Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 12

June 12 edit

Template:Ceza edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:25, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only one album by this music artist has an article, thus this navbox offers no navigational benefit. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:37, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Plist edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:24, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused portal related template. Gonnym (talk) 16:40, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This template is no longer needed.  Buaidh  talk e-mail 17:51, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Peter Pan Speedrock edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navigation template with only 2 blue links. Gonnym (talk) 16:39, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. No navigational benefit in having this. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:04, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not enough articles to warrant a navbox. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Philippines fraternities and sororities table row edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table related template. Gonnym (talk) 16:38, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2009 ICC World Twenty20 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough blue links to justify a template. 2008 ICC World Twenty20 Qualifier could be added to this template, but that is still too few links. And we don't need these templates for every ICC tournament Joseph2302 (talk) 10:48, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2009 ICC Champions Trophy edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough valid blue links (and separate articles for the redlinks are unlikely ever to be needed, especially since for example qualifying round didn't exist) Joseph2302 (talk) 10:47, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2008 Twenty20 Cup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:21, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary template, as the better {{Twenty20 Cup 2008}} exists, which has just about enough links to be kept. The teams are just redirects to the general team articles, not anything related to the 2008 event, and so this template has no encyclopedic value. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:45, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Madame X tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 13:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There already is a precedent per Template:Extra track listing to not have separate templates dedicated to whole album tracklists for those with navboxes. Template:Madonna songs exists and includes all the tracks with their own articles, which means this should be deleted like many similar templates that previously have been made and went to TFD. Another thing making it redundant is how Madame X lists each song from the album. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:26, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).