Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 19

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 18 October 20 >

October 19 edit

Template:Invalid parameters category edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, incoming links, categories, or documentation. An abandoned experiment? – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zen Lineage Mel Weitsman edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and is article content. Same list exists on the Mel Weitsman article. No need for this anymore. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tanduay Light Rhum Masters roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use. Substitute on mainspace article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Café France Bakers roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:43, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Hasn't been updated since 2016. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1920/21 Richmond dual premiership players edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Respective navboxes for each season already exist. Template:1920 Richmond premiership players, Template:1921 Richmond premiership players, Template:1932 Richmond premiership players, Template:1934 Richmond premiership players. Dual premiership is not a thing for any sport. Even if players win two ore more championships. More navboxes are not needed here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as dual premiership is not a real thing, and correct templates already exist. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1973/74 Richmond dual premiership players edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navboxes for both teams championship exist with Template:1973 Richmond premiership players and Template:1974 Richmond premiership players. No need for another when two are already doing the job. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as dual premiership is not a real thing, and correct templates already exist. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1967/69 Richmond dual premiership players edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navboxes for the championship Richmond teams exists with Template:1967 Richmond premiership players and Template:1969 Richmond premiership players. No need for another. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as dual premiership is not a real thing, and correct templates already exist. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2017/19 Richmond dual premiership players edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thr 2017/2019 is unused and duplicates the entries already on Template:2017 Richmond premiership players, Template:2019 Richmond premiership players, and Template:2020 Richmond premiership players. Dual and triple premierships do not exist as a thing in Australian rules football. I think this navbox is trying to make one championship navbox for Richmond's three championship seasons for 2017, 2019, and 2020. But normally for championship teams, we use a single navbox for each season. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:46, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Should be one navbox per premiership season. --SuperJew (talk) 05:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as dual premiership is not a real thing, and correct templates already exist. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GridStart edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 26. ✗plicit 23:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Afghanistan conflict detailed map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 27. ✗plicit 00:11, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014–15 Champions Hockey League standings – Group A and related templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. It appears that the relevant article(s) have been adjusted to transclude this article content from another article instead of using templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Inter-Provincial Twenty20 color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links from discussions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:11, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I imagine the intended use was to use the team colours from Inter-Provincial Cricket#Current teams, but that would probably be a pointless template anyway (as each team's associated colour is just one colour). Definitely delete, as no proper use case for this, and it appears to have no actual functionality. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:49, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:54, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NS Stoptrein lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Nederlandse Spoorwegen Frietjes (talk) 19:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NS Sprinter color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Nederlandse Spoorwegen Frietjes (talk) 19:09, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IRE lines and related edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Train templates with no transclusions; replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/DB Regio Baden-Württemberg and similar as part of the S-line migration project. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User United States territory/cat edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shared documentation page that is no longer used, because Category:United States user categories and Category:United States territories user categories are container categories, and all of their subcategories use shared documentation pages that are unique to a state or territory. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User za-0/doc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed, since the parent template uses the standard shared documentation template, {{User x}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Userstats edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions after existing for eight months. The creator did not express an interest in keeping it around for development. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User Lombardy/cat edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused documentation template. The relevant categories that apparently hosted it have been deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User currently listening to/doc/main edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused subpage of a template documentation page. Created in 2012. Created as a test? – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User attribute edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Created in 2013. Presumably, some other template does the job that this one was created for. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022–23 ICC T20 World Cup East Asia-Pacific Qualifier edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As per previous deletions, we now only use inline invoke sports table within cricket articles for most events other than things like the World Cup. See the other table used on the same article. The template for this regional qualification event is highly unlikely to be used any where other than this one article. Bs1jac (talk) 11:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NFL staff footer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per discussion at WT:SPORT - proposed deletion and replacement with List of current National Football League staffs. WP:NAVBOXes are designed for linking articles to other articles, not for linking an articles to many other templates as is the use in the template. There's no need for a navigation box half way through an article only for current leagues. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Changing my vote to "do not replace" as per below comment. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_19&oldid=1118430490"