Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 December 11

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 10 December 12 >

December 11 edit

Template:CelestialRefAllNoImages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:56, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 10:49, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cenozoic era nav edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and contains only links to categories. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete --- superceded by Template:Geological category see also. — hike395 (talk) 08:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cathead irbm of edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:12, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused category header. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, this can be closed as keep. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:16, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Categorygraph edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:57, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 10:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Owensboro Rage roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Owensboro Rage stopped playing in 2013, making this roster template no longer needed. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:28, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. DMC511 (talk) 20:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Food Safety incidents in 2019 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:23, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a template. The content was later added to Food safety incidents in China, so I believe this was made in Template by mistake. No histmerge required as the mainspace article is by a different user. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bowls2021WorldChampionship edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:23, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The 2021 World Bowls Championship was cancelled in March 2021 per this notice. Therefore, there will be no articles that'll use this 2021 template. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:16, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no longer valid because they were cancelled and the next championships will now be in 2023. Racingmanager (talk) 16:53, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Prince Street Players edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:24, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a template but an article. As the content is unsourced and has some neutrality issues (i.e. "Sadly all the tapes that CBS owned were destroyed"), I think it needs to be userified or draftified as it's not ready for mainspace. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:37, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Metro Manila Film Festival Award for Best Picture edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:22, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant with Template:Metro Manila Film Festival, which was made many years before this 2021 template. Metro Manila Film Festival Award for Best Picture uses Template:Metro Manila Film Festival, and not the individual Best Picture award template. The main template has a group that lists the winners for Best Picture, making it a duplicate. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Carolina League ballparks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:22, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and outdated as the two leagues no longer exist and the articles use the current minor leagues navboxes. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 10:46, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canberra Olympic FC matches edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:22, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused with mostly redlinks and one redirect. No navigational benefit presented. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 10:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canadian federal election, 1993/St. Paul's edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 08:16, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed as the Toronto—St. Paul's article features the results in non-template format. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I should mention that it's standard (if not universal) practice for Canadian election results to appear in template format, and for the templates to appear on the relevant constituency and candidate pages. I'm not sure why this particular template wasn't at least included on the candidate pages; it probably should have been (and still should be).
I don't have a strong opinion on whether this particular template should be deleted -- having election results in template format is a convenience, not an essential matter -- but the larger point is that there are literally hundreds of templates like this one currently in use for Canadian election results. Deleting one of them would be an odd course of action. CJCurrie (talk) 07:09, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While it is certainly not uncommon to see candidate pages with such tables, that is a very bad design. Some tables have dozens of entries where the only relevant information for the candidate is a single row. Better designs exist such as a table for all elections of a single candidate or prose. Regarding using a template in a candidate page when the election itself does not use it, that should never be a thing either way. Toronto—St. Paul's does not use templates in any of their tables. Gonnym (talk) 08:13, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Whether it's a bad design is a matter of discretion, I suppose; I would argue that this approach provides encyclopedic value by identifying the candidate's opponents. Separately, I suspect that the fact of Toronto—St. Paul's not using templates is a matter of accident rather than design. CJCurrie (talk) 11:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To make a point through analogy, we don't use the full Oscar nomination list in a single film's award list. Instead we only show the film's result. The encyclopedic value is provided through the link to the main article about the subject, which is the relevant award ceremony. In this situation, the main article is the election page hosting the complete results. Gonnym (talk) 10:43, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as still unused after a week of TfD. Gonnym (talk) 10:44, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BotFuture edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 18. ✗plicit 23:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Blue bib edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 18. ✗plicit 23:58, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFC Champions League 2009 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:42, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both unused and primarily feature the teams that participated in the tournament. Articles about the tournaments themselves are already included in the 2009 and 2010 in Asian Football navboxes. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:52, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Citeplato edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:42, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This template has been broken for some time, with every link leading to a 503 error page at Toolforge (example). Its creator, User:Atethnekos, hasn't edited since 2014. Help has been requested on the template talk page and at WT:WikiProject Templates, but no suggestions have been offered as to how to fix it, or whether it's fixable, so at this point deletion seems the best option. I've removed the template from the four articles that were still using it. Dan from A.P. (talk) 10:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BoraTwenT2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:38, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Navbox with no incoming or outgoing links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Luge2012WYOG edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:38, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, categories, or documentation. Appears to be a potential single-use template, with a better table already in place in the relevant article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:30, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox world by religion edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:38, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, name makes no sense. Created over a year ago and not edited since then. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox pronoun module edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation. Appears to be an abandoned experiment. Last substantive edit was creation in 2019. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:25, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. I was actually going to CSD this in like a week, but we're here now. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 17:43, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't figure out a valid speedy criterion. It seems to be well-formed, just abandoned without a demonstrated potential use. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jonesey95: Lol, I'm the author. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NBL TH edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no documentation, no incoming links. Template contents are just a wikilink, with no parameters or other options. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:14, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Part of a set of team names at Category:National Basketball League (Australia) templates. Not sure why the ~12k football ones were deleted (and some cricket ones) but other sports still use them. Gonnym (talk) 08:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SHOWROOM edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories. Created 11 months ago, with no substantive edits since then. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TeamResLH edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No tranclusions, no incoming links, no documentation, no categories, unexplained template name. Last substantive edit was shortly after creation in 2016. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:03, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:One Cut of the Dead edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All but one link lead to the same article. The whole point of a navbox is to make navigation between closely related articles easier; this does not do that. Nardog (talk) 06:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IMDb company edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unlike the other IMDb external link templates, this one generates only a search result on IMDb. This directly contradicts item 9. of WP:ELNO, which specifically precludes links to "Any search results pages . . ." Accordingly, this template should be deleted. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:16, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. When the template was created, IMDb had pages for companies that showed a list of their projects (example), but that changed at some point in the past few years. DoubleCross (‡) 17:59, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MMA upcoming fight edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 05:31, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:45, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Blacklisted link inline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 December 18. Izno (talk) 03:31, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2021_December_11&oldid=1061043396"