September 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm SkyWarrior. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vann Molyvann, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SkyWarrior 03:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Vann Molyvann. Thank you. SkyWarrior 04:02, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:2020 C-League

edit
 

Hello, WNkh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2020 C-League".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:18, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Visakha Stadium

edit
 

Hello, WNkh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Visakha Stadium".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 19:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve 2021 C-League

edit

Hello, WNkh,

Thank you for creating 2021 C-League.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The only reference links to the 2018 league, please supply a 2021 reference

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 10:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

SRU Stadium moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, SRU Stadium, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 07:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: SRU Stadium (February 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, WNkh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:23, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Takaki Ose

edit

Hello, WNkh,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Takaki Ose, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 10:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@John B123: This page should not be speedily deleted because... I have reference link of the player Takaki Ose including stats and player's information (date of birth, place of birth, height...) please visit: <ref>https://www.transfermarkt.com/takaki-ose/profil/spieler/607380<ref>WNkh (talk)

The Cambodian Premier League isn't a fully professional league therefore he doesn't meet the requirements of WP:NFOOTBALL. --John B123 (talk) 12:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Saveng Samnang

edit

Hello, WNkh,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Saveng Samnang, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 15:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Stop disturbing me WNkh (talk) 16:08, 24 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Takaki Ose for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Takaki Ose is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takaki Ose (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Saveng Samnang for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saveng Samnang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saveng Samnang (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Emmanuel Mbarga for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emmanuel Mbarga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Mbarga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:01, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit

  Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Takaki Ose. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

You know nothing about Cambodian League. So don't act like you are genius. WNkh (talk) 09:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Saveng Samnang, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Takaki Ose. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takaki Ose (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saveng Samnang (2nd nomination) and stop disrupting the process. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:46, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

You wasted sperm WNkh (talk) 10:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. For this edit Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:15, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Abusive comment from User:WNkh|Abusive comment from User:WNkh]]. Thank you. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72h for personal attacks and general disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 12:26, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Saveng Samnang

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saveng Samnang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saveng Samnang. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 14:14, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Block Appeal

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WNkh (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked for the reason suspected as the sock puppetry of user Hsn11988. I clarify that I am another person. That user might have just interested editing the same topic as me. WNkh (talk) 23:31, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Even if true, and I'm not at all sure it is, this edit guaranteed your indefinite block. Yamla (talk) 23:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I see no policy for indefinite block with this case. If have, kindly show me. I believe the block should be in the limited time not indefinitely. WNkh (talk) 00:08, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Cambodia Classic Match

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cambodia Classic Match requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://fr.edu.vn/en/Cambodia_Classic_Match-6466448226. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 13:11, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

2022 C-League moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, 2022 C-League, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 13:50, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:SRU Stadium

edit

  Hello, WNkh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SRU Stadium, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:SRU Stadium

edit
 

Hello, WNkh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SRU Stadium".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:2022 C-League

edit

  Hello, WNkh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 C-League, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply