User talk:Vimalkalyan/Archive 4

Roger Federer

I have answered to one of your suggestions on the discussion page. Pumukli 20:54, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

It has already been solved... sorry to disturb you. User:Teh tennisman has added all the references. Pumukli 05:22, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Bill Johnston

I will start working on it now. Unfortunately I got caught up in a few things. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi. I think I've addressed all of your points except one that I will need to consult the book on - but I will fill this one in. Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I've done some upgrades. Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for all your work. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

		The India Star
		Awarded to Kalyan for excellent work on Indian cricket and Andhra Pradesh articles. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Well done, we really had no regular editors from Andhra and it's really good that you are filling in the gaps there in particular....as well as the cricket of course! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:19, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar.Dineshkannambadi 16:52, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Western Ganga Dynasty

Hi. I have made corrections, changes, clarifications etc. Please take a look and see how it looks now.Dineshkannambadi 02:14, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Looks I have addressed the rest of issues.Please take a look.Dineshkannambadi 01:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the support.Dineshkannambadi 04:12, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Financial history of the New York Giants

Hi -- I noticed that the GA review of Financial history of the New York Giants hasn't had any activity in a while. I think Quadzilla99, the user who was working on it, has been on wikibreak for a couple of weeks. Would you mind going ahead and passing or failing it please? Or if you prefer not to, just take it off hold so another reviewer can do so if they want to -- right now nothing's happening to it. Thanks -- Mike Christie (talk) 12:55, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Neil Harvey

hi there. I have done the requested tweaks. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:55, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I've just given an overhaul to Kuiper belt

If it's not too much trouble, could you give it a look? Thanks. Serendipodous 15:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

GAs

Two quick things I'd like to point out. First, I went and removed Brady Quinn from GAC since I'm not gonna get to fixing that up to soon, I'll re-nom it when it's done. Second, on Financial History of the New York Giants, it's been on hold for three weeks, let it looks like it's been fixed. Might want to take a look at that. Wizardman 19:45, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for passing Spider-Man film series as a GA. I was wondering if you could clarify your comment, "Circle reference to spider-man 1 section development and in here needs to be resolved." The development information on the film series had no bearing on the first film, so it only goes up to the point before the project came under Sony's wing. If this is not what you mean, please let me know what you intended. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 10:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. A summary of the previous development process in the first film's article would help the articles stand alone better instead of being dependent on each other. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 11:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Natascha Kampusch

Hi -- could you go ahead and pass or fail Natascha Kampusch for GA, or else take off the review tag so someone else can review it? It's been under review for a while now. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Oversight of GA Review comments

Hi, I'm a first time GA reviewer. I'm reviewing Deep Impact (space mission). I've placed my draft comments at User:AshLin/GA review comments. Would you kindly just go over them to see if I'm on the right lines? I'd really appreciate the mentoring. Regards, AshLin 20:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a ton. Really appreciate your help and moral support. Regards, AshLin 11:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Aston Villa F.C.

Jut a question related to the recently added fact tags to Aston Villa F.C. If these references are available on the subpage i.e the History of Aston Villa pages do we still have to add them. If we do then please reply and i will add them sometime today. Thankyou Woodym555 18:29, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes it answers that one, more though related to the review. It says "In the subsections, list of captains, managers and notable players - provide atleast a para that describes the main article". This has not happened on Arsenal F.C.. This article is the benchamark for my editing due to its very recent FA nom and pass.

Also the history section is meant to be a summary, the gap is there to prevent the history section expanding too much. The subsection is there to provide the information.

As to Danny Branchflower, English football is weird that way. He is in the England but not Villa, the villa was voted only by Aston Villa fans who seemingly had their own opinions on it. Strange but true. Any replies will be appreciated.

The lead section is very similar to Arsenal's and i do not see what else to add without summarising the summary of Aston Villa History. It explains everything in the article.

I will work on the other problems tonight. Thanks for taking the time to review.Woodym555 18:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

I have now added what you have requested. Any further comments or reviews would be helpful. Thanks Woodym555 21:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

The request for a further review was not time limited.(well maybe a week) I understand time pressures can occur. Thankyou for taking the time to review it as and when you can. Thanks Woodym555 09:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou for taking the time to review and pass Aston Villa F.C. for Good Article Review. I will build on your comments when i take it to FAC. Thankyou again for your time and effort. Woodym555 16:47, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

GA hold for History of American football

I have made most of the changes you requested on the talk page, and have made notes where I have disagreed with the need to make a few of them. I have added some basic information on other similar sports, a section on NFL Europe, and have included a link to the article Football (ball), which is the proper place for a full discussion of the evolution of the object in question. This article does contain some information about the use of various balls and changes to its shape where appropriate in each relevent era. Please re-review it, and let me know if these changes make this article pass the good article critera as laid out at the page WP:WIAGA. Thanks. Also, I intend to take this to peer review next, in response to your kind words about this being almost FAC ready. It is still a bit rough around the edges, and needs a possible copyedit from the League, but my long term goal is to perhaps see it featured. Thanks again for all of your help, and if there are any further fixes you would like to discuss, let me know at the article's talk page. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 19:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kapil awarded Wisden Indian cricketer of century.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kapil awarded Wisden Indian cricketer of century.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Sivaji: Yep.....

Thanks for replying, I thought I'll be left to rot in the corner....I really appreciate it....

• The Sivaji: The Boss article looked fantastic until about two weeks ago, when newcomers User:Nishkid64, User:Gnanapiti and User:Sarvagnya decided to interrupt. Despite their unpopularity they decided to change the article completely and keep their versions. Everytime when I corrrcted, improved or re-added my old version they remove it without giving an explanation, I cannot appeal against them with the 3RR rule as they do it alternatively...

• A previous hard editor who helped bring the article to an all time high, User:AVTN (changed his username and vanished) has quit Wikipedia, because of this, leaving me alone to do the best I can... Universal Hero 16:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Wow, thanks for the amazing response and your activites at the page. Back to work noe for me! Please keep going as we need your vital experience at the article. Thanks! Universal Hero 19:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

2007 Samjhauta Express bombings GAC

I've responded to your comments at the talk page. I've addressed all your concerns, except the diplomatic part. I couldn't find any mention of that in any of the news articles I looked at. Nishkid64 (talk) 20:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Re

OK, My bad. Sorry about that. But please make sure that all nonsense claims in that article are cleaned up. Too many false claims in that article. Gnanapiti 05:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Yup, having not so good day so far. Actually that article was in a much worse shape few days back. I removed lot of such nonsense, youtube videos, flickr images which were given as references. Believe me, it's a big task to work on that article, partly because people keep reverting back all your work. And each and everyday, a new false claim gets added. Whenever I get time, I'll work on that article. Thanks, Gnanapiti 05:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Roger Federer

You reviewed Roger Federer back on 19 June: I can't quite see whether all of your comments have been addressed or not, but I don't think they have. In any case, the article should probably be passed or failed now: it's been on hold for 17 days, while the upper limit is normally 10 days, and no really substantial changes seem to have been made since the beginning of the month. Cheers. 4u1e 10:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I could see that much of what you had asked for had been done, so I wasn't quite sure if the article was now satisfactory or not. If it had been more obvious I would just have failed it myself rather than chasing you! 4u1e 16:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Ford BA Falcon

Hi Kalyan, you recently reviewed the article Ford BA Falcon, and left some comments on the talk page to improve. These issues have now been implemented, and I was wondering if you could have another look. OSX (talk • contributions) 07:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Samjhauta Express bombings GAC

I have added the details about the diplomatic row here. Please re-evaluate the article. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

I saw that you were currently online. Could you please re-evaluate the article if you have some time now? Nishkid64 (talk) 16:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Re Manmohan Singh

Hi Vimal I agree with you. But in Atal Bihari Vajpayee article error remained as 13th and 16th PM please correct that one. --Raja Hussain 06:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank u very much for your effort in this matter --Raja Hussain 05:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Geology of the Lassen volcanic area FAC stalled due to intro tag

Hi again - you previously voted at Geology of the Lassen volcanic area's FAC. Since then, a tag was added to the intro saying it was vague or misleading. So even though there is consensus to feature this article, it can't because of the tag. Could you look at the intro/lead section and comment on the article's talk page about whether or not to keep the tag? Thanks. :) --mav 13:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I made some edits based on your feedback. Please re-check. --mav 03:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

British Rail Class 47

Hi - thanks for reviewing this article. I have made changes to the article as you and another reviewer suggested, and would appreciate it if you could look over the article again. Thanks, EliminatorJR ^Talk 06:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Fake "in use" tag

I noticed that you added a "in use" tag to this article and did not remove it for the past three days. Please read Wikipedia policy about using such tags here for short intervals of a few minutes only.Anwar 12:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sivaji Poster.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Sivaji Poster.jpg, by Anwar saadat (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Sivaji Poster.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

editor repeatedly uploads this copyvio image that was previously speedied twice. See Image:Sivajirajinishriya.jpg

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Sivaji Poster.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

• This seems to be the most accurate version. I ask you politely if we'd work on this, more than start on your version. I have cut down mass info, removed the unneeded table, split things up into different pages and reduced the work load. It's time to make sure sources are accurate. When you reply in the positive, I'll revert it back to this version. This User:Anwar saadat needs a warning... Universal Hero 17:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Aston Villa FAC

hello, thankyou for your extra comments, just to say that i have now fixed the problems that you have brought up. I don't want to strike out your text without you permission so i ask whether you would be willing to do it (or give me permission to do it). Thankyou for taking the time, once agian, to review this article. Thanks again Woodym555 18:40, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Working together

Well done on the box-office part check out the Lage Raho Munna Bhai page for more work: (eg. critical, commercial, special.). I'll put the mass info back in and start sourcing them properly. Okay? You work on the plot and box-office, I'll do the rest. Reply. Cheers. Universal Hero 10:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Give me 12 hours to get things sorted. Universal Hero 12:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I feel the same way about you at times. I'm using the information I gathered from the most recent featured film article, V for Vendetta. And the plot is usually the main thing a reader would want to see. Universal Hero 18:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Your lead paragraph looks scruffy with too much digits in it. A couple of editors have expressed their concerns ove rthat. Universal Hero 18:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Villa FAC

I've added some comments here, sorry they're took a while, been busy. Let me know if I can help further and let me know when I can come back and re-assess the article to hopefully offer my support. The Rambling Man 16:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Samjhauta Express bombings

I don't know if you saw my last message, but I have added the details of the diplomatic row at 2007 Samjhauta Express bombings. Please re-evaluate the GAC. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 22:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Nishkid64 (talk) 17:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

GA comment

Good job on fixing those, I just wanted to point that out so that you didn't have to worry about it when the editor comes along to review it. It should be reviewed soon with the current drive going on. Good luck and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 18:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I refer to the Gulzarilal Nanda page. In some countries there is provision for an "interim" prime minister. It is better not to use the term for Nanda because the Indian constitution does not recognise an "interim" arrangement of a political party as "interim" prime minister. Nanda had at his disposal all powers of a regular PM. Your notes on "interim" status are OK, but it would still be better to remove it, in my not-so-studied opinion.

Wikwiki 10:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

List of state symbols of Maryland

Do your objections to the FLC still stand? There have been some changes since your comment in opposition. Geraldk 15:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Cult_Information_Centre and Talk:British_Rail_Class_47

GA holds should be for no more than 7 days. This article needs to be checked to see if the issues were addressed bringing the article up to standards. If so, it should be listed. If not, it needs to be removed from GAC. Regards, LaraLove 04:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

British Rail Class 47 GAN

Hi - sorry about that, I haven't been through this process before! I've addressed the comments individually now. Thanks, EliminatorJR ^Talk 09:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

AIV report re Sivaji (film)

Hi Vimalkalyan. You reported User:Anwar saadat to WP:AIV for vandalism. His edits do not appear to be vandalism, so no action has been taken. Please review what vandalism is. Accusations a fellow user of vandalism where none exists is not very civil. This seems to be a content dispute; please try and resolve it through the talk page or via a request for comment. If you have any questions, let me know. Thanks. Neil ╦ 11:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:Sivaji Poster.jpg

I'm sure you already know that this poster has been marked for deletion yet again. I suggest that you do two things to prevent this:

1. Add source information
2. Scale down the image to the size required for the article. The image in its current format is not lo-res.

Do those two things, then I'll rmv the tag reg the contesting of the Fair Use Rationale. That tag contains some lies cos it blames you for a photo (totally non-copyvio; completely free) that I uploaded - the first day crowds at PVR Cinemas, Bangalore. :) Anyways, let's c what we can do. aJCfreak yAk 12:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Excellent and quick work. I've removed the tag already since it was previously removed stating that the Fair Use Rationale provided was sufficient. I've left a note at Anwar's talk page. Further, I'd suggest that you don't bite Anwar as you did in the Sivaji article talk page. I agree he seems a bit anti-Sivaji. But let's be nice. We all wanna live together on WP, right?! Anyways, cheerio... and happy Wiki-ing! aJCfreak yAk 12:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Re:GA review of Religion in India

Hi! Thanks for the note in my talk page. We started to work on the article when it was WP:INCOTW. AFter some time, User:Saravask took over and started to polish the article. However, he went for a wikibreak. I utilized this time for GAC as we needed to have some feedback. Your review is great and will help a lot.

However, my feeling is we have to cover even more for being comprehensive. If you have additional comments, you can leave those at the article talk page. That will help Saravask, me and others who are/will be interested to develop the article.

I do not have much time right now. So, cannot really put much effort :( Anyway, would love to work on it at some later time.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Sivaji

Thanks! Gnanapiti 14:13, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Kapil Dev

What was the controversy over Azhar's injury before the first Test v SA 1999-00 ? Tintin 03:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

I think you'll have to get rid of those flickr pics of the big hitting. It's illegal. The guy went into the Lord's museum and took photos of their copyrighted photos, which isn't allowed. The flickr guy used an invalid license. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

(A very belated) thanks :-) Tintin 14:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

A request- Review for Geological history of Earth

Hi, since you are good in reviewing the articles can you please review the article on Geological history of Earth. hope so you won't mind. thanks, Sushant gupta 10:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sachin Book cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sachin Book cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:43, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Where are you?

Hope all is well with you. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:34, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Hillary Rodham Clinton now FAC

FYI, since you previously indicated interest, Hillary Rodham Clinton is a now an FA candidate. Wasted Time R 05:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

FL Main page proposal

You either nominated a WP:FLC or closed such a nomination recently. As such, you are the type of editor whose opinion I am soliciting. We now have over 400 featured lists and seem to be promoting in excess of 30 per month of late (41 in August and 42 in September). When Today's featured article (TFA) started (2004-02-22), they only had about 200 featured articles and were barely promoting 20 new ones per month. I think the quality of featured lists is at least as good as the quality of featured articles was when they started appearing on the main page. Thus, I am ready to open debate on a proposal to institute a List of the Day on the main page with nominations starting November 1 2007, voting starting December 1 2007 and main page appearances starting January 1 2008. For brevity, the proposal page does not discuss the details of eventual main page content, but since the work has already been done, you should consider this proposal assuming the eventual content will resemble the current content at the featured content page. Such output would probably start at the bottom of the main page. The proposal page does not debate whether starting with weekly list main page entries would be better than daily entries. However, I suspect persons in favor of weekly lists are really voicing opinions against lists on the main page since neither TFA nor Picture of the day started as weekly endeavors, to the best of my knowledge. Right now debate seems to be among support for the current selective democratic/consensus based proposal, a selective dictatorial approach like that used at WP:TFA or a non-selective first in line/calendar approach like that used at WP:POTD. See the List of the Day proposal and comment at WP:LOTDP and its talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Your Rama in Tirumala Image

Hi, Since the WP:PPR review of your Rama in Tirumala image was encouraging and since you don't seem to be active lately, I took the liberty of nominating it for WP:FPC. Regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 20:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Outlook

Could you pleas verify whether this Indian magazine in fact includes the word "The" in its title. Eclecticology 09:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sivaji Poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sivaji Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Annamayya movie screenshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Annamayya movie screenshot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 14:29, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Featured List of the Day Experiment

I am contacting individuals in the order of the number of featured lists that they had created by Novemeber 10, 2007. You have created several. So you are among the first. There have been a series of proposals to initiate a Featured List of the Day on the main page. Numerous proposals have been put forth. After the third one failed, I audited all WP:FL's in order to begin an experiment in my own user space that will hopefully get it going. Today, it commences at WP:LOTD. Afterwards I created my experimental page, a new proposal was set forth to do a featured list that is strikingly similar to my own which is to do a user page experimental featured list, but no format has been confirmed and mechanism set in place. I continue to be willing to do the experiment myself and with this posting it commences. Please submit any list that you would like to have considered for list of the day in the month of January 2008 by the end of this month to WP:LOTD and its subpages. You may submit multiple lists for consideration.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD) 17:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Invitation

Please accept this invite to join the Red Sox WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with the Boston Red Sox. Simply click here to accept!

Commons

Thank you for uploading images/media such as Image:Vinayak Chaturthi.JPG to Wikipedia! There is however another Wikimedia foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading media there instead. That way, all the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading! --Storkk (talk) 17:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)