UK general election infobox edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Please stop making changes to the infobox for the UK 2015 general election. This is a controversial topic, as you may have been able to tell from the fact that your edits were almost immediately undone. You must propose and get consensus for your changes on the article's talk page. If you attempt to make any further changes without getting consensus, it is likely that you will be blocked from editing. Thanks, Number 57 14:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2017 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Conservative Party (UK), without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also, please do not add names for Deputy Party Leader - when the official post did not exist. David J Johnson (talk) 22:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I just copied and pasted from the dedicated page for the topic. i wasnt aware the sources would follow across.

Firstly, sign your "contributions" and secondly, Wikipedia is not a photographic album for party leaders, nor is it a place for cut and paste jobs - there could be copyright problems here. David J Johnson (talk) 23:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Firstly, these are contributions, not "contributions", there is no debate over the meaning of that word, and secondly I will consider that cut and paste next time I contribute. Thank you.

Still not signing your posts here. Please follow Wikipedia conventions by signing. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

But you know its me?

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dorset County Council, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove Coat of Arms without reason, nor add unsourced additions. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dear David, is it just Dorset? I only removed them to make it look a little neater, as the coat of arms dont look particularly tidy or high resolution. Any more additions are based entirely on what was on the page before, just formatted differently. TP69

No, it certainly is not just Dorset. You have absolutely no right to delete any county's Coat of Arms. Whilst a county may have a logo, the Coat of Arms is the official badge of the county, appearing on county boundary signs, and registered with the College of Arms. Any deletion of them, "to look a little neater", is wrong, as they are still used in multiple ways. In any case, the matter should have been discussed on the article(s). Also you are still adding unsourced information, which is against Wikipedia policy. Talk page. David J Johnson (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dear "David", I thank you for you truly supportive and motivating compliments. I will be sure to keep up MY good work. :) I "understand" your grievance regarding coats of arms. Hopefully we can request permission for better quality ones by obtaining permission. As I am not as obsessed with Wikipedia and do not know where to find the talk page, please can you direct me in the correct way to find it? It will help me know the guidelines and stop your sassy little comments about work which has taken me a long time, for the greater good. TP69

Non-free image use edit

  Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Home Secretary, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 14 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of MPs elected in the United Kingdom general election, October 1974, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Republican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 21 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of MPs elected in the United Kingdom general election, 1945, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Government. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for April 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited North Weald, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waltham. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lincolnshire County Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lincoln. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


  Hello, TomPumpkin69. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Spouse of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom edit

What were you trying to do there? --John (talk) 17:45, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Just trying to expand the page to look more appealing and more informing.--Tom (talk) 18:48, 23 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, TomPumpkin69. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Discussion at Commons:User talk:TomPumpkin69#File:Philip May, June 2017.png question edit

  You are invited to join the discussion at Commons:User talk:TomPumpkin69#File:Philip May, June 2017.png question. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 23:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Legge, 10th Earl of Dartmouth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henry Bolton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018 edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:Spouse of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Thomas Bromwich (MP) edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. TomPumpkin69, thanks for creating Thomas Bromwich (MP)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. PLease add your sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas Bromwich (MP) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Thomas Bromwich (MP) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/volume/1509-1558/member/bromwich-thomas-1523-57-or-later. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PamD 21:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018 edit

Hello, TomPumpkin69. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia. I'm sorry, but  Thomas Bromwich (MP) has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G12. Wikipedia is the world's largest free content encyclopedia. As such, it cannot contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content must be completely rewritten and reformatted from scratch. Content published elsewhere copied into Wikipedia must state that it is public domain, licensed under the GFDL, or a creative commons license. Cheers, and happy editing.

 --Dlohcierekim  (talk) 07:11, 27 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 6 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Epping Forest District Council election, 2015, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Epping and Waltham Abbey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you edit

Hi TomPumpkin69! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I’m inviting you to join other people who edit conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where group members can ask questions and meet new colleagues. You'll also discover DYK: the easiest and funnest way to get your article on the Main Page. I hope to see you there! – Lionel(talk) 06:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

UK election polls! edit

Hi! Thank you for your recent creations about UK elections polls. I was wondering if you could offer references in the articles that were just reviewed. Thanks! --Jamez42 (talk) 21:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 9 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United States presidential election, 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Delaney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, TomPumpkin69. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 16 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2014 Epping Forest District Council election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waltham Abbey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 16 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violation edit

Thanks for creating 2011 Epping Forest District Council election (please note the correct format of the article title). However, you included several lines of text that were copied and pasted from this website. This is a copyright violation and has had to be removed. Please do not copy text from other websites into Wikipedia; you must write content in your own words. Thanks, Number 57 23:30, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Also, I noticed you have uploaded several images of politicians to Wikipedia, claiming they are your own work. Did you really take the official pictures of Diane Collins and Jon Whitehouse? It seems highly unlikely to me. Number 57 23:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Leadership approval opinion polling for the 2017 United Kingdom general election moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Leadership approval opinion polling for the 2017 United Kingdom general election, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 00:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2019 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2014 European Parliament election in the United Kingdom. DrKay (talk) 21:42, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Election article naming format edit

Hi Tom. Just an FYI that the election article naming format has changed, and the year should now be put at the start. See WP:NC-GAL#Elections and referendums. Cheers, Number 57 20:19, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 25 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Opinion polling for the 2019 Conservative Party (UK) leadership election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Missing footnote edit

Hi, there. Sorry for bothering you. In this edit 3 days ago, you created half a dozen references to an undefined footnote, leading to a red-ink Cite Error message at the bottom of the page and also wherever the footnote is referenced. It would be helpful if you could either define it or remove the references to it. Regards, Tlhslobus (talk) 07:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 29 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leadership approval opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal Democrats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, TomPumpkin69. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leadership approval opinion polling for the 2017 United Kingdom general election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 08:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 4 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Speaker of the British House of Commons election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Williamson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

North edit

Please considering orienting any maps you make with North at the top, South at the bottom, etc. A map such as File:Results_of_the_Michigan_Democratic_Primary,_2008.png looks sloppy and absurd: tilted with north-south and east-west lines so far off from vertical and horizontal. As part of a map of the United States projected to approximate the curvature of the Earth, presenting the state of Michigan this way isn't a problem, but like this... it really just looks bad. I don't want to put in the effort of fixing the maps you've made, because it's a daunting task. But someone is going to have to replace them eventually. Please don't make that task any harder by continuing to create skewed maps like that. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 04:02, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

K hun xoxo

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, TomPumpkin69. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leadership approval opinion polling for the 2017 United Kingdom general election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:27, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Undefined footnote edit

Hi TomPumpkin69. When you created Leadership approval opinion polling for the 2015 United Kingdom general election, you included a number of footnotes with the name "YouGov-q" but did not define them, creating an error at the bottom of the page. Do you remember what that footnote was supposed to be? —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leadership approval opinion polling for the 2017 United Kingdom general election has been accepted edit

 
Leadership approval opinion polling for the 2017 United Kingdom general election, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 11:09, 29 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 31 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2007 Epping Forest District Council election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epping.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

2008 Epping Forest District Council election moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, 2008 Epping Forest District Council election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 21:18, 7 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

2008 Epping Forest District Council election moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, 2008 Epping Forest District Council election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 22:45, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

1976 Epping Forest District Council election moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, 1976 Epping Forest District Council election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 17:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

1973 Epping Forest District Council election moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, 1973 Epping Forest District Council election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 16:20, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:1976 Epping Forest District Council election edit

  Hello, TomPumpkin69. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1976 Epping Forest District Council election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:1973 Epping Forest District Council election edit

  Hello, TomPumpkin69. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1973 Epping Forest District Council election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:1973 Epping Forest District Council election edit

 

Hello, TomPumpkin69. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1973 Epping Forest District Council election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply