Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 July 18

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< July 17
July 19 >

July 18 edit

Template:BLP Mainspace edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7. Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We do not put notices like this in articles. This is what talk page notices and editnotices are for. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:28, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as template creator, per Redrose64 (talk · contribs) — Knightoftheswords 22:45, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NUMBEROFFAMILY edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:16, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, categories, or incoming links from discussions. Created in 2015. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:07, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently copied from meta:Template:NUMBEROFGROUP. Probably not needed here. Delete — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Reynolds family tree edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cruft template created by blocked user Painting17 (talk) 11:17, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Notrealname1234 (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AreaChartUnder1.5m edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:05, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused chart. Gonnym (talk) 13:35, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Notrealname1234 (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iraq squad 2022 AFC U-23 Asian Cup edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not standard to have navboxes for youth-level tournament squads, Spike 'em (talk) 16:20, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As an example, have done a random selection of blue-linked players at 2023 UEFA European Under-21 Championship and other teams players at 2022 AFC U-23 Asian Cup and can't see any other teams with such a navbox. Spike 'em (talk) 16:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Colored box2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:58, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created in January 2023. Appears to be an experimental fork of {{Colored box}}. Replace with that template and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:04, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jonesey95:  
As this template is widely used on FrWikipedia, I though that it could be useful. Thus, it was not experimental and I have indicated the origin of the code in my creation summery. But if it is not suitable, I accept the deletion. Anyway, it now make time that I do not want to contribute anymore on this project (EnWikipedia).
Best regards, Rishāringânu 19:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MRT 2-tracked island platform station edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused platform templates. However, even if they were used, these are too simple to be of any encyclopedic use. The prev/next stations listed can be achieved with Template:Adjacent stations. Gonnym (talk) 15:43, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When I made these templates I was taking notes from similar NYCS templates. However, I recognise these track layout templates might not be necessary given a majority of MRT articles are island platforms, with only a few with unusual configurations. So I'm fine if they're deleted. ZKang123 (talk) 01:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. There's been fairly strong consensus within the Trains project that simple layouts like these don't require diagrams. Mackensen (talk) 11:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, Mackensen and the repeated strong consensuses about these type of templates in previous TfDs and at the Trains WikiProject. Thryduulf (talk) 12:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Borders of Croatia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only one link. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bowlers with career strike rate of 50 or less in Test matches edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:00, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed, being in the top 40 on one stats metric isn't a reason to have a template to navigate between these people. There are many stats used for "best bowlers", and a strike rate wouldn't be the first one that comes to mind anyway. A previous nomination for this in 2017 was withdrawn, but doesn't demonstrate that it is a useful navigation tool. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:16, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_July_18&oldid=1167108348"