Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 July 11

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< July 10
July 12 >

July 11 edit

Template:Jessica Jones (TV series) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. However, it looks like there could be consensus to replace with a Template:Marvel's Netflix television series navbox if that were proposed instead. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary WP:CONTENTFORK of Template:Marvel Cinematic Universe with hardly any content worthwhile for a separate temp. Trailblazer101 (talk) 00:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as I think there are enough dedicated articles (series, three seasons, character list) to justify this template, plus relevant related articles. Just because all of these links can be found on the main MCU navbox doesn't mean there isn't value in having a separate template. If someone is specifically interested in the Jessica Jones topic I don't think they should have to go looking for all of the related articles when it is standard to put all of those together in a series template. - adamstom97 (talk) 08:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do you realise there is also {{Jessica Jones}}? --woodensuperman 14:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not everything needs a separate template, especially when there are other templates they can easily fall under. Trailblazer101 (talk) 14:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per my previous relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 22:50, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:See-element edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions except in a 2008 discussion page in which it was proposed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sermon list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:35, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2011. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SharkTank edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete and redirect to Template:Shark Tank. ✗plicit 00:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2014. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Specific gravity edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:12, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst this simple table into its article and then delete the template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Soviet military aid edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst this simple table into its article and then delete the template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:UCI WWT Standings (Youth) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Standings are for 2021, so no further updates appear to be forthcoming. Subst into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:London Irish squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Team was wound-up at the conclusion of the 2022/23 season due to financial problems. As they no longer complete a current squad template is no longer required. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Can the focus of the template be changed, to focus on the history rather than the current season, as the article title would imply? 86.41.195.33 (talk) 20:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    That isn’t typically done, historical squad templates are usually only for specific tournaments such as British Lions or Rugby World Cup. I suppose it could be kept as “final season” but as players move on, the template would be removed from their page and replaced with their current squad, so it eventually faces being orphaned.
    RodneyParadeWanderer (talk) 20:57, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    So would you say keep for now? 86.41.195.33 (talk) 11:08, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Historic templates are only kept for Lions/Barbarians sides as RPW states, World Cup squads, and medal winning sides. We don't keep historic templates for each season. The templates are designed to allow easy access and links between players, and as RPW states, if these templates aren't used in player articles, then what benefit does it have? Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I would say delete
    RodneyParadeWanderer (talk) 11:47, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. The person who loves reading (talk) 05:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:11, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Intel Pentium 4 / Core line roadmap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template containing a table with no template parameters. Possibly substed into List of Intel CPU microarchitectures, which appears to be the only article that could have been using it. Further detective work may turn up something else. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IWGA year edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox golfer/ranking edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Possibly an abandoned experiment or superseded by {{Infobox golfer/highest ranking}}. The creator is an experienced template editor, so this may have some use that I do not comprehend. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see lots of discussion on Template talk:Infobox golfer/Archive 3 but it seems it was never deployed. Ah well — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/isotopes table/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused documentation sub-subpage. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/element navigation/format/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused documentation sub-sub-subpage. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox element/name-to-symbol edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links from discussions. Some of them are marked as deprecated already. The developer of these templates has been indefinitely site-banned, so there is no prospect of further development of these unused templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 21:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox drug/doc/licence EU list of EMA licenced INNs (original list) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:37, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a preliminary version of {{Infobox drug/doc/licence EU list of EMA licenced INNs}}. Delete or userfy, or move to project space if it has value to the WikiProject. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox drug/doc/licence EU list of EMA licenced INNs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a combination list article and project to-do list from 2017 that is linked to from {{Infobox drug/licence/doc}}. It should be incorporated into the documentation, or listified, or moved to project space, or deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:38, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox drug/doc/full parameter list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to be abandoned documentation from 2015, probably superseded. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox drug/doc/articles with infobox drug edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Appears to be an abandoned report from 2015. A maintenance burden, as can be seen from the edit history. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox drug/ELbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or documentation. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chembox/doc/chembox design edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or links, except links from the creator's User space. Looks like a set of notes for the creator's reference. Userfy. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:32, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Any useful information should be added to Template:Chembox/doc and this deleted. Gonnym (talk) 02:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chembox/doc/Same data in Chembox and Drugbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Marked as "Underconstruction" in 2015. No substantive edits since then. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chembox/doc/Adding a parameter to Chembox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:40, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links. These appear to be abandoned experiments. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep as it is a documentation on chembox. Perhaps it should be moved to non-template space and linked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:29, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Any useful information should be added to Template:Chembox/doc and these deleted. Gonnym (talk) 02:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Speedcube match edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in one editor's sandbox. Created in 2018. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:04, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jones family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 07:57, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRUFT template created by block-evading user. Four transclusions. Painting17 (talk) 13:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:16, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Reynolds family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 July 18. (non-admin closure) Notrealname1234 (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chembox SDBS edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused stale WIP templates by an editor who’s been site banned. Gonnym (talk) 08:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That isn't the reason. The reason is that aside from those edits on the day it was created, no work has been done in over 5 months. That's a clear sign it's been abandoned. The fact that the only editor working on it was site banned just means that that they won't be returning to work on it. Gonnym (talk) 21:48, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:11, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Michael D. Turnbull: If you think it could be useful, could it be moved to draft while you work on it? 86.41.195.33 (talk) 20:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • Delete I have no expertise in creating templates and given that the other editors I mentioned have not commented, I'm happy to see it removed.
    Mike Turnbull (talk) 10:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AreaChartUnder1.5m edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 July 18. (non-admin closure) Notrealname1234 (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AreaChartOver1.5m edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused chart. Gonnym (talk) 13:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Flags and names of the armed forces of Ukraine edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:35, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per recent and emerging precedent against having this sort of template, which is primarily used in infoboxes and thus fails MOS:ICON. Recommending (as previous) replacement with just the wikilink (i.e. remove the images). Primefac (talk) 10:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Rusyns/style.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Template:WikiProject Rusyns style. Gonnym (talk) 07:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Rodents/EZ assess edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused WikiProject sub-template. Gonnym (talk) 07:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ÖPNV Bremen edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now unused. Last few transclusions were replaced with icons from Module:Adjacent stations/Bremen S-Bahn. Gonnym (talk) 07:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:R color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Two transclusions left which should be converted to Template:Adjacent stations and Module:Adjacent stations/ÖBB Gonnym (talk) 07:10, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Yes, I'm working on the article space conversions. It's not a straight conversion; the rail services need to be reviewed and updated. One down, one to go. Mackensen (talk) 10:43, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. Mackensen (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Obahn edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recently created but should be deleted since the project is moving to use Template:Adjacent stations and the system modules (Module:Adjacent stations/Adelaide Metro). Gonnym (talk) 05:58, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Colored box African cinema portal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused portal related template. Gonnym (talk) 05:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_July_11&oldid=1166241376"