose these serve. Each Survivor voting table is used on precisely one page each. This user copied the tables from each page into his template and then replaced each table with a unique template. Why? That just creates an additional hurdle if the table should ever need to be modified. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AUSSurvivorVotingHistoryTable/1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure what on earth purpose these serve. Each Survivor voting table is used on precisely one page each. This user copied the tables from each page into his template and then replaced each table with a unique template. Why? That just creates an additional hurdle if the table should ever need to be modified. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:17, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete all those (sub)pages. No need for such separate single-purpose templates as these. George Ho (talk) 18:43, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Banaras Hindu University Hostels edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

provides no useful navigation Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

France rugby union standings templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:54, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing this, I have also merged these with their parent articles. The usefulness of these templates only ever last a year, so a {{lst}} transclusion is more appropriate in these cases. In addition, would it be appropriate to merge Template talk:2022–23 Top 14 Table with Talk:2022–23 Top 14 season? — AFC Vixen 🦊 08:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022–23 WNBL Finals Bracket edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template is used on one page, with no obvious uses elsewhere. Substitute and delete. fuzzy510 (talk) 07:53, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2021 NBL–Philippines Playoffs bracket edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template is used on one page, with no obvious uses elsewhere. Substitute and delete. fuzzy510 (talk) 07:44, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019 All-Ireland Minor Football Championship bracket edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template is used on one page, with no obvious uses elsewhere. Substitute and delete. fuzzy510 (talk) 07:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2018 GCPL Playoffs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template is used on one page, with no obvious uses elsewhere. Substitute and delete. fuzzy510 (talk) 07:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2010 AFL playoffs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:27, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template is only used on one page, with no obvious uses elsewhere. Substitute and delete. fuzzy510 (talk) 07:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Unused s-line templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused s-line templates. --Gonnym (talk) 07:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Politburo of the Communist Party of Vietnam ordinal category edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused category template. Gonnym (talk) 07:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Open Science Good edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:28, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-page content used in one User draft. Subst into page and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BSnp edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:23, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in mid-2021, never adopted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:46, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bilateral ambassador category edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:46, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Possibly replaced by a template that is more functional, is better-maintained, and has documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:39, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brexit polling summary edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is article content used in two articles, and it should be stable by now. It should be substed into the articles, or section transclusion should be used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst and delete per nom. The content in question has not changed since creation, which proves these kinds of templates just don't work. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:JS error edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Used in one archived User talk page from eight years ago. No documentation or categories. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jira edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:12, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two transclusions, no documentation or categories. The links in the two discussion pages no longer lead to the intended content. Subst and delete; if anyone wants to fix the links, it will be easier to do so if the links are plain wikitext. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:07, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jain Digambara sects edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:13, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst into article and delete template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Piped link edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. May be eligible for G4 speedy deletion; I can't see deleted revisions to be able to compare this undocumented template with the deleted version. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:58, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete pointless excessive processor loading for added page complexity and the same number of characters as what it's supposed to replace -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 05:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Television Series in production edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All documentation is in French. The message in this ambox says "The text is likely to contain speculative information and its content may be significantly modified as the series progresses and information becomes available. relating thereto." which is both a mess and probably contrary to WP:CRYSTAL. We also have {{Speculation}}, which probably covers the need expressed by this template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I never understand why so many people insist in copying templates from wiki to wiki without even appearing to care whether they work. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:08, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2011 AFL playoffs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 03:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in one article, with no obvious uses elsewhere. Substitute and delete. fuzzy510 (talk) 02:54, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BS-header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in mainspace and long-deprecated. There is an older no-consensus TFD on the books, but given that they appear to have been entirely removed from the mainspace in the meantime and the no-consensus was more about what to replace it with, I think these should be deleted. See also recent TFD for Template:Railway line header. Izno (talk) 01:29, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • DELETE. It's about time. I've been trying for years to get these deprecated templates removed. Useddenim (talk) 11:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. A de facto consensus appears to have emerged about what to replace these with, since they have all been replaced. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, no longer needed. Frietjes (talk) 19:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rail-header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:49, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Izno (talk) 01:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_13&oldid=1161150095"